logo
Voice actors vs AI dubbing

Voice actors vs AI dubbing

Express Tribune30-07-2025
Rise of AI poses questions about whether voice actors will be needed. Photo: Reuters
Boris Rehlinger may not turn heads on the streets of Paris, but his voice is instantly recognisable to millions of French filmgoers.
As the French voice of Ben Affleck, Joaquin Phoenix, and even Puss in Boots, Rehlinger is a star behind the scenes — and now he is fighting to keep his craft alive in the age of AI.
"I feel threatened even though my voice hasn't been replaced by AI yet," the actor, who is part of a French initiative, TouchePasMaVF, to protect human-created dubbing from artificial intelligence, told Reuters.
He said there was a team of professionals, including actors, translators, production directors, dialogue adapters and sound engineers, to ensure audiences barely notice that the actor on screen is speaking a different language than they hear.
The rise of global streaming platforms such as Netflix, which relies heavily on dubbing to make global hits such as Squid Game and Lupin, has amplified demand.
Consumer research firm GWI says 43 per cent of viewers in Germany, France, Italy and Britain prefer dubbed content over subtitles.
The market is expected to grow to $4.3 billion in 2025, reaching $7.6 billion by 2033, according to Business Research Insights.
That growth could also amplify demand for the so-far nascent technology-based solutions, with platforms competing for subscribers and revenue, and seeking to win over advertisers from their rivals by emphasising their increasing reach.
But as AI-generated voices become more sophisticated and cost-effective, voice actor industry associations across Europe are calling on the EU to tighten regulations to protect quality, jobs and artists' back catalogues from being used to create future dubbed work.
"We need legislation: Just as after the car, which replaced the horse-drawn carriage, we need a highway code," Rehlinger said.
Worries over technology in the movie industry and whether it will replace the work of humans are not new.
AI has been a flashpoint in Hollywood since the labour unrest of 2023, which resulted in new guidelines for the use of the technology.
Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos said this month that the company used generative AI to produce visual effects for the first time on screen in the original series El Eternauta (The Eternaut).
It has also tested GenAI to synchronise actors' lip movements with dubbed dialogue to improve the viewing experience, according to three sources familiar with the work.
These experiments rely on local voice actors to deliver the lines, rather than use AI to synthetically translate the on-screen performer's voice into another language.
Such a use of AI for dubbing is permitted under the new SAG-AFTRA actors' union contract, which covers voice-over dubbing from foreign languages into English. It also requires that the actor rendering the dubbing service be paid.
Netflix declined to comment on its use of AI in dubbing when asked by Reuters.
Intellectual property
Such test-runs by an industry giant will do little to allay the fears of dubbing actors.
In Germany, 12 well-known dubbing actors went viral on TikTok in March, garnering 8.7 million views, for their campaign saying "Let's protect artistic, not artificial, intelligence".
A petition from the VDS voice actors' association calling on German and EU lawmakers to push AI companies to obtain explicit consent when training the technology on artists' voices and fairly compensate them, as well as transparently label AI-generated content, gained more than 75,500 signatures.
When intellectual property is no longer protected, no one will produce anything anymore "because they think 'tomorrow it will be stolen from me anyway'," said Cedric Cavatore, a VDS member who has dubbed films and video games including the PlayStation game Final Fantasy VII Remake.
VDS collaborates with United Voice Artists, a global network of over 20,000 voice actors advocating for ethical AI use and fair contracts.
In the United States, Hollywood video game voice and motion capture actors this month signed a new contract with video game studios focused on AI that SAG-AFTRA said represented important progress on protections against the tech.
Studios experiment
Some studios are already cautiously exploring AI.
Eberhard Weckerle, managing director of the Neue Tonfilm Muenchen studio, hopes AI and human dubbing can one day coexist.
"The fear is that AI will be used to make something as cheap as possible and then people will say, 'Okay, I'll accept that I'll have poorer quality'. And that would actually be the worst thing that could happen to us," said the sound engineer whose studio worked on the German version of Conclave and is currently dubbing Guy Ritchie's new film.
Earlier this year, the German-dubbed version of streaming service Viaplay's Polish crime series Murderesses was removed after criticism from viewers about the monotony of its AI-generated dialogue.
The streamer had decided to look into alternative dubbing options due to how prohibitively expensive going through the traditional channels can be in Germany.
The hybrid dubbing, created with Israeli startup DeepDub, used a mix of human and AI voices. DeepDub did not respond to an emailed request for comment.
"We'll continue offering subtitles and reserve dubbing for select content," said Vanda Rapti, the executive vice president of ViaPlay Group, ViaPlay Select & Content distribution.
Despite the disquiet over that series, other potential viewers seem more sanguine. According to GWI, nearly half of viewers said their opinion would not change if they learned that the content they liked was generated by AI.
Some 25 per cent said they would like it slightly less, and only 3 per cent said they would like it much more.
'Interest is huge'
Stefan Sporn, CEO of Audio Innovation Lab, which used AI to dub the Cannes Film Festival entry Black Dog from Chinese to German, believes AI will reshape, but not replace, voice work.
Humans will always be needed for emotion, scripting, and language nuance, he said, "just not to the same extent".
Audio Innovation Lab's technology alters the original actor's voice to match the target language, aiming for authenticity and efficiency.
"Interest is huge," said Sporn, adding that producers, studios and advertisers all want to know how well it works.
Another startup, Flawless AI, bills itself as an ethical AI company that works with local voice actors and uses its technology to match the on-screen actor's lip movements to the different languages.
"When AI technologies are used in the right way, they are a silver bullet to change how we can film-make in a new way," co-CEO Scott Mann said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Spotify set to raise its premium prices
Spotify set to raise its premium prices

