Snowfire AI Emerges from Stealth; Announces Cybersecurity Maverick Greg Genung as CEO and Founder to Redefine Decision Intelligence with Adaptive AI Platform
Genung will guide Snowfire AI's goal to empower global business leaders with cutting-edge AI technology. With over 20 years of experience in cybersecurity and data analytics, Genung is uniquely positioned to lead Snowfire AI. Genung holds patents in cybersecurity and has driven innovation at Deepwatch, Rackspace, Intel471, Praetorian and as the founding employee of the Retail and Hospitality Information Sharing and Analysis Center (RH-ISAC), Genung united the $30 trillion retail industry with unified intelligence following the Target breach.
'Snowfire AI is here to redefine how executives make data-driven decisions and I'm thrilled to lead the charge. We're not just building an AI tool, we are creating a brand new category of AI with our Adaptive Decision Intelligence platform, one that constantly analyzes data and processes information flow. Our aim is to help scale intelligent decisioning with our personalized AI platform that enables executives to make precision decisions across the entire business, in real time,' said Genung.
Snowfire AI will launch its platform later this month, designed to provide global business executives, military and government officials, and venture capital/private equity investors with unified decision intelligence AI insights from complex data sets. The Snowfire AI platform helps industries such as finance, healthcare, retail, high-tech, and manufacturing to deploy and enable cost-effective AI and decision making, harnessing growth, margin, and retention data at scale.
Genung's announcement marks a pivotal moment for the company as it enters the AI space with the bold mission to transform how CEOs, their executive teams, and boardrooms use Adaptive Decision Intelligence to harness data investments and steer strategic direction in the age of AI.
About Snowfire AI
Snowfire AI redefines executive decision-making through its patent-pending Adaptive Decision Intelligence platform. Synthesizing internal intelligence and external information data, it provides real-time, tailored insights at scale to empower data-driven leadership. Snowfire fosters growth, strengthens margins, and enhances retention by harnessing artificial intelligence to optimize operational efficiency, elevate performance, and deliver strategic outcomes. Headquartered in Austin, Texas, Snowfire pioneers the advancement of data-driven leadership in the age of AI. For more information call +1-844-SNO-FIRE or visit https://www.snowfire.ai.
Media Contact
Snowfire AI Press
[email protected]
###
SOURCE: Snowfire AI
Copyright 2025 EZ Newswire
https://app.eznewswire.com/news/snowfire-ai-emerges-from-stealth-announces-cybersecurity-maverick-greg-genung-as-ceo-and-founder-to-redefine-decision-intelligence-with-adaptive-ai-platform
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Retail Earnings Loom: What Can Investors Expect?
Walmart WMT shares have been standout performers this year, handily outperforming not just the broader market indexes and peers like Target TGT but also the likes of Amazon AMZN and many members of the Magnificent 7 group. With the company on deck to report quarterly results on Thursday, August 21st, it will be interesting to see if the stock can maintain its momentum after the results. The chart below shows the year-to-date performance of Walmart shares (green line, up +11.7%) relative to the Mag 7 group (blue line, up +15.6%), the S&P 500 index (red line, up +9.9%), Amazon (orange line, up +5.3%) and Target shares (bottom line in the chart, down -22.8%). We have also added Home Depot (HD) to the chart, as the home improvement retailer is also reporting results on Tuesday, August 19th. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research We should keep in mind, however, that the performance pecking order shifts once the starting point of this chart shifts to April 8th, when the market bottomed following the tariff-induced sell-off. While Target and Home Depot are laggards in the market's rebound from the April 8th lows as well, Walmart lags behind the Mag 7, Amazon, and the S&P 500 index in that time period, as the chart below shows. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Walmart shares' relatively subdued performance in the market's rebound from the April 8 lows reflects the company's low-beta status and defensive orientation. Today's Walmart has a big and growing digital operation, but the company's merchandise continues to be heavily indexed towards groceries and other essential and must-have necessities. This orientation towards essentials, coupled with Walmart's well-earned reputation for low prices, provides the company's results with a high degree of cyclical stability, hence the stock's defensive attributes. We should note, however, that a big contributing factor to Walmart's stock market momentum over the last few years reflects its ability to gain market share among higher-income households. Driving those gains has been a combination of higher-income households trading down to Walmart in response to the effects of inflation and also the ease of using the company's e-commerce abilities. Walmart has consistently reported market share gains across all income categories in recent quarterly releases, particularly in the high-income category. We expect further gains on that front in this quarterly report as well. Results likely benefited from pulled-forward demand in anticipation of tariffs, particularly in specific categories, such as