logo
Meme lords, not warlords

Meme lords, not warlords

Express Tribune28-04-2025

At the dinner table, when my family convenes for its routine dispatch of all things political and conspirational, though often it is hard to distinguish one from the other, I do my part by narrating my favourite memes about Pakistan and India's "upcoming" war.
There is one about Sonam Bajwa hosting Jeeto Pakistan, another predicting Salman Khan's marriage at last, broadcast on a local channel's morning show, and one of the most relatable ones, jokes: "Itni garmi mein koi Walima nahi rakhta, inhon ne jang rakh di."
Where once, the mere mention, forget possibility, of a Pak-India war summoned impassioned speculations on Ghazwae Hind, all the nuclear arsenal Pakistan has covertly stocked over the years, and a fragmented recall of Naseem Hijazi, Allama Iqbal, and the one nation theory, it should be puzzling that my family and I, like many others, can find fun at the alleged brink of World War III (or fifth generation warfare, if you will).
"Jinnah literally put all funny people on one side and drew a line." Are Pakistanis really very funny people, unlike India and perhaps the wider global north?
Unbeatable meme game?
As if it weren't already a sentimental flex - you may have everything, but we have a sense of humour - it also, quite whimsically, disowns a nationalist fervour birthed by decades of political and ideological whiplash. Our memes suggest chronically low expectations of the future. "There is absolutely nothing India can threaten us with that we aren't already suffering from at the hands of our government.
You'll cut off our water supply? We already don't get any. You'll kill us? Our government is already doing that. Will you capture Lahore? Thirty minutes in and you'll return it."
Another X/Twitter user puts it more snappily: "Jang kerni ho tau 9 bajey se pehle karlena. 9:15 per gas chali jati hai hamari."
Critics with more sobriety or patriotism may read into this accelerating meme-fication of worsening geopolitical instability as naive, wilfully ignorant, or both. Since when did war become a laughing matter? Even a quick scan of Pakistan and India's recurrent antagonisms will show that the cross-border conflict majorly plays out in rhetoric and discourse. For decades, the entertainment industries have led this front, acting as tranquilisers, softening the sharp edges of intra- and transnational narratives of state-making. At different points in history, it has meant something that a Shah Rukh Khan-starrer advocated for Project Milaap, or that Meera so easily took to the explicit romance in her Bollywood debut, Nazar (2005). Come 2025, "art has no borders" is nothing but an easy, feel-good truism. Any expectation that Indian or Pakistani actors will usher in sanity is lost between generic platitudes about humanity and unabashed warmongering couched in patriotism.
And maybe that's just as well. The terminally online epoch has conceived new harbingers of sanity - the memesters. At least, on this side of the border.
Anti jingoism
Any discussion of Pakistan's meme game inevitably circles back to 2019, when Muhammad Sarim Akhtar, a comically disappointed cricket fan, became an internet sensation during the Pakistan v Australia match at the World Cup. His expression of frustration quickly transformed him into the globally recognised "angry Pakistani fan" or "disappointed cricket fan."
Earlier that year, on February 27, Pakistan shot down two Indian aircrafts and captured Wing Commander Abhinandan Varthaman. His now-iconic video, where he praises the "fantastic" tea, sparked a meme that resurfaces annually: Pakistanis wishing Indians a "Happy Fantastic Tea Day," marking the country's swift response to the Balakot airstrike.
