Thiam delisting could rattle Côte d'Ivoire business confidence
A court ruling last month barred former Credit Suisse CEO Tidjane Thiam, leader of the Democratic Party of Ivory Coast (PDCI), from running in October's presidential election. He revoked his previous French citizenship in February, with the request approved the following month. But the court ruled that he didn't revoke his French citizenship early enough to qualify for this year's vote..
The decision 'sends a devastating signal,' Thiam's lawyer, Mathias Chichportich, told Semafor. Investors may struggle to trust a state that disregards its own laws, he argued, adding that political and legal uncertainty creates instability that may deter investment.
In a glowing April report, the International Monetary Fund said Côte d'Ivoire had emerged as an 'engine of growth and stability' in the eight-country West African Economic and Monetary Union of Francophone African countries. GDP growth in the country averaged 6.4% over the past decade, around 3 percentage points higher than the average for sub-Saharan Africa. Côte d'Ivoire also attracts nearly 30% of foreign direct investment in WAEMU — more than any other nation in the group — according to data from the UN's trade and development body.
Analysts warn that Thiam's disqualification, amid uncertainty over whether 83-year-old President Alassane Ouattara will seek a fourth term, could lead to damaging instability in Francophone West Africa's biggest economy. 'Thiam's disqualification sends a negative signal for a country like Côte d'Ivoire, which otherwise enjoys strong governance indicators in the region,' said Aroni Chaudhuri, Africa economist at the French credit insurer Coface.
Thiam's exclusion stems from a legal complaint filed by private citizens citing a rarely used clause in the 1961 Nationality Code. The law states that any adult who acquires another nationality automatically forfeits Ivorian citizenship. Thiam is exploring ways in which to mount an appeal, according to Chichportich.
He is the fourth major political figure in Côte d'Ivoire barred from running for president, after former President Laurent Gbagbo, former Prime Minister Guillaume Soro, and former Youth Minister Charles Blé Goudé.
Côte d'Ivoire has wrestled with bouts of insecurity since the country descended into a bloody civil war in 2002 that lasted five years. Ouattara, who took office in 2011 after months of violence that followed his predecessor's refusal to accept electoral defeat, has presided over a period of economic growth that has outstripped other countries in the region.
But Ouattara's controversial decision to seek a third term — a move many opposition parties viewed as unconstitutional — triggered unrest in 2020.
'Until now, the consensus was that this election cycle would be calmer than in 2020, which saw violence,' said Chaudhuri. 'But even without unrest, uncertainty over how the vote will be conducted can impact consumption and investment — as seen in Senegal, where growth slowed and consumption fell during the 2024 election period.'
A broader concern lies beyond Thiam's case: The sudden enforcement of dormant legal provisions. The particular clause invoked against him was almost never used against political figures — except for a case in 2011 — and its reactivation raises questions about what other long-overlooked laws could be resurrected for political (or business) ends.
The Abidjan court ruled in April that Thiam lost his Ivorian citizenship in 1987 when he became French, only regaining it in March 2025 after he renounced that nationality — too late to qualify for the late 2024 electoral roll update.
Chichportich, Thiam's lawyer, argues that his client's dual nationality was long known and never contested, even during his tenure as a minister in the 1990s. Thiam has also pointed out that half of the country's football team holds dual citizenship — and that ignoring such realities would undermine the legitimacy of many public figures and national symbols.
Questions of nationality — or — have been used to sideline political opponents in Côte d'Ivoire for more than a generation. Former President Henri Konan Bédié was accused of having a Ghanaian father. Thiam's case shows how arcane legal precedents could be used to great effect to undermine high-profile individuals.
Some, including within Thiam's party, argue that he should have anticipated the legal outcome and renounced his French citizenship after being elected PDCI president in December 2023.
One adviser to French companies in Abidjan, speaking on condition of anonymity, told Semafor: 'Investors like predictability. If the Thiam decision doesn't cause turbulence, the economy keeps growing, and the country stays on a steady course, no one will make a fuss — aside from the standard formal statements from Western embassies. Everyone has their role.'
'Among many business leaders, especially SME [small and medium enterprise] heads who lived through the 2010 crisis, there's real fear and apprehension,' said Georges Yao Yao, co-founder of Y3 Audit & Conseils. 'But there's also a shared sense that, given all the progress and investment since 2011, there are strong incentives not to risk sliding backwards.'
The 'Thiam saga' shows how identity politics can still weigh heavily in Côte d'Ivoire, wrote Chatham House consulting fellow Paul Melly in a BBC article.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
10 hours ago
- Business Insider
Macron has acknowledged the atrocities of France in another African country
French President Emmanuel Macron has publicly acknowledged the brutality perpetrated by French soldiers in Cameroon during and after the country's fight for independence. French President Emmanuel Macron acknowledged French military brutality in Cameroon post-independence. The admission followed a joint historical report highlighting France's oppressive measures from 1945 to 1971. Historical accounts reveal significant human rights abuses, including killings and imprisonment. The admission came after the publication of a joint report by Cameroonian and French historians on France's persecution of independence aspirations between 1945 and 1971. The study portrays a bleak picture of the times, noting widespread imprisonment, village devastation, and the employment of ruthless militias to suppress dissent. Tens of thousands of Cameroonians were killed, and hundreds of thousands were confined to internment camps. "A war had taken place in Cameroon, during which the colonial authorities and the French army exercised repressive violence of several kinds in certain regions of the country,' the French leader said via a letter made out to Cameroon's president, Paul Biya. "It is up to me today to assume the role and responsibility of France in these events," he added. Despite France's acknowledgment, Macron did not issue a formal apology, and he said nothing about reparations. The Cameroon acknowledgement comes at a time when France is under increasing pressure to address its colonial past more publicly. While some see Macron's acceptance as a step toward historical truth, detractors believe that without a formal apology and reparative measures, France's colonial scars would only be partially healed. Macron's recent admissions of guilt The French leader's attitude is consistent with his handling of other delicate historical reckonings, such as France's participation in the 1994 Rwandan slaughter and its colonial past in Algeria, as seen in the BBC. In Rwanda's instance, Macron said in 2021 that France carried "overwhelming responsibilities" for failing to intervene despite warnings of the imminent carnage, which killed around 800,000 people.

