
3I/Atlas Isn't The First Interstellar Object To Visit Our Solar System
CERRO PACHON, CHILE - JUNE 08: (——EDITORIAL USE ONLY - MANDATORY CREDIT - 'OBSERVATORIO VERA C. ... More RUBIN / HANDOUT' - NO MARKETING NO ADVERTISING CAMPAIGNS - DISTRIBUTED AS A SERVICE TO CLIENTS——) The night sky dazzles above Rubin Observatory in this image in Cerro Pachon, Chile on June 08, 2025. Beginning in late 2025, Rubin Observatory's decade-long Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) will generate an ultra-wide, ultra-high-definition time-lapse record of the Universe at Observatorio Vera C. Rubin, in Cerro Pachon, Chile. (Photo by OBSERVATORIO VERA C. RUBIN/ HANDOUT/Anadolu via Getty Images)
Comet 3I/Atlas appears to hail from somewhere toward the center of the Milky Way (which makes sense, because most of the galaxy is 'toward the middle' from Earth). And according to astronomer Matthew Hopkins and his colleagues, the comet entered our Solar System at a steep angle, which suggests that it came from a region of the galaxy called the 'thick disk.'
Most of the stars, gas, and dust that make up our galaxy orbit around the center in the same plane, a spiral-armed disk about 400 light years deep. But about 10% of the Milky Way's stars (by mass) orbit in the 1000 light years 'above' and 'below' the thin disk, like the stellar bread on a galactic sandwich. The thick disk is home to older stars with simpler chemical makeup than our young Sun, and there's very little interstellar gas or dust drifting between them. In other words, interstellar comet 3I/Atlas didn't just come from an alien star system – it came from a cosmic neighborhood very different, and much older than, our own.
"We think there's a two-thirds chance this comet is older than the Solar System, and that it's been drifting through interstellar space ever since," said astronomer Chris Lintott, a coauthor of the study, in a recent press release.
But though Comet 3I/Atlas may be the oldest interstellar object we've ever seen, it's not the first – it may even be one of thousands.
Interstellar Object 'Oumuamua: A Messenger From Afar, Arriving First
This artist's illustration shows what 'Oumuamua might look like if we had been able to get a closer ... More look.
Interstellar object 1I/'Oumuamua was 21 million miles from Earth and already on its way out of the system when astronomers first spotted it in October 2017. That meant we got just a fleeting glimpse of the long, thin, red-hued chunk of rock as it tumbled into the cosmic distance – just enough to stir up wild speculation about alien space probes, in fact.
After 'Oumuamua swung past the Sun, it accelerated slightly. Astronomers watching the asteroid's progress calculated that the pull of the Sun's gravity couldn't have accounted for that burst of speed.
'Oumuamua moved more like a comet than an asteroid; as comets get closer to the Sun, their icy nucleus starts to evaporate, releasing plumes of gas into space – which in turn give the comet a push that can speed it up or change its course. But 'Oumuamua moved like a comet, it didn't look like one. All that erupting gas and dust usually forms a cloud, or coma, around the comet's nucleus, along with a tail pointing away from the Sun.
Harvard University astrophysicist Avi Loeb proposed that 'Oumuamua was actually a thin solar sail (a sail designed to catch solar radiation instead of wind), which had caught the solar wind and used it to accelerate. Other astronomers pointed out that the idea made no sense, because 'Oumuamua was tumbling as it passed through the Solar System, and a tumbling solar sail wouldn't have been very effective at all.
It turned out that, according to a 2023 study, 'Oumuamua was really a comet all along – just a weird one. As it flew through interstellar space, cosmic rays had broken apart about a third of the water molecules trapped inside 'Oumuamua, creating a lot of loose hydrogen molecules. When 'Oumuamua approached the Sun and started venting gas, the hydrogen was too light to drag any dust along with it as it erupted, so the comet's coma and tail were invisible but could explain the bizarre acceleration.
Interstellar Object Borisov: A Rogue Comet From A Dim Red Star
The Hubble Space Telescope captured this image of Borisov when it was about 260 million miles away.
Another piece of a distant star system, a rogue comet probably born around a red dwarf star, swept through our Solar System in late 2019, streaming a tail of gas and dust 100,000 miles long. (The comet itself, 2I/Borisov, was only about a mile wide when astronomers first spotted it.)
