
Furious India eyes response to Pakistan after Kashmir attack
And then on Thursday, New Delhi said it had suspended visas services "with immediate effect" and ordered all Pakistani nationals to leave the country, with the exception of remaining diplomats.
Experts say that a military response may still be in the pipeline, with some speculating that a response may come within days while others say weeks.
New Delhi accuses Islamabad of supporting "cross-border terrorism" -- claims Pakistan denies -- and police in Kashmir identified two Pakistani nationals among the three alleged gunmen.
India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi vowed on Thursday to punish all those responsible "to the ends of the Earth".
Relations between the nuclear-armed neighbours have sunk to their lowest level in years and some fear New Delhi's diplomatic moves may just be an opening salvo.
"This attack is going to take... relations a long way back to the dark days," said International Crisis Group analyst Praveen Donthi.
"Given the Narendra Modi government's security approach, they might resort to kinetic (military) measures in the next couple of weeks, because they believe in projecting a strong security state."
Pakistan held a rare national security meeting on Thursday after New Delhi's punitive diplomatic measures.
'Escalation'
The killings have shocked India because they were a dramatic shift targeting civilians and the area's vital tourism industry, rather than more common smaller-scale attacks against Indian security forces.
Hindu pilgrims have been targeted in the past, but direct attacks on the tourist trade that underpins much of the local economy are much rarer.
"A major attack in a tourist area does constitute a break from the past," said Ajai Sahni, a counter-terrorism expert at the New Delhi-based Institute for Conflict Management.
Sahni suggested there had been "an unwritten contract" not to attack the general tourism trade "because virtually everyone" in Kashmir is directly or indirectly dependent on tourism.
For New Delhi, the 3.5 million tourists who it says visited Kashmir in 2024 -- mostly domestic visitors -- illustrated what officials called "normalcy and peace" returning to the troubled region after a massive crackdown in 2019.
"One of the reasons this attack might have happened is because the government started linking the numbers of tourists... to this narrative of normalcy," Donthi said.
"The militants finally changed their attack. Usually, they don't attack tourists and civilians... And this is going to mark an escalation in the conflict."
The 2019 crackdown followed Modi's decision to cancel Kashmir's partial autonomy and impose direct control from New Delhi.
US-based analyst Michael Kugelman said he believed the shift meant India would therefore also likely respond with military force.
"I would argue that the combination of the scale of this attack as well as the targeting -- the fact that civilians were hit -- that suggests to me that there is a strong likelihood of some type of Indian military retaliation," he said.
"I don't necessarily think that such a response would come quickly. I suspect that New Delhi will want to take some time, some days to review a range of possible retaliations."
'Covert options available'
India has taken its time to respond to past attacks.
The worst attack in recent years in Indian-run Kashmir was at Pulwama in 2019, when insurgents rammed a car packed with explosives into a police convoy, killing 40 and wounding 35.
Indian fighter jets carried out air strikes on Pakistani territory 12 days later, a raid that came against the backdrop of campaigning for India's general elections.
Action taken by India so far is limited.
The now-suspended Indus Water Treaty shares critical water between the two countries -- but is more a paper agreement and India has no major means of restricting flow downstream to Pakistan.
The closure of the border crossing at the Attari-Wagah frontier is also significant, although there are rarely large numbers who cross.
The border crossing hosts a hugely popular evening ritual, where crowds gather to cheer on soldiers as they goose-step in a chest-puffing theatrical show that has largely endured through innumerable diplomatic flare-ups.
Sahni said any potential military response was "ill-advised".
"There have been military responses in the past," he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


AFP
15 hours ago
- AFP
Clip of Pakistan PM niece's supposed criticism is edited
"When electricity and petrol prices increase then you should know that the prime minister is a thief," Punjab Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz is heard saying in a July 16, 2025 Facebook reel. "Maryam Nawaz called her own uncle and the current Form 47 Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif a thief in front of the public," reads Urdu-language text overlaid to the clip. "Form 47" refers to allegations Sharif's party rigged the country's most recent vote to sweep to power, made by the party of his rival and predecessor Imran Khan (archived link). Image Screenshot of the false Facebook post taken August 6, 2025, with a red X added by AFP Similar posts also surfaced on X, Instagram, and TikTok. But a Google search of keywords from Maryam's speech led to an Aaj Television report published on YouTube on October 17, 2021 which shows her speaking during a rally in the eastern city of Faisalabad (archived link). The circulating clip was taken from the longer video's 3:31 to 4:01 mark but excludes portions that clearly indicate Maryam Nawaz was criticising Imran Khan. She was repeating earlier comments made by Khan when he was leading the political opposition against the powerful Sharif family (archived link). During her speech, Maryam Nawaz shows a poster with Khan's name and reads his quote: "When electricity and petrol prices increase then you should know that the prime minister is a thief." At the time of her speech, Khan was Pakistan's prime minister. The former cricket star-turned premier has been jailed since August 2023 on a slew of corruption charges his party says are politically motivated (archived link). Image Screenshot comparison of clip in false posts (L) and Aaj Television's report Pakistani English-language daily Dawn in its report on the rally also quotes Maryam Nawaz as saying: "There was a man named Imran Khan, who used to say when flour becomes expensive, when sugar prices rise, when rates of electricity and petrol rise, know that your prime minister is a thief" (archived link). Soaring fuel costs globally, coupled with demands from the International Monetary Fund to slash government subsidies, led successive Pakistani administrations to repeatedly hike electricity costs (archived link). Prices have fluctuated since 2022 but peaked at a 155-percent increase, and power bills sometimes outweigh rents. AFP has debunked more misinformation targeting Maryam Nawaz here, here and here.


