Jets' running back retires amid competition for spot on RB depth chart
The Jets have placed Zach Evans on the reserve/retired list.
Evans spent last season on the Jets' practice squad.
The year before, he played in 10 games for the Rams and totaled 19 rushing yards.
The Jets have a lot of RB depth, led by Breece Hall, Braelon Allen and Isaiah Davis.
Evans is 24 years old and played his college ball between TCU and Ole Miss.
He was a sixth-round draft choice by the Rams in 2023.
MORE: Raiders' surprise release of Christian Wilkins involved a kiss
At 5-foot-11, 211 pounds, Evans has always been a sturdy running back.
He starred in his final college season, when he ran for 936 yards and nine touchdowns for Mississippi. He led the SEC with 6.5 yards per carry.
In his college career, Evans averaged an absurd 6.9 yards per touch.
At least for now, though, his football career is over.
Placement on the reserve/retired list means the Jets retain Evans' rights. If he decided to make a comeback at some point, it'd be New York with the first crack at having him on their roster, if they still wanted him.
But that placement, rather than being cut by the Jets, suggests Evans is ready for a new chapter, at least right now.
MORE NFL NEWS:
Micah Parsons risks temporary retirement, frozen contract if he leaves training camp
Steelers' NFL record holder announces his own release
We've all been pronouncing Bijan Robinson's name wrong
Bills' James Cook contract saga doesn't lessen his importance to Super Bowl aspirations
Shedeur Sanders could 'realistically' end up in the CFL
Bengals, Trey Hendrickson in 'big disagreement'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Micah Parsons' dad once named Chiefs, Steelers, Lions as preferred trade destinations
With Micah Parsons officially requesting a trade from the Dallas Cowboys, an old clip of his father, Terrence Parsons, talking about preferred destinations for his son in a hypothetical trade scenario has resurfaced. During an appearance on the "Life in the Stands" podcast in December 2024, Parsons' dad stated that his preferred trade landing spots for the superstar edge rusher are the Kansas City Chiefs, Pittsburgh Steelers, and Detroit Lions. "I know Pittsburgh fans are like, 'whoa,' but I'm sorry, him [Micah Parsons] and [T.J.] Watt together would be like cheating," Terrence Parsons said. "Him and [Aidan] Hutchinson together in Detroit would be like cheating. I love it. Kansas City, that's who they are right now." Parsons requested a trade out of Dallas due to the franchise's lack of communication with his agent. The 26-year-old's relationship with the Cowboys and owner Jerry Jones seems to be completely destroyed. Dallas has no plans of trading Parsons, but if they can't agree on a long-term extension with him, they may be forced to move him at some point. Parsons' father's landing spots for the four-time Pro Bowl edge rusher are bold. Adding Parsons to Kansas City's defense would be lethal, while pairing the disgruntled Cowboy with Watt or Hutchinson in Detroit would also be pretty much unstoppable. However, none of the teams Parsons' dad listed as preferred spots have the money to sign Parsons to a record-breaking extension. The Chiefs are slated to have negative $61 million in cap space next offseason, and the Steelers already have two expensive edge rushers in Watt and Alex Highsmith. As for the Lions, the team must prioritize getting an extension done with Hutchinson first, which likely takes them out of the running for Parsons. It's possible that Parsons lands with one of three destinations his dad spoke about during a podcast appearance last year, as all three franchises are playoff contenders, and two are legitimate Super Bowl contenders in Kansas City and Detroit. However, it remains to be seen whether any have the money to sign Parsons to a new deal after trading valuable picks for him while also keeping their core together. MORE:Infamous Raiders trade used as measuring stick for potential Micah Parsons deal
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
DC Council Gives Initial Approval to Commanders' New Stadium Package
