Unravelling claims Biden abandoned NASA astronauts in space for political gain
Musk also alleged, in multiple instances, that his astronautics company, SpaceX, offered to bring the astronauts back but were refused by the Biden administration. During a March 14 news conference, a NASA administrator said he "can't give a lot of clarity" about these purported conversations, but that NASA is a nonpartisan agency that "gets support from whoever's in office."
However, the evidence suggests NASA was working on the Starliner crew's return to Earth as early as August 2024 and delays were due to safety concerns and technical difficulties. In fact, the SpaceX Crew-9, which brought the astronauts home on March 18, 2025, docked at the International Space Station in September 2024, months before Trump entered office and supposedly appointed Musk to oversee the rescue mission.
The original announcement, dated August 2024, said Williams and Wilmore would "continue their work" on the ISS "through February 2025," suggesting it was always the plan for the crew to fly home in early 2025.
While Wilmore said Musk's comments were "factual," he also said he had no information on any politically motivated delays, nor did he see any evidence of that from his perspective, suggesting he had no proof regarding the truth of Musk's statements. In a statement about Wilmore's and Williams' return, NASA's acting administrator, Janet Petro, said: "Per President Trump's direction, NASA and SpaceX worked diligently to pull the schedule a month earlier."
Finally, there is no credible evidence that the Biden administration deliberately left the astronauts in space, nor is there documented proof that Biden turned down an offer from Musk's SpaceX to bring them home earlier.
After astronauts Barry "Butch" Wilmore and Sunita "Suni" Williams finally landed back on Earth in the spring of 2025 — following a nine-month space odyssey that was meant to last little more than a week — rumors continued to spread that former U.S. President Joe Biden had chosen to leave them stranded in orbit and refused help from Elon Musk's SpaceX to bring them home.
The first crewed test flight for the Boeing Starliner spacecraft launched on June 5, 2024, during Biden's administration. Since Trump's second term began in January 2025, he and his adviser Musk repeatedly claimed that after the capsule malfunctioned, Biden abandoned Williams and Wilmore and did not instruct NASA, the federal space agency, to bring them back. Musk also said the former president had declined the tech mogul's offer to retrieve the astronauts earlier.
Social media users on various sites, including Musk's social media platform X and TikTok and Instagram, spread the rumor. In April, weeks after the astronauts returned, one X user responded to an interview Wilmore gave – in which he said he watched church services every week while in space – by writing: "Biden Abandoned the USA Astronauts in Space."
Wilmore's daughter, Daryn Wilmore, broached the subject on TikTok, saying the delay to her dad's return was linked to "a lot of politics" and "negligence," but she couldn't say more because she didn't "know fully" what happened.
Snopes readers wrote in to ask whether posts about these claims were true.
Evidence suggests that — contrary to Trump's and Musk's assertions that they were responsible for finally retrieving the astronauts — NASA was discussing how to facilitate the Starliner crew's return as early as August 2024, and that the SpaceX capsule that brought them back was not only docked at the ISS by September 2024 but scheduled for an early 2025 return. We could find no documented proof to corroborate Musk's claim that he offered to rescue the astronauts earlier.
In lieu of answering detailed questions, a NASA spokesperson, Joshua Finch, sent links to two of the agency's hourlong news conferences. In the first, on March 14, a reporter asked if NASA leadership could give "any clarity" on "claims that the previous administration refused to bring home the Starliner astronauts despite an offer being made." NASA's space operations associate administrator, Kenneth Bowersox, replied that he could not give "a lot of clarity there."
"Those discussions, I wasn't part of, so I can't tell you if they did happen or didn't happen," Bowersox said (see 35:31). "All I can tell you is NASA is an incredible nonpartisan agency. We get support from whoever is in office. Our presidents always care a lot about what happens at NASA, and it's great to see that trend continue with our current president."
Musk, SpaceX and Trump did not immediately return requests for comment. It was not possible to reach Biden; inquiries left with former Vice President Kamala Harris' office were not returned as of this writing.