electronics. Growth in e-commerce and steadily lower losses in that business, coupled with gains from third-party fulfillment and advertising, are some of the other areas that will benefit results this quarter. The e-commerce business in the U.S. is now profitable, and management views it as a significant contributor to earnings for the year. E-commerce accounts for an estimated 15% of total ex-gasoline sales at present, which management expects to eventually increase to more than double that level over time. Concerning tariffs, management noted earlier in the year that roughly two-thirds of U.S. sales were from domestically-sourced products, which gave them a degree of insulation from the tariffs issue compared to others. A significant part of this is Walmart's grocery business, which accounts for almost 60% of its sales, unlike Target, where groceries make up a much smaller portion of the revenue mix. Management has reiterated its commitment to maintaining a price advantage over rivals, a function of Walmart's size, the nature of its supplier relationships, and the increasing automation of its logistical operations. Walmart's value orientation and well-executed digital strategy have been key to gaining grocery market share by attracting higher-income households. Management has acknowledged some near-term challenges as a result of the uncertain macroeconomic environment; however, they remain confident of achieving their long-term plans and targets, including sales growth of at least +4% and operating income growth in excess of the sales growth pace. Walmart has consistently exceeded its targets over the last two years, with sales increasing by +5.5% and operating income rising by +9.5%. Walmart is expected to report $0.73 in EPS on $175.51 billion in revenues, representing a year-over-year change of +8.9% and +3.6%, respectively. Estimates have remained stable, although they have increased modestly since the quarter began. In terms of same-store sales, the expectation is of U.S. comps (ex-fuel) of +4.17%, which will compare to a +4.8% gain in the preceding quarter (vs. expectations of +4%) and a +4.3% gain in the year-earlier period (vs. expectations of +3.65%). A positive general merchandise read will also have positive read-throughs for Target. Same-store sales at Target are expected to decline -3.03% when it reports results on Wednesday, August 20th. Target comps declined -3.80% in the preceding quarter (vs. expectations of -1.91%) and the year-earlier period of +2% (vs. expectations of +1.23%). With respect to the Retail sector 2025 Q2 earnings season scorecard, we now have results from 21 of the 32 retailers in the S&P 500 index. Regular readers know that Zacks has a dedicated stand-alone economic sector for the retail space, which is unlike the placement of the space in the Consumer Staples and Consumer Discretionary sectors in the Standard & Poor's standard industry classification. The Zacks Retail sector includes not only Walmart, Target, and other traditional retailers, but also online vendors like Amazon AMZN and restaurant players. The 21 Zacks Retail companies in the S&P 500 index that have reported Q2 results already belong mostly to the ecommerce and restaurant industries, though we have several restaurant companies on deck to report results this week as well. Total Q2 earnings for these 21 retailers that have reported are up +20.5% from the same period last year on +8.7% higher revenues, with 81% beating EPS estimates and an equal proportion beating revenue estimates. The comparison charts below put the Q2 beats percentages for these retailers in a historical context. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research As you can see above, the EPS and revenue beats percentages for these online players and restaurant operators are tracking significantly above the historical averages for this group of companies, with the variance particularly notable on the revenues side. With respect to the elevated earnings growth rate at this stage, we like to show the group's performance with and without Amazon, whose results are among the 21 companies that have reported already. As we know, Amazon's Q2 earnings were up +37.9% on +13.3% higher revenues, as it beat EPS and top- line expectations. As we all know, digital and brick-and-mortar operators have been converging for some time now, with Amazon now a sizable brick-and-mortar operator after acquiring Whole Foods, and Walmart a growing online vendor. As we noted in the context of discussing Walmart's coming results, the retailer is steadily becoming a big advertising player, thanks to its growing digital business. This long-standing trend received a significant boost from the COVID-19 lockdowns. The two comparison charts below show the Q2 earnings and revenue growth relative to other recent periods, both with Amazon's results (left side chart) and without Amazon's numbers (right side chart) Image Source: Zacks Investment Research As you can see above, earnings for the group outside of Amazon are up +2.3% on a +5.3% top-line gain, which represents a notable improvement from what we have seen from this ex-Amazon group in other recent periods. Key Earnings Reports This Week We have more than 100 companies on deck to report results this week, including 15 S&P 500 members. In addition to Walmart, Target, Home Depot, and Lowe's, other notable companies reporting this week include Palo Alto Networks, Toll Brothers, Estee Lauder, and others. The Q2 Earnings Scorecard Through Friday, August 15th, we have seen Q2 results from 462 S&P 500 members or 92.4% of the index's total membership. Total earnings for these 462 index members are up +11.4% from the same period last year on +5.8% revenue gains, with 80.5% of the companies beating EPS estimates and 78.8% beating revenue estimates. The comparison charts below put the Q2 earnings and revenue growth rates for these index members in a historical context. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research The comparison charts below put the Q2 EPS and revenue beats percentages in a historical context. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research As you can see here, the EPS and revenue beats percentages are tracking above historical averages, with the Q2 EPS beats percentage of 80.5% for the companies that have reported already comparing to the average for the same group of 77.6% over the preceding 20-quarter period (5 years). The Q2 revenue beats percentage of 78.8% compares to the 5-year average for this group of index members of 70.5%. Is the Turnaround in Estimates for Real? Looking at Q2 as a whole, combining the actuals from the 462 S&P 500 members with estimates for the still-to-come companies, the expectation is that earnings will be up +12.1% from the same period last year on +6% higher revenues, which would follow the +12.2% earnings growth on +4.6% revenue gains in the preceding period. The chart below shows current earnings and revenue growth expectations for 2025 Q2 in the context of where growth has been over the preceding four quarters and what is currently expected for the following four quarters. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research As you can see above, earnings for the current period (2025 Q3) are expected to be up +4.8% from the same period last year on +5.5% higher revenues. We noted in recent weeks that estimates for the current period have notably firmed up, as you can see in the chart below. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Since the start of the period, estimates have increased for 5 of the 16 Zacks sectors. These include Tech, Finance, Energy, Retail, and Conglomerates. On the negative side, estimates remain under pressure for the remaining 11 sectors, with the biggest pressure at the Medical, Transportation, Basic Materials, Consumer Discretionary, Consumer Staples, and other sectors. The chart below shows how Tech sector earnings estimates for the period have evolved since the quarter got underway. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research The chart below shows the overall earnings picture on a calendar-year basis. Image Source: Zacks Investment ResearchWant the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Inc. (AMZN) : Free Stock Analysis Report Target Corporation (TGT) : Free Stock Analysis Report Walmart Inc. (WMT) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
1 Green Flag for Costco Wholesale Right Now
Key Points Price-sensitive shoppers are more likely to choose Costco over Walmart and Target if tariffs fuel inflation. This thesis is a relative edge, not a super-positive windfall. 10 stocks we like better than Costco Wholesale › Stiff and unpredictable tariffs aren't exactly good news for retail giant Costco Wholesale (NASDAQ: COST), but they could actually help the company in a relative way. Here's why I would call the spiking tariffs a green flag for Costco and its shareholders. Tariffs aren't great for Costco, but even worse for its rivals I don't think you'll see Costco's management tout the tariffs as helpful any time soon. The company's focus on selling high-quality goods at a low price is strictly opposed to rising and unstable item prices. Indeed, management spent a lot of time on the last earnings call discussing Costco's tariff mitigation efforts, but never even suggested that the trade tensions could be a net positive catalyst for the company. At the same time, I see several ways this global trade environment might work to Costco's benefit. You see, this particular type of pressure is best met by some of Costco's strongest qualities: Its scale lets Costco push vendors to absorb more of the cost hit than smaller retailers. With fewer unique items on the store shelves, Costco can reprice and pivot sourcing faster than most. Price-sensitive shoppers will probably choose Costco more often if the recently activated tariffs result in costly inflation. The company's profit margins were always slim, but supported by the lucrative and ultra-predictable membership fees. Imagine shoppers visiting Costco (or its online store) just to compare prices against Walmart (NYSE: WMT) and Target (NYSE: TGT). These curious peeks could very well inspire more membership sales. The popular Kirkland Signature store brand can dodge tariff effects by selecting local production partners or other lower-tariff sources more often. A relative edge for Costco investors So tariffs will add to Costco's expenses and make its operations less predictable for a while. But the same effects will apply to every rival, and often to a greater and more painful degree. It's not a classic competitive advantage, but I see the current tariff trend as a green flag for owning Costco stock in 2025. Should you buy stock in Costco Wholesale right now? Before you buy stock in Costco Wholesale, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Costco Wholesale wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $663,630!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,115,695!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,071% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 Anders Bylund has positions in Walmart. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Costco Wholesale, Target, and Walmart. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 1 Green Flag for Costco Wholesale Right Now was originally published by The Motley Fool