On Friday, the Washington, D.C. City Council voted 9 to 3 in favor of revised legislation in support of a $3.8 billion, mixed-used stadium district, including a new stadium for the Washington Commanders, at the RFK Stadium site. A minimum of eight votes was needed to move the legislation forward. The tally came after two days of public comment and debate between councilmembers, Commanders' leadership and Washington mayor Muriel Bowser. The initial plan, which was introduced in April, would commit $1.1 billion in taxpayer funds towards the stadium's construction as well as the two parking garages that will have 8,000 spots combined. More from Conor McGregor Loses Appeal in Sexual Assault Lawsuit Athletics' Las Vegas Ballpark to Get Food, Funding From Aramark USA Fencing Sees New Academy as Revenue Driver in Post-House World A second vote on the funding will take place on September 17 after Trayon White is sworn in as councilman for Ward 8. That vote will require a minimum of nine votes. 'The era of a crumbling sea of asphalt on the banks of the Anacostia is finally coming to an end,' Mayor Bowser said in a statement released after the vote. In April, Bowser, Commanders owner Josh Harris and NFL commissioner Roger Goodell announced the team's plans to build a 65,000-seat domed stadium on the site of RFK Stadium. The new venue would be the center of a new 180-acre retail, housing and entertainment development in the southeast part of the district. The Commanders have publicly committed to $2.7 billion towards the project, but in the revised agreement, the city council was able to coax some financial concessions out of the team. The franchise agreed to hand the city $260 million in parking revenue from non-stadium event days, $112 million from parking taxes (at a 18% rate) and $54 million in sales tax receipts from merchandise. The team also agreed to give the city 10% of sales taxes from food and beverage on game days, which is estimated to run $248 million over the course of the proposed 30-year stadium lease. One other change from the original agreement seen as benefiting the city is a restructuring of debt financing by not capitalizing interest in fiscal years 2028 and 2029. The district will ideally save $55 million in the process. Finally, the proposed bill will redirect $600 million from the city's sports facility fee to a transportation redevelopment pool that will fund improvements to the Stadium-Armory Metro station at the RFK stadium site. The sports facility fee was originally designated as the 'ballpark fee,' which was created to fund the construction of Nationals Park, the home to MLB's Washington Nationals that opened in 2007. Congress is in control of the district's budget, and in the lead-up to the April announcement, several city councilmembers expressed concerns about funding a new stadium when the federal body mandated $410 million of cuts to the city's budget. Bowser dismissed the budget concerns at the time, saying, 'I call it a fake budget crisis, because we have the money. So if we have to cut services because they don't fix their snafu, that's a problem.' Prior to leaving office in January, President Donald Trump's predecessor Joe Biden approved a transfer of authority for the RFK Stadium site from the federal government to the district. While the likelihood that the bill would be rejected was small, Trump posed a potential roadblock on July 20 when he threatened to hold up the stadium deal if the team did not revert its name back its former moniker. It remains possible Trump will attempt to throw his weight against the team over this gripe. In a post on his social media platform Truth Social, the president said, 'I may put a restriction on them that if they don't change the name back to the original… and get rid of the ridiculous moniker, 'Washington Commanders,' I won't make a deal for them to build a Stadium in Washington.' (Trump simultaneously asked that MLB's Cleveland Guardians revert their name to the 'Indians.') Valued at $6.3 billion, including real estate and corporate sponsorships, the Commanders rank 10th in Sportico's NFL franchise valuations list. Yet, the team's operating profits of $110 million in 2023 rank 22nd while its $80 million ticket revenue only paces ahead of the Tennessee Titans and Arizona Cardinals. The Commanders have played at what is now called Northwest Stadium—formerly FedEx Field—in the Maryland suburbs since 1996. With the team's least at Northwest Stadium set to expire after the 2027 NFL season, the team would need to extend the current deed before the new RFK stadium is set to open in 2030. Best of Tennis Prize Money Tracker: Which Player Has Earned the Most in 2025? Browns Officially Get Public Money for New Stadium in Ohio Budget WNBA Franchise Valuations Ranking List: From Golden State to Atlanta
USA Today
4 minutes ago
- USA Today
Matt LaFleur and Packers coaching staff rated top 10 group but fall in rankings from 2024
