logo
Satwik-Chirag building back their game, one resilient service return at a time

Satwik-Chirag building back their game, one resilient service return at a time

Indian Express24-07-2025
The China Open Super 1000 Round of 16, mirrored the career of Satwiksairaj Rankireddy and Chirag Shetty – a swell start, needing to dig deep and learning to stay calm and battle discomfiting zones along the way.
Playing Leo Rolly Carnando and Bagas Maulana, a juggled Indonesian pairing, Satwik-Chirag were dragged into now what is a familiar flat game – demanding a set of strokes that they have literally had to learn anew, by unlearning their natural repository of aggressive down strokes. It's literally a tilted axis – not many leaping smashes north to south, just a lot of angular whizzings east to west and diagonal.
Crouch, chisel a clever curler, crunch a point. Rinse, repeat. 21-19, 21-19 in 43 minutes for the day, recorded.
Having repeatedly been caught off guard on the literal receiving end of funky spinning, shooting, squirming serves over the last 18 months, the Indians showed glimpses of coming to grips with a weapon the Indonesians and Malaysians have been liberally using against them.
This they have been doing by tweaking their crouching stance, keeping their heads and biding their time while puncturing the fear around the serve. They stub it with some aggression now, and use racquet angles to shake off the fanged poison.
But just like their career the steep inclines invariably follow the smooth sailings. Except now they arent caught unawares having faced literally every calamitous situation in the past year. So even after they had broken away at 16-all to take the opener 21-19, things got ticklingly unfunny in the second.
Chirag told the BWF, 'It was quite topsy turvy, back and forth, we didn't really have a sizeable lead, neither did they. At some point we were leading 2 points. They led by 2. Eventually at 16, we finally had that breakthrough when we got 3-4 points in a row. And we could close out that first game..'
But, for there's always a but.
'But we should have started that second game, a little more safe – nor safer, a little more calmer. We could have restricted them quite a bit. But they played good badminton as well. Service and receiving. But happy we could finally get that game,' he narrated.
The flat, fast game simply needs constant improvisations and endless patience, while never foregoing aggression. But every jazzed up serve dished out, needs to be dealt with. And like Satwik says, needed digging deep. And committing this debugging to muscle memory.
Satwik typically has picked a few tricks himself while trying to find their antidotes. Talking through the second set when they fell behind 10-14, he described the broad contours of resilience, to a point where the drift advantage or dis, barely bothered them. ' 'Nothing, we felt both sides are quite similar. No so much of major difference. But after first game we got a lot of confidence. Like Chirag said, we were a little passive, not so aggressive on receiving. Way too many mistakes which we didn't do in first game. Then they got their rhythm. Then we again had to dig deep and here and there, had to struggle.'
The duo after a series of disappointments have learnt that turnarounds demand patience. 'And overall first game was very confident actually. In second, we stuck together, even when we are down, we knew it was just a matter of one two points. One two good service, that's it.'
While the Malaysians Ong-Teo offer them no respite, and it might be only Malaysians the next two days given the draw, there is incremental, hard earned progress.
They will definitely cross over to play in Macau, a smaller tournament but much needed next week. 'We play Macau,' Chirag informed. 'Each passing day, we are definitely feeling better. Still a long way to go. I won't say we are at our best as yet. We are happy with the way we are playing. Like, we've not played as many tournaments in the past year. That's why we entered Macau.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Shubman Gill, Indian cricket's prince of Wales at Glamorgan: Alan Wilkins recalls Indian captain's county stint
Shubman Gill, Indian cricket's prince of Wales at Glamorgan: Alan Wilkins recalls Indian captain's county stint

Indian Express

time13 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Shubman Gill, Indian cricket's prince of Wales at Glamorgan: Alan Wilkins recalls Indian captain's county stint