Here is a rundown of how the astronauts' long-beleaguered stay on the ISS – and the mission to rescue them – developed over the course of two presidencies.
Trump, on his social media platform Truth Social, claimed in a March 17, 2025, post that he brought the astronauts home "long prior to the two week period originally approved by NASA," and that efforts to bring them home began when he asked Musk to "go up and get the abandoned astronauts because the Biden Administration was incapable of doing so." (Trump appeared to be referencing a prior timeline to bring the astronauts home a month later, although it is not entirely clear.)
(Truth Social @realDonaldTrump)
It was the latest in a string of claims from him (see 44:31) and Musk that they had "taken on the project" of bringing Williams and Wilmore home.
Musk has repeatedly claimed SpaceX offered to bring the astronauts back under the Biden administration — but was rejected for "political reasons" because they didn't want to make him, as a Trump supporter, "look good." For example, see his Feb. 20, 2025, comments at the Conservative Political Action Conference (see 26:13) and his Feb. 28 comments on The Joe Rogan Experience podcast (see 1:23:34).
Musk even got into a spat on Feb. 20 with a Danish astronaut, Andreas Mogensen, about this claim after Mogensen accused Musk of lying during a Feb. 19 Fox News interview, in which Musk and Trump both claim the astronauts were left in space by Biden (see 14:53).
In response to Morgensen, Musk said "SpaceX could have brought them back several months ago. I OFFERED THIS DIRECTLY to the Biden administration and they refused. Return WAS pushed back for political reasons."
Despite Trump's and Musk's claims that they were responsible for setting a rescue plan in motion, documentation from NASA reveals that the plan to get Williams and Wilmore home had been in discussion as early as August 2024.
Starliner's technical problems began before its liftoff from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida, but it was the issues it encountered before even docking at the ISS on June 6 that forced Williams and Wilmore to stay at the ISS. At first, NASA announced a steady stream of delays to the Starliner crew's return via teleconferences and news releases. The space agency cited the need to review technical issues, avoid other preplanned ISS spacewalks, or conduct additional testing (see 4:59).
By Aug. 7, NASA officials acknowledged in a news conference that the Starliner crew may need to come home on a different spacecraft and discussed leaving two empty seats on the upcoming launch of the Dragon spacecraft – which was built by SpaceX and assigned to NASA's Crew-9 mission. Bowersox, NASA's space operations administrator, said (see 7:47):
Our decision-making process at NASA can run really fast or it can take a while. What you find is that the speed of the decision can vary with the clarity of the information you're working with, the amount of uncertainty in the problem, the time that you have available, and the number of options that you have to deal with issues. If you talk Starliner in particular, we're in a – kind of a new situation here in that we've got multiple options. We don't just have to bring a crew back on Starliner, for example, we could bring them back on another vehicle.
On Aug. 24, NASA announced Boeing's Starliner would return to Earth without Williams and Wilmore, and that the two astronauts would instead fly home aboard the SpaceX Dragon Crew-9 capsule. "The decision to keep Butch and Suni aboard the International Space Station and bring Boeing's Starliner home uncrewed is the result of our commitment to safety: our core value and our North Star," said then-NASA administrator Bill Nelson.
The SpaceX Crew-9 tasked with bringing Williams and Wilmore home docked at the ISS on Sept. 29, 2024 – months before Trump supposedly entrusted Musk with the rescue mission. It was stated in the original announcement that Williams and Wilmore would stay at the ISS to "continue their work formally as part of the Expedition 71/72 crew through February 2025," suggesting that it was a long-standing plan for the Starliner crew to fly back home in early 2025. (NASA took advantage of the extended time in space, asking astronauts to complete various experiments and research, including on stem cell technology, lighting systems and sleep rhythms.) Indeed, NASA's descriptions of Expedition 71 and Expedition 72 show that they were planned to run consecutively, the first from April 5, 2024, until Sept. 23, 2024, and the second from Sept. 23, 2024, until "Spring 2025."
"If I step back to last year, this has been nine months in the making," said Steve Stich, NASA's commercial crew program manager, during a March 18 news conference on the astronauts' return (see 8:30).
