Rajnath Vs Rahul On Op Sindoor: 32-Hour Fiery Discussion Begins Today, Will PM Modi Join?
Defence Minister Rajnath Singh will initiate the discussion in the Lok Sabha. The government has officially not committed to PM Modi's speech, but he could join in
Starting Monday, Operation Sindoor will be discussed in Parliament for 32 hours in all. The discussion is expected to be fiery and confrontational, with the Opposition seeking clear answers while the government would look to turn the tables by questioning the nationalism of the Congress, like after the Balakot air strikes in Pakistan in 2019.
Defence Minister Rajnath Singh will initiate the discussion in the Lok Sabha. The Opposition's intent is clear as Rahul Gandhi will open the discussion from the Congress. PM Narendra Modi could intervene in the discussion to speak, which is a key demand of the Opposition, as much as the PM's presence when the opposition speaks.
Interestingly, the government has officially not committed to the PM's speech. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said last week that the Opposition cannot decide if the PM will speak. Rijiju said it was similar to how the government cannot decide who the opposition speakers will be. But given that the discussion is only happening after the PM returned from abroad shows that the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) would want to unleash its biggest weapon on the Opposition as Operation Sindoor is a brainchild of the PM.
But India will be careful to not take matters too far by criticising Trump as the India-US trade deal is nearing completion. Instead, the government ministers could question the nationalism and patriotism of the Congress for trusting the words of a foreign leader rather than of their own Prime Minister. India could also lay bare details how Pakistan has suffered big losses during Op Sindoor.
If the Opposition keeps insisting on knowing losses on I ndian side, it could become a situation like Balakot where the Opposition had asked for evidence and suffered heavily subsequently in the 2019 general elections.
Security failure in Pahalgam
The security failure in Pahalgam will also be a hot issue. The government in earlier discussions with Opposition did admit to security and intelligence lapses on April 22.
J&K LG Manoj Sinha has officially admitted to the lapses and took responsibility for them. S. Jaishankar, Amit Shah, Anurag Thakur and Nishikant Dubey are expected to speak and lead the charge in Parliament. Mallikarjun Kharge and Akhilesh Yadav will be speaking as well, to try to corner the PM.
Support for India after Pahalgam
The government would also impress upon the Opposition during the discussion that almost the entire world stood with India after Pahalgam. From Washington to Tokyo, from Paris to Canberra, countries condemned the cowardly act in one voice — and backed India's fight against terror without hesitation, the government may say.
The United States called the Pahalgam attack as 'heinous" and even designated The Resistance Front — a Lashkar-e-Taiba proxy — as a terrorist organisation, in a major diplomatic win for India. France offered unwavering support. French President Emmanuel Macron condemned the attack strongly, just as he did during Pulwama.
Russia's President Vladmir Putin personally called PM Modi to offer condolences and solidarity. Moscow continues to block anti-India proposals at the UNSC. The UK, along with the G7, declared it 'an attack on peace and humanity".
Even China, despite its usual tightrope walking, expressed 'shock" and 'strong condemnation". Though Beijing did try to balance with diplomatic doublespeak by mentioning Pakistan's 'concerns", it didn't dare repeat Islamabad's propaganda.
top videos
View all
So the UNSC P5 — US, UK, France, Russia, and even China — either fully backed India or stayed neutral. The European Union backed India unequivocally. Japan praised India's restraint and reiterated its Indo-Pacific partnership. Australia, Italy, Germany, Spain, Israel, and Argentina all condemned the attack in strong terms and extended full support. Even countries that often sit on the fence — like Iran, Palestine, and several Arab nations, including Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, and Jordan — offered clear support to India.
This is expected to put Rahul Gandhi in a spot as he has repeatedly questioned that most countries had not come out in open support of India.
tags :
Homework Column news18 specials Rahul Gandhi rajnath singh
view comments
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
July 28, 2025, 07:00 IST
News politics Rajnath Vs Rahul On Op Sindoor: 32-Hour Fiery Discussion Begins Today, Will PM Modi Join?
