Godongwana withholds grants from municipalities owing water boards
Image: Phando Jikelo/ Parliament of SA
Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana has informed his Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs counterpart, Velenkosini Hlabisa, that he intends to withhold millions of rand in grants to several municipalities due to their persistent failure to settle billions in debt.
The 39 municipalities are in the Free State, Gauteng, Mpumalanga, Northern Cape, North West, and Limpopo.
According to Godongwana, 18 defaulting municipalities owe the highest amounts to the four water boards facing imminent bankruptcy.
In total, the 18 municipalities owe Vaal Central, Magalies Water, Lepelle Northern Water, and Rand Water nearly R18 billion.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Matjhabeng Local Municipality in the Free State owes Vaal Central over R8.13bn.
Kopanong and Mafube local municipalities, both in the Free State, were R330 million and R253.4m, respectively, in arrears for pension fund contributions.
Rand Water, Vaal Central, Lepelle Northern, and Magalies Water have been advised to enforce their credit control policies to also attach the bank accounts of defaulting municipalities to ensure a change in their behaviour.
Godongwana said pension funds were also owed about R820 million by 18 municipalities, while the Auditor-General South Africa's (AGSA) debt stands at R68.4m across six municipalities.
He told Hlabisa on June 30 that SARS' outstanding debt was R197.5m across eight municipalities.
'This letter serves as a consultative mechanism with you in terms of section 38(2)(c) of the Municipal Finance Management Act (MFMA) with regard to the intention of the National Treasury to invoke section 216(2) of the Constitution by stopping the transfer of the July 7, 2025 tranche of the equitable share and all the grants to be transferred to the 39 municipalities,' stated Godongwana.
The Constitution provides that the National Treasury must enforce compliance with the established measures and may stop the transfer of funds to an organ of state if that organ of state commits a serious or persistent material breach of those measures.
Additionally, the MFMA requires the National Treasury to consult the Cabinet member responsible for the national department making the transfer.
Godongwana cited persistent failure by the 39 municipalities to pay water boards and/or third parties like pension funds, medical aids, SARS, and the AGSA, and/or adopting unfunded budgets for the invocation of the Constitution.
Stringent conditions have been set for each of the municipalities, including forcing them to provide proof that it has fully paid the outstanding amounts owed to the respective water boards, or else the local government's equitable share of that municipality will be stopped and will only be released to the municipality in portions with conditions.
'The conditions describe that the first amount of the withheld equitable share is to be released and strictly used to pay the water boards' current accounts and provide evidence to the National Treasury in the form of a proof of payment.
'Should this condition be met, then the second amount of the equitable share will be released and strictly used to honour any arrears owed in terms of a valid repayment arrangement with the water board and provide evidence to the National Treasury in the form of a proof of payment,' the finance minister warned.
Godongwana said if the conditions are met, then the July 2025 tranche of the equitable share will be released under specified conditions until such time that all outstanding water board debt has been resolved.
The National Treasury has also indicated that if both conditions are not met or municipalities fail to submit the evidence that SARS, pension funds, and other relevant statutory third parties have been paid, it will approach Parliament to endorse that its decision to stop the transfer of all the equitable share due to the municipality over the remainder of the 2025/26 financial year (June 30, 2026) for the municipality's persistent failure.
Godongwana said a similar approach will be followed for the municipalities that persist with unfunded budgets.
'All 39 municipalities will be required to provide evidence that SARS, pension, and other staff benefits deducted from salaries of municipal officials have been paid over to the appropriate institution within the prescribed period,' he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Labour Party's legal bid to halt National Dialogue dismissed by Gauteng High Court
President Cyril Ramaphosa claims the dialogue will develop a national ethos and shared value system to unify a divided country, plagued by economic inequality, high crime, unemployment, and political instability. Image: Itumeleng English / Independent Newspapers The Labour Party of South Africa has failed in its urgent legal bid for an interim interdict to halt the National Dialogue set to commence on August 15. The party turned to the Gauteng High Court, Pretoria, to urgently halt the President's decision to convene a National Dialogue and two related conventions. At the heart of its objections were the costs associated with this. It argued that the National Dialogue is not a genuine democratic exercise, but a costly and dangerous duplication of the national legislature. It argued that the National Dialogue Preparatory Committee estimates that the initiative will cost over R700 million, according to an announcement dated June 12. The government, however, in its argument to court, denied this amount. According to the State respondents, a final budget will only be developed following engagements with the National Treasury and other potential partners. The Labour Party's approach to the court was motivated by constitutional concerns. It questioned what power the President has to establish a National Dialogue. It argued that if its ultimate aim is to ensure public participation, create policy and make binding decisions, this is a duplication of the functions of Parliament. It also questioned whether it would be lawful to attach a R700 million price tag for a part of this endeavour. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading They asked the court to halt the National Dialogue, pending an opportunity to later review the President's decision. Acting Judge I de Vos said the Constitution mandates the President to promote national unity and the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court has repeatedly asserted this process is ongoing and that this duty falls to the President. 'The court is not, based on the text of the Constitution and the jurisprudence from the Constitutional Court, persuaded that the President is acting outside his powers,' she said. The judge added that the court is not persuaded that the applicant has made out a prima facie case on this basis or that it bears strong prospects of success in the review on this ground. 'The court is not empowered to determine if a National Dialogue is the best method for promoting national unity. Or if the same people that have been invited to the table to do the preparatory work are the ones the court would have chosen. Or even if it would rather spend money on a National Dialogue or on health care or some other issue.' Judge de Vos added that the goal of the National Dialogue, which consists of public participation and engagement, is to promote national unity. 'There is a rational link between the National Dialogue, particularly one premised on public participation, and the promotion of national unity,' she said. In turning down the application, she concluded that the Labour Party has failed to meet the threshold to show irrationality in the method employed in announcing the National Dialogue. 'The court is not convinced that the Labour Party has proven a prima facie right in this regard and is doubtful as to its prospects of success at the hearing of the final relief,' she said. As to the money involved, the judge said the court is not empowered to ask whether this is the best use of money. That is the domain of the executive. Cape Times
