Chandigarh MC House clears tax hike for govt properties too
The decision, however, still requires UT approval to come into effect.
On March 31, the UT administration had approved a steep hike in property tax for residential and commercial properties starting April 1, but chose to exempt government-owned buildings from the increased rates.
The decision sparked sharp criticism from city residents and opposition leaders alike, especially given that government buildings collectively owe a staggering ₹250 crore in unpaid property taxes, further straining the cash-strapped MC's finances.
During Wednesday's meeting, former mayor Anup Gupta raised concerns about the fairness of UT's exemption.
'Why was the tax hike imposed solely on city residents while government buildings were exempted? Despite already enjoying a 25% annual rebate on service tax, many of these properties have defaulted on payments, resulting in a massive ₹250 crore in outstanding dues—a significant shortfall in MC's annual revenue,' Gupta said.
He proposed that the same tax hike be imposed on government buildings to ensure fairness and boost the city's revenue, while also demanding that the House's decision of revoking the 25% rebate to government buildings be implemented at the earliest.
Gupta's proposal was unanimously supported by BJP councillors, who then proceeded to approve the increased tax rates for government buildings, similar to those imposed on residential and commercial properties.
MC's decision, however, will need UT administration's approval, as is the norm.
Notably, over 650 government buildings—including those belonging to the Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh and central governments—are on the tax defaulters' list, along with institutions under the Chandigarh administration itself.
Autonomous institutes like the Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Panjab University (PU) and Punjab Engineering College (PEC) alone owe ₹123.13 crore.
As part of its recovery strategy, MC has already issued property attachment notices to three institutions and has asked them to declare their movable and immovable assets. If dues are not cleared, the civic body is planning to seal their properties.
In October 2024, MC councillors had even revoked the 25% rebate in service tax being offered to government buildings annually, but the decision was not approved by the UT administration.
Congress, AAP stage walkout over rising financial burden on residents
Earlier, as the MC House got into session around 11 am, high drama unfolded as opposition councillors from the Congress and Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) launched a scathing protest against the BJP-led administration's decision to hike property taxes in Chandigarh.
Wearing black clothes and badges, the Opposition stormed the House with slogans like 'BJP aai, taxes lai' and 'Mayor Madam brought tax hike as a gift from Amit Shah'.
The opposition councillors remarked that the tax hike was a reflection of the BJP's decision to target residents' pockets to help MC recover from financial crisis and BJP's failure to bring in legitimate additional grants from the administration.
To defend the move, mayor Harpreet Kaur Babla invoked media reports, quoting Punjab governor and UT administrator Gulab Chand Kataria, claiming the Union ministry of home affairs (MHA) will soon release ₹238 crore for MC.
HT had on April 25 highlighted that UT administration has written to MHA and sought ₹238-crore recurring savings resulting from UT electricity department's privatisation that will further be redirected to the civic body.
Calling it a 'celebratory moment', Babla urged councillors to think about development projects for their wards.
Sweet distribution by BJP causes uproar
In a move that shocked many, BJP councillors, on the directions of Babla, began distributing sweets on the floor of the House — a gesture that backfired entirely.
The Congress and AAP leaders reacted with fury, condemning the act as 'inhuman' and 'insensitive,' especially given that the country is still mourning the recent terror attack in Pahalgam, where 26 innocent tourists were killed.
Congress councillor Gurpreet Singh Gabi said, 'BJP has hurt religious and patriotic sentiments of each and every citizen of India by distributing sweets. BJP councillors displayed a shameful and inhuman mindset by distributing sweets, even as the pyres of 26 martyrs from Pahalgam had not yet cooled. This act not only dishonours the sacrifices of our brave martyrs but also exposes the inhuman and apathetic mindset of the BJP.'
Senior deputy mayor Jasbir Singh Bunty exposed what he called the 'hollow announcements' of the BJP. 'Earlier, ₹92 crore was promised post-mayoral polls, but not a rupee has come. Now, they're banking on a 'requested' ₹238 crore, not even approved or confirmed yet. Is the BJP celebrating a tax hike or their failure to secure central funds?'