Indians know the former English county cricketer Alan Wilkins as the suave and erudite pundit from the early days of cricket broadcasting. What's lesser known is how he played a role in facilitating for the England experience for Shubman Gill that came in handy on this tour. A couple of years back, as president of Glamorgan County, he played a big role in signing up Shubman as their overseas player. It is learnt that Shubman's county mates would give him inputs about playing conditions at various Test venues where India was to play and also help to choose which of his horses he should unbolt at which course. Wilkins, 70, points to Glamorgan's rather lesser-known history with Indian captains. 'Sourav Ganguly, Ravi Shastri, Shubman Gill … three Indian captains have been associated with the county. Ravi Shastri has gone down in folklore, we loved having Sourav, and now Shubman has just been handed the baton,' he tells The Indian Express. Congratulations to former Glamorgan player Shubman Gill on being appointed India's Test captain 🇮🇳 Gill joined Glamorgan in 2022 and scored 244 runs in 3 First-Class matches for the Club, averaging 61 with the bat 👏#OhGlammyGlammy — Glamorgan Cricket 🏆 (@GlamCricket) May 24, 2025 Having watched Indian cricket closely, Wilkins understands the importance of Shubman to India and his place in the pantheon of Indian batting greats. 'I think at times India's batting has looked a little light given that you've taken two huge heavyweights like (Rohit) Sharma and (Virat) Kohli out of the lineup. So you've got Rishabh Pant batting at five, whereas in the halcyon years that I covered Indian cricket, you had VVS Laxman batting at six. So if you have to think about that batting lineup, that was Sachin (Tendulkar), Ganguly, (Rahul) Dravid and Laxman at six. Shubman's runs in this series have come at the right time,' he says. 'But in terms of the transition, I don't know how much better it could have gone, to be honest. I think it's been quite seamless.' Wilkins has fond memories of Shubman at Glamorgan. 'Matthew Maynard, former England player, was the Glamorgan coach when Shubman played. Matthew is a good friend of many years, he told me that Shubman was fantastic in the dressing room. He is very easy-going and has a nice sense of humour. And the Glamorgan boys really enjoyed his company in the dressing room … And I think he enjoyed it too. I saw him a couple of times and he would give thumbs up and a big smile,' he says. Having seen Tendulkar and Kohli's stardom, Wilkins knows what a cricketing superstar has to go through. 'I think the scrutiny is on Shubman now because of the weight of runs that he has scored. He is the main billing. As an Indian cricketer, he stands out from the crowd. Everyone, every camera, every phone is pointing at him. But he is calm, which stands him in good stead. In the mad landscape of modern cricket, there's so much scrutiny, and I think he's weathered the storm of scrutiny.' Wilkins says Glamorgan has its doors open for Shubman, and they would be delighted to welcome him back to Wales.

7,187 runs, Gill's mastery, Rahul's brilliance, Jadeja's grit, but it was Siraj who had the final word
7,187 runs, Gill's mastery, Rahul's brilliance, Jadeja's grit, but it was Siraj who had the final word

Hindustan Times

time13 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

7,187 runs, Gill's mastery, Rahul's brilliance, Jadeja's grit, but it was Siraj who had the final word

Shubman Gill and co. snatched the win from the jaws of defeat at the Oval to level the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy 2-2. It was a tightly contested series where every single Test went to Day 5. While Edgbaston had a clearer outcome, the other four encounters went right down to the wire, with both sides having genuine chances to seal victory. At Old Trafford, England were cruising towards a win at one stage, but Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar's heroic efforts from the bat pushed it to a draw, which frustrated the hosts and eventually helped India draw the series with a win at the Oval. Mohammed Siraj was named Player of the Match at the Oval.(PTI) The series opened with England pulling off a successful chase of 371 at Headingley. India responded emphatically in the second Test at Edgbaston, securing a dominant 336-run win to level the series. England reclaimed the lead at Lord's, going 2-1 up, but tensions began to simmer during the third Test when their time-wasting tactics sparked the first major flashpoint in what became an increasingly heated contest. Old Trafford hosted the fourth Test, where India's remarkable rear-guard action helped them salvage a draw. England, however, were visibly frustrated as India refused to settle for a draw early, adding another layer of drama to the tightly-contested series. Meanwhile, Mohammed Siraj turned the game on its head at The Oval, producing a fiery spell to snatch victory from the brink and ensure the series ended in a thrilling 2-2 draw. The series produced a staggering 7,187 runs in total—the second-highest ever in Test history and the most in any five-match series. India contributed 3,807 of those runs, the most ever by a team in a five-Test series and second overall in all Test history. It started with five centuries scored by Indians - KL Rahul, Yashasvi Jaiswal, Shubman Gill and Rishabh Pant (in both innings) at Leeds —an extraordinary feat. Yet, in a stunning twist, India became the first team in Test history to lose a match despite posting five individual hundreds. In the five Tests, 21 centuries were scored - which equalled the record for most tons in a single Test series. Meanwhile, it was the Indian batters who dominated the scoring charts with 12 centuries to their names, equalling the record for the most by a single team in one series. Three Indian players scored over 500 runs —Gill (754), Rahul (532), and Jadeja (516)—a rare feat achieved by only five other teams in Test cricket. Jadeja etched his name in the history books by becoming the first Indian to amass over 500 runs in a Test series while batting at No. 6 or lower — a feat no other Indian has managed before. Meanwhile, Gill amassed 754 runs in the 2025 Test series against England, which stands as the second-highest total by an Indian batsman in a single Test series. Sunil Gavaskar remains the only Indian to have scored more in a series, with 774 runs during the 1971 tour of the West Indies. In a series largely dominated by batters on friendly pitches, The Oval flipped the script,becoming the stage where bowlers had the final word to decide the series. For England, Gus Atkinson claimed a five-wicket haul in the first innings; meanwhile, for India, Siraj and Krishna decided the fate of the contest and series. Siraj, the leader of the attack at the Oval, picked nine wickets across two innings. The series reached a gripping climax as six wickets fell in the final 15 overs, including a flurry of four during a tense eight-over spell on the last morning. Siraj ended the match by clean bowling Gus Atkinson, marking the 45th time a batter was bowled in the series—the highest in any Test series since 1984, and the most in an England-based series since 1976. The Indian pacer also finished the series with the most wickets - 23.

