logo
Why You Should Care About Remote Clinical Trials

Why You Should Care About Remote Clinical Trials

Most of us don't wake up dreaming about joining a clinical trial. For decades, research was something that happened to other people: the hyper-healthy, the terminally curious, folks with more time on their hands, or even those of us trying to earn an extra buck. So why are 'remote clinical trials' suddenly trending?
Clinical trials are one of the foundations of evidence-based medicine and wellness. These types of studies prove what really works, they test which therapies, supplements, or health routines are safe and effective. And every medication you've ever taken, every new wellness product that claims benefits, and nearly every major advance in healthcare have passed through clinical trials first. We need them to separate fact from fiction, and to make sure that breakthroughs aren't just hype.
A little secret: you might already be part of the movement, even if you've never set foot in a research hospital.
If you use an app to count your steps, check how you slept last night, or even just look up 'why am I tired?' online, you're already doing your own version of data-driven wellness. The big change is that clinical trials, the official way we find out if health products and habits actually work, are finally catching up. They're leaving behind the lab coats and stacks of paperwork, and starting to work more like the apps and tech we use every day. That's a win for everyone.
People Science, a health research company focused on making clinical trials more accessible, says traditional clinical trials are slow, expensive, and often disconnected from real-world consumer behavior. 'Even the newer digital trials can be clunky, with lots of different tools and forms that make it hard for people to stick with the process or for scientists to gather clear results.'
The research company is trying to unify participant experiences and data infrastructure so that everything you need can be in one place, making the whole process smooth for us regular folk, and much faster for researchers and health brands who want quick, reliable answers about what works.
Imagine being able to answer questions like, 'Does this probiotic really help my digestion?' or 'Will this new sleep routine actually work for me?' and get the answers instantly. That's where Chloe comes in. Chloe is an app that allows participants to consent, complete surveys and receive results from their phone or computer. 'This removes the need for physical sites and makes research more inclusive,' says People Science. This means you don't have to drive across town or wait in a clinic before getting the info that you need. You're part of a cutting-edge health study while standing in line at Ralph's.
It's not just about accessibility. Remote trials are redefining what it feels like to participate in health science. The Chloe platform is designed to be as user-friendly. That's the whole point, removing the friction that usually turns people off from research in the first place.
So what does the typical experience look like? It's refreshingly simple:
Maybe you're thinking: 'Sounds cool, but I'm not a scientist. Why should I care?' Well…
Making things easier doesn't mean dumbing down the science. 'Everything is managed and administered through the Chloe platform. We integrate eConsent, validated digital surveys, automated reminders, and wearables like sleep and HRV trackers. All data is HIPAA-compliant and encrypted, and researchers can monitor adherence and data quality in real time,' People Science assures.
'While we move faster than traditional models, our in-house scientists and statisticians ensure rigor, credibility, and transparency in every study. AI helps us accelerate aspects like protocol optimization, participant targeting, and real-time monitoring, but it doesn't replace the context, clinical judgment, or methodological expertise our research team brings. Our approach is to combine speed with substance, using AI to enhance, not substitute, scientific rigor.'
Chloe's studies span topics like gut health, sleep, stress, cognitive performance, metabolic health, and women's health. 'Brands use our platform to test the real-world impact of probiotics, nootropics, adaptogens, herbs, dietary supplements, and other functional products.'
And yes, some surprising findings pop up: 'Some products with strong online followings show little measurable benefit, while others perform better than expected with consistent use. These insights help brands improve products and ground their marketing in evidence.'
Every study is tailored to the unique outcomes being explored. 'Each category requires specialized tools. Gut health may involve bowel tracking and GSRS scores; nootropics often use cognitive tasks and focus measures; adaptogens might include stress scales and biometrics. Chloe supports this customization easily. We also support at-home biological sample collection, such as stool samples for microbiome sequencing or dried blood spot collection for exploratory biological age testing, all integrated through the Chloe platform to maintain a seamless participant experience.'
People Science says they are combining the scientific standards of clinical research with the speed and flexibility of a consumer-first platform. 'We center and prioritize the consumer at the end of the day, it is their data that they are sharing for scientific exploration and learning.' In plain English, this means they are making their research trustworthy but also easy to use.
Click here to learn more about People Science
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why You Should Care About Remote Clinical Trials
Why You Should Care About Remote Clinical Trials