AAP councillor and leader of Opposition Jaswinder Kaur added that the AAP demanded immediate removal of the BJP councillors and the mayor involved in this act, and a public apology and expression of remorse by them.
The BJP hit back, insisting that the sweet distribution was unrelated to the tribute and meant solely to celebrate the central government's reported intent to financially assist the MC. Mayor Babla accused the Opposition of twisting facts to suit a political narrative. 'Tributes were paid with honour. Linking that with our separate celebration of the funding news is misleading and shows the opposition's petty mindset,' she remarked.
BJP councillors even demanded suspension of Opposition councillors for 'politicising martyrdom'.
However, by walking out of the House before tabling of key agendas around 3 pm, the Congress and AAP councillors left the floor open for the BJP-led MC to pass a steep hike in parking fees under the Smart Parking project and water bill penalties — without a single voice of dissent being recorded.
The 35-member MC House has the BJP in majority with 16 councillors, followed by 13 of the AAP and six of the Congress. Member of Parliament Manish Tewari, who has an ex-officio vote in the House, did not attend the Wednesday meeting.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
15 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Bihar SIR: No objections filed by parties, says EC; on the ground, political workers say they raised red flags
In its daily statements since August 1, the Election Commission of India has been maintaining that none of the 1.6 lakh booth-level agents (BLAs) appointed by political parties has filed any claims and objections to the recently published draft electoral roll as part of Bihar's ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR). Yet, on the ground, the BLAs – political workers meant to be the eyes and ears of parties at the level of Assembly constituencies and booths – say they have been actively raising objections: from alleged duplication of voters to the presence of 'fake voters' and those whose names have been allegedly mistakenly deleted or declared dead in the draft rolls. The Indian Express spoke to BLAs across political parties – from the BJP's agents in Darbhanga, who are confident that the 'mool niwasi' won't be left out; to Ara in Bhojpur, where BLAs of the CPI- (ML-Liberation) say they have flagged nine cases of voters being inaccurately declared dead on the draft rolls; to a booth in Aurangabad, where the BLA says he is going door-to-door alerting the 122 voters in his booth whose names have been struck off the EC list. While EC rules say objections to the draft roll have to be submitted in the prescribed format – Form 6 for additions, Form 7 for deletions – along with a declaration, BLAs say that while they have brought the alleged inaccuracies to the notice of the authorities, it's for the EC to take action. Officials told The Indian Express that BLAs don't usually submit claims and objections in the format prescribed since they are required to present the evidence on oath. This is the same rule that Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar cited on Sunday when asking Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi to give an affidavit for his allegations of voter fraud in Karnataka. Under Section 31 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, making a false declaration is an offence punishable by a jail term/fine. At a booth in Darbhanga's Bahadurpur Assembly constituency, BLA Krishna Bhagwan Jha of the BJP says he is yet to see the draft electoral roll published on August 1, but is not worried about genuine voters being left out of the rolls. 'Jo yahan ke mool niwasi hai, unke paas koi toh proof hoga (The original residents will have some proof),' he says, confidently. According to EC data, of the 1.60 lakh BLAs, the BJP, which is part of the ruling coalition, has the highest number (53,338), but even that does not cover all the 90,712 booths in the state. In another booth, in Darbhanga Assembly seat, BLA Lakshman Kumar of the BJP says he has submitted a letter to the District Magistrate, Kaushal Kumar, with names of 665 electors who allegedly have more than one Voter ID in the same constituency. Nearly all the electors on Lakshman's list are from the minority community. 'We have found that these 665 people have two, three and even four EPICs in some cases. Some are registered in the same booth multiple times, others are in different booths in the Vidhan Sabha,' he says. Lakshman says that when he submitted the complaint, he was asked to attach an affidavit too. 'I gave the complaint on my letterhead, as a BLA of the world's largest political party. I don't think an affidavit is required. We have identified these duplicates; now it is for the authorities to investigate and delete the names they find,' he says. The DM did not respond to The Indian Express's request for a comment. However, officials said, the complaint was being inquired into. Rajesh Choudhary, a BJP BLA in Hayaghat Assembly constituency, insists the SIR process has been smooth. 