Express Tribune

time3 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

Spotify set to raise its premium prices

Spotify said on Monday it would increase the monthly price of its premium individual subscription in select markets from September, as the Swedish streaming giant looks to improve margins, as per Reuters. The company's shares jumped nearly 8 per cent. They have gained about 40 per cent so far this year. The subscription price will rise to 11.99 euros (USD13.86) per month from 10.99 euros in markets including South Asia, the Middle East, Africa, Europe, Latin America and the Asia-Pacific region. Spotify said subscribers will receive an email explaining the price rise over the next month. Price increases in the past, combined with cost-cutting efforts in recent years, have helped it to achieve its first annual profit for 2024. The company saw an increase in monthly active users and premium subscribers during the second quarter, while higher taxes related to employee salaries led it to post a loss during the period and weighed on its third-quarter profit forecast. Spotify has been expanding its library of video content to attract subscribers, including through its partner program, which is designed to help podcast creators by offering them monetization options. A growing number of creators are joining the Spotify Partner Program, resulting in a significant increase in video content on the platform, CEO Daniel Ek had earlier told Reuters. The streaming company is also benefiting from Apple's approval of its US app update to show subscription prices and external payment links, after a judge barred the iPhone maker from charging commission on off-app purchases. Ek said this change has led to "a very positive uptick" in the US If similar rules are adopted in Europe and the UK, it would benefit both Spotify and other app developers.

Where is Xavier in 'Wednesday' Season 2? Percy Hynes White's absence explained following scandal
Where is Xavier in 'Wednesday' Season 2? Percy Hynes White's absence explained following scandal

Express Tribune

time18 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

Where is Xavier in 'Wednesday' Season 2? Percy Hynes White's absence explained following scandal