In a series of interviews from space, Wiliams and Wilmore addressed the rumors about their situation. In February 2025, CNN news anchor Anderson Cooper asked them if — as Trump had asserted — they had been "abandoned" by Biden (see 03:34, or archived here). Wilmore responded:
We don't feel abandoned, we don't feel stuck, we don't feel stranded. I understand why others may think that. We come prepared, we come committed [...] So, if you'll help us change the rhetoric, help us change the narrative, let's change it to prepared and committed.
A little more than two weeks before their flight home, Williams and Wilmore held an "in-orbit" news conference in which they fielded questions as to whether it was true Musk had offered to bring them back earlier. Wilmore said, "From my standpoint, politics is not playing into this at all" in response to a question about the timing of his return. When a Washington Post reporter asked again whether it was true Musk offered an earlier return, Wilmore appeared to contradict himself:
I can only say that Mr. Musk, what he says is absolutely factual. I have no – we have no information on that though, whatsoever. What was offered, what was not offered, who it was offered to, how [those] processes went — that's information that we simply don't have. So I believe him, I don't know all those details and I don't think any of us can really give you the answer that maybe you would be hoping for.
His comments suggest that he had no official proof that Musk had offered to bring them home earlier, or that Biden had refused that offer for any reason. A reporter for The Times of London alluded to some of these unfounded claims in NASA's March 18 news conference, asking why the organization had not "pushed back more emphatically" against a "fictitious narrative" surrounding the mission and "against the use of astronauts by one of its commercial contractors as political pawns."
"Oftentimes, there may be things out in the press that may not be exactly what's happening," replied Joel Montalbano, a deputy associate administrator at NASA (see 51:47). "Our job is to fly these missions, and regardless of what you read in the press, our job is to fly successful missions, safe missions, and do the science we do onboard the International Space Station."
However, NASA's acting administrator, Janet Petro, whom Trump appointed to the role in January, said in a statement shortly after the astronauts' splash-landing off the coast of Tallahassee, Florida, that "per President Trump's direction, NASA and SpaceX worked diligently to pull the schedule a month earlier."
"This international crew and our teams on the ground embraced the Trump Administration's challenge of an updated, and somewhat unique, mission plan, to bring our crew home," she added.
On March 31, 2025 — around two weeks after Williams and Wilmore landed — Williams and Wilmore sat down for an interview with Bill Hemmer, co-anchor of Fox News' "America's Newsroom" show. Referencing their February interview with CNN's Anderson Cooper, in which Wilmore had said they did not feel "abandoned," "stuck" or "stranded," Hemmer then asked if they had been "marooned" (see 08:40). Wilmore reiterated that they did not feel abandoned and even went as far as to take some responsibility himself:
Okay, so, any of those — any of those adjectives, they're very broad in their definition. So, okay, in certain respects we were stuck, in certain respects maybe we were stranded. But based on how they were couching this — that we were left and forgotten and all — we were nowhere near any of that, at all. So, "stuck" — okay we didn't get to come home the way we planned. So, in one definition we're stuck but in the big scheme of things, we weren't stuck. We were planned, trained — but let me comment back on this other [assertion that], you know, "they failed you." Who's they? There are many questions that, as the commander of CFT [crew flight test], I didn't ask. So, I'm culpable. I'll admit that to the nation.
Anderson Cooper 360. ""We Don't Feel Abandoned, We Don't Feel Stuck, We Don't Feel Stranded": Astronauts Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore Talk with Anderson about Being In... | by Anderson Cooper 360 | Facebook." Facebook.com, CNN, 14 Feb. 2025, www.facebook.com/watch/?v=3342404222602484. Accessed 2 Apr. 2025.
C-SPAN. "President Trump Signs Executive Orders." C-SPAN.org, C-SPAN, 6 Mar. 2025, www.c-span.org/program/white-house-event/president-trump-signs-executive-orders/656830. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
Fox News. "Rescued Astronauts Speak out on What Can Be Learned from Mission." Facebook.com, Fox News, 31 Mar. 2022, www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1074336591171921. Accessed 2 Apr. 2025.