'There are some people whose names were not there or their documents were not available. We have been contacting them over the phone and asking them to send the documents over WhatsApp if they are not here. We then submit the forms to the BLO,' he says. Sapna Bharti, a BJP BLA in Darbhanga Assembly constituency, too, expresses confidence. 'There are many people whose names are left out, but we are making sure that they all complete the formalities in the next two-three days. We have helped them to get their caste or residence certificates made,' she says. With the Opposition joining forces against the SIR, BLAs of the RJD, Congress and the Left are going all out to bring the alleged irregularities to light. At Ara town, the district headquarters of Bhojpur, BLAs and functionaries of the CPI (ML-Liberation) say they have identified nine cases of voters being 'inaccurately' declared dead on the draft rolls. Among them is Mintu Paswan, one of seven such cases that Rahul Gandhi recently highlighted. The CPI (ML-Liberation) has a strong presence in Bhojpur, with the party's Sudama Prasad defeating former Union minister and senior BJP leader RK Singh from Ara Lok Sabha seat in the 2024 polls. The party had also won the adjoining Karakat Lok Sabha seat. At a booth in Dharhara in Ara, BLA Ritesh Sunilam of the CPI (ML-Liberation) says he has identified three voters, including Madan Prasad, a daily wager, who were 'inaccurately' declared dead and deleted from the draft roll. 'I am completely worthless now. At least I could vote until now; now I can't even do that,' says Prasad, a member of the Extremely Backward Class who has been out of work for some years. Sunilam tries to cheer him up. He asks for Prasad's Aadhaar card and one of the 11 EC-mandated documents and says he will help him apply as a fresh voter with Form 6. 'Baad mein (later),' says Prasad, brushing off the BLA. Sunilam says all the three voters in his booth who have been declared dead on the EC draft roll had voted in the 2024 Lok Sabha polls. Citing an instance of the same voter with three different names and EPIC numbers — Sonu Kumar Tiwari, Vinay CPI (ML-Liberation's) Kumar Tiwari and Vikas Kumar Tiwari, son of Krishnanamd Tiwari from Kudaria village, Booth Number-210) — Sanjay Kumar, state committee member of the party, says, 'When we visited Kudaria, we learnt that that the person's real name is Vinay Tiwari. We have complained to the BLO concerned.' On August 16, the Left party, one of the key allies of the RJD-led Opposition Mahagathbandhan in Bihar, called a district-level meeting of its functionaries to highlight discrepancies in the SIR and find ways to redress it by bringing the matter to the attention of the EC's Booth Level Officers (BLOs). The party's BLAs in Ara have raised many such objections – alleged duplication of voters at booths in the Tarari and Nokha Assembly segments; about 50 people at Khopira in the Ara Assembly segment listed as 'permanently shifted', when they had only migrated for work; and a case in Dehri Tola, Jagdishpur Assembly segment, where 76 people bearing the surname Choudhary (EBCs) got allegedly listed as Choubey (an upper-caste surname) in the draft roll. Functionaries of the CPI (ML-Liberation) say they have brought these 'irregularities' to the attention of the BLOs concerned. In another part of the state, at Aurangabad's Ward number 13, Sarvind Kumar, a BLA of the Congress, has a list of 122 voters whose names have been deleted from the voter list. 'People have been coming to my house to find out if their names have been struck off. Since it was getting crowded, I told them to go back home and now I am going to each of their homes, informing them that they are not on the draft rolls. That is the first step,' says Kumar. The ward has a sizeable population of Dalits and Muslims, besides upper-caste voters too. At the home of Dhananjariya Devi (45) and Ramesh Ram (50) – a Dalit couple who work as daily wagers – Kumar announces: 'Your name has been deleted from the voter list.' While Devi's name has been deleted citing that she wasn't 'present', her husband is shown on the draft rolls as having 'moved out of the state permanently'. Kumar tells the couple they will have to get their caste certificates made and that he would discuss the matter with Congress MLA Anand Shankar Singh. 'Don't worry. I will go with you to get the caste certificate made,' he says, before heading to another house.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Chandigarh administration seeks ₹125 crore from MHA for cash-strapped MC
