More autism bills moving through House, Senate panels
The legislation, SB 756, also requires policies sold to large employers (defined as businesses with more than 50 employees) to cover the benefit until the child no longer is covered by the policy. Today, applied behavior analysis and other services meant to habilitate people with autism are only required to be provided until the child is 18.
The bill doesn't alter the annual or lifetime limits of $36,000 and $180,000, respectively.
Senate releases sweeping autism proposal
Senate OKs sweeping autism bill as Capitol focuses on developmental disabilities
The bill revises the definition of the term, 'autism spectrum disorder' to conform with the most recent edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), which identifies a condition characterized by persistent deficits in social communication and interaction and repetitive behaviors. According to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, as of 2020 an estimated one in 36 children aged 8 has autism.
The Senate already has passed legislation aimed at improving access to autism diagnoses and educational opportunities. SB 112 was the first bill to clear the Senate and passed unanimously. It's a top priority for Speaker Ben Albritton and House Speaker Danny Perez.
A House education panel on Tuesday agreed to amend HB 591 to make the bill identical to its Senate counterpart, according to House bill sponsor Rep. Randy Maggard.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
2 minutes ago
- Politico
Judge plans Wednesday ruling on Alina Habba's authority as New Jersey's top prosecutor
But the Trump administration on July 22 fired Grace, with Bondi posting on social media that the department 'does not tolerate rogue judges.' Two days later, Trump withdrew his nomination of Habba as U.S. attorney, and she resigned her position as interim U.S. attorney. She was then appointed first assistant U.S. attorney, allowing her to automatically take on the acting role. Bondi also said she made Habba 'Special Attorney to the Attorney General,' which she said gave her the authority of a U.S. attorney. The Trump administration argues that Habba began the job March 28, which started the 120-day clock, and so the judges did not have a vacancy to fill when they chose Grace to replace her. In court, Trump administration attorneys added some clarity to Habba's start date, noting that her immediate predecessor, John Giordano, had continued signing orders as interim U.S. attorney until March 28 and that Habba's first day of pay was March 29. They characterized Trump's announcement, made in a social media post, as a 'directive' to Pam Bondi to appoint Habba. Brann suggested that maneuver to keep Habba in charge of the office as special attorney would render the law on appointing U.S. attorneys 'pointless' since a person could do the job indefinitely without Senate confirmation. 'Even if you believe [the law] is ambiguous — and I don't think it is — going to the legislative history is a death knell,' Brann said, referring to a Senate report made during the passage of the Federal Vacancies Reform Act in 1998. The distinction between Habba's role as acting U.S. attorney and special attorney is important because the acting position can only serve 120 days, while there's no time limit for a special attorney. Nevertheless, later in the hearing, Brann said, 'It's very likely that Alina Habba is going to end up down the road as the United States attorney of the district of New Jersey.' He did not elaborate on his reasoning. The defendants challenging Habba's authority argued in part that her nomination by Trump made her ineligible to serve in the acting role under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act. 'There is no support for a finding that withdrawal of the nomination would remove someone from the bar,' said Giraud attorney Thomas Mirigliano. But Henry Whitaker, counselor to the attorney general, said the language of the law is written in the present tense. 'At that moment,' he said, referring to the Trump administration's legal maneuvering, 'there was no pending nomination.' 'This is not circumvention,' Whitaker said. 'It is simply a way for the executive branch to have officials temporarily serving the functioning of the office.' The two sides also debated whether the Trump administration could stack 120-day interim appointments. 'It can't be the case ... that the attorney general can terminate an interim appointment on day 119 and then appoint another person?' said Gerry Krovatin, an attorney for Pina. 'That could go on forever.'