---. "Trump, Musk Pull Curtain Back behind Relationship, Media's Divide and Conquer Mission." YouTube, 18 Feb. 2025, www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMbcMO5JgEo. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
Kekatos, Mary, and Gina Sunseri. "Boeing's Starliner Successfully Docks at ISS after Helium Leaks, Thruster Issue." ABC News, 6 June 2024, abcnews.go.com/US/helium-leaks-discovered-onboard-boeings-starliner-track-reach/story?id=110893167. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
Morelle, Rebecca. "Nasa Astronauts Butch and Suni Finally Back on Earth." BBC News, 19 Mar. 2025, www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0mw221z2yyo. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
Musk, Elon. ""The @POTUS Has Asked @SpaceX..."" X (Formerly Twitter), 28 Jan. 2025, x.com/elonmusk/status/1884365928038563880. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
---. ""The Astronauts Were Only Supposed to Be..."" X (Formerly Twitter), 5 Mar. 2025, x.com/elonmusk/status/1897420509966688555. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
---. ""You Are Fully R*******. SpaceX Could..."" X (Formerly Twitter), 20 Feb. 2025, x.com/elonmusk/status/1892584783064052114. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
NASA. "Expedition 71 - NASA." Nasa.gov, www.nasa.gov/mission/expedition-71/. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
---. "Expedition 72 - NASA." Nasa.gov, www.nasa.gov/mission/expedition-72/. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
---. "NASA, Boeing Adjust Timeline for Starliner Return." Nasa.gov, 22 June 2024, blogs.nasa.gov/boeing-crew-flight-test/2024/06/21/nasa-boeing-adjust-timeline-for-starliner-return/. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
---. "NASA, Boeing Discuss Ground Testing, Forward Work for Starliner Return." Nasa.gov, 25 July 2024, blogs.nasa.gov/commercialcrew/category/boeing/page/2/. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
---. "NASA's Boeing Starliner Crew Flight Test Launch – June 5, 2024 (Official NASA Broadcast)." YouTube, 5 June 2024, www.youtube.com/watch?v=HneVxAmYcaA. Accessed 3 Apr. 2025.
---. "NASA's SpaceX Crew-9 Post-Splashdown News Conference." NASA Image and Video Library, 18 Mar. 2025, images.nasa.gov/details/iss072m260772333_NASA%E2%80%99s_SpaceX_Crew-9_Post-Splashdown_News_Conference_250318. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
---. "SpaceX Dragon with Crew-9 Aboard Docks to Station - NASA." NASA, 29 Sept. 2024, www.nasa.gov/blogs/commercialcrew/2024/09/29/spacex-dragon-with-crew-9-aboard-docks-to-station-3/. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
NASA Video. "International Space Station Operations (June 28, 2024)." YouTube, 28 June 2024, www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-BGAPuzxZU. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
---. "International Space Station Operations Update Media Teleconference." YouTube, 7 Aug. 2024, www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYPL6bx87yM. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
---. "NASA's SpaceX Crew-9 Pre-Departure News Conference – Tuesday, March 4, 2025." YouTube, 4 Mar. 2025, www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvhpqzL8ZrI. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
---. "NASA's SpaceX Crew-10 Post-Launch News Conference." YouTube, 15 Mar. 2025, www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqQIhSiR4bk. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
PBS NewsHour. "WATCH: Elon Musk Wields "Chainsaw for Bureaucracy" on Stage before Speaking at CPAC." YouTube, 20 Feb. 2025, www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9q_udkpymM. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
PowerfulJRE. "Joe Rogan Experience #2281 - Elon Musk." YouTube, 28 Feb. 2025, www.youtube.com/watch?v=sSOxPJD-VNo. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
SpaceX. "Dragon." SpaceX, www.spacex.com/vehicles/dragon/. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
Taveau, Jessica. "NASA Decides to Bring Starliner Spacecraft back to Earth without Crew - NASA." NASA, NASA, 24 Aug. 2024, www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-decides-to-bring-starliner-spacecraft-back-to-earth-without-crew/. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
