logo
Mom Thinks She's Bought a New iPhone, Shows Daughter—but There's a Problem

Mom Thinks She's Bought a New iPhone, Shows Daughter—but There's a Problem

Newsweek09-05-2025
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
A mother who had switched from an Android to her first iPhone was excited to show the new device off, only to quickly realize there was something very wrong.
A Reddit user Tobias Tawanda, who posts under the username u/Tobias-Tawanda, shared a photograph of a touch-screen phone to the r/MildlyInfuriating subreddit on May 8. He wrote: "My friend's mom proudly showing off her new 'iPhone 16 Pro Max' to me and her daughter."
A second photo showed the "about phone" info, where the model was listed as an iPhone 16 Pro Max, but was followed by "Android Version 12." Some people may be able to tell at first glance that the device was not an iPhone, and certainly not the 16 Pro Max, which was released in 2024 and retails for $1,199 on the Apple website.
However, Tawanda told Newsweek that his friend's mother is in her late 50s and "not very tech-savvy." She had never owned an iPhone before, instead using an old Samsung "for years" until it eventually stopped working.
The mom bought the phone on Facebook Marketplace, and it "came in a box and looked convincing enough at first glance, which is likely why she trusted it," Tawanda said—and she had paid "close to $600 for the phone, which is a significant amount for her.
The poster added in a Reddit comment that when she described the phone as an iPhone 16 Pro Max Mini, Tawanda instantly saw a red flag, as "that model doesn't exist."
He and his friend had to break the news that it was fake, and he told Newsweek "she was understandably very upset when we told her."
While it is unclear whether the mom will be able to get her money back, Tawanda said they "messaged the seller immediately, but they haven't responded."
"Her oldest son is now helping her get a proper new phone. We'll also be filing a police report—even if we're not sure how much it will actually help, it feels like the right thing to do."
Stock image: A woman holds a smartphone with a blank screen.
Stock image: A woman holds a smartphone with a blank screen.The post had a huge reaction, racking up more than 90,000 upvotes. Commenters worried about whether there could be even more sinister things at play, as one wrote: "God forbid she tries to access a credit card or bank on it."
"There could be anything installed on it and she 100 percent should not be using it," another agreed, as a third said: "If there wasn't some kind of spyware or something else on that phone I would be shocked."
Others suggested it was unlikely the person who sold it to her would refund her, as one user put it: "This was not an accident."
Another agreed: "The scammer isn't going to respond. Their account will probably be blank or deleted soon. Just consider the money gone and this to be a lesson learned."
E-commerce fraud, relating to things bought and sold online, is massive: in 2025 alone, losses to online payment fraud were estimated at $44 billion, according to Statista.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Apple (AAPL) Is Developing a Tabletop Robot as Part of Its AI Strategy
Apple (AAPL) Is Developing a Tabletop Robot as Part of Its AI Strategy

Business Insider

timean hour ago

  • Business Insider

Apple (AAPL) Is Developing a Tabletop Robot as Part of Its AI Strategy

Apple (AAPL) is reportedly developing a tabletop robot as part of its artificial intelligence (AI) strategy. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Media reports state that the consumer electronics giant plans to launch the AI-driven robot in 2027. The robot is being described as an iPad mounted on a movable limb that can swivel to follow users around a room. It's designed to turn toward people speaking, seek attention from people not facing it, and inject itself into conversations. The device will feature an entirely new version of the Siri digital assistant that is infused with AI and a bubbly personality. Reports say Apple is considering making the robot resemble its MacBook 'Finder' logo. The new Siri will be able to engage in back-and-forth conversations and help people complete tasks. Project J595 Within Apple, the robot's development is code-named 'Project J595' and is being led by Kevin Lynch, who previously oversaw development of Apple's smartwatch. The company is also exploring other robotics, including a mobile bot with wheels similar to Amazon's (AMZN) Astro robot, and is even sketching out plans for humanoid models. Before the robot launches, Apple plans to release an AI smart speaker with a display by mid-2026. This device is said to be a stripped-down version of the robot without the arms and Siri capabilities. It will offer home control, music playback, note-taking, web browsing, and videoconferencing. CEO Tim Cook recently told employees that Apple 'must win in AI.' AAPL stock is down 6% this year. Is AAPL Stock a Buy? The stock of Apple has a consensus Moderate Buy rating among 29 Wall Street analysts. That rating is based on 16 Buy, 12 Hold, and one Sell recommendations assigned in the last three months. The average AAPL price target of $236.93 implies 1.16% upside from current levels.

Juggling Multiple High-Paying Jobs Is Risky Business. One Overemployment Veteran Says There's One Mistake That Can End It All
Juggling Multiple High-Paying Jobs Is Risky Business. One Overemployment Veteran Says There's One Mistake That Can End It All

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Juggling Multiple High-Paying Jobs Is Risky Business. One Overemployment Veteran Says There's One Mistake That Can End It All