Los Angeles Times

time30-07-2025

  • Los Angeles Times

Why You Should Care About Remote Clinical Trials

Most of us don't wake up dreaming about joining a clinical trial. For decades, research was something that happened to other people: the hyper-healthy, the terminally curious, folks with more time on their hands, or even those of us trying to earn an extra buck. So why are 'remote clinical trials' suddenly trending? Clinical trials are one of the foundations of evidence-based medicine and wellness. These types of studies prove what really works, they test which therapies, supplements, or health routines are safe and effective. And every medication you've ever taken, every new wellness product that claims benefits, and nearly every major advance in healthcare have passed through clinical trials first. We need them to separate fact from fiction, and to make sure that breakthroughs aren't just hype. A little secret: you might already be part of the movement, even if you've never set foot in a research hospital. If you use an app to count your steps, check how you slept last night, or even just look up 'why am I tired?' online, you're already doing your own version of data-driven wellness. The big change is that clinical trials, the official way we find out if health products and habits actually work, are finally catching up. They're leaving behind the lab coats and stacks of paperwork, and starting to work more like the apps and tech we use every day. That's a win for everyone. People Science, a health research company focused on making clinical trials more accessible, says traditional clinical trials are slow, expensive, and often disconnected from real-world consumer behavior. 'Even the newer digital trials can be clunky, with lots of different tools and forms that make it hard for people to stick with the process or for scientists to gather clear results.' The research company is trying to unify participant experiences and data infrastructure so that everything you need can be in one place, making the whole process smooth for us regular folk, and much faster for researchers and health brands who want quick, reliable answers about what works. Imagine being able to answer questions like, 'Does this probiotic really help my digestion?' or 'Will this new sleep routine actually work for me?' and get the answers instantly. That's where Chloe comes in. Chloe is an app that allows participants to consent, complete surveys and receive results from their phone or computer. 'This removes the need for physical sites and makes research more inclusive,' says People Science. This means you don't have to drive across town or wait in a clinic before getting the info that you need. You're part of a cutting-edge health study while standing in line at Ralph's. It's not just about accessibility. Remote trials are redefining what it feels like to participate in health science. The Chloe platform is designed to be as user-friendly. That's the whole point, removing the friction that usually turns people off from research in the first place. So what does the typical experience look like? It's refreshingly simple: Maybe you're thinking: 'Sounds cool, but I'm not a scientist. Why should I care?' Well… Making things easier doesn't mean dumbing down the science. 'Everything is managed and administered through the Chloe platform. We integrate eConsent, validated digital surveys, automated reminders, and wearables like sleep and HRV trackers. All data is HIPAA-compliant and encrypted, and researchers can monitor adherence and data quality in real time,' People Science assures. 'While we move faster than traditional models, our in-house scientists and statisticians ensure rigor, credibility, and transparency in every study. AI helps us accelerate aspects like protocol optimization, participant targeting, and real-time monitoring, but it doesn't replace the context, clinical judgment, or methodological expertise our research team brings. Our approach is to combine speed with substance, using AI to enhance, not substitute, scientific rigor.' Chloe's studies span topics like gut health, sleep, stress, cognitive performance, metabolic health, and women's health. 'Brands use our platform to test the real-world impact of probiotics, nootropics, adaptogens, herbs, dietary supplements, and other functional products.' And yes, some surprising findings pop up: 'Some products with strong online followings show little measurable benefit, while others perform better than expected with consistent use. These insights help brands improve products and ground their marketing in evidence.' Every study is tailored to the unique outcomes being explored. 'Each category requires specialized tools. Gut health may involve bowel tracking and GSRS scores; nootropics often use cognitive tasks and focus measures; adaptogens might include stress scales and biometrics. Chloe supports this customization easily. We also support at-home biological sample collection, such as stool samples for microbiome sequencing or dried blood spot collection for exploratory biological age testing, all integrated through the Chloe platform to maintain a seamless participant experience.' People Science says they are combining the scientific standards of clinical research with the speed and flexibility of a consumer-first platform. 'We center and prioritize the consumer at the end of the day, it is their data that they are sharing for scientific exploration and learning.' In plain English, this means they are making their research trustworthy but also easy to use. Click here to learn more about People Science

Are Your Gut Health and Nootropic Supplements Actually Working?
Are Your Gut Health and Nootropic Supplements Actually Working?