The Green Bay Packers' coaching staff has been rated as one of the ten best groups in the NFL ahead of the 2025 season by ESPN's Ben Solak, but curiously, their ranking has fallen since 2024. A year ago at this time, Green Bay's coaching staff, consisting of head coach and offensive play caller Matt LaFleur, offensive coordinator Adam Stenavich and defensive coordinator Jeff Hafley, who was entering his first season as an NFL DC, were ranked eighth in the league. LaFleur was credited for launching Jordan Love's career as a starting quarterback, as well as taking the youngest team in the NFL to the playoffs, with the Packers then becoming the youngest group to win a postseason game since 1970. Despite some caution over Hafley as a first-time DC coming over from the college game, Solak expressed belief the former Boston College head coach could improve Green Bay's defense. For Stenavich's part, a former offensive line coach turned OC, Solak was impressed by the Packers' ability to always field a competent unit even in the face of injuries. Then in 2025, the Packers improved their record from 9-8 the previous year to 11-6 despite playing in arguably the most challenging division in football, Love missing 2.5 games early in the year and playing hurt for plenty of others. Green Bay's ability to find a way to put up points on offense and win games with Malik Willis in the lineup, who was acquired in a trade less than two weeks before the season opener, was remarkable. The defense also improved significantly in Hafley's maiden season as an NFL coordinator, and the Packers return the same core three coaches entering the 2025 campaign. Yet their overall standing among NFL coaching staffs has fallen to tenth in this year's version of the rankings. The Packers did not go as far in 2024 as they did the previous year, beaten by the eventual Super Bowl champion Philadelphia Eagles in the Wild Card round, but looking at the entire season, it is hard to argue they were not a better team on both sides of the ball than in 2023. In Solak's rankings, he admitted LaFleur had 'one of his better seasons' as a coach in 2024, applauding the job he did in designing a workable offense with Willis at the helm to keep the Packers afloat until Jordan Love returned. He was also impressed with Jeff Hafley's creativity and ability to have success in his first season calling plays for an NFL defense. So what was the problem? Why the regression in Green Bay's overall ranking? Solak cited the Packers' reliance on turnovers defensively, which can be volatile year to year, and their ranking in defensive success rate against dropbacks (dead last) as evidence the success the unit had a year ago perhaps not being sustainable going forward. Green Bay had 17 interceptions and 14 forced fumbles a year ago. Whether that should take away from the coaching job Hafley did and how he is regarded, rather than being a point of pride is debatable. Hafley and the defensive coaches have placed an extreme emphasis on forcing more fumbles this season, with the players responding by regularly punching the ball out in training camp practices so far. The Packers' poor record in division (1-5, with the lone win coming in last gasp fashion over the Bears) or more specifically, the combined six losses they had against three playoff teams in the Lions, Vikings and Eagles, was also given as a reason for knocking the coaching staff. Solak said Love was 'flummoxed' when facing quality coordinators, while Hafley's defense was 'exposed'. It is true the Packers often did not look ready to play in the biggest games, starting slow too regularly and digging themselves a hole they could not get out of. Love's injuries cloud almost everything that happened on the offensive side specifically though, with the quarterback admitting this offseason the various ailments impacted him pretty much all year. Hafley's defense was mostly responsible for keeping the Packers in some of those games while the offense tried to find its feet. It is worth remembering that tenth is still a good overall ranking, but perhaps the most surprising aspect of the article was the team ranked one spot above Green Bay: The Las Vegas Raiders. The Raiders were ranked 32nd, dead last, in this exercise a year earlier, and this offseason hired 73-year-old Pete Carroll to be their new head coach as well as Chip Kelly to call plays on offense. Carroll's bona fides are well known, but he has not won 10 games or more as a head coach since the 2020 season and has no playoff wins since the 2019 campaign. Kelly is an intriguing hire which may prove to be inspired, but his last two years working in the NFL with the 2015 Eagles and 2016 49ers did not go well. Las Vegas retained defensive coordinator Patrick Graham, who has a good reputation around the league, but the Raiders defense has ranked no higher than 14th in expected points added in his three years leading the unit. Hafley's Packers were 5th in that statistic in 2024. The other eight teams ranked above the Packers in order of worst to best are the Eagles, Bills, Broncos, Rams, Ravens, 49ers, Chiefs and the Vikings at number one overall. That puts Green Bay's coaching staff eighth among the 14 playoff teams from last year. The Packers will not be losing sleep over their arbitrary ranking, which is still strong, but the decision to drop them two spots, especially given some of the teams placed above them, is certainly an interesting one.
