Saudi push into Indian refining is stalling over crude supply
Saudi Arabia's progress in securing investment in two oil refineries in India is being held back by a lack of consensus around crude supply, according to people familiar with the matter.
#Pahalgam Terrorist Attack
Inside Operation Tupac: Pakistan's secret project to burn Kashmir
Who is Asim Munir, the Zia-style general shaping Pakistan's faith-driven military revival
'Looking for partners, not preachers': India's strong message for EU amid LoC tensions
The nations agreed last month to collaborate on the two plants, as the largest oil exporter seeks to tap a massive market that will help drive global demand growth.
But the early-stage discussions have stalled as Saudi negotiators push to supply half of the crude needed by the processors at official selling prices that are often above market rates, the people said, declining to be named due to the sensitivity of the talks.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Mountain Gear for Extreme Conditions
Trek Kit India
Learn More
Undo
India wants Saudi's share of supply to be closer to its desired 20% stake in the ventures — and at a discount to so-called OSPs, the people said.
Bloomberg
India's oil ministry and the local project partners —
Bharat Petroleum
Corp. Ltd. and
Oil and Natural Gas Corp
. — didn't reply to emails seeking comment. Saudi Aramco did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Live Events
State-owned Saudi Aramco is looking to help set up multibillion-dollar refineries in high-growth nations including China and India, as well as in Southeast Asia, to secure demand for its crude and ensure stability during market volatility, according to its latest annual report. Its weighted average share in overseas processors in 2024 was 35% but it supplied an average 53% of the crude they used, according to the document.
The exporter is also looking to claw back market share. Saudi Arabia, the de-facto leader of the OPEC+ producer group, was once India's largest oil supplier but has seen its position in the market decline as discounted imports from Russia increase.
A failure to agree on the projects would also be a diplomatic blow. Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman — who announced the ventures at a meeting with India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi in Jeddah — had in 2019 pledged $100 billion of investments in India, but just a 10th of that has materialized.
A proposed $60 billion refinery planned by Aramco, Abu Dhabi National Oil Co. and India's state firms, didn't materialize due to land acquisition issues. Plans to buy a 20% stake in billionaire Mukesh Ambani's Reliance Industries also fell through.
That has increased pressure on both sides to finalize the investments in the new processors — BPCL's proposed refinery and petrochemical complex on the east coast and ONGC's on the west coast in Gujarat, the people said. However, without an agreement on discounted supplies, the Indian refiners see little reason for the Saudis to take a stake, especially as they can easily raise debt from local banks, they said.
Saudi Arabia is also proposing to take a stake of as much as 15% in
Indian Oil Corp
.'s Panipat refinery, one of the people said, a plan which the Indian government plans to study.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
'We don't have money, and neither does Siddaramaiah': Empty-coffer remarks embarrass Karnataka govt; home minister G Parameshwara says it was only in jest
BENGALURU/BAGALKOT: A tongue-in-cheek remark by Karnataka home minister G Parameshwara about shortage of funds in the state govt has triggered a political firestorm and social-media frenzy, after a video of his speech in North Karnataka's Badami went viral. This prompted Parameshwara to issue a clarification on Tuesday, insisting his comments in jest had been misconstrued as a suggestion that the Congress govt was facing a financial crunch. Speaking at the inauguration of a fire station in Badami Monday evening, Parameshwara urged local Congress MLA BB Chimmankatti to think big and push for a Rs 1,000-crore development plan for the region, once the capital of the Chalukya dynasty. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru "Draft a plan worth Rs 1,000 crore for the development of Badami assembly constituency and send it to the Union govt. We don't have money, and neither does Siddaramaiah," he said, prompting laughter from the audience. HM clarifies there's no financial distress The home minister doubled down on the point for comic effect. "After providing rice, lentils, and oil, the funds are depleted," he quipped, before gesturing to excise minister RB Timmapur and adding with a grin, "The 'enne' (liquor or excise) minister is right here," drawing peals of laughter from the crowd. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo While the humorous tone elicited chuckles at the event, the viral clip has since ignited serious political chatter and left the govt red-faced. The minister said on Tuesday: "I have not said like that, who said there is no money? I have defended the govt, saying we have presented a record budget... as someone said things jokingly during the speech, I reacted in a similar fashion, that's all." Reiterating the fiscal strength of the state, the minister said, "A sum of Rs 22,000 crore has been allocated for irrigation in the budget. Allocations have been made for the five guarantee schemes, and instructions have been made to prepare an action plan for Rs 50 crore in every constituency." He added, "I'm now saying officially that there is no financial distress in our govt. I'm saying it very clearly. Sometimes, there may be a delay in the release of funds, as DPR and estimates have to be prepared before releasing money. There may be some delay in that; other than that, there is nothing else." Despite the explanation, Parameshwara's remark - "We don't have the money, and neither does Siddaramaiah" - continues to dominate discussions, with political opponents questioning the fiscal health of the state and the delivery of five welfare guarantees.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Starting with Bihar, voters to give proof of place of birth