These are only two instances when made-in-Pakistan memes travelled past national borders. It would demand a separate, focused piece to trace the history of memes here. Millennials are better equipped to pinpoint the moment when viral "blunders" (Meera trying to pronounce photographer) and low production media artifacts (KitKat talcum powder) collapsed into the intertextual umbrella of internet memes. But the present moment requires neither history nor any one generation's standpoint to understand the Pakistani memester, who is practically the antithesis of a jingoist. Unlike the jingoist, the memester resists genealogy and ownership. And do not be misled by its spelled singularity. A memester is not an individual, but a temporary public always in flux.
The emerging cyber generations that constitute this public do not bleed green. In fact, they do not bleed at all. Is it because the rotting system we inhabit has bled us dry, and now, there is nothing left to give? Or are we every bit the snowflakes the far right makes us out to be? Perhaps we don't bleed because our generation is all about needle pricks and paper cuts. Nothing goes deeper, beyond the surface.
If a jingoist is always looking back in search of a golden past, the memester is content with half-formed ideas, quick hits of recognition, and a partial futurity. This is why memes, in Pakistan, as everywhere else, answer less to generations and more to the speed of the internet itself. Of course, everywhere else the memester has become synonymous with brainrot, a hasty coinage that, as per Oxford Dictionary, refers to "the supposed deterioration of a person's mental or intellectual state, especially viewed as the result of overconsumption of material (now particularly online content) considered to be trivial or unchallenging." But not the Pakistani memester. Not at the present moment.
'Not that deep'
The memes coming out right now remember the past: "Ab tau Madam Noor Jehan bhi nahi. Jang hui tau Aima Baig k tarane sunne parein ge." Just as they are aware of common grounds: "Border pe Jhol chala dena, mohabbat jaag jayegi sabki." And they are not forgetting what makes us us: "Request to the Indian forces: Please leave your valuables in India before going to Lahore," "Ghar wale phuppo ko mananay jarahe hain kyun k unko jang ka nahi bataya."
We are no longer just responding to a fantastic cup of tea or the suspension of Indus Treaty. We are stepping into a future where the war is already over.
Some may call it "self-trolling" or mistake it for self-deprecation, but it is neither. When every rational response crumbles into a truism, when every sober argument is already dead on arrival, what is left except a meme?
Unlike in other parts of the world, where memes are often seen as a downgrade of public discourse, for us, memes are the discourse - an alternative language built from the rubble of failed conversations and collapsing narratives.
And the Pakistani memester is radical precisely because it is a paradox: belonging nowhere, refusing both nationalism and anti-nationalism, making jokes that could belong to anyone, from anywhere. The longer you scroll, the more you wonder: is it a Pakistani or an Indian joking that you can cut off water for everyone else, just make sure Hania Aamir gets a glass?
Or maybe you're too busy laughing to care where one ends and the other begins. Because, as they say: it's not that deep.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Military notes; Indo-Pak conflict: deterrence, pre-battle manoeuvres
Military notes; Indo-Pak conflict: deterrence, pre-battle manoeuvres

