logo
Congress, other parties criticizing new Waqf law want to keep Muslims as vote bank: Kiren Rijiju

Congress, other parties criticizing new Waqf law want to keep Muslims as vote bank: Kiren Rijiju

Time of India5 days ago
Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju accuses Congress and other parties of exploiting Muslims as a vote bank by opposing the Waqf (Amendment) Act. He defends the Act, emphasizing its aim to empower the Muslim community and ensure proper management of Waqf properties for their welfare. Rijiju asserts the government's commitment to justice for all, dismissing claims of unconstitutionality.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju has alleged that the basic purpose of the Congress and some other parties criticizing the Waqf (Amendment) Act is to keep Muslims as their vote bank, and asserted that the Modi government believes in "appeasement to none, justice to all".With the Supreme Court in May reserving interim orders on three key issues after hearing both sides in the Waqf case, Rijiju said he will not make any preemptive statement right now with regard to the matter which is pending in the apex court."But let us make one thing very clear. The job of Parliament is to make laws. The Supreme Court can definitely interpret it in the right way," Rijiju told PTI Videos in an interview."We are very confident that whatever we have done is as per law and as per the provisions and spirit of the Constitution. I am very confident that the role of Parliament will not be taken away," he said.On AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi 's criticism of the new Waqf law, Rijiju said he doesn't want to criticize Owaisi for his opposition to the Waqf (Amendment) Act because he made the remarks against the legislation out of compulsion."The main problem is what I tell you. Some of these leaders, including the Congress party, have treated the Muslims as a vote bank. When you start taking and making a community as a vote bank, then you become irrational."Then you put them into one bracket, that good or bad doesn't matter, they will all be rhetorical," the minister said.So, those who criticized the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, are only trying to keep the Muslims poor and ensure that they remain as their vote bank."Our thinking is opposite to that. Ours is appeasement to none, justice to all," Rijiju said.There are many within the Muslim community, lots of groups, women, children and backward communities who have not gotten any benefit out of the Waqf properties, the minister told PTI on Friday."So, India's Waqf properties you know very well are the highest number of Waqf properties in the world. More than 9,70,000 Waqf properties are there which must be put into use for the purpose for which those properties were created," Rijiju said.He pointed out that under the provisions of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, "we are to handle through the mutawallis and the waqf boards proper management for the welfare of the Muslim community, especially the poor.""These (Congress and some other leaders) people know that if the Muslim community becomes better, prosperous then they will be more educated, have more understanding and they will not be the main vote bank for anybody," Rijiju said."So, the basic purpose of Congress and some of the other leaders criticizing the Waqf (Amendment) Bill is to make Muslims as their vote bank and to keep them poor all the time," he said."Otherwise, tell me one reason why they should oppose the Waqf (Amendment) Bill? On a rational basis, they cannot," he said.On the Collector being given more powers under the new law, Rijiju said, "We are making the rules, now it's in the final stage. There is no final authority to any officer. It is only responsibility being given to certain officers. If there are disputes between the government lands and the private, the collector has to decide, but the appeal has to be made to an officer which is higher than the collector. Otherwise, what is the job of the collectors? Collectors are there for revenue purposes primarily.""So, if you don't trust collectors, then who do you trust?" he said.Reiterating its observation on the presumption of constitutionality in favour of the law, the Supreme Court in May reserved interim orders on three key issues after hearing both sides in the waqf case.The Centre has strongly defended the Act, saying waqf by its very nature was a secular concept and can't be stayed given the presumption of constitutionality in its favour.Moreover, though waqf was an Islamic concept, it was not an essential part of Islam.The Waqf (Amendment) Act was passed by Parliament in April and subsequently came into force through a government notification.While the BJP-led NDA had rallied in support of the Bill, the opposition INDIA bloc united in opposing it.Several Muslim bodies and opposition MPs had moved the Supreme Court against the law, which the ruling alliance has described as a force for transparency and empowerment of backward Muslims and women from the community. The Opposition has slammed it as unconstitutional and claimed that it infringes on the rights of Muslims.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ceasefire With Pakistan Was Bilateral Decision, MEA Tells Parliament, Rejects Trump's Claims
Ceasefire With Pakistan Was Bilateral Decision, MEA Tells Parliament, Rejects Trump's Claims