'We reasoned that Borisov is likely a representative of the star system it comes from,' Auburn University astronomer Dennis Bodewits said in a 2020 press release from NASA. In other words, 2I/Borisov's chemical makeup could offer some clues about the alien star it once orbited. The comet contained a surprising amount of carbon monoxide ice (some comets in our Solar System contain carbon monoxide ice, too, but not nearly as much of it), according to data from the Hubble Space Telescope and the National Radio Astronomy Observatory's Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA), Because carbon monoxide needs much colder temperatures to freeze than water does, 2I/Borisov must have formed somewhere very cold: less than −337.04° Fahrenheit.
That could point to the system of planets orbiting a type of small, dim star called a red dwarf. "Red dwarfs are much smaller and dimmer than the Sun, so the planet-forming material around them would be colder than the building blocks of our solar system," explained NASA in its press release at the time. And the odds are in favor of the red dwarf idea, because these dim, cool-burning stars make up about 75% of the stars in our galaxy.
On the other hand, the carbon monoxide ice could also point to someplace like the outskirts of a system like ours; at 3.7 billion miles away from the Sun, dwarf planet Pluto's surface temperature ranges from -375° to -400° Fahrenheit, and there is carbon monoxide ice on its surface. So it's possible that 2I/Borisov is actually a chunk of a dwarf exoplanet – another star's version of Pluto – which got knocked into space by a meteor impact.
Or maybe 2I/Borisov was always just a mile-wide clump of ice and dust that coalesced in the chilly outer reaches of its star system. Either way, something must have boosted the comet to escape velocity, letting it slip the bonds of its star's gravity and travel through interstellar space. In our own Solar System, migrating gas giants probably boosted some of the comets of the Oort Cloud into their long, lopsided orbits, and they may also have kicked an entire planet out into interstellar space. The same process could have flung 2I/Borisov out of its own star system.
Interstellar Object Atlas: The Oldest Comet Ever Seen
This diagram shows Atlas's likely route through our Solar System.
And now, for the third time in less than a decade, another comet from another distant star system is passing through.
Like 2I/Borisov, 3I/Atlas is probably a comet. Telescopes here on Earth can't see 3I/Atlas in much detail yet, but what they can see suggests that it's surrounded by a haze of gas, some of which is streaming outward to form a short tail, which will get larger as the comet gets closer to the Sun. That means 3I/Atlas is probably made of more ice than rock. And if Hopkins and his colleagues are right about its origins, a lot of that ice should be water, rather than other ices like carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, or methane.
'The gases that may be seen in the future as 3I is heated by the Sun will test our model,' said co-author University of Canterbury in New Zealand astronomer Michele Bannister, a co-author of the recent study, in a press release.
Comet 3I/Atlas looks larger than either 1I/'Oumuamua or 2I/Borisov; Atlas is somewhere between 6.2 and 12.4 miles wide, while Borisov was about a mile wide. Cigar-shaped 'Oumuamua, the smallest of the three, was less than 3,000 feet long and less than 500 feet wide.
And Atlas is also 'moving considerably faster than the other two extrasolar objects that we previously discovered,' according to University of Lancashire astronomer Mark Norris in comments to Agence France Presse. 'Oumuamua was zooming along at around 86,000 miles per hour when it passed the Sun, and Borizov whizzed past at 98,000 miles per hour. Meanwhile, astronomers have already clocked Atlas at around 137,000 miles per hour, and it will be moving even faster by the time it passes by the Sun in October 2025.
Interstellar Objects Pass Through More Often Than We Thought
Authorities and scientists attend a simultaneous conference with the United States, after the first ... More images of deep space captured by the Vera Rubin Observatory in Chile were revealed, in Santiago on June 23, 2025. The team behind the long-awaited Vera Rubin Observatory in Chile published their first images on June 23, 2025, revealing breathtaking views of star-forming regions as well as distant galaxies. More than two decades in the making, the giant telescope, funded by the US National Science Foundation and the US Department of Energy is perched at the summit of Cerro Pachon in central Chile, where dark skies and dry air provide ideal conditions for observing the cosmos. (Photo by Rodrigo ARANGUA / AFP) (Photo by RODRIGO ARANGUA/AFP via Getty Images)
So why are astronomers suddenly so many interstellar objects wandering through our Solar System? It's not because we're the hot new travel destination for wandering space rocks, but because new telescopes – like Vera Rubin – make it possible to see smaller, dimmer, and more distant objects. The presence of interstellar objects in our Solar System isn't anything new, but our ability to spot them definitely is.
'Astronomers estimate that an interstellar object similar to 'Oumuamua passes through the inner solar system about once per year, but they are faint and hard to spot and have been missed until now. It is only recently that survey telescopes, such as Pan-STARRS1 [which spotted 'Oumuamua], are powerful enough to have a chance to discover them,' explains NASA on its webpage for 'Oumuamua.