Express Tribune

timean hour ago

  • Express Tribune

Military notes; Indo-Pak conflict: deterrence, pre-battle manoeuvres

The writer is a retired major general and has an interest in International Relations and Political Sociology. He can be reached at tayyarinam@ and tweets @20_Inam Listen to article We continue to discuss various aspects of the recent Indo-Pakistan military standoff. Third, deterrence per se. More than a billion lives escaped Modi's madness in a closer than ever nuclear Armageddon. Besides the conventional side of warfare, the more dangerous 'nuclear parity' still overhangs South Asia perilously. With deterrence in 'conventional terms re-established', one hopes India under Modi would avoid another wasteful adventure of humiliation, and resume talks over the table, rather than in the skies and through brinkmanship. The future India-Pakistan conflict scene will no longer be unilateral. It will be dictated and decided by Sino-Pak military alliance especially in collaboration with China's Western Theater Command. And this would augment deterrence for rational players on the Indian side, if any. Pakistan's Military, in South Asia's modern history, showcased the most integrated defensive strategy and real-time coordination. And just to reiterate, in military literature, a weaker side is supposed to have won an asymmetrical contest, if it denies outright victory or the attainment of war's aims and objectives to the stronger side, which Pakistan did to a larger India. So perceptually speaking, deterrence in the Indo-Pakistan context would, henceforth, be defined by the conventional military capabilities plus nuclear arms, and the fragility of psychological threshold on both sides, as discussed in my piece, 'India, Pakistan — redefining deterrence', printed in this space on May 22, 2025. And in Pakistan's context, deterrence would remain to be fortified by the Sino-Pakistani alliance, and the resolve of Pakistan's civil and military leadership, through Islamabad's 'quid-pro-quo Plus' strategy, to never let India prevail. So, peace, the perusal of which now squarely lies with a mellowed but bellicose India that still pursues its intended water wars, would remain elusive if we do not recognise each other's capabilities, and do not engage each other with dignity, mutual respect and patience, and not with ignorance or arrogance. Fourth. The Exterior Manoeuvre. Without going into the nuts and bolts of the diplomatic war, the Indian efforts to paint Pakistan into endemically bad light and as a state sponsor of terrorism, had very few takers, regionally and internationally. Indian diplomatic overtures focused on painting itself taller by telling the world its military response was calculated and non-escalatory and that this 'new India' would respond muscularly to the so-called terrorist attacks, without wanting a wider war with Pakistan and its people. Essentially contradictory iterations. No country condemned Pakistan for the 'alleged' terrorism; none appreciated India's 'carefully calibrated' military response. The world, contrarily, was preoccupied with the IAF's French Rafael jets being shot down by PAF's Chinese J-10C fighters using PL-15 E air-to-air missiles. Even the US after some initial ambivalence from VP Vance had to forcefully intervene to affect a ceasefire, without giving India the blank cheque of unilateralism and brinkmanship. Russia, India's traditional friend, withheld the 'expected' diplomatic support for India. And Türkiye, Azerbaijan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar and the entire OIC, the UN all called for restraint and then ceasefire. Major capitals responded with studied neutrality despite India sending seven diplomatic delegations to 32 countries. Beijing's signalling and posturing in support of Pakistan were overtly clear. Washington's ceasefire appeal re-hyphenated the two nuclear neighbours, to India's great chagrin. New Delhi even refused to acknowledge any US role, for which Trump had publicly taken credit. The paradox of Indian 'Exterior Manoeuvre' was laid bare, as to why was it accepting a ceasefire, irrespective of whether it was reached bilaterally (as India claimed) or under US interlocution (as Trump tweeted), if it had an upper hand militarily. During the conduct of operations, fiasco after fiasco derided New Delhi's aspirations and outsized ego. From denial to acknowledging downing of planes including Rafaeles, to persistent lies on the state and social media, greatly diminished India's shine, sheen and diplomatic weight. New Delhi's comical effort to influence the World Bank under its Indian-origin president, Mr Ajay Banga, from sanctioning loan to Islamabad failed spectacularly. The extent of India's hostility towards Pakistan permeated not only its body politics, but also its cultural elite (read Bollywood), its state behaviour; and resulted in a compulsive obsession with Pakistan, whom India's intellectual wizards proudly claim to have pushed into irrelevant ignominy. This paradox - Pakistan's irrelevance and Islamabad being an uncomfortable reality - remains unresolved and has been damaging India's 'perceived' important power aspiration and status, without pundits realising it. Fifth, The Inner Front. India whipped up its jingoist anti-Pakistan narrative in order to jell its inner front, silencing opposition, muzzling rationality and suppressing truth in the process. And it failed. The Modi Government had to launch Operation "Tiranga Yatra (tricolour journey)" for intense domestic messaging, to manipulate outcomes during Operation Sindoor. From annihilating Pakistan to dominating South Asia as the new hegemon, its efforts, however, could not convince most of its 200 million Muslims, who constitute 10.9 per cent of its population, is the world's 3rd largest Muslim population, and the largest Muslim-minority globally. Its illegally occupied Kashmir, the expected battle zone, simmers with hate, discontent and a resurgent anti-India sentiment, making operations and rear-area security a nightmare for the Indian Military. Assam, Christian Mizoram, Nagaland, the Naxalite insurgency in the 'Red Corridor', Khalistan Movement in Punjab and abroad, and other insurgencies drive wedges in the India Union. Even the Brahman-dominated decision-making elite had and have reservations on the direction secular India has taken under Hindutva-laced Modi Sarkar. Indian security sector and armed forces saw removals, arrests and demotions during the stand-off; and its population is still experiencing arrests for supporting Pakistan, as per press reports. By comparison, Pakistan's inner front jelled like it always does in a crisis with India. RAW-financed terrorism in KP and Balochistan, and the expected political uprising by some political forces against the armed forces, in hilarious formulation of Indian intelligence, failed and failed miserably. Pakistan's national will, determination, resolve and motivation across the political spectrum and across the nation was tougher and firm. Pakistan's 'relative' demographic homogeneity compared to India's heterogeneity is always an asset and a force-multiplier. Such demographic truism also permeates Pakistan's armed forces, making it a formidable fighting machine. Continues...

Bilawal-led Pakistani delegation ends two-day UN visit in New York
Bilawal-led Pakistani delegation ends two-day UN visit in New York