---. "Welcome Home! NASA's SpaceX Crew-9 Back on Earth after Science Mission - NASA." Nasa.gov, 18 Mar. 2025, www.nasa.gov/news-release/welcome-home-nasas-spacex-crew-9-back-on-earth-after-science-mission/. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
The White House. "President Trump Announces Acting Cabinet and Cabinet-Level Positions – the White House." The White House, 20 Jan. 2025, www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/designation-of-acting-leaders/. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
Trump, Donald. ""I Have Just Asked Elon Musk..."" Truth Social, 29 Jan. 2025, truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/113909188940119917. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
---. ""I Just Spoke with the Acting Administrator..."" Truth Social, 17 Mar. 2025, truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114179081339591399. Accessed 19 Mar. 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
7 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Republicans look to make a U-turn on federal commitment to electric vehicles for the Postal Service
WASHINGTON (AP) — A year after being lauded for its plan to replace thousands of aging, gas-powered mail trucks with a mostly electric fleet, the U.S. Postal Service is facing congressional attempts to strip billions in federal EV funding. In June, the Senate parliamentarian blocked a Republican proposal in a major tax-and-spending bill to sell off the agency's new electric vehicles and infrastructure and revoke remaining federal money. But efforts to halt the fleet's shift to clean energy continue in the name of cost savings. Donald Maston, president of the National Rural Letter Carriers' Association, said canceling the program now would have the opposite effect, squandering millions of dollars. 'I think it would be shortsighted for Congress to now suddenly decide they're going to try to go backwards and take the money away for the EVs or stop that process because that's just going to be a bunch of money on infrastructure that's been wasted," he said. Beyond that, many in the scientific community fear the government could pass on an opportunity to reduce carbon emissions that contribute to global warming when urgent action is needed. Electrified vehicles reduce emissions A 2022 University of Michigan study found the new electric postal vehicles could cut total greenhouse gas emissions by up to 20 million tons over the predicted, cumulative 20-year lifetime of the trucks. That's a fraction of the more than 6,000 million metric tons emitted annually in the United States, said professor Gregory A. Keoleian, co-director of the university's Center for Sustainable Systems. But he said the push toward electric vehicles is critical and needs to accelerate, given the intensifying impacts of climate change. 'We're already falling short of goals for reducing emissions,' Keoleian said. 'We've been making progress, but the actions being taken or proposed will really reverse decarbonization progress that has been made to date.' Many GOP lawmakers share President Donald Trump's criticism of the Biden-era green energy push and say the Postal Service should stick to delivering mail. Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, said 'it didn't make sense for the Postal Service to invest so heavily in an all-electric force." She said she will pursue legislation to rescind what is left of the $3 billion from the Inflation Reduction Act allocated to help cover the $10 billion cost of new postal vehicles. Ernst has called the EV initiative a 'boondoggle' and "a textbook example of waste,' citing delays, high costs and concerns over cold-weather performance. 'You always evaluate the programs, see if they are working. But the rate at which the company that's providing those vehicles is able to produce them, they are so far behind schedule, they will never be able to fulfill that contract," Ernst said during a recent appearance at the Iowa State Fair, referring to Wisconsin-based Oshkosh Defense. 