Forbes
11 hours ago
- Forbes
Target Ends Ulta Deal As Shop-In-Shops Face Strategy-Or-Stopgap Moment
A Week That Changed The Shop-In-Shop Narrative Three headlines in rapid succession this month have shifted the conversation around shop-in-shop strategy: the Target x Ulta split, Claire's bankruptcy, and the Best Buy × IKEA launch. Together, they mark a turning point for the model, away from blanket expansion and toward disciplined, results-driven partnerships. It also highlights that shop-in-shops are not a fix for underlying weaknesses but can work when the synergy is Rise Of Shop-In-Shops Retailers have long used shop-in-shop partnerships to boost traffic and broaden assortments, but the format surged between 2020 and 2022. Target, Kohl's, Macy's and others have leaned into in-store boutiques from recognized brands, hoping to spark visits and incremental sales. Early results were promising. Hosting a popular brand often lifted traffic and softened slower periods, leading some analysts to call the format the next evolution of the department store. By 2023, though, results were mixed. Partnerships drove growth in select categories but rarely fixed broader performance issues. Target and Kohl's, despite high-profile collaborations, still faced sluggish sales. The question became whether the trend had peaked. The model wasn't new; Sephora's 2006 debut inside JCPenney proved a lifeline for its beauty business, but its post-pandemic revival was rapid. Kohl's struck deals with Amazon for returns and with Sephora for beauty. Target rolled out Disney and Apple shop-in-shops, plus Levi's in apparel. Lowe's piloted Petco sections. Macy's revived Toys 'R' Us via in-store toy shops. Momentum was fueled by necessity. Retailers emerging from lockdowns needed fresh reasons to get shoppers back in-store. Partnerships offered new categories without having to build internal expertise, and investor reaction was often positive. Early data backed the excitement: Target credited in-store partners with 'pivotal' contributions to 2022 growth, noting that Disney shop locations saw higher traffic. Kohl's reported high-single-digit sales lifts in Sephora locations. These wins drove a rush to replicate the model, until uneven execution and shifting strategies started to reveal its limits. But as the initial excitement faded, retailers discovered that borrowed credibility has its limits. Why Borrowed Brand Power Has A Shelf Life Retailers from JCPenney, Kohl's, and Macy's to Target have leaned on shop-in-shops to boost traffic, with mixed outcomes. Macy's partnership with Toys 'R' Us brought attention to its toy aisles but hasn't halted share erosion. JCPenney's long-running Sephora alliance ultimately unraveled when Sephora shifted to Kohl's, showing how quickly credibility can move with the partner. Sephora at Kohl's saw rapid early growth, generating strong consumer excitement and reaching $1.8 billion in annual sales in 2024. As the partnership expanded nationwide, sales momentum slowed, with comparable beauty sales in Kohl's stores growing just 13% year-over-year in Q4 2024 and net Sephora sales increasing only 6% in Q1 2025. This deceleration marks a shift from the explosive gains seen in the initial rollout to more moderate, mature growth as most stores now offer Sephora. Even well-matched partnerships can stall. Target's recent breakup with Ulta is the latest reminder that shop-in-shops are no cure-all. Ulta continues to grow in its own channels, but the Target tie-up hit limits as store overlap capped expansion and inconsistent execution diluted the prestige experience. Across these examples, one constant emerges: brand adjacency can open doors, but without operational discipline and sustained relevance, the initial lift fades. When More Stores Can't Save A Failing Business Model Claire's bankruptcy shows that a wide shop-in-shop footprint cannot offset deeper structural weaknesses. Despite a presence across Walmart, Kohl's, Macy's, and more, the accessories retailer was already overextended and struggling with slowing mall traffic, higher interest rates, and tariff pressures. Competition from faster-moving rivals like Lovisa added further pressure. The additional floor space improved visibility but did not translate into long-term viability. By the time it filed for bankruptcy, its second in recent history, Claire's faced heavy debt, store closures that could reach 1,100 U.S. locations, and a fading brand proposition. Its trajectory illustrates how the shop-in-shop model can broaden reach but is ineffective without strong underlying brand health and a sustainable business model. The Best Buy x IKEA Formula: When 1+1 Actually Equals 3 Some partnerships start with a clear, mutual value proposition, and Best Buy x IKEA is one of them. Best Buy's strength in appliances and smart home technology pairs naturally with IKEA's kitchen planning and design expertise, offering customers a more complete solution. The in-store format lets shoppers visualize and plan an entire kitchen, then seamlessly add appliances to their purchase. The rollout is intentionally slow and regional, beginning in select markets to test integration and refine the customer experience before scaling. This phased approach allows the partners to fine-tune operations, from cross-trained staff to digital planning tools, and to ensure the merchandising feels seamless between brands. Although it's too early