Business Insider
10 hours ago
- Business Insider
Macron has acknowledged France's atrocities in yet another African country
French President Emmanuel Macron has publicly acknowledged the brutality perpetrated by French soldiers in Cameroon during and after the country's fight for independence. French President Emmanuel Macron acknowledged French military brutality in Cameroon post-independence. The admission followed a joint historical report highlighting France's oppressive measures from 1945 to 1971. Historical accounts reveal significant human rights abuses, including killings and imprisonment. The admission came after the publication of a joint report by Cameroonian and French historians on France's persecution of independence aspirations between 1945 and 1971. The study portrays a bleak picture of the times, noting widespread imprisonment, village devastation, and the employment of ruthless militias to suppress dissent. Tens of thousands of Cameroonians were killed, and hundreds of thousands were confined to internment camps. "A war had taken place in Cameroon, during which the colonial authorities and the French army exercised repressive violence of several kinds in certain regions of the country,' the French leader said via a letter made out to Cameroon's president, Paul Biya. "It is up to me today to assume the role and responsibility of France in these events," he added. Despite France's acknowledgment, Macron did not issue a formal apology, and he said nothing about reparations. The Cameroon acknowledgement comes at a time when France is under increasing pressure to address its colonial past more publicly. While some see Macron's acceptance as a step toward historical truth, detractors believe that without a formal apology and reparative measures, France's colonial scars would only be partially healed. Macron's recent admissions of guilt The French leader's attitude is consistent with his handling of other delicate historical reckonings, such as France's participation in the 1994 Rwandan slaughter and its colonial past in Algeria, as seen in the BBC. In Rwanda's instance, Macron said in 2021 that France carried "overwhelming responsibilities" for failing to intervene despite warnings of the imminent carnage, which killed around 800,000 people.


Newsweek
12 hours ago
- Newsweek
NATO Countries Threaten Iran Over Nuclear Program
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Britain, France and Germany warned they are prepared to reimpose United Nations sanctions on Iran if the country fails to resume negotiations over its nuclear program and restore cooperation with the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog by the end of August. The three nations — known collectively as the E3 — delivered the warning in a letter to the U.N., dated Friday, which French Foreign Minister Jean-Nöel Barrot posted Wednesday on X. Co-signed by Barrot and his counterparts from Germany and the United Kingdom, the letter said the countries were ready to trigger the "snapback" mechanism, a process that allows any of the Western parties to restore sanctions if Iran violates the terms of the 2015 nuclear agreement. French President Emmanuel Macron, Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer at a hotel prior to an E3 meeting on the sidelines of the NATO summit in The Hague, Netherlands. Picture date:... French President Emmanuel Macron, Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer at a hotel prior to an E3 meeting on the sidelines of the NATO summit in The Hague, Netherlands. Picture date: Tuesday June 24, 2025. More Associated Press "E3 have always committed to use all diplomatic tools at our disposal to ensure Iran does not develop a nuclear weapon," the letter stated. "We have made clear that if Iran is not willing to reach a diplomatic solution before the end of August 2025, or does not seize the opportunity of an extension, E3 are prepared to trigger the snapback mechanism." Iran's government did not immediately comment, but a senior lawmaker issued a stark warning. Manouchehr Mottaki, a former foreign minister who served for five years in the 2000s, said Tehran could quickly respond by quitting the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT) if sanctions are reinstated. "We only need 24 hours to approve quitting the nuclear deal," he said, adding that parliament has a "finger on the trigger" for leaving the NPT, an international accord designed to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons. The E3 letter follows months of diplomatic stalemate, particularly after a 12-day war between Iran and Israel in June. During that conflict, Israeli and American airstrikes targeted nuclear-related sites inside Iran. Last month, the E3 met with Iranian officials at Tehran's consulate in Istanbul to discuss the potential reinstatement of sanctions. Those sanctions were lifted in 2015 in exchange for strict limits and monitoring of Iran's nuclear activities. Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesman, Esmail Baghaei, said ahead of the Istanbul talks that he hoped the E3 would reconsider their "previous unconstructive attitude." But since the June conflict, negotiations with Washington for a new nuclear deal have stalled, and Iran has cut ties with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The U.N. watchdog's first post-war visit to Iran on Monday did not include inspections of nuclear facilities, and cooperation remains suspended. A diplomat familiar with the matter told The Associated Press that triggering the snapback mechanism would renew U.N. sanctions unless Iran restored full cooperation with the IAEA and addressed concerns about its stockpile of highly enriched uranium. German Foreign Ministry spokesperson Josef Hinterseher said Wednesday the letter "once again underlines that the legal preconditions for snapback have long existed." He added: "Our position and our appeal is, very clearly, that Iran still has the choice of deciding to return to diplomacy ... and full cooperation with the IAEA." The IAEA and U.S. intelligence agencies have assessed that Iran halted its organized nuclear weapons program in 2003, but Tehran has recently enriched uranium to 60%, a short technical step from the 90% purity needed for weapons-grade material. The IAEA did not immediately respond to a request for comment. This article includes reporting by the Associated Press.