
Trump's tariffs could squeeze US factories, boost costs by up to 4.5 per cent, new analysis finds
Trump
prepares to announce new tariff increases, the costs of his policies are starting to come into focus for a domestic manufacturing sector that depends on global supply chains, with a new analysis suggesting factory costs could increase by roughly 2 per cent to 4.5 per cent.
"There's going to be a cash squeeze for a lot of these firms," said Chris Bangert-Drowns, the researcher at the
Washington Centre for Equitable Growth
who conducted the analysis.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Please select course:
Select a Course Category
Management
PGDM
Finance
Healthcare
Degree
MBA
Data Science
others
Artificial Intelligence
Public Policy
Operations Management
Data Analytics
Others
Data Science
Project Management
Leadership
Product Management
Cybersecurity
Design Thinking
CXO
Digital Marketing
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
9 Months
IIM Calcutta
CERT-IIMC APSPM India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
11 Months
IIM Kozhikode
CERT-IIMK General Management Programme India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
9 Months
IIM Calcutta
CERT-IIMC APSPM India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Those seemingly small changes at factories with slim profit margins, Bangert-Drowns said, "could lead to stagnation of wages, if not layoffs and closures of plants" if the costs are untenable.
The analysis, released Tuesday, points to the challenges Trump might face in trying to sell his tariffs to the public as a broader political and economic win and not just as evidence his negotiating style gets other nations to back down.
The success of Trump's policies ultimately depends on whether everyday Americans become wealthier and factory towns experience revivals, a goal outside economists say his Republican administration is unlikely to meet with tariffs.
Live Events
Trump has announced new frameworks with the
European Union
, Japan, the Philippines, Indonesia and Britain that would each raise the import taxes charged by the United States. He's prepared to levy tariffs against goods from dozens of other countries starting on Friday in the stated range of 15 per cent to 50 per cent.
The US stock market has shown relief the tariff rates aren't as high as Trump initially threatened in April and hope for a sense of stability going forward. Trump maintains the tariff revenues will whittle down the budget deficit and help whip up domestic factory jobs, all while playing down the risks of higher prices.
"We've wiped out inflation," Trump said last Friday before boarding Marine One while on his way to Scotland.
But there's the possibility of backlash in the form of higher prices and slower growth once tariffs flow more fully through the world economy.
A June survey by the Atlanta Federal Reserve suggested companies would on average pass half of their tariff costs onto US consumers through higher prices.
Labour Department
data shows America lost 14,000 manufacturing jobs after Trump rolled out his April tariffs, putting a lot of pressure as to whether a rebound starts in the June employment report coming out Friday.
With new tariffs in place, there are new costs for factories
The Washington Centre for Equitable Growth analysis shows how Trump's devotion to tariffs carries potential economic and political costs for his agenda. In the swing states of Michigan and Wisconsin, more than 1 in 5 jobs are in the critical sectors of manufacturing, construction, mining and oil drilling and maintenance that have high exposures to his import taxes.
The artificial intelligence sector Trump last week touted as the future of the economy is dependent on imports. More than 20 per cent of the inputs for computer and electronics manufacturing are imported, so the tariffs could ultimately magnify a hefty multitrillion-dollar price tag for building out the technology in the US.
The
White House
argues American businesses will access new markets because of the trade frameworks, saying companies will ultimately benefit as a result.
"The Made in USA' label is set to resume its global dominance under President Trump," White House spokesman Kush Desai said.
Still lots of uncertainty, but world economy faces a new toll
There are limits to the analysis. Trump's tariff rates have been a moving target, and the analysis looks only at additional costs, not how those costs will be absorbed among foreign producers, domestic manufacturers and consumers. Also, the legal basis of the tariffs as an "emergency" act goes before a US appeals court on Thursday.
Treasury
Secretary Scott Bessent said in an interview last week on Fox Business Network's "Kudlow" show countries were essentially accepting the tariffs to maintain access to the US market. "Everyone is willing to pay a toll," he said.
But what Bessent didn't say is US manufacturers are also paying much of that toll.
"We're getting squeezed from all sides," said Justin Johnson, president of
Jordan Manufacturing Co
in Belding, Michigan, northeast of Grand Rapids. His grandfather founded the company in 1949.