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
7 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Reconciling the questions about voter-roll integrity
The Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, made serious allegations about the integrity of elections and electoral rolls in the country on Thursday. The Congress has alleged that some prima facie credible discrepancies in electoral rolls in a single assembly segment (Mahadevpura) made a critical difference to overall results in the Lok Sabha constituency of Bangalore Central, which was won by the Bharatiya Janata Party in the 2024 polls. Regions with a contested history of migration such as Assam have had long spells of unrest over electoral discrepancies, which led to controversial moves such as the NRC. (HT Photo) He also charged the Election Commission of India (ECI) — one of the most critical constitutional institutions which safeguards the sanctity of democratic competition and hence peaceful transfer of power — of colluding with the ruling dispensation. What is one to make of these allegations? Three things can be said. This is neither the first nor the last allegation of electoral rigging in India via various forms. These allegations are more likely to be levelled against a hegemonic political party that is difficult to dislodge from power. The Left Front and the Trinamool Congress in pre- and post-2011 West Bengal, Lalu Prasad Yadav's rule in Bihar in the 1990s — which brought the TN-Seshan-led ECI in direct conflict with the Bihar government — the BJP's allegations of rigged EVMs after its defeat in the 2009 elections, and the Congress's string of allegations against the BJP in the post-2019 period are some such instances. In many cases, the parties accused of such rigging eventually lost power, which suggests that even if there were irregularities, it was never strong enough to permanently subvert democratic sentiments. If one were to confine the argument to unscrupulously engineered electoral rolls — which is what Gandhi is alleging now — there is good reason to believe that these were never an epitome of integrity in the past. A data analysis in this newspaper found that the number of registered voters often exceeded the number of adults of voting age in the country (as seen in the census) in many past elections. All this, however, does not mean that Gandhi's allegations should be summarily dismissed. This is because the core of his demand is that ECI be more upfront and cooperative in sharing information about the electoral rolls, and their translation to actual voting, with political parties. While one might have to look carefully at the fine print of laws and rules vis-à-vis the mechanism of ECI sharing information with political parties, in principle, there is nothing wrong in raising such a demand. India has almost one billion voters now, and it is impractical to expect political parties to ascertain the integrity of electoral rolls without resorting to machine-based tools. ECI has to provide machine-readable electoral rolls for this to happen. The longer ECI stonewalls this demand, the more it will hurt its credibility. This brings us to the final point. Even if one were to accept, for the sake of argument, that political actors do try to contaminate electoral rolls to influence results — such allegations go back a long time in India — the question is: Can something be done at a systemic level to prevent this from happening? Regions with a contested history of migration such as Assam have had long spells of unrest over these issues, which in turn led to controversial moves such as the National Register of Citizens. In such instances, allegations about the lack of integrity of electoral rolls triggered mass unrest and often divisive and violent agitations, indicating that there was organic traction, justified or not, in the belief of large-scale vote tampering. Recent allegations about tampering have seen no such mass unrest, which suggests that they might not be as large in scale. Be that as it may, can ECI and the system as a whole do something about making electoral rolls more robust and immune to malfeasance? This is the proverbial elephant in the room. Should we move towards linking electoral rolls to other databases such as Aadhaar, which, theoretically, make it possible to eliminate discrepancies such as multiple entries for the same person or even prevent the same person voting more than once? Many voices driven by privacy concerns have opposed such moves, and there is some merit in their concerns about all this emboldening a larger surveillance State. However, it is also worth asking whether we are only protecting privacy on a de-jure basis while it is being blatantly violated by State and non-State actors colluding with each other to subvert it in a de-facto manner. Another option could be to resort to processes such as electoral-roll additions or deletions requiring mandatory approval of designated representatives of recognised political parties. As will be obvious to the discerning reader, neither of these processes can be deemed foolproof. The choice, as is always the case while making large databases, will be between wrongful inclusion and wrongful exclusion. The Opposition, with its attacks about fake voters, is emphasising wrongful inclusion. But, it is also protesting possible wrongful exclusion by opposing the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, presently ongoing in Bihar. Logically, one cannot minimise one without letting the other increase. In an ideal world, ECI should have been a non-partisan body, making both the ruling party and Opposition realise the inherent tension between the concerns of wrong inclusion and exclusion in electoral rolls. But realpolitik and institutional propriety crossed the Rubicon of this ideal a long time ago, and it is condemned to veer towards the banks of one echo chamber or another. The views expressed are personal.