And now that the Vera Rubin Observatory is up and running, astronomers like Norris are optimistic about spotting more interstellar objects passing through the Solar System on their way to (and from) parts unknown: maybe as many as several a year.
Meanwhile, a 2022 study suggested that we may actually have a few million samples of other star systems orbiting our own Sun. If University of Edinburg astronomer and statistician Jorge Peñarrubia is right, our Sun may have trapped a few million passing interstellar objects in the outer reaches of our Solar system. Some of them are stuck permanently, while others may make a couple of laps around the Sun and slingshot off into interstellar space again.
It's a fascinating reminder that our Solar System is part of a wider galaxy – and not as isolated from it as we tend to think.
As John Noonan of the Lunar and Planetary Laboratory at the University of Arizona, Tucson, said in the same 2020 NASA press release,'With an interstellar comet passing through our own solar system, it's like we get a sample of a planet orbiting another star showing up in our own backyard.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UPI
12 hours ago
- UPI
Light pollution is encroaches on observatories around the globe
As human activity spreads out over time, many of the remote areas that host observatories are becoming less remote. Light domes from large urban areas slightly brighten the dark sky at mountaintop observatories up to 200 miles away. Photo by mariya_m/ Pixabay Outdoor lighting for buildings, roads and advertising can help people see in the dark of night, but many astronomers are growing increasingly concerned that these lights could be blinding us to the rest of the universe. An estimate from 2023 showed that the rate of human-produced light is increasing in the night sky by as much as 10% per year. I'm an astronomer who has chaired a standing commission on astronomical site protection for the International Astronomical Union-sponsored working groups studying ground-based light pollution. My work with these groups has centered around the idea that lights from human activities are now affecting astronomical observatories on what used to be distant mountaintops. Hot science in the cold, dark night While orbiting telescopes like the Hubble Space Telescope or the James Webb Space Telescope give researchers a unique view of the cosmos -- particularly because they can see light blocked by the Earth's atmosphere -- ground-based telescopes also continue to drive cutting-edge discovery. Telescopes on the ground capture light with gigantic and precise focusing mirrors that can be 20 to 35 feet wide. Moving all astronomical observations to space to escape light pollution would not be possible, because space missions have a much greater cost and so many large ground-based telescopes are already in operation or under construction. Around the world, there are 17 ground-based telescopes with primary mirrors as big or bigger than Webb's 20-foot mirror, and three more under construction with mirrors planned to span 80 to 130 feet. The newest telescope starting its scientific mission right now, the Vera Rubin Observatory in Chile, has a mirror with a 28-foot diameter and a 3-gigapixel camera. One of its missions is to map the distribution of dark matter in the universe. To do that, it will collect a sample of 2.6 billion galaxies. The typical galaxy in that sample is 100 times fainter than the natural glow in the nighttime air in the Earth's atmosphere, so this Rubin Observatory program depends on near-total natural darkness. Any light scattered at night -- road lighting, building illumination, billboards -- would add glare and noise to the scene, greatly reducing the number of galaxies Rubin can reliably measure in the same time, or greatly increasing the total exposure time required to get the same result. The LED revolution Astronomers care specifically about artificial light in the blue-green range of the electromagnetic spectrum, as that used to be the darkest part of the night sky. A decade ago, the most common outdoor lighting was from sodium vapor discharge lamps. They produced an orange-pink glow, which meant that they put out very little blue and green light. Even observatories relatively close to growing urban areas had skies that were naturally dark in the blue and green part of the spectrum, enabling all kinds of new observations. Then came the solid-state LED lighting revolution. Those lights put out a broad rainbow of color with very high efficiency -- meaning they produce lots of light per watt of electricity. The earliest versions of LEDs put out a large fraction of their energy in the blue and green, but advancing technology now gets the same efficiency with "warmer" lights that have much less blue and green. Nevertheless, the formerly pristine darkness of the night sky now has much more light, particularly in the blue and green, from LEDs in cities and towns, lighting roads, public spaces and advertising. The broad output of color from LEDs affects the whole spectrum, from ultraviolet through deep red. The U.S. Department of Energy commissioned a study in 2019 which predicted that the higher energy efficiency of LEDs would mean that the amount of power used for lights at night would go down, with the amount of light emitted staying roughly the same. But satellites looking down at the Earth reveal that just isn't the case. The amount of light is