The company, which makes parts used by Amazon warehouses, auto companies and aerospace firms, has seen the price of a key raw material - steel coil - rise 5 per cent to 10 per cent this year.
Trump has imposed 50 per cent tariffs on imported steel and aluminum. Jordan Manufacturing doesn't buy foreign steel. But by crippling foreign competition, Trump's tariffs have allowed domestic US steelmakers to hike prices.
Johnson doesn't blame them. "There's no red-blooded capitalist who isn't going to raise his prices'' under those circumstances, he said.
Trump says no inflation from tariffs, but businesses see higher prices
The Trump White House insists inflation is not surfacing in the economy, issuing a report through the Council of Economic Advisers this month saying the price of imported goods fell between December of last year and this past May.
"These findings contradict claims that tariffs or tariff-fears would lead to an acceleration of inflation," the report concludes.
Ernie Tedeschi, director of economics at the Budget Lab at
Yale University
, said that the more accurate measure would be to compare the trends in import prices with themselves in the past and that the CEA's own numbers show "import prices have accelerated in recent months."
The latest estimate from the Budget Lab at Yale is the tariffs would cause the average household to have USD 2,400 less than it would otherwise have.
Keeping the economy on a knife's edge
Josh
Smith
, founder and president of
Montana Knife
Co., called himself a Trump voter but said he sees the tariffs on foreign steel and other goods as threatening his business.
For instance, Smith just ordered a USD 515,000 machine from Germany that grinds his knife blades to a sharp edge. Trump had imposed a 10 per cent tax on products from the EU that is set to rise to 15 per cent under the trade framework he announced Sunday.
So Trump's tax on the machine comes to USD 77,250 - about enough for Smith to hire an entry-level worker.
Smith would happily buy the bevel-grinding machines from an American supplier. But there aren't any.
"There's only two companies in the world that make them, and they're both in Germany," Smith said.
Then there's imported steel, which Trump is taxing at 50 per cent. Until this year, Montana Knife bought the powdered steel it needs from Crucible Industries in Syracuse, New York. But Crucible declared bankruptcy last December, and its assets were purchased by a Swedish firm, Erasteel, which moved production to Sweden.
Smith beat the tariffs by buying a year's worth of the steel in advance. But starting in 2026, the specialty steel he'll be importing from Sweden is set to be hit with a 50 per cent duty.
"The average American is not sitting in the position I am, looking at the numbers I am and making the decisions each day, like, Hey, we cannot hire those extra few people because we might have to pay this tariff on this steel or this tariff on this grinder,'" he said. "I want to buy more equipment and hire more people. That's what I want to do."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
6 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump's tariff may seem severe, but India not worse-off than nations that signed trade deal: GTRI
Despite US President Trump's proposed tariffs on Indian goods, GTRI suggests India isn't worse off than nations that made trade deals with Washington. These countries conceded significantly, while India refused to compromise on key areas like agriculture. India's tariffs are WTO-compliant, and its relationship with Russia has aided in managing inflation. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads US President Donald Trump's announcement to impose a 25 per cent tariff and penalty on Indian goods may seem severe but the country is not in a worse position than nations that signed trade deals with Washington, think tank GTRI said on Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) said the UK, the EU, Japan, Indonesia, and Vietnam now face elevated tariffs, and in return, have given sweeping concessions --zero tariffs on US farm goods, massive investment pledges, and purchases of American oil, gas, and has made no such concessions, it added."While Trump's announcement of a 25 per cent tariff plus penalty on Indian goods appears harsh, a closer look shows that India is not significantly worse off than countries that did sign deals with the US," GTRI Founder Ajay Srivastava added that India did not walk away from the deal and it negotiated in good faith but refused to cross its red lines particularly on agriculture, where over 700 million livelihoods are at justification for India's tariffs, trade barriers, and ties with Russia does not stand up to scrutiny, he said, adding that India's tariffs are WTO-compliant, non-tariff barriers are common globally, and discounted Russian oil has helped India manage inflation during global volatility."India is not alone; over 90 countries face similar US pressure. A deal may still emerge, but only on fair terms. For now, India's principled stand has avoided the trap of a one-sided deal -- and that's a success," he added.