Hindustan Times
7 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Securing the poll process
Politics in India is a highly competitive and contested space. Elections are its high point. And there are too many held too frequently. This makes the challenge of the Election Commission of India (ECI) difficult and risky. When complaints were raised about electronic voting machines in the past, ECI sought to rebut them by organising public demonstrations of the working of machines and explaining how EVMs are secured during the elections. (AFP) In the past, this constitutional body has conducted itself in an exemplary manner, contributing to the significant deepening of democracy in the country. Its success in holding elections in a diverse polity such as India with minimum fuss and attracting little contestation has influenced many other democracies to learn from its experience. Against this backdrop, Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi's allegation that the institution has compromised its integrity to favour the electoral needs of the BJP marks a contentious moment. Gandhi is alleging that large-scale discrepancy in voter rolls in a single assembly segment influenced the results of the parliamentary constituency of Bangalore South, which the BJP won, in the 2024 Lok Sabha polls. He has accused ECI of being in cahoots with the ruling dispensation and alleged that it stonewalled requests to share machine-readable voter lists. The BJP has described the allegations as motivated. Unnamed spokespeople for ECI have mounted an aggressive pushback, demanding that Gandhi either sign an affidavit backing his allegations or apologise to the nation. But its response has to be more sober and constructive. It has to offer a clear explanation to the charges the LoP has made to guard its institutional reputation and legacy. It must explore the possibility of releasing machine-readable voter lists and further expand its cooperation with political parties in sharing information with electoral rolls, within the bounds of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. There is precedent in this case. When complaints were raised about electronic voting machines in the past, ECI sought to rebut them by organising public demonstrations of the working of machines and explaining how EVMs are secured during the elections. This was an act that showed ECI as a highly responsible institution accountable to voters and willing to engage with its critics. The body secured not only the reputation of EVMs but also its own. Therefore, ECI should consider giving a more reasoned response rather than resorting to technicalities. It's the job of the poll watchdog to ensure that the electoral process is unsullied and remains above the political fray. For example, the ongoing special intensive revision in Bihar was aimed at cleaning up the voter rolls, but the high bar of documentation triggered complaints, prompting the Supreme Court to ask ECI to consider Aadhaar and voter IDs and remind the body that inclusion, rather than exclusion, should be the objective. Such controversies are best avoided. There is a takeaway for the polity — both the government and the Opposition — as well. In India, allegations about compromised voter rolls are unfortunately both old and common and have been raised by parties cutting across the political spectrum. In a country with almost one billion voters, managing the electoral roll will always require some hard choices and balancing between fears of wrongful inclusion and wrongful exclusion of ordinary people. These decisions have to be made carefully and deliberatively, in an atmosphere not influenced by polarised electoral considerations. Unfortunately, that appears to be in short supply in India today.
Indian Express
7 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Rahul doubles down on ‘vote theft' charge, seeks Karnataka govt probe; EC hits back
Keeping his guns trained on the Election Commission (EC) and the BJP over his allegations of 'vote theft', Leader of the Opposition (LoP) in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi on Friday urged the Congress-led Karnataka government to investigate alleged irregularities in the Bangalore Central constituency during the 2024 Lok Sabha elections and initiate action against the culprits behind it. Addressing the Congress's 'Vote Adhikar Rally' at Freedom Park in Bengaluru, Gandhi asked the EC to share the digital voter list of constituencies across India compiled in the last 10 years along with CCTV footage recorded at polling booths in elections during this period. 