'For now,' she added, "gas-powered vehicles — use some ethanol in them — I think is wonderful.' Corn-based ethanol is a boon to Iowa's farmers, but the effort to reverse course has other Republican support. Rep. Michael Cloud, R-Texas, a co-sponsor of the rollback effort, has said the EV order should be canceled because the project "has delivered nothing but delays, defective trucks, and skyrocketing costs.' The Postal Service maintains that the production delay of the Next Generation Delivery Vehicles, or NGDVs, was 'very modest" and not unexpected. 'The production quantity ramp-up was planned for and intended to be very gradual in the early months to allow time for potential modest production or supplier issues to be successfully resolved,' spokesperson Kim Frum said. EVs help in modernization effort The independent, self-funded federal agency, which is paid for mostly by postage and product sales, is in the middle of a $40 billion, 10-year modernization and financial stabilization plan. The EV effort had the full backing of Democratic President Joe Biden, who pledged to move toward an all-electric federal fleet of car and trucks. The 'Deliver for America' plan calls for modernizing the ground fleet, notably the Grumman Long Life Vehicle, which dates back to 1987 and is fuel-inefficient at 9 mpg. The vehicles are well past their projected 24-year lifespan and are prone to breakdowns and even fires. 'Our mechanics are miracle workers,' said Mark Dimondstein, president of the American Postal Workers Union. 'The parts are not available. They fabricate them. They do the best they can.' The Postal Service announced in 2022 it would deploy at least 66,000 electric vehicles by 2028, including commercial off-the-shelf models, after years of deliberation and criticism it was moving too slowly to reduce emissions. By 2024, the agency was awarded a Presidential Sustainability Award for its efforts to electrify the largest fleet in the federal government. Building new postal trucks In 2021, Oshkosh Defense was awarded a contract for up to 165,000 battery electric and internal combustion engine Next Generation vehicles over 10 years. The first of the odd-looking trucks, with hoods resembling a duck's bill, began service in Georgia last year. Designed for greater package capacity, the trucks are equipped with airbags, blind-spot monitoring, collision sensors, 360-degree cameras and antilock brakes. There's also a new creature comfort: air conditioning. Douglas Lape, special assistant to the president of the National Association of Letter Carriers and a former carrier, is among numerous postal employees who have had a say in the new design. He marvels at how Oshkosh designed and built a new vehicle, transforming an old North Carolina warehouse into a factory along the way. 'I was in that building when it was nothing but shelving,' he said. 'And now, being a completely functioning plant where everything is built in-house — they press the bodies in there, they do all of the assembly — it's really amazing in my opinion.' Where things stand now The agency has so far ordered 51,500 NGDVs, including 35,000 battery-powered vehicles. To date, it has received 300 battery vehicles and 1,000 gas-powered ones. Former Postmaster General Louis DeJoy said in 2022 the agency expected to purchase chiefly zero-emissions delivery vehicles by 2026. It still needs some internal combustion engine vehicles that travel longer distances. Frum, the Postal Service spokesperson, said the planned NGDV purchases were "carefully considered from a business perspective' and are being deployed to routes and facilities where they will save money. The agency has also received more than 8,200 of 9,250 Ford E-Transit electric vehicles it has ordered, she said. Ernst said it's fine for the Postal Service to use EVs already purchased. 'But you know what? We need to be smart about the way we are providing services through the federal government,' she said. 'And that was not a smart move.' Postal vehicles, he said, have low average speeds and a high number of stops and starts that enable regenerative braking. Routes average under 30 miles and are known in advance, making planning easier. 'It's the perfect application for an electric vehicle," he said, 'and it's a particularly inefficient application for an internal combustion engine vehicle.'