The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
Rand Water CEO explains why Gauteng is often without water
Rand Water to invest R40 billion in the next five years on water projects. Residents of Gauteng do not go a full month without waking up to dry taps, sometimes due to maintenance, sometimes because they have had a pipe burst. But without fail, some parts of the province will go days without water each month. The issue appears to be persistent, as millions more rands are needed to repair it. CEO of Rand Water, Sipho Mosai, said the issue is not because South Africa does not have enough water, but due to maintenance recovery and other challenges further down the supply chain. ALSO READ: 21-day water disruptions in Joburg from next week Rand Water distribution Rand Water is the largest bulk water utility in Africa, supplying water to Gauteng, parts of the Mpumalanga, Free State, and North West provinces. The water utility is responsible for purifying and distributing large volumes of water, which it then sells to municipalities, who are then expected to handle distribution to households. Addressing attendees at the PSG Think Big webinar on Tuesday, Mosai highlighted that the water utility will be investing at least R40 billion in water projects for the next five years. Water frustrations Mosai added that the rising pressure on the country's water system is due to ageing infrastructure, illegal connections, and poor municipal governance. He said the daily per capita water consumption in the country has increased to 290 litres, raising concerns about sustainability. 'We do not have a bulk water crisis. What we as a bulk utility are putting into the system is way above the world average.' ALSO READ: 'If you don't want to pay more, use less': Parliament debates new water caps for farmers Pressure on infrastructure Mosai said the increase in daily water usage is putting a lot of pressure on infrastructure, and the problem is getting worse because municipalities have not spent enough on maintenance and are losing a lot of water through leaks or other issues. 'The maintenance that we're doing now is exactly that – we are going into our infrastructure to ensure its resilience. And unfortunately, as we do so, we have to take certain systems out.' Recent maintenance outages have triggered public frustration around poor communication and slow service restoration, but Mosai pushed back on suggestions of poor execution. 'All the maintenance schedules were completed on time. The system takes time to recover, and the recovery time varies depending on your location. Low-lying areas normally receive water faster than high-lying areas.' Water quality Mosai also touched on the issue about water quality, stating: 'We supply some of the best drinking water in the world. We compare our water with the World Health Organisation standard and comply with SANS 241, part of our commitment to supply safe drinking water to our consumers. So, if anybody tells you that the water quality from Rand Water is substandard, just take that as misinformation.' He has acknowledged that the root cause of the problem is at the municipal level, not at the water utility. He stated that this has been substantiated by reports, citing national water strategies and the department of Water and Sanitation's blue-drop, no-drop, and green-drop assessments as evidence of deep-rooted issues that fall outside Rand Water's purview. However, the water utility has come up with solutions to some of the challenges. They have established special-purpose vehicles with municipalities to tackle infrastructure failures and non-revenue water, which includes both technical losses and illegal connections. ALSO READ: Burst Sandton pipe repaired, though water woes persists R40 billion investment Speaking on the utility's large-scale capital projects, 'If you look at what we are investing in the next five years, from the bulk point of view, we're talking R40 billion or so.' This includes upgrades to wastewater treatment works and new capacity to meet future demand. 'We're not going to be simply looking at maintenance; we are also looking at building new infrastructure to meet future demands. For example, Station 5 Water Treatment Plant has been instrumental in boosting the overall capacity of Rand Water operations, enabling us to supply an increasing population and provide reliable water services during periods of high-water demand. 'A major milestone in Rand Water's infrastructure renewal and augmentation strategy to ensure a sustainable future water supply to its customers and municipalities across Gauteng.' NOW READ: Giyani Water Project nears completion as additional R3 billion needed
Eyewitness News
7 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Zuma, MK Party to challenge Ramaphosa's decision to place Mchunu on special leave
JOHANNESBURG - A presidential battle will play out in the Constitutional Court on Wednesday morning as the uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party and its leader, former President Jacob Zuma, are set to challenge President Cyril Ramaphosa's recent decision to place Minister of Police Senzo Mchunu on special leave. The MK Party approached the apex court on an urgent basis, wanting Mchunu's suspension, the appointment of an acting minister, and the institution of a judicial commission of inquiry set aside. ALSO READ: Ramaphosa defends decision to appoint Firoz Cachalia as acting police minister Earlier in July, Ramaphosa made the decision based on an explosive media briefing by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. The MK Party will argue that while the Constitution is clear on the president's powers to appoint and fire ministers, there is no provision for placing a member of Cabinet on special leave. They said the only rational reason that Ramaphosa could have decided this for Mchunu is so that he keeps his salary and perks as a minister. But the president argues that while there is no explicit mention of special leave in the supreme law, he has implied ancillary powers. He said he cannot simply fire Mchunu based on untested allegations. Because Zuma and the MK Party are separate applicants in the matter, different lawyers will argue on their behalf before the bench.