'Here (in Karnataka), one Lok Sabha seat was stolen. This is a criminal act against the people of the state. The Karnataka government should investigate this and take action,' Gandhi said. He accused the EC of allegedly including 'thousands of fake voters in the list' and said the issue should be investigated to bring out details of the irregularities in Mahadevapura Assembly segment, which falls within the Bangalore Central Lok Sabha seat. Gandhi claimed that 'if the EC doesn't share the electronic voter lists and CCTV footage, they are hiding a crime and are helping the BJP steal elections'. After claiming that he had an 'atom bomb' of evidence showing the EC had allegedly 'stolen votes' for the BJP, Gandhi on Thursday released the findings of a Congress investigation in the Mahadevapura Assembly segment's voting in the 2024 Lok Sabha polls. In a presentation to the media at the All India Congress Committee (AICC) headquarters in Delhi then, he claimed the Congress won other Assembly segments in Bangalore Central Lok Sabha seat 'except Mahadevapura' and lost the election by 1,14,046 votes. 'It is a huge imbalance. So we started looking at Mahadevapura, the details. And we found that 1,00,250 votes were stolen,' the LoP then alleged. He said the Congress's analysis revealed '11,965 duplicate voters, 40,009 fake and invalid addresses, 10,452 bulk voters with the same address, 4,132 invalid photos, and 33,692 instances of Form 6 misuse'. Reiterating at the Bengaluru rally that the EC should share voter data with the Opposition parties in a digital format along with video records, Gandhi said this would prove the Congress's charge that such 'vote irregularities' did not result in just one seat being 'stolen'. 'Not only in Karnataka, seats were stolen across the country. The EC is not of the BJP. The EC works for the Constitution. In Karnataka, we have investigated one seat. But we are sure that more seats were stolen,' he alleged. Such 'irregularities', he added, amounted to attacking the foundational idea of 'one person, one vote' in the Constitution. Gandhi said Prime Minister Narendra Modi became the PM for the third time with the NDA's 293 Lok Sabha seats after the BJP's tally of 240 seats fell short of the 272-seat majority mark. 'We have shown that one seat was stolen. In 25 (Lok Sabha) seats, they have won by a margin of fewer than 35,000 votes. If we get electronic data, we will show that he became PM because of theft,' he alleged. The EC, the LoP said, should give all details sought by Opposition parties as soon as possible. 'The data we collected is evidence of crime. It took six months to analyse it. Entire election data is evidence. And if anyone destroys it, then they are destroying the evidence and continuing the crime,' he said. If the EC refuses to share the data, the Congress will carry out the same exercise in 15 to 20 other seats to expose such 'malpractices', Gandhi said. 'We have paper copies (of voter data). You cannot hide it. One day or another, you will have to face the Opposition. Every officer and the EC should understand this clearly,' he added. Addressing the rally, Congress national president Mallikarjun Kharge also alleged that the BJP-led NDA government was formed due to such 'vote theft'. 'As a result, it has no moral ground or right to continue in power. The Congress is finding out such (electoral) lapses across the country,' he said. Referring to his first election loss in the 2019 Lok Sabha polls, Kharge alleged his defeat to the BJP in Gulbarga was due to 'vote fraud'. 'But we did not realise it then. In five constituencies, bogus voting was done,' he alleged. Rejecting Gandhi's allegations, state BJP president B Y Vijayendra said that the Mahadevapura Assembly segment has always been a bastion of the BJP. Alleging discrepancies in the Chamarajanagar Lok Sabha seat and the Shivajinagar Assembly seat, where minorities are in large numbers, he demanded that the Congress leader 'inspect' what happened in these constituencies. 'Gandhi, who is unable to win the confidence of the people of the country, who is desperately trying to become the PM, is rejected by the people of the country. Unable to tolerate this, he is making such allegations,' Vijayendra said. After the rally, Deputy Chief Minister D K Shivakumar led a Congress delegation to meet the state chief electoral officer (CEO) V Anbukumar to submit a petition, adding that the party will share more information on its investigation in the coming days. 'We know that an election petition cannot be filed now as it is too late. But what is wrong in the system has to be addressed,' said Shivakumar, who is also the state Congress president. Referring to Gandhi's demand for machine readable voter lists, the EC said on X that the Congress's plea for it had been rejected by the Supreme Court in 2019. It added that Gandhi had never 'personally sent a self-signed letter' to the EC and reiterated its position that he should submit claims and objections against specific voters and sign the declaration as per rules. 'Either sign the declaration on issues you have raised in the press conference which you believe is true or else apologise to the nation,' the EC stated. On his part, Gandhi has maintained that he has taken the oath as an MP in Parliament holding the Constitution. The poll body also rejected the allegation that electoral rolls were not available, sharing a link for downloading them. With inputs from Damini Nath