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Ex-AOC youth organizer Iman Abdul busted for urging 'attack' on Jewish students 'grew up in a mansion,' classmate says
The self-described 'youth organizer' for 'Squad' Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who allegedly urged a hate-filled 'attack' on Jewish students at a Brooklyn public high school, was herself a graduate of the school and a popular teen who was voted 'biggest flirt,' a classmate told The Post. She was one of the popular students and definitely had a good time there,' Alina Bernstern said of Iman Abdul, a fellow 2016 alum of Leon M. Goldstein High School for the Sciences in Manhattan Beach, adding that Abdul took part in the school's annual SING! musical show and 'grew up in a mansion.' 'She didn't show any kind of radical tendencies back then,' recalled Bernstein, who took an elective on social justice with Abdul. Advertisement 3 A former classmate said Abdul was a popular student at Leon Goldstein HS — which she identified in a social media post as 'a public school in NYC to attack for whatever reason.' Obtained by the NY Post 'Fear is stupid, so is regret,' reads a quote, attributed to Marilyn Monroe, under Abdul's yearbook photo. Abdul, 27, went on to become the 'face of youth organization' and volunteered on AOC's successful 2018 congressional campaign, Bernstein said. Advertisement A spokesperson for Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) insisted to Fox News that Abdul was never 'staff.' 'Their comments are appalling and we condemn threats of violence without hesitation,' the spokesperson said. Abdul said in a 2019 interview she worked as a youth organizer for the socialist pol, but the web page with the article was deleted after her arrest. But critics note that the congresswoman, who has an audience of 9.4 million on Instagram, included Abdul among the 3,126 accounts she followed. 'I think it proves that she was part of AOC's campaign or knew her in some way,' Bernstein said. Advertisement 3 Abdul was named as the school's 'biggest flirt,' the yearbook shows. Obtained by the NY Post Abdul is accused of posting a screenshot of the location of Goldstein HS on Google Maps. The caption: 'If anyone needs a public school in NYC to attack for whatever reason … Lexus driving Israhell (sic) loving Zionisits (sic) all attend here.' 'That made me laugh,' said Bernstein, who is Jewish, 'because she grew up in a mansion, having more money than most of the Jews in our school, and drove a Range Rover.' In Instragam posts added by Abdul, she called Bernstein 'a Zionist bitch,' adding, 'Zio girls always be the most p—y' Advertisement The NYPD arrested Abdul on Aug. 9, a day after her post appeared, charging her with making a terroristic threat, acting in a manner injurious to a child, aggravated harassment, and making a threat of mass harm. 3 Abdul, whose social media post sparked her arrest on a charge of making a terroristic threat, quickly hired a high-profile criminal defense attorney. Obtained by the NY Post She was released without bail and set to face the charges on Nov. 19. Abdul immediately hired criminal defense attorney, Geoffrey St. Andrew Stewart. He is the son of the late Lynne Stewart, an infamous lawyer convicted and imprisoned for helping client Sheikh Omar Abdel-Rahman, an Egyptian terrorist, communicate with his followers. 'It is alarming that Iman Abdul has retained a high-profile attorney associated with someone who defended individuals accused of terrorism,' said Matthew Spern, president of United Jewish Teachers. 'The fact that she is out on no bail until November should be a significant concern for all New Yorkers.' Stewart did not return messages seeking comment. Advertisement Abdul, who could not be reached for comment, worked as a director of the AM:PM Gallery in Brooklyn. The gallery did not return a message about Abdul's employment. Representatives of Rep. Ocasio-Cortez did not respond to requests for comment.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Scientists want to send tiny, solar-powered spacecraft to Mars
Scientists want to send tiny, solar-powered spacecraft to examine difficult-to-reach parts of Earth's atmosphere – and eventually other planets too. The small devices are able to float in the air and could carry sensing instruments to monitor our climate as well as explore Mars, the researchers behind them suggest. Unlike conventional spacecraft, they do not need fuel to stay floating in the atmosphere. Instead, they use energy from light, through a process known as photophoresis that has been used to make objects levitate for 150 years. Despite that long history, the practical use of photophoresis has been limited to truly tiny objects or very powerful artificial light, and practical devices have not worked out. Now, however, researchers believe that they have made a centimetre-long flying device out of perforated sheets that can use natural sunlight to stay afloat. The flying structure is made from two thin, perforated membranes that are attached together by tiny supports. They can be used to create a tiny disc that is then able to leveitate. They could be sent up to the upper layers of the Earth's atmosphere. If they can be scaled up slightly, they would be able to carry antennae and circuits that would allow them to be used to monitor the atmosphere and for other science work. Eventually, the same design could be taken to other planets, they suggest. It is currently almost prohibitively expensive to send satellites to Mars, for instance – but doing so with the tiny spacecraft could allow researchers to monitor conditions on that planet, they say. 'If the full potential of this technology can be realized, swarms or arrays of such photophoretic flyers could be collecting high-resolution data on the temperature, pressure, chemical composition and wind dynamics of the mesosphere within the next decade,' Igor Bargatin from Penn University wrote in an article accompanying the new research. The work is described in a paper, 'Photophoretic flight of perforated structures in near-space conditions', published in the journal Nature.
