
Lecturer tried to sue his university for £9million after it painted an enormous mural of a women's football squad near his office
Dr Andrew Kear claimed he was being targeted by a 'smear campaign' by the University of Bournemouth following allegations he had prevented girls from playing football in a local team.
The senior lecturer also believed he was being labelled as a 'misogynist' by other staff over the incident, which took place while he worked at Bournemouth University.
But the university claimed Dr Kear's suggestions were nonsense and asked for his case to be thrown out, describing it as 'ludicrous', 'outlandish', and saying Dr Kear's version of events 'only exist in a world of fantasy'.
A judge has now dismissed his claims and found that there is no reasonable prospect of the lecturer establishing the university were at fault for his allegations.
The tribunal, held in Bristol, heard that Dr Kear was upset at an installation of a large mural near his office depicting a women's football team.
He had become frustrated by the artwork because he felt it was being used as a form of harassment to oust him from his job following previous false claims of misogyny at his former workplace.
Dr Kear started working for Bournemouth University as a senior lecturer in Digital Communications and Media in September 2017.
It was heard he had previously worked at the University of Gloucester, where he claimed 'a campaign against him was hatched'.
Another investigation concluded that he had been the victim of false allegations and a statement said: 'Specifically one of the objects of this campaign was the lodging of false allegations against him with Gloucester FA [Football Association] by the parents of some girls who played in a girl's football team which he coached.
'These allegations included false allegations that he did not think girls should play football, and was a misogynist.'
The recent tribunal heard that the lecturer had previously been the victim of false allegations against him which were lodged with Gloucester FA [Football Association] by the parents of some girls who played in a girl's football team which he coached.
The false allegations included that he did not think girls should play football and that he was a misogynist.
However the judge heard that Dr Kear believed the allegation of misogyny against him had continued to 'be spread and dog him' during his time lecturing at the University of Bournemouth.
He claimed the issue in relation to the girls football team had been 'weaponised as part of smear campaign' against him.
The artists behind the work, Rick Walker of Paintshop, told the Daily Mail that the mural represented Bournemouth University's sponsorship of AFC Bournemouth women's team.
The academic said that during his tenure, his desk was given to a colleague named Libby while he was absent - who shares the name of a girl whose parents he was in dispute with in relation to the football team.
Dr Kear alleged that this was not 'simply coincidental' and argued that the university was instead sending him messages that they were 'aware of the earlier dispute'.
The academic also claimed that he was targeted due to a 'giant mural of girls football' which was displayed on the wall outside of where he was scheduled to teach.
And, he said there were posters of the Burning Man festival on the hallway to his office, which he argued refers to him and sends a message that he is being 'targeted'.
Dr Kear also claimed that a female student he taught was actually an escort who had killed a man and was placed in his class 'in an attempt to lure him into some form of relationship with her'.
The university argued this claim was 'especially preposterous'.
The academic claimed he had suffered a detriment, and the university had been 'generating hate to support harassment and negative treatment'.
He said this was 'mostly from females due to the powerful axiom of Dr Kear being falsely labelled a misogynist and stopping girls play football'.
Dr Kear - who was dismissed in May 2024 - also said there were attempts to murder him while he was driving and kayaking, and said the campaign against him had blighted his son's football career.
He brought claims of sex discrimination, public interest disclosure detriment, and unfair dismissal to a tribunal and hoped to sue for £9.25 million in compensation.
His sex discrimination claim was on the basis that the acts 'would not have happened to a female academic'.
In an application to have the case dismissed, the University of Bournemouth argued that Dr Kear's claims were 'outlandish', 'ludicrous', and 'only exist in a world of fantasy'.
Employment Judge Paul Cadney said both the Burning Man posters and girls football team mural are 'perfectly ordinary features of a university campus'.
EJ Cadney said the claim relating to the academic named Libby was 'ludicrous'.
And, he said the claim relating to the escort was 'clearly fantastical'.
All claims made by Dr Kear were dismissed at a preliminary hearing.
Dismissing his sex discrimination claim in relation to the football club, EJ Cadney said: 'In my judgement there is no legal basis for the claims in respect of these allegations.
'The [university] is liable for the acts of its employees in the course of their employment and/ or its agents.