Wednesday season 2 has officially arrived on Netflix, and the show has addressed the absence of Xavier Thorpe, previously played by Percy Hynes White. Xavier, a key character in the first season and romantic interest of Wednesday Addams, is confirmed to have transferred to Reichenbach Academy in Switzerland. Principal Dort, played by Steve Buscemi, informs Wednesday of Xavier's move during the first episode. A letter from Xavier later reaches her, referencing one of his psychic visions connected to the mystery at Nevermore. It reads: 'Consider this my goodbye gift… Don't ask me how I know or what it means, but it's connected to you, I'm sure.' Percy Hynes White confirmed earlier this year that he would not return for season 2, writing, 'I had so much fun working on this show. I can't wait to watch season 2 :) Much love.' While no formal reason was shared by the production, his departure follows accusations of sexual assault made in 2023 on X. The post, now deleted, accused the actor of misconduct at a party. Hynes White denied the claims, calling them 'a campaign of misinformation' and stated that the rumours were false. Meanwhile Wednesday Season 2, Part 1 of which is now streaming on Netflix, also features cast additions, including Steve Buscemi, Joanna Lumley, and Billie Piper.

Musk vs. Modi: Inside the battle over India's internet censorship
Musk vs. Modi: Inside the battle over India's internet censorship

Business Recorder

time21 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Musk vs. Modi: Inside the battle over India's internet censorship