Express Tribune

time8 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

Bilawal-led Pakistani delegation ends two-day UN visit in New York

Listen to article A high-level Pakistani parliamentary delegation led by Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, chairman of the Pakistan Peoples' Party and former foreign minister, wrapped up a two-day visit to the United Nations Headquarters in New York. The delegation conveyed Pakistan's stance on regional tensions, urging respect for international law and peaceful relations with neighbours. During the visit, the delegation met with the UN Secretary-General, the President of the General Assembly, members of the Security Council, ambassadors of the OIC group, media representatives, civil society, and the Pakistani diaspora. Bilawal Bhutto Zardari said Pakistan seeks peaceful, cooperative relations based on equality and mutual respect but will not tolerate aggression or violations of international norms. READ MORE: Pakistan downed five Indian jets 'like mosquitoes': Bilawal The delegation highlighted India's unlawful actions, including violations of the UN Charter and international humanitarian law, and condemned attacks on civilians in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK). They rejected India's claims about the April 22 terrorist attack, citing a lack of evidence. Speaking at a press conference at the UN Headquarters in New York on Tuesday, he blamed India for using the April 22 Pahalgam attack in IIOJK as a pretext for aggression. He emphasized that Pakistan has consistently condemned terrorism in all its forms and proposed a collaboration between ISI and RAW to combat terrorism. "I am completely confident that if ISI [Inter-Service Intelligence of Pakistan] and RAW [Research and Analysis Wing of India] sat down and worked together to fight these forces, we would see a significant decrease in terrorism both within India and Pakistan," he said. He described the recent ceasefire as a 'welcome first step,' but warned it was 'merely a first step.' Bilawal also highlighted the human cost of terrorism in Pakistan, stating, 'If you compare the number of victims to terrorism then far more Pakistanis are killed by terrorists than Indians.' Concern was raised over India's unilateral decision to suspend the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), vital for more than 240 million Pakistanis. The delegation warned that India's "weaponisation of water" breaches treaty obligations and international law. Pakistan reaffirmed its commitment to fighting terrorism in all forms and condemned Indian-sponsored terrorism and transnational assassination campaigns. The delegation called for cooperation over politicisation to combat terrorism effectively. The delegation stressed Pakistan's restrained and lawful response to Indian provocations and warned against attempts to normalise arbitrary strikes in the nuclear-sensitive region, cautioning that such actions could have disastrous consequences. READ MORE: Pak delegation to expose India's propaganda They called for a just and peaceful resolution of the Jammu and Kashmir dispute, in line with UN Security Council resolutions and the aspirations of the Kashmiri people. The delegation urged the international community to uphold treaty sanctity, restore the Indus Waters Treaty, and support comprehensive dialogue between India and Pakistan. Other members of the delegation included Minister for Climate Change Dr. Musadik Masood Malik; Senator Sherry Rehman, chairperson of the Senate Standing Committee on Climate Change; former foreign ministers Hina Rabbani Khar and Khurram Dastgir Khan; Senator Syed Faisal Ali Subzwari; Senator Bushra Anjum Butt; and former foreign secretaries Jalil Abbas Jilani and Tehmina Janjua. Pakistan sent two delegations to different world capitals as part of Islamabad's diplomatic campaign to present its position on India's aggression following the Pahalgam attack. A nine-member delegation led by Bilawal is visiting the United States, while another team, headed by Special Assistant to the Prime Minister Tariq Fatemi, is currently in Moscow, where they met with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov on Tuesday. READ MORE: Pakistan launches diplomatic offensive against India At the United Nations, the Pakistani delegation engaged with representatives from UN Security Council member states, including some of India's close allies, briefing them on the concerning security developments in South Asia after India's recent military aggression and unilateral actions. The parliamentary delegation led by Bilawal arrived in Washington on Wednesday, where they were warmly welcomed by Pakistan's Ambassador to the United States, Rizwan Saeed Sheikh.

Tump assistant commissioner abducted from near Tigranabad, Balochistan
Tump assistant commissioner abducted from near Tigranabad, Balochistan

Express Tribune

time9 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

Tump assistant commissioner abducted from near Tigranabad, Balochistan

Armed men abducted Tump Assistant Commissioner Hanif Noorzai on Wednesday morning near Tigranabad as he was traveling with his family to Quetta, according to local sources. Eyewitnesses report that between six to eight armed individuals stopped his official vehicle, took him away at gunpoint, and fled with the car. His wife, driver, and official gunman were left at the site and remain unharmed. The incident has prompted a swift response from security forces, who have launched a large-scale search operation in the area. Snap-checking has begun along Zubaida Jalal Road and nearby routes, while intelligence-based efforts are being used to track the abductors. The abduction of a senior government officer has raised concerns over the safety of civil servants in Balochistan, particularly in the Makran region. Authorities have not yet identified those responsible, and no group has claimed responsibility as of now. Efforts to locate and safely recover Assistant Commissioner Noorzai are ongoing. Earlier this week, seven terrorists allegedly affiliated with the India-backed group Fitna al-Hindustan were killed in two separate operations in Balochistan on June 2, 2025. Earlier, the federal government had officially designated all terrorist groups operating in Balochistan as 'Fitna al Hindustan', accusing India of sponsoring a proxy war through these outfits. According to a notification issued by the Ministry of Interior, the move stems from 'the involvement of some organizations and groups in terrorist activities in Balochistan, which are detrimental to Islamic faith, the sovereignty of Pakistan, and its customary traditions'. The notification further stated that the new designation is intended to reflect 'the true nature and ideology' of these groups and their 'nefarious designs' sponsored by India. 'All government entities are directed to start the above practice immediately,' the notification said, underscoring a concerted effort to reframe the narrative around insurgent violence in the province. The announcement came after Islamabad accused India of escalating indirect aggression after what he described as its defeat in a recent security operation dubbed "Marka-e-Haq'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store