News18

time35 minutes ago

  • News18

Ceasefire With Pakistan Was Bilateral Decision, MEA Tells Parliament, Rejects Trump's Claims

Last Updated: Minister of state for external affairs Kirti Vardhan Singh categorically denied any US role in facilitating the ceasefire Amid claims by US President Donald Trump that he was solely responsible for brokering peace between India and Pakistan, the ministry of external affairs (MEA) has clarified in Parliament that the ceasefire agreement of May 10 was entirely a bilateral decision reached after direct military-level talks initiated by Pakistan. Responding to a series of pointed questions from Congress MP Mohammed Javed, TMC MP Mala Roy, and others, the MEA laid out a detailed timeline of events. It stated that by May 8, India had successfully achieved its primary military objectives, including dismantling terrorist camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu & Kashmir, following the April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam. From April 22 to May 10, Indian diplomats engaged in consultations with several global partners, including the United States. However, India consistently communicated that its actions were strategic, deliberate, and aimed at avoiding unnecessary escalation. Crucially, on May 9, Indian officials informed US Vice President JD Vance that any large-scale retaliation from Pakistan would be met with a firm and decisive Indian response. In Parliament, minister of state for external affairs Kirti Vardhan Singh categorically denied any US role in facilitating the ceasefire. He dismissed Trump's repeated assertions as baseless, including the claim that India's restraint was influenced by prospective trade deals with the US. Singh underlined that India's position on Kashmir remains unchanged—that it is a bilateral issue not open to third-party mediation, a message also conveyed to the United States President. The clarification comes after Trump, in numerous public appearances and campaign events in the US, claimed credit for 'bringing peace" to South Asia. He suggested his intervention helped prevent war and hinted that trade negotiations may have influenced India's decision to de-escalate. These claims ignited a political debate within India. Opposition leaders, including Rahul Gandhi, questioned whether India's strategic autonomy had been compromised. In response, external affairs minister Dr S Jaishankar firmly rejected the allegations and reiterated that India's military and diplomatic decisions were entirely self-driven. The ceasefire came after Operation Sindoor, India's swift military response targeting terror infrastructure across the LoC and deep inside PoJK, following the Pahalgam terror attack. The government has emphasised that the ceasefire was declared only after its objectives were met, and not due to any external pressures. view comments First Published: July 26, 2025, 04:04 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

No protest, slogans in Madhya Pradesh assembly, Congress slams speaker's move
No protest, slogans in Madhya Pradesh assembly, Congress slams speaker's move

India Today

time40 minutes ago

  • India Today

No protest, slogans in Madhya Pradesh assembly, Congress slams speaker's move

Ahead of the Madhya Pradesh Assembly's monsoon session beginning on July 28, a fresh order issued by the Speaker, Narendra Singh Tomar, has banned all forms of protests and sloganeering by legislators inside the Assembly premises. The directive, passed under Rule 94(2), prohibits MLAs from holding any demonstrations or raising slogans within the Assembly Congress party, which had planned to raise several public-centric issues including unemployment, poor law and order, bad road conditions, and corruption during the upcoming session, has strongly opposed the move. With this ban in place, the party's legislators will no longer be able to protest or raise their voices inside the to the directive, Leader of the Opposition Umang Singhar alleged that the Speaker acted under pressure from the ruling government. 'Today, under pressure from the government, the Speaker has stopped legislators from protesting and raising the voice of the people inside the Assembly premises. In fact, the opposition has been continuously demanding that Assembly proceedings be made live. Instead of allowing transparency, the Speaker, under government pressure, is now preventing MLAs from even raising public issues,' said also emphasised the constitutional rights of elected representatives. 'It is important to remember that Article 194 of the Constitution grants special powers to legislators, which allow them to raise public interest issues in the House, express their views, and demand answers from the government. The government, which often presents false and misleading data in the Assembly, is now trying to avoid being exposed by pressuring the Speaker into issuing such orders and regulations. This is a direct attack on democracy, " Singhar added.- Ends IN THIS STORY#Madhya Pradesh

Rahul Gandhi makes another OBC push: ‘Didn't  know issues, will work at double speed'
Rahul Gandhi makes another OBC push: ‘Didn't  know issues, will work at double speed'

Indian Express

time40 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Rahul Gandhi makes another OBC push: ‘Didn't know issues, will work at double speed'