'Given that it is not alleged that any of those involved were either, and given that they all occurred before [Dr Kear] was employed by the [university], in my judgement there is no reasonable prospect of [Dr Kear] establishing that the [university] bore any responsibility for any of these allegations and they will be dismissed as having no reasonable prospect of success.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
How people in Epping reacted to closure of migrant hotel
Locals in Epping have welcomed an injunction to block asylum seekers from being housed at a nearby hotel, but raised concerns the decision would only 'kick the can down the road'. Epping Forest District Council was granted a temporary High Court injunction on Tuesday blocking asylum seekers from being housed at the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex. Several protests and counter-protests have been held in the town since Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, a then-resident at the hotel, was charged with trying to kiss a teenage girl, which he denies. Following the decision on Tuesday, a crowd of about a dozen people gathered outside the hotel brandishing flags, shouting 'We've won' and popping sparkling wine, while passing traffic honked their horns at them. A few police cars were parked nearby with officers standing outside the hotel, which is fenced in. Other residents gave a mixed reaction to the injunction, with some saying they were glad to 'see it gone'. But others cited concerns about where the asylum seekers currently housed inside the hotel would be moved to in light of the court's decision. Callum Barker, 21, a construction worker who lives next to the hotel, was handing out leaflets at the protest including the names of three men staying at the Bell Hotel who are alleged to have committed criminal offences. He said he was in favour of the injunction. Mr Barker told the PA news agency: 'Our community's in danger and we don't want these people here. 'I'm ecstatic; I haven't stopped smiling. For five years, this hotel's blighted us. Everyone's had their complaints and reservations about it and I'm really glad to see it gone. 'I think nationally there will be more protests; I hope so. We want people to get out into their communities, get rid of these hotels. 'It's not right they're here on taxpayers' dime while British people struggle. 'They get three meals a day and a roof over their head while kids go hungry in school and have to rely on free dinners and I think it's terrible. The asylum system is broken.' In the town centre, Charlotte, 33, a solicitor living in Epping, said: 'I think it's kicking the can down the road because where are they going to go? 'Personally, I have lived here for four years and I've never had an issue, never noticed any problems with any asylum seekers living in the hotel a mile away. 'With the injunction today, I don't know what the long-term solution is going to be because they have to be housed somewhere so what's the alternative? 'I don't partake in (the protests). I think people are allowed to have a right of free speech but what annoys me about them is I'm on community groups on Facebook and it seems if you're not speaking about it you're presumed to be completely for it when I think a lot of people are in the middle. 'There are extremists at these protests every week.' Michael Barnes, 61, a former carpenter from Epping, said he was happy about the High Court's decision. He said: 'The question is, where does it go from here? I don't love them on my doorstep but, in fairness, they've got to live somewhere. 'I don't think it's all of them, it's just the minority of them that get up to no good.' Gary Crump, 63, a self-employed lift consultant living just outside of Epping, said: 'I was quite pleased it's actually happened. 'I don't think they should be housed in the hotels like they are. 'We haven't got the infrastructure here. The doctors' surgery is filled up in the mornings with people from there with translators. Everything is pushing the limits. We're an island. We're full. 'I've got no reason to be against people coming into the UK but I do think that the reasons given are not true in a lot of cases.' Ryan Martin, 39, who runs a natural health business, said: 'It's a good thing. When people spend a lot of money to live in this area, they want to feel safe. 'Them shutting it down probably happened because of the noise that was made about it and the reaction they saw from people because there was a strong reaction. 'It was taking a while to happen but people finally got up to protest against them being here.'


Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Photos show fully-clothed stunt double Devyn LaBella smiling on set as Kevin Costner files to dismiss her lawsuit
has hit back at stuntwoman Devyn LaBella's lawsuit in new court filings containing images that appear to show she was smiling and 'comfortable' on set while rehearsing a 'rape' scene for his Horizon western film series. In a sworn declaration obtained by Daily Mail, the 69-year-old actor-director included behind-the-scenes photos that show the scene involving LaBella was 'carefully blocked' and contained 'no nudity, simulated sex, or simulated rape.' LaBella, who was stunt-doubling for actress Ella Hunt, filed a lawsuit in May claiming she was the victim of a 'violent, unscripted, unscheduled rape scene' directed by Costner, while filming Horizon: An American Saga - Chapter 2 in May 2023. According to her complaint, LaBella was 'told to lie down' while an actor was brought into simulate rape on top of her 'without warning or rehearsal.' She also claimed her undergarments were exposed. But the series of images appear to dispute that account, show LaBella 'in full costume', with bike shorts under an ankle-length dress, lying fully clothed next to actor Roger Ivens in a covered wagon. In his declaration, Costner claims the stuntwoman agreed to block the moment, was never pressured, and 'did not look uncomfortable or in distress. He adds that he had 'no reason to believe that she was upset in any way.' 