going steadily up, meaning that cities and businesses were willing to keep their electricity bills about the same as energy efficiency improved, and just get more light. Natural darkness in retreat As human activity spreads out over time, many of the remote areas that host observatories are becoming less remote. Light domes from large urban areas slightly brighten the dark sky at mountaintop observatories up to 200 miles away. When these urban areas are adjacent to an observatory, the addition to the skyglow is much stronger, making detection of the faintest galaxies and stars that much harder. When the Mount Wilson Observatory was constructed in the Angeles National Forest near Pasadena, Calif., in the early 1900s, it was a very dark site, considerably far from the 500,000 people living in Greater Los Angeles. Today, 18.6 million people live in the LA area, and urban sprawl has brought civilization much closer to Mount. Wilson. When Kitt Peak National Observatory was first under construction in the late 1950s, it was far from metro Tucson, Az., with its population of 230,000. Today, that area houses 1 million people, and Kitt Peak faces much more light pollution. Even telescopes in darker, more secluded regions -- like northern Chile or western Texas -- experience light pollution from industrial activities like open-pit mining or oil and gas facilities. The case of the European Southern Observatory An interesting modern challenge is facing the European Southern Observatory, which operates four of the world's largest optical telescopes. Their site in northern Chile is very remote, and it is nominally covered by strict national regulations protecting the dark sky. AES Chile, an energy provider with strong U.S. investor backing, announced a plan in December 2024 for the development of a large industrial plant and transport hub close to the observatory. The plant would produce liquid hydrogen and ammonia for green energy. Even though formally compliant with the national lighting norm, the fully built operation could scatter enough artificial light into the night sky to turn the current observatory's pristine darkness into a state similar to some of the legacy observatories now near large urban areas. This light pollution could mean the facility won't have the same ability to detect and measure the faintest galaxies and stars. Light pollution doesn't only affect observatories. Today, around 80% of the world's population cannot see the Milky Way at night. Some Asian cities are so bright that the eyes of people walking outdoors cannot become visually dark-adapted. In 2009, the International Astronomical Union declared that there is a universal right to starlight. The dark night sky belongs to all people -- its awe-inspiring beauty is something that you don't have to be an astronomer to appreciate. Richard Green is astronomer emeritus at Steward Observatory at the University of Arizona. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. The views and opinions in this commentary ae solely those of the author.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Scientists find temperate planet in nearby system full of rocky worlds
A tiny red star not far from Earth is turning out to be a heavyweight in the search for rocky worlds. Nestled just 35 light-years away in space, the star L 98-59 is home to a tight-knit pack of exoplanets, including one that now appears to orbit at just the right distance to harbor liquid water. Using data from NASA's TESS space telescope and a pair of high-precision instruments in Chile, scientists led by the Université de Montréal have confirmed a fifth planet in the system — and this one is in the so-called habitable zone. The team thinks it could receive as much warmth from its star as Earth does from the sun. And it's not alone. The L 98-59 system already has a reputation for its wide variety of intriguing exoplanets. "With its diversity of rocky worlds and range of planetary compositions, L 98-59 offers a unique laboratory to address some of the field's most pressing questions," said René Doyon, one of the study's researchers, in a statement. "What are super-Earths and sub-Neptunes made of? Do planets form differently around small stars? Can rocky planets around red dwarfs retain atmospheres over time?" Red dwarf stars like L 98-59, sometimes referred to as M-type stars, are the most ubiquitous kind in the Milky Way, yet nobody knows whether planets closely orbiting them can hold onto atmospheres, Néstor Espinoza, a Space Telescope Science Institute researcher, previously told Mashable. Though these host stars aren't as hot as the sun, nearby worlds would be exposed to their extreme stellar radiation. Most astronomers agree that detecting atmospheres in general is crucial in the search for habitable worlds. NASA has playfully called Earth's own atmosphere its "security blanket": Without it, the type of life flourishing here wouldn't exist. This cocoon holds oxygen in the air and filters out harmful ultraviolet radiation from the sun, all while keeping the world warm. Furthermore, it creates pressure that allows liquid water to pool on the surface. Espinoza is a leader in the new massive James Webb Space Telescope study of rocky worlds, specifically to find out if planets around red dwarfs could have air. The campaign, first reported by Mashable, will take a closer look at a dozen nearby-ish planets outside the solar system over the next two years. One