A day after conceding that the Congress 'fell short' of understanding issues faced by OBCs, which 'opened up the space' for the BJP, Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi said on Friday that he didn't protect the community's interests earlier as the issues they faced were 'complex' and not 'easily visible'. Henceforth, he said, he would work at 'double speed' for the community. During his speech, Gandhi also highlighted the party's 'achievements' in Telangana where its government conducted a 'comprehensive' caste survey. The Congress would conduct such surveys wherever it is elected, and once that happens, the 'wall' of 50 per cent cap for reservation would be broken, he said. Gandhi made these remarks at the 'Bhagidari Nyay Sammelan' of Congress OBC leaders and workers at Talkatora Stadium, as part of a larger initiative launched by the Congress in the run-up to the Lok Sabha polls last year to reach out to the community. Gandhi also took a dig at Prime Minister Narendra Modi, saying that after meeting him a few times, he realised Modi was all about 'show' with no 'substance'. He also targeted the RSS, describing it as the community's 'biggest enemy' and accusing it of having 'wiped out' the history of OBCs. According to Gandhi, while he scored well on issues related to Dalits, tribals, minorities and women, he has not done enough for the OBC community. 'When I look back, and in a way, analyse myself. Where I did the right thing, and where I lacked. I see a couple of big issues. I worked on the Land Acquisition Bill, MGNREGA, right to food, Tribal Bill… These things I did well. I feel I should get good marks on issues of Tribals, Dalits, minorities, women… When I look back, I see things clearly. I lacked on one thing, made a mistake — what was it. The Congress and I made a mistake. I should have protected the OBC section, I didn't. The reason for this was that I didn't understand your issues at the time,' he said. He said that around a decade ago, he 'could see the problems faced by Dalits'. 'It was clear and I understood it…Untouchability is their history,' he said. On tribals, he said: 'It is easy to understand issues of tribals — jungle (forest), jal (water), zameen (land) are right there for you to see.' On OBCs, Gandhi said: 'But the OBC issues are hidden, and not easy to see. My regret is that if I knew your history and issues, I would have got the caste census done then. And it is my mistake and not the Congress's. The good thing is that if I had got the caste census done then, it wouldn't have been as good as it will be now.' The Congress leader went on to describe his party's caste survey in Telangana as a 'tsunami'. 'In Telangana, it is black and white that laborious work is done by Dalit, OBC, Adivasi communities. (Bhupesh) Baghel ji (former Chhattisgarh CM) said something very correct — 'utpadak shakti' (productive force). Meaning, who runs the country… It is the productive force which runs it. But the main question is that this force gives the country so much… Then, what does the country give it? You make the country, build roads and schools, temples… If you build the country, what does it give you? It is giving your private schools where you have to pay lakhs in fees… Your reservation is robbed,' said Gandhi. 'My target is to get the productive force of the country respect and share,' the MP said. Gandhi then asked the crowd what the 'biggest problem' in politics was, prompting some to shout the name of Modi. 'No, Narendra Modi is not a big problem… I had not met him earlier, but now I have met him two-three times, there is nothing in him… It is all show and no substance. I am saying the biggest problem in politics is a person who doesn't understand their own power. My biggest complaint from OBC youth is that they don't understand their power… The day you understand it, it will all topple,' said Gandhi. Asad Rehman is with the national bureau of The Indian Express and covers politics and policy focusing on religious minorities in India. A journalist for over eight years, Rehman moved to this role after covering Uttar Pradesh for five years for The Indian Express. During his time in Uttar Pradesh, he covered politics, crime, health, and human rights among other issues. He did extensive ground reports and covered the protests against the new citizenship law during which many were killed in the state. During the Covid pandemic, he did extensive ground reporting on the migration of workers from the metropolitan cities to villages in Uttar Pradesh. He has also covered some landmark litigations, including the Babri Masjid-Ram temple case and the ongoing Gyanvapi-Kashi Vishwanath temple dispute. Prior to that, he worked on The Indian Express national desk for three years where he was a copy editor. Rehman studied at La Martiniere, Lucknow and then went on to do a bachelor's degree in History from Ramjas College, Delhi University. He also has a Masters degree from the AJK Mass Communication Research Centre, Jamia Millia Islamia. ... Read More

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store