When India's red-ball squad turn up again they'll be the coolest act in town
When India's red-ball squad turn up again they'll be the coolest act in town

Hindustan Times

time13 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

When India's red-ball squad turn up again they'll be the coolest act in town

When on Sunday night did you think India could level the series against England? Okay, for sure not at tea time but the fall of Harry Brook's wicket, surely? Not because of his extravagant dismissal but what it did to the incoming batsmen. Or rather what India did to them. Over the last two hours of the series, the Indians sighted the opening, then imagined the magic and went about manifesting it. From 301-3, with 73 runs to play for, India pulled not rabbits but an entire menagerie out of their pockets and had it run amok over England's plans. India players acknowledge the crowd following the team's victory in the fifth Test match against England, at The Oval. (PTI) If you were looking for fantastic cricketing beasts and wondering where to find them, the Oval on Monday was it. That 'thankyavermuch' finale brought to a close this showstopper of an India v England Test series of the kind that has not been seen for oh, let's say, as long as some of us can remember. Yes, some of the game's biggest names from both countries have put in heavy shifts and produced exceptional displays over the decades, but 2025 will always be a history-marker in Indian cricket. Its reasons are simple but the ending seals it: A match and a series win was snatched out of England's grasp with India pulling off its narrowest Test victory (by runs). Everything hinged on those last final hours of a series that had gone the distance in every single match. A relatively inexperienced team held their nerve in a high-pressure situation – in Test cricket, an unusual occurrence because after 25 days of gruelling cricket, the bets are on the most seasoned rather than the least to pull through. Had India lost, respectful commiserations would have meant nothing for the team. But to snatch victory when hanging at literally the very end of their rope and leave England with a 2-2 result from a contest where they were always trying to snatch some carelessly ceded territory now means much. It has suddenly widened horizons, provided clarity and optimism in Indian cricket, put much into perspective and like Test cricket does repeatedly, schooled us all once again. Cricketing ones like dot ball upon dot ball creates wickets and big totals appear surmountable but smaller ones can suddenly suck the atmosphere of oxygen and confidence. That sometimes logic can actually be stood on its head by on-field performances. That weird selections around lengthened batting line-ups or a rash of all-rounders cannot be argued against a result in your favour. There is another Test lesson from the series we must accept and absorb. That the Indian game particularly abhors vacuums of any kind – talent, ambition, striving, even stardom (not forgetting power, of course). The bigger the name leaving the Indian game doesn't mean the bigger the vacuum. It only creates more space for someone new to stand up to stand out and make a name for themselves amongst their peers and fans. (Broadcasters/advertisers take a while to sheepishly follow). India's Test team has gone from being an unregarded mix of rookies and strugglers to now a melting pot of possibilities and promise; every apprehension of what appeared doomed about this series for India has been dismissed. Before this series, India's new Test captain's average outside Asia was 27.33 and his only Test scores in England were 17 and 4. Shubman Gill's run-scoring was stratospheric in Gavaskar and Bradman seven hundred-run territory. The workload management of Jasprit Bumrah and the absence of Mohammed Shami retreated into the background, replaced by a spirited leadership of the bowling pack by the ever-effervescent Mohammed Siraj. By the last day, everyone who mattered in the Indian team was there, ever-present, ever-alive. Nothing and no one could be missed because something else and someone had taken their place. What was visible across the board with the Indians in England this summer – be it the stellar names like Rishabh Pant or the newcomers like Akash Deep, the on again, off again Washington Sundar, Prasidh Krishna – was their appetite for a fight. That they have drawn the series having collectively willed victory the Oval will add another layer to that most precious component of cricket teams with a common purpose – bouncebackability. That they can win anything from anywhere by putting mind and body to the task as one. 'We never give up,' Gill said and that's all fans need. This was the first series being played for a new piece of silverware. After some cynical boffins replaced the name of an England-India Series prize from the Pataudi Trophy to the mouthy Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy, which we can now refer to like we do the US telecom company, ATT. To add to the absurdity outside cricket, after the drawn Old Trafford Test, an unnamed BCCI official was quick to tell The Telegraph newspaper that BCCI was contemplating sacking in the team's support staff, particularly bowling coach Morne Morkel and assistant coach Ryan ten Doeschate with chief selector Ajit Agarkar and his colleage SS Das also under some invisible scanner. As of Monday evening, no squeaks or leak from the same quarter. Before the series began, India's white-ball teams appeared secure but its red-ball bunch was causing anxiety. When India's red-ball squad turn up again they will be the coolest act in town. But to extrapolate what the ATT series will do for Test cricket as a whole is an overreach because it involved two of the game's three biggest teams. But there is a possibility that the new generation of Indian post-IPL cricketer who must now fill up the Indian Test team has had chance to look at the game's longest format more closely and be mesmerised, curious. Captain Gill called it the game's most 'rewarding and satisfying format', one where 'you have to work the hardest to be able to get a win'. Then he added the kicker, 'and the best thing about it, it always gives you second chances'. The series against England was his team's first big chance and they embraced it with their big, big hearts.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store