In a fresh bid to bail out the cash-strapped Chandigarh municipal corporation (MC), the UT administration on Tuesday wrote to the Union ministry of home affairs (MHA), seeking an additional grant of ₹125 crore. The proposal, prepared by the UT finance department, recommends the 're-appropriation of ₹ 125 crore funds from the material and supplies head to the grant-in-aid head, for release to the MC. (HT File) Development works in the city have been stalled since May last year due to the financial crisis. The proposal, prepared by the UT finance department, recommends the 're-appropriation of ₹125 crore funds from the material and supplies head to the grant-in-aid head, for release to the MC. Officials said the re-appropriation has already been processed on the Union Budget Information System (UBIS) portal, considering available savings under the same section. The latest demand follows repeated pleas by mayor Harpreet Kaur Babla and municipal commissioner Amit Kumar to UT administrator Gulab Chand Kataria, urging allocation of additional funds to ensure the corporation's smooth functioning. Mayor Harpreet Kaur Babla said, 'We are hopeful of additional grants from the MHA so that development work can resume as soon as the weather conditions are suitable.' Earlier in April, the UT administration had sought ₹238 crore from the recurring savings generated through the privatisation of the electricity department. The proposal aimed to redirect those funds to the MC, but the MHA rejected the request earlier this month, further deepening the civic body's financial woes. The fund crunch prevented the MC from floating fresh development tenders for solid waste management, door-to-door segregated waste collection, operation of garbage transfer station-cum-material recovery facilities, liquid and sludge waste management, horticulture waste processing, road re-carpeting across V3, V4, V5 and V6 categories, maintenance of green belts, fire-fighting services, and upkeep of streetlights. Around 250 km of city roads need urgent repair as they are in dire straits. Road recarpeting work, usually carried out during March-April and October-November due to favourable weather conditions, has remained suspended since May 2024. The civic body's annual shortfall has also affected its ability to meet basic commitments such as salaries, pensions, utility bills, maintenance works and fuel the mayoral polls on January 30, following Harpreet Kaur Babla's victory, BJP's city president Jatinder Pal Malhotra had announced a special grant of ₹92 crore by the Centre for MC. However, it has yet to become a reality.
The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
CEC Gyanesh Kumar isn't interested in convincing the people of India
What this means is that India's democracy is now facing one of the worst crises in its history. So here's the problem: this current avatar of the Election Commission is wiping out that sterling record. I know fewer and fewer people who admire our present election commissioners. Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, in particular, has lost the respect of much of the nation with his farcical press conference a few days ago. First things first. I believe the Election Commission, along with the Supreme Court, is the most important constitutional body in India. It deserves our respect and admiration for the role it has played over the last seven decades in allowing us to proudly describe ourselves as the world's largest democracy. Lest you think that sounds overdramatic, let me explain. Election Commission's key role in Indian democracy Electoral franchise is one part — the major part, certainly, but not the only one — of modern democracy. Not only should people be governed by those they have elected, but they should also be guaranteed certain basic rights — liberty, free speech, dissent, and more — for democracy to function effectively. The tragedy of India is that many of these rights are often disrespected or overturned entirely. It's always easy to point fingers at the government of the day, but let's accept that the decline began decades ago, long before the BJP was even founded. Indira Gandhi first subverted many of our democratic institutions and later went the whole distance: censoring the press, arresting journalists, locking up the opposition, and more. The whole promise of India as a nation was about to be betrayed. The Supreme Court, which was supposed to protect citizens, failed. Only elections saved democracy. Convinced that she would win and legitimise her dictatorial regime, Indira Gandhi called a general election in 1977. She lost that election so badly that all future would-be dictators learned two lessons: never actually declare an Emergency, just impose it quietly. And don't call an election unless you are certain of winning it. That's why the Election Commission is so important. If elections are fair, and the people of India are allowed to register their protest and vote out tyrants or scamsters, only then can democracy survive. All the other features we associate with modern democracies (mostly