The Hindu
8 minutes ago
- The Hindu
U.S. tariff and penalty on Indian goods disappoint garment and textile exporters
The 25% tariff coupled with penalty announced by the U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday for India has thrown the textile and apparel industry into uncertainty. The Confederation of Indian Textile Industry (CITI) said the new U.S. tariff rate for India presents a stiff challenge as the U.S. is India's largest market for textile and apparel exports. During January-May 2025, U.S. imports of textile and apparel from India were valued at $4.59 billion, a rise of more than 13% compared with the same period last year ( $4.05 billion). The U.S. has imposed a 35% tariff on exports from Bangladesh and 19%, 20%, and 36% respectively for Indonesia, Vietnam, and Cambodia. 'The lack of clarity on the penalty amount adds to the uncertainty for businesses as planning becomes difficult,' said CITI chairman Rakesh Mehra in a press release. According to S.K. Sundararaman, chairman of the Southern India Mills' Association (SIMA), this is not just about relative rates. 'Ultimately the U.S. consumer will pay more price for his goods and will slowly start buying less. The retailers will put pressure on the suppliers, squeezing their margins. The goods ready for shipments will be the worst hit,' he said. Sanjay K. Jain, chairman of the National Expert Committee on Textiles of the Indian Chamber of Commerce, said the industry was expecting 20% duty. While 25% is manageable, the additional penalty that remains undefined is disappointing. Indian textile and garment exports to the U.S. may still see some growth as China and Bangladesh have relatively higher duties, he said. Mithileshwar Thakur, secretary general of AEPC, said the U.S. constitutes 33% of Indian garment exports and its share in the U.S. garment market increased from 4.5% in 2020 to 5.8% in 2024. The imposition of penalty has thrown things into uncertainty and this should be addressed at the earliest. According to Prabhu Dhamodharan, convenor of Indian Texpreneurs Federation, if the 25% duty continues, India will still be competitive - with a 10% edge over Bangladesh and Cambodia, 5% over Sri Lanka, and 20 - 25% over China. 'We believe ongoing negotiations may still alter the tariff structure. India's strong domestic ecosystem of raw materials and intermediates gives global buyers a compelling reason to prefer India,' he said. 'The CITI anticipates the tariff issue to get resolved following the Bilateral Trade Agreement between India and the U.S.,' added Mr. Mehra.


India.com
8 minutes ago
- India.com
Why are US and China fighting to control this country near India, they are trying to find special…
Home News Why are US and China fighting to control this country near India, they are trying to find special… Why are US and China fighting to control this country near India, they are trying to find special… In a massive fight, US and China are trying to control the critical metals of Myanmar essential for manufacturing advanced weapons and electronics. China vs US Amid the global aspiration to control the rare earth minerals of the world, a geopolitical tussle is brewing between the US and China in India's neighbourhood. In the recent tussle between China led by President Xi Jinping and the United States of America led by President Donald Trump, both the power-hungry countries are eying the rare earth minerals of Myanmar, the country which witnessed a military coup a few years back. Why US and China are fighting in Myanmar? Both US and China are trying to control the 17 critical metals that are essential for manufacturing advanced weapons and electronics. However, due to Myanmar's political instability and control of mining regions by ethnic rebel groups like the Kachin Independence Army (KIA), the situation is quite complicated and the battle is expected to be tough. How is US trying to capture Myanmar's resources? As per media reports, the US is considering risky options, such as negotiating directly with the KIA or working through Myanmar's military, despite past sanctions and human rights concerns. Proposals also include reducing tariffs, appointing a special envoy, and acting as a mediator to secure access to the mines. Readers should note that the currently ruling military government of Myanmar is backed by China and experts also warn of serious logistical and political obstacles, especially as China is likely to block any attempt to divert Myanmar's minerals to US or India. China's control over global rare earth minerals According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), China controls 90% of global rare earth processing. Moreover, China is the largest producer and processor of these minerals and America wants to reduce its dependence on China. However, for the US, partnering with Myanmar would be a major shift, given past sanctions over military abuses and Rohingya violence. As per media reports, though some sanctions were recently lifted on Myanmar, officials say US policy remains largely unchanged in its policy on the country. For breaking news and live news updates, like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter and Instagram. Read more on Latest World News on