'In fact, I never heard that Devyn claimed to be upset about anything that happened that day until months after principal photography of the Picture was over when I learned that she had retained an attorney,' the document states. In an amended complaint filed on June 18, LaBella included screenshots of text messages with the film's intimacy coordinator along with detailed descriptions of the painful emotions she allegedly experienced after the scene was completed. That month, Costner's attorney Marty Singer slammed her allegations in a statement to the Daily Mail, accusing LaBella of fabricating her account and insisting there was 'no intimacy or anything sexual' in the scene she filmed. Now, Costner's legal team have filed new court documents - obtained by the Daily Mail - in which they insist that LaBella's complaint be dismissed altogether. They assert that LaBella was happy on set and sent a gushingly grateful text to a supervisor after the shoot wrapped - and they are also offering their own version of what happened during the scene at issue. According to Costner's declaration, the scene was included in the script and saw LaBella 'in full costume' in bike shorts under an ankle-length dress, lying fully dressed next to actor Roger Ivens in a covered wagon. Costner maintains the scene went only as far as having Ivens lift the hem of her dress and swing a leg over her, so that he ended up 'on all fours over her.' His declaration insists: 'There was no nudity, simulated sex, simulated rape, physical contact, fighting, gyrating, or any physicality other than Devyn's outer dress being pushed from her ankles to her knees.' He also states: 'While Devyn's outer dress may have bunched up around her knees (there was a lot of fabric), the dress was still below her waist and the pantaloons and petticoats underneath remained undisturbed.' Per his version of events, the shot was blocked ahead of time with the participation of LaBella, who 'understood what was to happen and consented to help.' Costner - who directed, co-wrote, produced and starred in Horizon - also submitted declarations from other members of the cast and crew contradicting LaBella's story. Moreover, he claimed that after the wrap, LaBella texted a supervisor: 'Thank you for these wonderful weeks! I so appreciate you! I learned so much and thank you again. I'm really happy it worked out the way it did too. Have a great rest of the shoot and yes talk soon!' Costner's new filing comes nearly two months after LaBella and her legal team doubled down on their allegations, accusing Singer, Costner, and the other defendants named in her suit of conspiring to silence and discredit her, as they attempt to bury her 'indisputable evidence.' 'What happened to me on that set was a reckless violation - a breach of consent and of basic workplace safety,' LaBella said in a statement shared with the Daily Mail on June 25. 'I was told to lie down, and without warning or rehearsal, another actor was brought in to simulate a rape on top of me. My undergarments were exposed. I was left alone afterward, overwhelmed and in shock. Compliance under pressure is not consent. Consent cannot be given after the harm has already begun.' LaBella continued: 'Once the line is crossed, there is no real choice left to make. I spoke up immediately. And for that, I was met with silence, deflection, and efforts to discredit me. 'This case is not just about what happened to me. It's about a broken system that protects those in power and punishes those who speak out. It's about demanding change, not just for me but for everyone who deserves to work in safety and dignity. 'What happened on that set was wrong. Let it be known: I stood up. I told the truth. And I will never apologize for demanding the bare minimum - to be treated like a human being at work.' Her attorneys, James A. Vagnini and Kate McFarlane, both shared statements echoing LaBella's claims. Vagnini claims that, contrary to remarks made by Singer, Labella immediately objected to the traumatic incident she experienced on set and that there's strong evidence - such as texts and a report from the intimacy coordinator - that supports her account. '[T]he Defendants failed her in every possible way,' said Vagnini. 'The playbook used by Defendants like this is tired, archaic, and as hollow as their words. 'How many more men who have followed this same pattern of denial and redirection have to be sued or go to jail before they realize that leading with accountability and an apology goes a long way?'


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Driver pleads GUILTY to killing woman, 22, in 140mph horror crash on Christmas Day as he fled police in his Mercedes
A DRIVER has pleaded guilty to the killing of a 22-year-old woman on Christmas Day in a 140mph horror crash. Evan Forde, 32, was driving his Mercedes in Brent Cross, north London, when he crashed into another vehicle at high speed. 2 He then proceeded to flee from the police on foot in the early hours of the morning on December 25, 2022. Brazilian Maria Carolina Do Nascimento was a passenger in the BMW that Forde crashed into. The young woman tragically passed away at the scene. The accident occurred on a 40mph stretch of road in Hendon Way at around 3.45am. Despite the speed limit, Forde had been driving at speeds of more than 140mph. This resulted in Nascimento's tragic death, despite the London Ambulance Service rushing to the scene and desperately trying to save the girl. Shortly before the fatal crash, police officers on patrol in a marked vehicle had indicated for his car to stop. However, the vehicle drove off from police and there was no pursuit, according to Scotland Yard. Moments later, cops were informed that the same car had been involved in a collision. The occupants of the Mercedes did not stop for the police as they proceeded to flee the scene on foot. Moment unsuspecting painter is sent flying through air in terrifying crash after car comes out of nowhere On Tuesday, Forde appeared at the Old Bailey where he pleaded guilty to causing Ms Nascimento's death by dangerous driving. Members of the victim's family wept in court after he admitted the offence. Defence barrister Tasmin Malcolm said Forde had "always accepted" he was driving the Mercedes. She said: 'Undoubtedly the speed Mr Forde was driving will be an aggravating feature to the court. 'It is important we are satisfied of the accuracy of the material relied on by the Crown.' Prosecutor Frederick Hookway observed that small variations of the speeds involved in the case were unlikely to have an impact given the defendant had reached 'top speeds of over 140mph'. Judge Anthony Leonard KC adjourned sentencing until October 22 and granted Forde continued conditional bail. He told him: "You have pleaded guilty to a very serious charge. "There was perhaps no option other than to do so given the state of the evidence. "However, the fact you pleaded at this stage will be taken into account at sentencing. Previously the Metropolitan Police said it had made a referral to the Independent Office for Police Conduct as is routine in such circumstances.