NEW DELHI: In a decision aimed at weeding out illegal immigrants erroneously included in the nationwide electoral roll, the Election Commission has made it mandatory for new applicants as well as existing voters - enrolled after the last special intensive revision (SIR) undertaken in 2003-04 - to submit a self-attested declaration that they are Indian citizens, whether by birth or registration/naturalisation, and back it up with documentary proof of date and place of birth or certificate of registration/naturalisation. While the SIR for Bihar , where polls are due later this year, will start Wednesday - with the roll published in Jan 2003 serving as the draft roll - the schedule for the rest of India will be ordered "separately in due course", the Election Commission said in an order Tuesday. In an order issued on Tuesday, Election Commission - comprising chief election commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and election commissioners S S Sandhu and Vivek Joshi - invoked its powers under Section 21 of Representation of the People Act, 1950, to order an SIR across the country in "discharge of its constitutional mandate (under Article 326) to protect the integrity of the electoral roll". No documents will be collected from those who figured in the 2003 Bihar roll, except the extract of the roll. "EROs shall treat the electoral roll of 2003... as probative evidence of eligibility, including presumption of citizenship unless they receive any input otherwise," the poll panel said. All other voters in Bihar must, in addition to the pre-filled enumeration form, furnish a declaration that they are above 18 years of age and ordinary resident of the relevant assembly constituency/parliamentary constituency (AC/PC), besides listing their citizenship status and proof through 11 eligible documents. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Brass Idols - Handmade Brass Statues for Home & Gifting Luxeartisanship Buy Now Undo The document submitted will be uploaded on the EC portal. In line with provisions of Citizenship Act and rules, the declarations require new and shifted voters to declare if they were born in India prior to July 1, 1987, in which case they must choose from a list of 11 documents to establish their date and place of birth. If born in India between July 1, 1987, and Dec 2, 2012, they must also provide a listed document for their father or mother. If born after Dec 2, 2004, they must provide their own and their parents' proof of date and place of birth. If either parent is non-Indian, they must provide a copy of the parent's valid passport and visa at the time of their birth. The declarations also require eligible electors or applicants to attach proof of birth registration issued by an Indian mission abroad if born outside India; or the certificate of registration of Indian citizenship if acquired by registration/naturalisation. "This is a historic step. Strictly in accordance with Article 326, only Indian citizens above 18 years of age and ordinary residents can vote from today onwards," a senior EC functionary told TOI. As per SIR guidelines, a pre-filled enumeration form will be printed by the electoral registration officer for all existing electors and distributed by the booth level officer through house-to-house visits. The form will have fields like an updated photo, date of birth, Aadhaar (optional), mobile number, and parents/spouse name and EPIC number. The BLO will collect these forms and documents in a subsequent house visit; elector/applicant can also upload these via ECINET app. The forms will be scrutinised by the ERO/asst ERO and in case of doubt about eligibility of a proposed elector, ERO/AERO will conduct a field inquiry and pass a speaking order on his inclusion/exclusion, before the final roll is published. Such special intensive revisions have been carried out 13 times since 1952, with the last taking place in 2004.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
What influences crude oil more? US bombs or Iran's silent allies
Crude oil's sharp reversal of the Israel-Iran war premium shows the power of a few words from a key player to move the market, but in doing so it also masks the greater influence of those who stay largely silent. Global benchmark Brent futures plunged after U.S. President Donald Trump said a "complete and total" ceasefire between Israel and Iran will go into effect. Brent ended at $71.48 a barrel on Monday, down 7.2% from its previous close and having given up its earlier rally that saw it climb as high as $81.40, the most since January 17. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 무지티만 입어도 빛날 수 있는 기부반지 유어턴 링 굿네이버스 Undo Crude prices had surged early on Monday amid worries Iran would respond to the U.S. joining Israel's attack by bombing three nuclear facilities. Once again media reports overflowed with concerns that Iran would try to block the Strait of Hormuz through which about 20% of global crude oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG) passes daily, or that Tehran would target U.S. military bases in the region. Live Events In the end Iran's response was restricted to an announced strike on a U.S. base in Qatar, which turned out to be merely symbolic as the missiles were mostly intercepted and only limited damage was reported. The price of crude continued to weaken in early Asian trade on Tuesday, dropping as low as $68.23 a barrel, down 4.4% and back to the level it was at on June 12, the day before Israel started its bombing campaign against Iran. There is little doubt Trump will claim credit for the ceasefire between Israel and Iran, and likely point to the U.S. bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities and Tehran's limited response as proof he made the right choice. Certainly the U.S. entry into the conflict would have altered the calculations of Iran's rulers. But if it is the case that Tehran has backed down, was it because Trump called for Iran's total surrender, or was it because of the influence of what could be termed the more discreet players. MUTED ALLIES It's worth noting that Iran's major allies, China, Russia and perhaps even India, did little more than offer pro-forma statements calling for an end to hostilities after the U.S. bombing. China is probably Iran's most important ally, as it is the only major buyer of its crude oil, which has been sanctioned by the United States. But the most strident China got in condemning the U.S. attack was the country's ambassador to the United Nations saying the involved parties, especially Israel, "should immediately cease fire to prevent the situation from escalating and avoid the spillover of war." While the ambassador to the United Nations is a senior diplomatic post, it's important that China didn't use a more important member of government to condemn the United States, and its support of Iran seemed muted at best. What Tehran probably discovered is that China's friendship is largely conditional on keeping oil flowing unhindered through the Strait of Hormuz, and also rapidly de-escalating so that prices can lose the risk premium. This was likely the same message delivered to Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi in a phone call on June 22. It's also likely that numerous other countries in the Middle East were quietly giving the message that it would be in nobody's interests for there to be any attacks on crude production and export infrastructure, or on shipping. What are the lessons from the 12-day Israeli campaign against Iran? The first is that crude oil prices still respond to geopolitical risks and moves tend to be volatile, short-lived and likely overstated. The second is that once again the shared self-interest of keeping oil flowing was in evidence, making it always likely that the risk premium in the oil price would be fleeting. The third is that Iran looks considerably weaker today than it did two weeks ago, but there is still much uncertainty as to what this means for the future of its rulers and their nuclear ambitions. The fourth is that despite Trump's bombast and hyperbole, there is little reason to believe that the Middle East is now any safer or more stable. The views expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.