of the exoplanets in the L 98-59 system, located in the constellation Volans, has already gotten a first look from Webb. A separate research team revealed that L 98-59 d, a bit larger and heavier than Earth, could have a sulfur-rich atmosphere that reeks of burnt matches and rotten eggs. Agnibha Banerjee, one of the researchers, said the team will need more observations to confirm those findings. "If these findings can be confirmed and turn out to be true, this planet won't be pleasant on human noses," Banerjee previously told Mashable. "Then again, if a human in the far future were to ever visit, the smell would be the least of their problems — in the midst of crushing pressure, boiling temperatures, and toxic gases." The latest discovery by the Montreal team of a fifth planet, known as L 98-59 f — along with insights into its planetary neighbors — will be presented in a new paper accepted for publication in The Astronomical Journal. "These new results paint the most complete picture we've ever had of the fascinating L 98-59 system," said Charles Cadieux, first author of the paper, in a statement. "It's a powerful demonstration of what we can achieve by combining data from space telescopes and high-precision instruments on Earth, and it gives us key targets for future atmospheric studies with the James Webb Space Telescope." To discover the planet, the scientists didn't need new telescope time. Instead, they used cutting-edge techniques to squeeze more juice out of existing data. For instance, L 98-59 f doesn't cross in front of its star from Earth's point of view, making it invisible to planet-hunting cameras. But researchers were able to detect it through subtle wobbles in the star's motion, caused by the tug of the unseen planet's gravity. By combining and reanalyzing records, they also dramatically improved estimates of the other planets' sizes, weights, and orbits. One planet is smaller and lighter than Earth — a rare confirmed "sub-Earth" — while others show signs of being rich in water or heated by internal volcanic activity like Jupiter's moon Io, thanks to gravitational stretching. Many planet hunters haven't been this optimistic about the search for habitable worlds since the tantalizing TRAPPIST-1 system. "With these new results," said coauthor Alexandrine L'Heureux in a statement, "L 98-59 joins the select group of nearby, compact planetary systems that we hope to understand in greater detail over the coming years." Solve the daily Crossword


Forbes
2 days ago
- Forbes
See The Moon Meet Mars As ‘Shooting Stars' Fall: The Night Sky This Week
Venus is shining brightly over the European Southern Observatory's La Silla Observatory in Chile. Each Monday, I pick out North America's celestial highlights for the week ahead (which also apply to mid-northern latitudes in the Northern Hemisphere). Check my main feed for more in-depth articles on stargazing, astronomy, eclipses and more. The Night Sky This Week: July 28-August 3, 2025 July ends, and August begins with a waxing crescent moon that continues its evening journey past Mars and through Leo while the very early hours offer a rising tide of meteor showers. Two minor showers — Delta Aquariids and Alpha Capricornids — reach their peak midweek, delivering a steady stream of shooting stars, especially for southern observers. By week's end, the moon performs one of its closest passes to Antares this year. Here's everything you need to know about stargazing and astronomy this week: Monday, July 28: Moon And Mars Monday, July 28: Moon And Mars About 45 minutes after the sun dips below the horizon, a 19%-illuminated waxing crescent moon will appear in the west just to the left of Mars. The two solar system objects will be separated by only about one degree. Tuesday, July 29: Meteor Showers Peak Two overlapping meteor showers — the Delta Aquariids and the Alpha Capricornids — both reach their peak tonight. The Delta Aquariids may produce up to 20 meteors per hour, while the Alpha Capricornids can add another 5 to 10. As luck would have it, the waxing crescent moon will set relatively early, leaving the sky dark for most of the night. For best viewing, head to a dark location and face generally southeast or south after midnight for the best chance to catch long, lingering Delta Aquariids and bright Alpha Capricornids. Wednesday, July 30: Moon Near Spica Wednesday, July 30: Moon Near Spica Now about 36%-lit, the waxing crescent moon will be positioned just a degree from Spica, the brightest star in Virgo. This blue-white binary star lies about 250 light-years away. Friday, August 1: 'Morning Star' Venus Peaks Look east 45 minutes before sunrise to see Venus at its highest point —about 25 degrees above east — during its current apparition as the 'Morning Star.' It will shine brilliantly at –3.9 magnitude in the outskirts of the constellation Orion, 'The Hunter.' Sunday, August 3: Moon And Antares Sunday, August 3: Moon And Antares From most of North America, the moon will appear to pass incredibly close to Antares, the brightest star in Scorpius. The moon regularly passes close to Antares, Aldebaran, Regulus, and Spica due to their location near the ecliptic, which the moon's orbital path around Earth closely follows and often intersects. The times and dates given apply to mid-northern latitudes. For the most accurate location-specific information, consult online planetariums like Stellarium. Wishing you clear skies and wide eyes.