
The quest to make an ice cream that doesn't melt
Few things delight on a summer day like an ice cream cone. Few things cause such despair, however, like the total disintegration of said ice cream, running down one's fingers, sagging from the cone, heading earthwards before you can say "toddler meltdown".
Any number of rhapsodies could be written about the pleasures of something so short-lived, all the sweeter for their brevity. But you would have to go to another story to find them, because here we will not tolerate such masochism.
Reports of Japanese manufacturer Kanazawa Ice's ice pops, and, later on, soft-serve ice cream, withstanding numerous heat-based assaults without melting, went viral some years ago, however. The scientists behind this ice cream had pumped it full of polyphenols, a class of antioxidant molecules found in many fruits. The result was a curious stability, a notable lack of creamy liquid running over fingers. How did it work?
Ice cream is composed primarily of cream and sugar. Machines for producing the stuff churn the sweet slurry in a refrigerated drum, and when it forms a frozen film on the drum's interior, a scraper chips it off. This keeps the ice crystals from growing to a distasteful size, the phenomenon behind the slightly jagged texture of some ice cream when you bring it home from the grocery store.
When ice cream, somewhere in the long trip between factory and your freezer, heats up slightly, melts, and then is refrozen, chunky, unpleasant crystals result.
This is a known problem with taking ice cream from its first freezer into a world full of temperatures greater than zero. Ice cream manufacturers already use a number of stabilisers, such as carrageenan, from seaweed, and guar gum (from guar seeds), to try to keep ice cream from suffering too much from its journeys.
When Cameron Wicks, a food scientist then studying at the University of Wisconsin who now works at food producer General Mills, saw the video of Kanazawa Ice's no-melt ice cream, she wondered how the polyphenols had their stabilising effect. The molecules are known for their potential health-promoting traits, not necessarily their engineering qualities. In the lab, she began to experiment with cream mixtures using higher and higher levels of one particular polyphenol: tannic acid.
In experiments where she mixed cream with 0.75%, 1.5%, and 3% tannic acid, she noticed that almost immediately, the higher concentrations began to thicken. After chilling the mixtures for 24 hours, she took measurements and noted that tannic acid had caused them to gel, so strongly that the 3% mixture could be cut with a knife or turned upside down without falling out of a cup.
Putting the cream under the microscope, Wicks saw that the higher concentrations had more distinct fat globules. The tannic acid, she and her colleagues surmised, was interacting with the proteins in the cream, creating a supportive network or barrier to the merging of the fat globs.
That would explain why ice cream made from such a substance is resistant to melting: the liberated fats from the melted crystals of cream would not be able to run down, thanks to the addition of the polyphenol.
More like this:• Should you avoid dairy when you have a cold?• Why not all comfort food is the same• The explosive potential of custard powder
That said, this chemical trick is not a way to freeze time and break the physical laws of the Universe. It's more like a bra for your ice cream – or a nice, supportive pair of dessert hosiery. As the hours pass, Wicks found in later experiments, ice cream made this way acquires a pudding-like texture, although it will continue more or less in its previous shape. And polyphenols do not, of course, keep the ice cream cold.
Ice cream that does not melt, that instead warms up into a rubbery monolith, is not really what most of us expect from a frozen dessert. Expectation matters more than you think when it comes to food. If you expect vanilla ice cream, and discover upon taking a bite that it is mashed potatoes, it is a profound readjustment.
Perhaps polyphenols will join the ranks of more established stabilisers, helping to keep ice cream more or less at it should be through the travails of long-distance travel. But will high-dose polyphenol desserts, designed to withstand a hair dryer's blast or to hold their shape for hours make their way to an ice cream stand near you? Only time will tell.
--
For more science, technology, environment and health stories from the BBC, follow us on Facebook and Instagram.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Titan sub firm used 'intimidation tactics' and 'critically flawed' safety practices, Coast Guard report finds
Titan 'like working on a high-school project', engineering director sayspublished at 18:40 British Summer Time The former director of engineering at OceanGate has said the engineering team was mostly made up of "young, inexperienced individuals", which led to "significant gaps in capability", according to the US Coast Guard report. He described the Titan as similar to a "high school project". Talking about the team's morale, the former director also told investigators that many employees were unhappy in their roles and "ill-equipped to tackle the complexities of designing a sophisticated deep-sea submersible".