Los Angeles Times

time22-07-2025

  • Los Angeles Times

Are Your Gut Health and Nootropic Supplements Actually Working?

Gut health, nootropics, adaptogens…these are buzzy words we've come to see in headlines and our social feeds but but if a product's benefits aren't clear in the data, skepticism follows. That's where People Science steps in. This platform works with brands and health companies to test whether supplements and wellness formulas actually do what they claim. Research doesn't happen behind closed doors. Instead, participants use at-home tools, submit biological samples, and share everyday results. The process is transparent and built for how people actually live. Paige Oliver, Director of Research at People Science says brands use their platform to test the impact of probiotics, nootropics, adaptogens, herbs, dietary supplements, and other functional products. Each supplement category, she explains, 'requires specialized tools. Gut health may involve bowel tracking and GSRS scores; nootropics often use cognitive tasks and focus measures; adaptogens might include stress scales and biometrics.' You can barely open a browser without seeing an ad for probiotics. Most claim to 'rebalance your microbiome' or 'boost immunity,' often with zero transparency. But rigorous science tells a messier story. For example, a recent meta-analysis in Nutrients found that while certain probiotic strains (Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, for example) can improve symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), results are highly variable, and benefits don't extend to everyone equally. People Science's trials demand more than vague 'feeling better' metrics: 'Gut health may involve bowel tracking and GSRS scores,' Oliver says, referring to the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, a validated clinical measure. Using AI, the Chloe platform can track changes in bowel habits and even sequence a user's microbiome before and after a product, providing actionable data to both brands and end users. Brain supplements (nootropics) have officially left the biohacker basement and are now a $10 billion industry. But which ingredients actually work? The answer, again, is nuanced. Lion's mane mushroom may promote neurogenesis and boost nerve growth factor; as research shows, older adults taking lion's mane showed significant improvements in cognitive scores after 16 weeks. Magnesium L-threonate, unique for its ability to cross the blood-brain barrier, is backed by preclinical data showing enhanced memory and learning. NAD+ precursors such as NMN and NR are gaining traction for cellular repair and energy, though human data is still evolving. 'Some products with strong online followings show little measurable benefit, while others perform better than expected with consistent use,' Oliver notes. 'These insights help brands improve products and ground their marketing in evidence.' Which is to say: sometimes, the internet is wrong. Sometimes, your new favorite powder is actually worth the hype. The adaptogen boom is powered by the promise of 'stress adaptation,' but most people are still asking: how does this stuff actually work? 'Each category requires specialized tools,' Oliver notes. For adaptogens, that means combining subjective stress scores with hard biomarkers, such as salivary cortisol or dried blood spots for aging markers. The science on stress, aging, and beauty is catching up. Chronic stress can tank your skin barrier and increase inflammation, as confirmed in National Institutes of Health studies and clinical psychodermatology research. Real-world studies show adaptogen-infused skincare and ingestibles may support resilience during stress-induced flare-ups, but most require regular use and realistic expectations. As Oliver says, 'AI helps us accelerate aspects like protocol optimization, participant targeting, and real-time monitoring, but it doesn't replace the context, clinical judgment, or methodological expertise our research team brings.' No supplement, probiotic, or digital brain game will overhaul your biology overnight. And despite what social media says, the data is rarely black and white. Even AI-powered trials are only as good as their controls and data inputs; most 'significant' results are modest, variable, and dependent on consistent use, not miracles. As Oliver puts it, 'Our approach is to combine speed with substance, using AI to enhance, not substitute, scientific rigor.' Safety is another watchpoint: combining supplements, especially with prescription meds, can be risky. And even the best AI can't fix a fundamentally poor study design or force honesty from brands not interested in real science. Cryotherapy, for example, is trending for recovery and mood, but large-scale trials show mixed results. As one longevity specialist explains, 'One needs to discern whether they're snake oil, or whether there's actually some utility.' The same logic applies to adaptogens and nootropics: 'Ask for published data and demand proof, not just PR'. Click here to learn more about People Science

Netflix is about to lose a sci-fi thriller movie that feels like a dark, emotional twist on the 'X-men' mutant story
Netflix is about to lose a sci-fi thriller movie that feels like a dark, emotional twist on the 'X-men' mutant story