in the West) — liberty, dissent, justice, etc — are already in trouble in India. It is difficult, if not impossible, for a poor person to find or afford justice or to speak out against powerful officials or politicians. Also read: Why Modi, BJP should worry about bad blood between CEC Gyanesh Kumar and Rahul Gandhi How Election Commission lost people's trust The only time every citizen of India feels empowered is when they vote. That's when the roles are reversed: when politicians must come to the people to ask for something. And the ordinary citizen knows that at least on that one day every few years, they have the right to send a tyrant or a crook packing. Take away electoral franchise and you take away our right to be called a democracy. That's why it is so important that elections remain fair and beyond controversy. It's not easy to do this in a country the size of India. And yet the Election Commission has often shown more courage than the judiciary. It turned Indira Gandhi out of office when she was all-powerful. In the 1990s, when TN Seshan was Chief Election Commissioner, he showed politicians their place and reminded them that the Constitution was more important than any individual. It is to the credit of those who conduct our elections that, until recently, even the losers did not claim the process was unfair. Yes, there were complaints about booth capturing, but the Commission usually ordered repolls in those booths. All that has changed. A few years ago, doubts were raised about the functioning of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs). Those doubts never gained much traction with the general public because nobody could convincingly explain how the EVMs had been tampered with, and former Election Commissioners made it clear that rigging them was impossible. But over the last couple of years, especially after the Maharashtra Assembly elections, there have been concerns about how electoral rolls are compiled. The allegation is that the Commission is complicit in adding a significant number of bogus voters in various constituencies. This is not done everywhere, so there is no question of the BJP winning a Soviet-style majority. But it is done shrewdly and selectively in enough constituencies to affect the outcome. It only works when the mood is not overwhelmingly anti-BJP and the votes of other parties do not swamp the bogus ones. Because this sounds like a sophisticated way of influencing elections, it is a hard allegation to substantiate. About the only thing critics can do is point to mysterious spikes in voting numbers and to suspicious or duplicate names in the rolls. Which is exactly what the Opposition — and Rahul Gandhi, most recently — has done. Also read: Dismiss debate on EC functioning as 'hoo-haa', then hail India as 'robust democracy' CEC shows no interest in convincing Indians Any sensible Election Commissioner knows that for the process to have credibility, both the government of the day (which appointed these commissioners and changed the selection process to exclude the Chief Justice) and the Opposition must have faith in the Commission. Most important of all: so must the electorate. The reason the EVM allegations receded was because the public was not convinced. To retain the faith of the Opposition and the public, the Chief Election Commissioner must go out of his way to demonstrate that once he occupies this constitutional office, he forgets his loyalties to those who appointed him and functions only in the interests of the Constitution. One of the problems today is that the Election Commission sees no reason to take the Opposition's complaints seriously. When someone points out anomalies in the rolls in detail, a sincere and honest guardian of the Constitution would say: 'I need to examine your claims and give you an equally detailed response.' He does not say: 'How dare you? File an affidavit or we won't listen to you! Apologise!' Do these sound like the words of a man determined to get to the truth? A man with nothing to hide? Worse still: there is no interest in convincing the people of India. Asked several important questions at his now notorious press conference, CEC Gyanesh Kumar simply did not answer them. Later, supporters of the government tried to muddy the waters by focussing on a numerical error in a tweet sent out by a pollster, arguing that because he made a mistake, the well-documented allegations levelled by the Opposition must also be false. None of this augurs well. The only thing that powers Indian democracy is the belief every Indian has: that they will get a fair opportunity to choose their leaders and throw out those who have not performed. Take away that assurance and you puncture the heart of Indian democracy. And you rob elected governments of their very legitimacy. Vir Sanghvi is a print and television journalist, and talk show host. He tweets @virsanghvi. Views are personal. (Edited by Prashant)
