SC issues amended guidelines on child rape cases
According to the SC, 'qualified rape of a minor' should be used when the elements of both statutory rape and qualified rape are present.
'The crime shall be denominated as qualified rape of a minor and not qualified statutory rape if any of the special qualifying aggravating circumstances in Article 266-B of the RPC is present and when the victim is below the statutory age or is suffering from mental retardation comparable to the intellectual capacity of a child below the statutory age,' it said.
Previously, only the victim's minority and relationship, age of below seven, and knowledge of the victim's mental disability were included.
Meanwhile, the SC also increased the minimum amount of damages that may be awarded.
It said P150,000 each for civil indemnity, moral damages, and exemplary damages in qualified rape of a minor, P100,000 each in qualified rape, and P75,000 each in statutory rape.
'These amounts may be increased if the accused showed cruelty in committing the crime,' the SC said.
Under the RPC, the SC said that statutory rape is committed when a man has sexual intercourse with a girl below 12 years of age, even without force, threat, or intimidation. This also applies to sexual intercourse with a woman whose intellectual age is below 12.
However, it said that Republic Act 11648 raised the threshold to 16 years old.
Meanwhile, the SC said that qualified rape applies to sexual intercourse with a woman against her will committed under abuse of authority, moral ascendancy, relationship, or the victim's vulnerability.
'The term qualified rape applies when any of the special qualifying aggravating circumstances is present, but the victim is neither below the statutory age nor suffering from mental retardation,' the SC said.
'On the other hand, the term statutory rape applies when no special qualifying aggravating circumstance is present, but the victim is below the statutory age or is suffering from mental retardation,' it added.
The SC issued the guidelines as it denied the motion for reconsideration filed by a man convicted of raping his eight-year-old daughter. —VAL, GMA Integrated News
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
17 hours ago
- GMA Network
2 hurt, suspect nabbed in Baliwag market hostage taking
A suspect was arrested after stabbing two individuals and taking a teen boy hostage at the Baliwag Public Market in Bulacan, the Philippine National Police (PNP) said. In a statement issued Wednesday evening, the PNP said the police around 1:35 a.m. received a report about the incident. 'Officers attempted to negotiate with the suspect, who refused to surrender,' the PNP said. 'Seizing the right moment, a responding officer successfully disarmed and subdued the suspect, ending the standoff without further harm to the hostage,' it added. The two injured victims were brought to a nearby hospital for medical treatment. According to the PNP, the suspect is now under police custody. He is facing charges for two counts of attempted homicide and serious illegal detention under the Special Protection of Children Against Abuse, Exploitation, and Discrimination Act. 'I commend the courage, professionalism, and quick response of our personnel in Baliwag. Their decisive actions not only protected the hostage but also prevented further harm to innocent citizens,' PNP chief Police General Nicolas Torre III said. 'This incident highlights the dedication of our officers who stand ready to serve and safeguard every community in the country,' he added. —VAL, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
a day ago
- GMA Network
SC issues amended guidelines on child rape cases
The Supreme Court (SC) on Wednesday announced that it has expanded the scope of the term 'qualified rape of a minor' and increased the minimum damages awarded to victims. According to the SC, 'qualified rape of a minor' should be used when the elements of both statutory rape and qualified rape are present. 'The crime shall be denominated as qualified rape of a minor and not qualified statutory rape if any of the special qualifying aggravating circumstances in Article 266-B of the RPC is present and when the victim is below the statutory age or is suffering from mental retardation comparable to the intellectual capacity of a child below the statutory age,' it said. Previously, only the victim's minority and relationship, age of below seven, and knowledge of the victim's mental disability were included. Meanwhile, the SC also increased the minimum amount of damages that may be awarded. It said P150,000 each for civil indemnity, moral damages, and exemplary damages in qualified rape of a minor, P100,000 each in qualified rape, and P75,000 each in statutory rape. 'These amounts may be increased if the accused showed cruelty in committing the crime,' the SC said. Under the RPC, the SC said that statutory rape is committed when a man has sexual intercourse with a girl below 12 years of age, even without force, threat, or intimidation. This also applies to sexual intercourse with a woman whose intellectual age is below 12. However, it said that Republic Act 11648 raised the threshold to 16 years old. Meanwhile, the SC said that qualified rape applies to sexual intercourse with a woman against her will committed under abuse of authority, moral ascendancy, relationship, or the victim's vulnerability. 'The term qualified rape applies when any of the special qualifying aggravating circumstances is present, but the victim is neither below the statutory age nor suffering from mental retardation,' the SC said. 'On the other hand, the term statutory rape applies when no special qualifying aggravating circumstance is present, but the victim is below the statutory age or is suffering from mental retardation,' it added. The SC issued the guidelines as it denied the motion for reconsideration filed by a man convicted of raping his eight-year-old daughter. —VAL, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
2 days ago
- GMA Network
SC upholds Comelec ruling on Quezon candidate disqualification
According to a statement, the SC ruled that the findings of the poll body were supported by substantial evidence. Seeking to remove doubts about the legality of the Commission on Elections' (Comelec) ruling, the Supreme Court (SC) on Tuesday announced that it upheld the disqualification of Matt Erwin Florido as representative of Quezon Province due to alleged vote buying. According to a statement, the SC ruled that the findings of the poll body were supported by substantial evidence. This stemmed from a complaint filed by registered voters and residents of Buenavista, alleging that Florido's camp distributed P1,000 bills along with free food, shirts, and transportation during a gathering on April 5 and 6. In his petition with the SC, Florido said that Comelec committed grave abuse of discretion and argued that the event was only for his campaign volunteers. The SC, however, noted that the event was not exclusive to campaign staff. It said that the event was clearly intended to gain electoral support. Aside from this, the SC said the distribution of cash and other items were not properly documented or liquidated. 'The SC emphasized that the lack of receipts, logbooks, or other records indicated that the funds were used to influence voters — constituting vote-buying under the Omnibus Election Code,' it said in a statement. According to the High Court, Florido's presence at the event also showed his knowledge and implied his approval. 'Although Florido ultimately lost in the 2025 elections, the SC still resolved the case to remove any doubts about the legality of the COMELEC's decision,' it said. — BAP, GMA Integrated News