AFP
15 hours ago
- AFP
Old photo shows military helicopter in Afghanistan, not crackdown on Pakistan militants
"What spectre has cast a shadow over my city? Even if the sun rises, the dawn cannot break through. Bajaur operation," reads the Urdu-language caption of an image shared on X on July 29, 2025. The image appears to show a military helicopter firing ordnance over fields in a lush green valley. It was shared as Pakistani authorities launched "Operation Sarbakaf" in Bajaur, an area in Pakistan's northwestern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province near to the border with Afghanistan. Pakistan's Dawn newspaper reported the security operation was targeting "militants affiliated with the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) as well as the Islamic State of Khorasan (ISKP), the local affiliate of the transnational Islamic State group" (archived link). Around 300 people, mostly security officials, have been killed in attacks since the start of the year by armed groups fighting the government in provinces bordering Afghanistan, according to an AFP tally (archived link). Image Screenshot of the false X post captured on August 12, 2025, with a red X added by AFP The same image was also shared in similar X posts and on YouTube. "Why do you give sanctuary to terrorists? if you provide sanctuary to terrorists, there will be no mercy for anyone," read a comment on one of the posts. Another said: "Terrorist sympathisers must be dealt with harshly." But the circulating image was not taken during the security operation in Bajaur. A reverse image search on Google led to the same photo on the Alamy platform (archived link). "An AH-64 Apache helicopter shoots flares over a valley to support members of the 8th Commando Kandak and coalition special operations forces during a firefight near Nawa Garay village, Kajran district, Daykundi province, Afghanistan, April 3," reads part of its caption. "Coalition SOF partners with the 8th Commando Kandak to conduct operations throughout Daykundi, Uruzgan and Zabul provinces. AH-64 Apache in Daykundi - 2012." The same photo can also be seen on the website of the US Department of Defense (archived link). Its caption reads: "An AH-64 Apache helicopter releases flares over a valley to support coalition special operations forces and Afghan soldiers during a firefight near Nawa Garay village in the Kajran district of Afghanistan's Daykundi province, April 3, 2012." Image Screenshot comparison of the falsely shared image (left) and the US Department of Defense photo (right) AFP has debunked similar claims from Pakistan that in fact show images from Afghanistan.


France 24
6 days ago
- France 24
India exporters say 50% Trump levy a 'severe setback'
Prime Minister Narendra Modi said he was willing to "pay a great personal price", while opposition Congress party leader Rahul Gandhi called the levies "economic blackmail" and "an attempt to bully India into an unfair trade deal". Stocks opened marginally lower on Thursday, with the benchmark Nifty index down 0.31 percent after an initial 25 percent US tariff came into effect. That levy will be doubled in three weeks after Trump signed an order on Wednesday to impose an additional 25 percent tariff because of New Delhi's continued purchases of Russian oil, a key revenue source for Moscow's war in Ukraine. India is the second-largest buyer of Russian oil, saving itself billions of dollars on discounted crude. India's foreign ministry condemned Trump's announcement of further tariffs, calling the move "unfair, unjustified and unreasonable". S.C. Ralhan, president of the Federation of Indian Export Organisations, said he feared a troubling impact. "This move is a severe setback for Indian exports, with nearly 55 percent of our shipments to the US market directly affected," he said in a statement. "The 50 percent reciprocal tariff effectively imposes a cost burden, placing our exporters at a 30–35 percent competitive disadvantage compared to peers from countries with lesser reciprocal tariff." Ralhan said "many export orders have already been put on hold" as buyers reassess sourcing decisions. Profit margins for "a large number" of small- to medium-sized enterprises profit "are already thin", he said. "Absorbing this sudden cost escalation is simply not viable," he said. India, the world's fifth-largest economy and most populous nation, is bracing for a bumpy ride because the United States is its largest trading partner, with New Delhi shipping goods worth $87.4 billion in 2024. "If the extra 25 percent tariff that President Trump has announced on imports from India remains in place, India's attractiveness as an emerging manufacturing hub will be hugely undermined," Shilan Shah of Capital Economics said in a note. US spending drives around 2.5 percent of India's GDP, Shah said. A 50 percent tariff is "large enough to have a material impact", he said, with the resulting drop in exports meaning the economy would grow by closer to six percent this year and next, down from the seven percent they currently forecast. Drug, gems, seafood India's top exports include smart phones, drugs, gems, textiles and industrial machinery, with some of the most labour-intensive goods -- including jewellery and seafood -- under threat. The Seafood Exporters Association of India said on Wednesday that the 50 percent tariff "imperils" its $3 billion business. India's jewellery sector, which exported goods worth more than $10 billion last year, had already warned of job losses potentially hitting "thousands" at lower levy levels. It called the higher rate "devastating". A key sticking point for India has been its reluctance to fully open its agriculture, a sector that employs vast numbers of people, to US imports. Modi said in a speech on Thursday that "India will never compromise on the interests of its farmers". He said he would "have to pay a great personal price, but I am ready for it", without giving further details. It seemed a far cry from India's early hopes for special tariff treatment. Trump said in February he found a "special bond" with Modi when the Indian leader visited Washington. Successive US administrations have seen India as a key partner that has like-minded interests with regard to China. India and China are intense rivals competing for strategic influence across South Asia. Indian media has reported that Modi might visit long-time rival China in late August. The trip has not been confirmed by officials but it would be his first visit to China since 2018. Modi and China's President Xi Jinping last met in Russia in October 2024.