to call the collaboration a success, it stands out for having a built-in rationale for cross-selling and a customer journey that feels cohesive from the outset, qualities many past shop-in-shop ventures have lacked. The Target x Ulta Split: More Than A Target Story It may be tempting to frame the Target x Ulta breakup this month as another casualty of Target's ongoing challenges, the signs were there months ago. Back in April, Ulta had already slowed its rollout within Target, citing uneven returns and operational friction in certain locations. For Ulta, international expansion and new market entries now promise higher growth potential. For Target, the exit clears space to double down on its own beauty strategy, much as it did when it replaced its Barnes & Noble shop-in-shops with its own in-house book department. The breakup isn't just about one retailer's performance, but underscores a key truth: the most resilient partnerships are those that evolve with market and brand strategies. Why Walmart Chose to Build Rather Than Borrow Target's pivot mirrors a move its largest competitor has already made. Walmart bypassed outside beauty partnerships entirely by launching its own 'Beauty Bar' concept, designed to elevate the category from within. The initiative reflects a broader strategy of owning customer experience end-to-end, controlling merchandising, branding, and margin without splitting the category spotlight. While shop-in-shops can create buzz and bring in new customers, Walmart's approach suggests that in-house development may offer more control, consistency, and long-term brand equity, particularly in categories with strong repeat purchase behavior. The Executive's Guide to Partnership Due Diligence For retail executives, the difference between shop-in-shops and shop-in-slops comes down to rigorous due diligence on several critical factors: Shop-in-shops can deliver early traffic lifts, but incremental gains often taper off once the novelty wears off. Saturation of locations, especially in overlapping markets, can limit growth potential. Without regular refreshes, customer engagement can fade quickly. Each partner brings its own growth goals, operational standards, and merchandising strategies. If these diverge over time, as with Ulta shifting focus to international markets while Target faced broader category challenges, the partnership's relevance can erode. The performance of the host retailer heavily influences the outcome. Even if the shop-in-shop brand is thriving elsewhere, weak foot traffic, poor execution, or inconsistent service in the host environment can undermine results. While attaching to a strong brand can temporarily boost credibility, it does not replace the need for a distinctive in-house value proposition. Relying too heavily on an external partner risks weakening the host's own brand equity. Partnerships should be structured with clear off-ramps. Retailers that have successfully transitioned, like Target replacing Barnes & Noble with its own book department, use the experience and category insights gained to build internal capabilities. Aligning supply chains, staff training, and merchandising processes is critical. Poor fit between partners can lead to inconsistent execution, harming both brands. Issues in the Kohl's x Amazon partnership have been heavily covered. Shop-in-shops work best when the categories naturally complement each other, creating cross-selling opportunities (e.g., Best Buy × IKEA) rather than forcing unrelated adjacencies. Partnerships increasingly need to extend beyond physical space. Integrating loyalty programs, digital try-ons, or unified customer data can drive deeper engagement and measurable ROI. The Verdict: Strategy Or Stopgap? The retail industry just witnessed a master class in strategic discipline. The Target x Ulta wind-down shows that even headline partnerships have a shelf life if they cannot adapt. Target announced its Warby Parker collaboration in February, months before publicly ending the Ulta partnership in August. The new partnership will integrate digital booking and try-on tools into a physical retail setting, targeting markets underserved in optical. This collaboration will test whether Target has learned to architect partnerships for longevity rather than repeat the execution issues that plagued the Ulta relationship. Other retailers are taking different approaches entirely. Walmart chose to build rather than buy credibility. Best Buy x IKEA, while promising on paper, remains in its pilot stage and is still a concept to watch rather than a proven win. Meanwhile, Claire's collapsed under the weight of partnerships that looked impressive on paper but couldn't fix fundamental flaws. For retail executives, the message is unmistakable: The era of shop-in-shops as a quick fix is over. What remains are the hard choices that separate strategic partnerships from costly distractions. The winners will be those who treat these ventures like any other major investment with rigorous due diligence, clear success metrics, and the courage to exit when the numbers don't add up. Losers will find themselves trapped in partnerships that drain resources while competitors build proprietary advantages. Because in retail's new reality, borrowed credibility has an expiration date, but strategic discipline never goes out of style. The question every CEO should ask isn't "Should we do a shop-in-shop?" It's "Can we afford not to have this capability in-house?" The companies that answer honestly and act decisively will own their categories while competitors are still shopping for partners.