Tom's Guide

time13-07-2025

  • Tom's Guide

Netflix is about to lose a sci-fi thriller movie that feels like a dark, emotional twist on the 'X-men' mutant story

There's a good chance you've scrolled past 'Freaks' on Netflix without a second thought. I get it, the title doesn't scream must-watch, and the thumbnail isn't exactly begging you to press play. But I'm here to tell you that you might be sleeping on one of the most gripping, emotionally-charged sci-fi thrillers the streamer has to offer. This overlooked dystopian flick feels like someone took the 'X-men' origin story, stripped out the costumes, dialed up the paranoia, and dropped it into a gritty indie drama. Somehow these elements work, and after watching it for the first time, I was truly and utterly hooked. Sadly, it's leaving U.S. Netflix on July 16. I'm not saying this is the best thriller out there, given its tiny budget and unique visuals. But I am saying that if you're into emotionally grounded sci-fi with a supernatural edge, and you appreciate storytelling that respects your intelligence (and doesn't spoon-feed the plot), then you really should give this one a shot before it disappears. Because once it's gone, there's no telling when it'll show up on any of the other major streaming services. 'Freaks' follows a young girl named Chloe (Lexy Kolker) who has spent her entire life hidden inside a rundown house by her paranoid and protective father (Emile Hirsch). He warns her never to go outside, claiming the world is dangerous and that people will try to hurt her. Despite his strict rules and frightening stories, Chloe becomes increasingly curious about the world beyond the front door, especially when a mysterious ice cream truck driver begins to appear in the neighborhood. As Chloe begins to question the world beyond her front door, it becomes clear that things aren't as simple as her father claimed. Unusual events start to unfold, leading her into a reality that's far more complex, mysterious, and dangerous than she ever imagined. If you watched the trailer above for 'Freaks' or skimmed the synopsis, you probably assumed it would be packed with strange twists and unexpected moments, and you wouldn't be wrong. 'Freaks' turned out to be a chaotic and thrilling surprise that completely defied almost every expectation I had going in. The movie thrives on its sense of mystery, so while I do recommend going in blind if you can, I'll be sharing a few very minor plot points here for context. Lexy Kolker takes center stage as Chloe, a young girl confined to a dark, dust-covered house by her father, Henry, who insists the outside world is too dangerous. Right from the start, there are shades of 'Room,' as we watch Chloe navigating her strange, enclosed life while being warned that stepping outside could put them both in serious danger. Still, when an ice cream truck run by a mysterious man (Bruce Dern) pulls up just beyond their doorstep, the temptation to explore grows almost impossible to ignore. The early part of the movie thrives on a sense of tight, suffocating tension. Within minutes, it's clear that Kolker is a remarkable young talent as she's completely believable and emotionally gripping in every scene. Her mostly improvised performance feels real and she pairs perfectly with Hirsch, who brings depth to the role of her overprotective father. One moment, Henry is nurturing, and the next he's locking his daughter in a closet 'for her protection.' But that's not the whole story, of course. Directors Zach Lipovsky and Adam B. Stein don't hand over the answers right away. Instead, they challenge you to uncover the truth alongside the characters. The payoff is absolutely worth it, thanks to their gripping storytelling and the unique, complex world they've built. When it comes to how believable 'Freaks' is, it's clear the movie operates in a heightened reality. The moment a story introduces extraordinary elements, it naturally invites closer scrutiny than something grounded in the real world. And because it leans so heavily into mystery, you're almost trained to analyze everything from the very beginning, searching for clues. Still, 'Freaks' feels like one of those movies that rewards a second watch, where moments that felt confusing or far-fetched the first time might make more sense once you've caught the details you missed. Don't go into 'Freaks' expecting explosions, massive set pieces, or fast-paced action. What you'll get instead is something far more intimate and tightly crafted. The story unfolds mostly behind closed doors, drawing you into a claustrophobic world that feels incredibly compelling. While the minimal sets and rare outdoor scenes hint at a very small budget, the filmmakers cleverly focus their energy on sharp sound design and striking, well-executed visual effects. Just keep in mind this is no blockbuster flick. It's a slow-burn experience that rewards your attention with tension, mystery, and a few genuinely surprising turns. Stream 'Freaks' on Netflix before it leaves on July 16. Otherwise, see what got added to the streamer this month.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store