Chicago Tribune
31 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
What states are doing in the battle over congressional maps as Texas pursues plan President Donald Trump sought
A partisan move by Texas to redraw its congressional maps in the middle of the decade to secure five more GOP seats in the U.S. House set off a clamor to replicate the effort in statehouses controlled by both parties. So far, though, only California has taken steps toward redistricting. Changing congressional maps in a bid to ensure one party's victory over another — called gerrymandering — has typically been done more furtively. But President Donald Trump's call for Texas to redraw the maps to better ensure that Republicans retain control of the House in the 2026 elections has blown the lid off the practice. Here is a rundown of what states are doing. Democratic lawmakers who left Texas have scuttled a special session on redistricting but appear set to end their standoff after nearly two weeks. The Republican majority adjourned their special session Friday morning in Austin. Gov. Greg Abbott quickly called another, though there still were not enough Democrats present. The minority caucus members have said they would return to Texas provided California Democrats move forward with their own new maps. Past efforts by Democrats to abscond and deny Republicans a quorum similarly only delayed the passage of bills, but didn't quash them. Abbott has said he will keep calling new special sessions, if necessary. State Rep. Jon Rosenthal, a Democrat from Houston, told The Associated Press this week that their protest was about raising awareness. 'They may still pass these maps, but we're going to do everything we can to awaken America,' he said. In response to Texas, Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom announced Thursday that the state will move forward with redrawing congressional maps aimed at putting five more Democrats into the U.S. House. The proposed maps, which are expected to be released Friday, are an attempt to counterbalance Texas' and Trump's plan to add five Republican seats. Newsom has been outspoken about retaliating if Texas's redistricting takes effect, telling Trump this week in a letter that the president was 'playing with fire.' Unlike Texas, however, California has an independent commission that handles redistricting after the census each decade, which is typically when districts are reshaped to account for population shifts. Any changes would first need the approval of state lawmakers and voters. State lawmakers plan to officially declare a special election next week. At Trump's urging and partly in response to California's threats, Missouri's Republican majority is preparing for a special session on congressional redistricting A document obtained by The Associated Press shows the state Senate has received a $46,000 invoice for software licenses and staff training for redistricting. While Republican Gov. Mike Kehoe hasn't officially announced a special session, Republican House Majority Leader Alex Riley told the AP it is 'pretty likely' to happen. Riley added that he has had discussions with White House staff about it. Republicans hold six of Missouri's eight congressional seats. The party could target a Democratic-held district in Kansas City to pick up another seat. In justifying the redistricting, Missouri Republicans accused neighboring Illinois of rigging its maps and pointed to a draft proposal circulating in California. New York, similar to California, has an independent commission that changes the political maps only after every census. But state Democrats introduced legislation to allow mid-decade redistricting. Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul said that if Texas proceeds, 'we must do the same.' But the soonest new maps could be in place would be for the 2028 elections. That is because the proposal would require an amendment to the state constitution, a change that would have to pass the Legislature twice and be approved by voters. While Republicans control the Legislature, Democrats turned to the courts to try to force a redrawing of congressional district boundary lines before the 2026 midterms. Two lawsuits were filed in July after the liberal-controlled Wisconsin Supreme Court — without explanation — previously declined to hear challenges directly. Maryland House Majority Leader David Moon, a Democrat, says he will sponsor legislation to trigger redistricting if Texas or any other state holds redistricting ahead of the census. Republican state House Speaker Daniel Perez said his chamber will take up redistricting this year through a special committee. Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis has told the public to 'stay tuned' and has reiterated his support for the state joining the redistricting fray. A law in Republican-led Ohio requires new political maps before the 2026 midterm elections. The GOP holds 10 of its 15 House seats already and could try to expand that edge. Vice President JD Vance said he spoke with Republican Gov. Mike Braun last week, as the redistricting melee intensified, but both politicians remained mum about the discussions. Braun, who would have to call a special session to draw new maps, has said he expects a 'broad conversation' with legislative leaders on the move's constitutionality and said no commitments have been made. Republicans face more limited possibilities of squeezing out another GOP seat in Indiana. Republican U.S. representatives outnumber Democrats 7-2 in the state already. Republican state Senate President Ty Masterson didn't rule out trying to redraw the state's four congressional districts, one of which is held by the state's sole Democrat House representative. The Legislature's GOP-supermajority could do so early next year, which would put the new lines in place before the June 1 candidate filing deadline.
Axios
31 minutes ago
- Axios
The everything race
Both parties are starting to act like the single most important vote in the 2026 midterms will take place in November of 2025. Why it matters: Republicans and Democrats are both eyeing $100 million campaigns to convince Californians to approve (or block) a mid-cycle redistricting change. 💪 Control of the House is potentially at stake. Gov. Gavin Newsom, brimming with presidential energy, has gone all-in, vowing to use his state as a blue wall against President Trump's mid-cycle meddling. He has promised to reveal proposed maps that would add up to five Democratic seats — and make just as many battleground districts safe territory for Dems. "We anticipate these maps will completely neuter and neutralize what is happening in Texas," Newsom said, referencing the special session where Texas Republicans plan to add five House Republican seats. Zoom in: Democrats have been privately discussing their own $100 million dollar campaign for the ballot initiative, which will require voters to amend the state's constitution, according to people familiar with the matter. Former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy is trying to raise $100 million to oppose the change, Politico reported today. McCarthy will get some muscle from former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who championed nonpartisan redistricting. Arnold posted a pic today where he's wearing a "F*** the politicians. Terminate gerrymander" t-shirt while working out. Between the lines: Democrats privately like their donor pitch better. If Republicans win the ballot initiative, they will save five incumbents — or at least give them a fighting chance in 2026 and beyond. But if Democrats prevail, they can flip those five GOP seats and use Newsom's redistricting wand to protect up to another five seats, currently in Democratic control. That means the party won't have to spend millions to defend those five seats for the next three cycles. The bottom line: California is typically a fount of big dollar donations. This year it will become a sink.