The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Research into Australian skinks' resistance to snake venom could streamline design of antivenoms
Australian skinks have evolved the means to resist snake venom by shutting down their muscles, suggests new research which could help to inform future treatments for snakebites. Research led by the University of Queensland has found that multiple species of Australian skink have evolved venom resistance through changes to a critical muscle receptor. In other animals, the receptor is the target of venom neurotoxins, which cause rapid paralysis and death. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Study co-author Prof Bryan Fry, who leads UQ's adaptive biotoxicology lab, said that when venomous snakes arrived in Australia 25 to 30m years ago from Asia that skinks would have been their prey, resulting in evolutionary pressure to evolve venom resistance. 'What was fascinating was that with the kind of mutations that we documented in the Australian … skinks that gave rise to resistance are the kind of mutations that we've seen in other animals outside Australia,' Fry said. Mongooses, which feed on cobras, are one such example. The researchers showed that the Australian major skink, Bellatorias frerei had the same mutation that gave the honey badger its resistance to cobra venom. The researchers looked at 47 skink species and found that 13 of these were resistant to snake venom. Of these 13 species, some had multiple types of resistance, leading the researchers to discover that the skinks had developed independent mutations conferring resistance on 25 occasions. Fry said the researchers used tissue banks from museums across Australia rather than testing venom on live skinks. Study co-author and UQ researcher Dr Uthpala Chandrasekara said in a statement: 'We used synthetic peptides and receptor models to mimic what happens when venom enters an animal at the molecular level and the data was crystal clear, some of the modified receptors simply didn't respond at all.' 'It's fascinating to think that one tiny change in a protein can mean the difference between life and death when facing a highly venomous predator. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'The more we learn about how venom resistance works in nature, the more tools we have for the design of novel antivenoms.' Dr Andrew Amey, collection manager of amphibians, reptiles and herpetology at Queensland Museum, who was not involved in the research, said that there were more than 470 currently recognised species of Australian skink, with more being discovered all the time – with little known about them. 'It is great to see research looking into how they deal with such an important predator that just might tell us more about how we can manage the effects of snakebite ourselves,' Amey said. The study was published in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences.


The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Great Barrier Reef suffers biggest annual drop in live coral since 1980s after devastating coral bleaching
The Great Barrier Reef has suffered its biggest annual drop in live coral in two out of three areas monitored by scientists since 1986, a new report has revealed. The Australian Institute of Marine Science (Aims) report is the first to comprehensively document the devastating impacts of the early 2024 mass coral bleaching event – the most widespread and severe on record for the Great Barrier Reef. In the months that followed that event, scientists described a 'graveyard of corals' around Lizard Island in the north and a study recorded the death of 40% of corals at One Tree Island in the south. Aims has conducted annual in-water surveys of the world's biggest reef system since 1986, checking the health and extent of corals. Sign up: AU Breaking News email This year's survey report found that in the reef's northern section – between Cooktown and the tip of Cape York – bleaching, two cyclones and associated flooding had caused coral cover to fall by 25%. In the southern section, from Mackay to just north of Bundaberg, coral cover had fallen by 30%. The northern and southern zones suffered the highest annual drops on record. Coral cover fell by 13% in the central section, which had escaped the worst of the heat in 2024. Dr Mike Emslie, who leads the long-term reef monitoring program at Aims, said coral cover was becoming more volatile. 'It has been a pretty sobering year of surveys with the biggest impacts I have seen in the 30-plus years I have been doing this,' he said. 'This volatility is very likely a sign of an unstable system. That's our real concern. We're starting to see record highs in coral cover that quickly get turned around to record falls.' Coral bleaching describes a process whereby the coral animal expels the algae that live in its tissues and give it its colour and much of its nutrients. Without its algae, a coral's white skeleton can be seen through its translucent flesh, giving off a bleached appearance. Mass coral bleaching over large areas, first noticed in the 1980s around the Caribbean, is caused by rising ocean temperatures. Some corals also display fluorescent colours under stress when they release a pigment that filters light. Sunlight also plays a role in triggering bleaching. Corals can survive bleaching if temperatures are not too extreme or prolonged. But extreme marine heatwaves can kill corals outright. Coral bleaching can also have sub-lethal effects, including increased susceptibility to disease and reduced rates of growth and reproduction. Scientists say the gaps between bleaching events are becoming too short to allow reefs to recover. Coral reefs are considered one of the planet's ecosystems most at risk from global heating. Reefs support fisheries that feed hundreds of millions of people, as well as supporting major tourism industries. The world's biggest coral reef system – Australia's Great Barrier Reef – has suffered seven mass bleaching events since 1998, of which five were in the past decade. With relatively benign impacts from cyclones and bleaching in the five years before the 2024 event, coral cover had reached record levels in some places. But that recovery, Emslie said, was largely driven by fast-growing acropora corals that were more susceptible to heat stress. 'We had said it could all get turned around in one year and, low and behold, here we are,' he said, adding that coral cover was now mostly back in line with long-term averages. The 2024 and 2025 events were part of an ongoing global mass coral bleaching event that led to more than 80% of the planet's reefs being hit with enough heat to cause bleaching, affecting corals in at least 82 countries and territories. A study last year found ocean temperatures on the Great Barrier Reef were likely at their hottest for at least 400 years and were an 'existential threat' to the Unesco World Heritage-listed reef. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Widespread mass bleaching of the Great Barrier Reef was first seen in 1998 and happened again in 2002, 2016, 2017, 2020, 2022, 2024 and 2025. Emslie said: 'These impacts we are seeing are serious and substantial and the bleaching events are coming closer and closer together. 'We will ultimately get to a tipping point where coral cover can't bounce back because disturbances come so quickly that there's no time left for recovery. 'We have to mitigate the root causes of the problem and reduce emissions and stabilise temperatures.' The Aims report comes a month before the federal government is due to reveal its emissions reduction target for 2035. The Albanese government promised Unesco last year it would 'set successively more ambitious emissions reduction targets' that would be 'in alignment with efforts to limit global temperature increase to 1.5C'. Last week, the Climate Change Authority, which will advise the government on what target to set, released a report that said holding warming 'as close as possible to 1.5C' was key to addressing the threats facing the reef. Richard Leck, head of oceans at WWF Australia, said the government needed to set a target consistent with 1.5C. 'This is the one action the government can take to give the reef a fighting chance.'