BENGALURU/NEW DELHI: In January, an old post on Elon Musk's social media platform, X, became a concern for police in the Indian city of Satara. Written in 2023, the short message from an account with a few hundred followers described a senior ruling-party politician as 'useless'. 'This post and content are likely to create serious communal tension,' inspector Jitendra Shahane wrote in a content-removal notice marked 'CONFIDENTIAL' and addressed to X. The post, which remains online, is among hundreds cited by X in a lawsuit it filed in March against India's government, challenging a sweeping crackdown on social media content by Prime Minister Narendra Modi's administration. Since 2023, India has ramped up efforts to police the internet by allowing many more officials to file takedown orders and to submit them directly to tech firms through a government website launched in October. X argues India's actions are illegal and unconstitutional, and that they trample free speech by empowering scores of government agencies and thousands of police to suppress legitimate criticism of public officials. India contends in court documents that its approach tackles a proliferation of unlawful content and ensures accountability online. It says many tech companies, including Meta and Alphabet's Google, support its actions. Both companies declined to comment for this story. Musk, who calls himself a free-speech absolutist, has clashed with authorities in the United States, Brazil, Australia and elsewhere over compliance and takedown demands. Musk says he will visit India after talk with Modi But as regulators globally weigh free-speech protections against concerns about harmful content, Musk's case against Modi's government in the Karnataka High Court targets the entire basis for tightened internet censorship in India, one of X's biggest user bases. Musk said in 2023 that the South Asian nation had 'more promise than any large country in the world' and that Modi had pushed him to invest there. This account of the behind-the-scenes battle between the world's richest person and authorities in the world's most populous country is based on a Reuters review of 2,500 pages of non-public legal filings and interviews with seven police officers involved in content-removal requests. It reveals the workings of a takedown system shrouded in secrecy, some Indian officials' ire over 'illegal' material on X, and the broad spectrum of content that police and other agencies have sought to censor. While the takedown orders include many that sought to counter misinformation, they also encompass directives by Modi's administration to remove news about a deadly stampede, and demands from state police to scrub cartoons that depicted the prime minister in an unfavourable light or mocked local politicians, the filings show. X didn't respond to Reuters questions about the case, while India's IT ministry declined to comment because the matter was before the court. Modi's office and his home ministry didn't respond to questions. There have been no immediate signs of souring personal relations between Musk and Modi, who have enjoyed a warm public rapport. But the showdown comes as the South African-born entrepreneur, whose business empire includes EV maker Tesla and satellite internet provider Starlink, gears up to expand both ventures in India. Even supporters of Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) have faced scrutiny of their online musings from police officials newly empowered by the IT ministry to target social media activity. Koustav Bagchi, a lawyer and BJP member, posted an image on X in March that depicted a rival, West Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee, in an astronaut suit. State police issued a takedown notice, citing 'risks to public safety and national security'. India's Modi meets Trump, Musk as tariff pressure Bagchi told Reuters the post, which is still online, was 'light-hearted' and that he wasn't aware of the takedown order. The chief minister's office and state police didn't respond to Reuters queries. Of the earlier 2023 post, Shahane, the Satara police officer, told Reuters he couldn't recall the takedown order, but said police sometimes proactively ask platforms to block offensive viral content. 'Censorship portal' For years, only India's IT and Information & Broadcasting ministries could order content removal, and only for threats to sovereignty, defense, security, foreign relations, public order, or incitement. Some 99 officials across India could recommend takedowns, but the ministries had the final say. While that mechanism remains in place, Modi's IT ministry in 2023 empowered all federal and state agencies and police to issue takedown notices for 'any information which is prohibited under any law'. They could do so under existing legal provisions, the ministry said in a directive, citing the need for 'effective' content removal. Companies that fail to comply can lose immunity for user content, making them liable for the same penalties a user might face - which could vary greatly depending on the specific material posted. Modi's government went a step further in October 2024. It launched a website called Sahyog - Hindi for collaboration - to 'facilitate' the issuance of takedown notices, and asked Indian officials and social media firms to get on board, memos contained in court papers show. X didn't join Sahyog, which it has called a 'censorship portal', and sued the government earlier this year, challenging the legal basis for both the new website and the IT ministry's 2023 directive. In a June 24 filing, X said some of the blocking orders issued by officials 'target content involving satire or criticism of the ruling government, and show a pattern of abuse of authority to suppress free speech.' Some free-speech advocates have criticised the government's stricter takedown regime, saying it is designed to stifle dissent. 'Can a claim that some content is unlawful be termed as indeed unlawful merely because the government claims so?' said Subramaniam Vincent, director of journalism and media ethics at Santa Clara University's Markkula Center for Applied Ethics. 'The executive branch cannot be both the arbiter of legality of media content, and the issuer of takedown notices.' Red dinosaur Court filings reviewed by Reuters show federal and state agencies ordered X to remove around 1,400 posts or accounts between March 2024 and June 2025. More than 70% of these removal notices were issued by the Indian Cybercrime Coordination Centre, which developed the Sahyog website. The agency is within the home ministry, which is headed by Modi aide Amit Shah, a powerful figure in the ruling BJP. To counter X in court, India's government filed a 92-page report drafted by the cybercrime unit to show X is 'hosting illegal content'. The unit analysed nearly 300 posts it deemed unlawful, including misinformation, hoaxes, and child sexual-abuse material. X serves as a vehicle for 'spreading hate and division' that threatens social harmony, while 'fake news' on the platform has sparked unspecified law-and-order issues, the agency said in the report. The government's response to X's lawsuit highlighted examples of misinformation. In January, the cybercrime unit asked X to remove three posts containing what officials said were fabricated images that portrayed Shah's son, International Cricket Council chairman Jay Shah, 'in a derogatory manner' alongside a bikini-clad woman. The posts 'dishonour prominent office bearers and VIPs', the notices said. Two of those posts remain online. Jay Shah didn't respond to Reuters queries. Other directives went beyond targeting fake news. X told the court India's railways ministry has been issuing orders to censor press reports about matters of public interest. These included February directives seeking the removal of posts by some media outlets, including two by Adani Group's NDTV, that contained news coverage of stampede at New Delhi's biggest railway station that left 18 dead. The NDTV posts are still online. NDTV didn't respond to Reuters queries and the railways ministry declined to comment. In April, police in Chennai asked X to remove many 'deeply offensive' and 'provocative' posts, including a now-inaccessible cartoon featuring a red dinosaur labelled 'inflation', which portrayed Modi and the chief minister of Tamil Nadu state as struggling to control prices. The same month, police demanded the removal of another cartoon that mocked the state government's lack of preparedness for floods by showing a boat with holes. X told the judge the cartoon was posted in November, and it could not 'incite political tensions' several months later, as the Chennai police asserted. The post remains online. The state government didn't respond to a request for comment. When Reuters visited the Chennai cybercrime police station that issued these directives, Deputy Commissioner B. Geetha criticised X for seldom acting on takedown requests. X does not 'fully grasp the cultural sensitivities', she said. 'What may be acceptable in some countries can be considered taboo in India.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store