For some workers, one full-time job isn't enough. They're quietly taking on two, three or even more high-paying roles at the same time, a practice known as overemployment. But with bigger paychecks comes bigger risks, and one veteran says there's one slip-up that can ruin everything. Double-Booked Meetings Are The No. 1 Danger In a viral post on Reddit's r/overemployed forum, one contributor recently shared 20 rules from five years of working multiple jobs. They've been caught once before, and it was for the same mistake that takes down most people. Don't Miss: The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can "Avoid double meetings at ALL costs. It's the No. 1 way people get caught, including me. Use a sick day if needed," the poster wrote. The survival guide covers everything from using separate devices for each job to avoiding shared human resources systems. The poster recommends completely separate laptops, webcams, keyboards and phones for each role, instead of juggling accounts on a single machine. They also change notification sounds, block off calendar time to separate each job's hours, label devices to avoid mix-ups, and use preferred names so coworkers can't link profiles across companies. They caution against letting a company install device management on a personal phone, using a real headshot in Slack or Teams, which are popular workplace communication platforms, or sharing payroll logins between jobs. "If they want to manage your device, they should provide a separate phone," the post said. Trending: If there was a new fund backed by Jeff Bezos offering a ? LinkedIn And Legal Risks When it comes to LinkedIn, the advice is to create a burner account with no photo and strict privacy settings. Others in the thread disagreed, saying they've simply hibernated their main account without issue. One commenter noted, "You raise more red flags by having different LinkedIn accounts, with different versions of your name." The post also stresses that if an employer catches on, you should never admit to overemployment. "That lets them fire you immediately with no severance," it said. Instead, it suggests mentioning "tortious interference" and possibly contacting legal counsel. Other Survival Tactics The list also includes avoiding overlapping jobs that use the same HR systems, steering clear of multiple active health insurance plans that might prompt questions, and never listing both jobs on a mortgage application. For those facing a return-to-office mandate, documented accommodations like a therapist's note, caregiver responsibilities or religious practices can keep you in the comments offered their own tips—from working for companies in different time zones to create natural schedule gaps, to always prioritizing the original job, to using visual mute indicators to avoid being overheard on the wrong call. Despite the risks, the original poster remains confident the payoff is worth it. "The risk of a sudden layoff from a single job is FAR greater than the risk of being caught," they wrote. "With OE, a layoff or termination is a minor setback, leaving you with another income stream and a powerful financial cushion." Read Next: In a $34 Trillion Debt Era, The Right AI Could Be Your Financial Advantage — Imagn Images UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Juggling Multiple High-Paying Jobs Is Risky Business. One Overemployment Veteran Says There's One Mistake That Can End It All originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

The Crypto Payment Paradox: Why Nobody's Actually Buying Coffee With Bitcoin In 2025
The Crypto Payment Paradox: Why Nobody's Actually Buying Coffee With Bitcoin In 2025

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The Crypto Payment Paradox: Why Nobody's Actually Buying Coffee With Bitcoin In 2025

Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Despite years of 'crypto is the future of money' rhetoric, a candid discussion among cryptocurrency enthusiasts on Reddit reveals the stark reality: most people still aren't spending their digital assets like traditional currency. While the infrastructure exists to buy everything from burritos to luxury cars with crypto, fundamental barriers continue to prevent mainstream adoption as a payment method. The Infrastructure Is There—But Is Anyone Using It? The good news for crypto believers is that spending options have expanded dramatically. Major retailers including Whole Foods, Starbucks (NASDAQ:SBUX), Home Depot (NYSE:HD), Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT), and luxury brands like Gucci now accept crypto payments through processors like Flexa and BitPay. Crypto debit cards from Coinbase Global Inc. (NASDAQ:COIN), and other exchanges allow users to spend digital assets 'as easy as a tap' at millions of merchants worldwide. Don't Miss: The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. Gift card platforms have become particularly popular bridges, enabling crypto holders to purchase everything from groceries to flights. Some users report successfully buying houses and cars after converting crypto to cash, while others highlight El Salvador as a rare example where Bitcoin functions as preferred everyday currency. The Dirty Secret: It's Not Really 'Crypto Commerce' Here's where the narrative gets complicated. Most crypto spending today doesn't involve true peer-to-peer digital currency transactions. Instead, crypto cards and payment processors typically convert digital assets to fiat currency instantaneously at the point of sale. Critics argue on Reddit that this is simply 'adding a crypto backend on top of the fiat system' for marketing purposes rather than genuine blockchain-based commerce. This technical distinction matters because it means merchants still receive traditional dollars, not cryptocurrency. The infrastructure resembles a complex currency exchange service more than the revolutionary payment system originally envisioned by Bitcoin's creators. Trending: If there was a new fund backed by Jeff Bezos offering a ? Three Major Barriers Killing Crypto Adoption Tax Complexity Remains King Every crypto transaction triggers a taxable event for capital gains purposes in most jurisdictions. Buying a coffee with Bitcoin means calculating and reporting the gain or loss on that specific portion of your holdings. This accounting nightmare encourages people to make lump-sum conversions to fiat rather than frequent small purchases. The 'Digital Gold' Mentality Many crypto holders view their assets as stores of value rather than spending money. Following Gresham's Law—that people spend 'bad money' and save 'good money'—investors prefer to spend depreciating dollars while hoarding appreciating Bitcoin. This psychological shift from currency to investment vehicle fundamentally changes user behavior. Volatility and Fees Still Bite While transaction costs have decreased, payment processors still charge 1%-2% fees comparable to credit cards. More importantly, Bitcoin's price volatility makes merchants hesitant to accept direct crypto payments due to settlement Stablecoin Exception Interestingly, stablecoins like USDC and USDT face fewer adoption barriers since they maintain dollar parity. Some users report successfully using stablecoins for international transfers and online purchases, suggesting these assets may represent crypto's true payment future rather than volatile tokens. Reality Check: Investment Asset, Not Daily Currency The honest assessment from the crypto community itself is telling: most view cryptocurrency primarily as 'an asset to invest in at this point,' not revolutionary payment technology. While enthusiasts predict mass adoption within 5-10 years, practical users recommend simply selling crypto for dollars when purchases are needed. This doesn't diminish crypto's value as a financial innovation—it just acknowledges that digital gold and everyday spending money serve different purposes in modern portfolios. Read Next: Kevin O'Leary Says Real Estate's Been a Smart Bet for 200 Years — Image: Shutterstock This article The Crypto Payment Paradox: Why Nobody's Actually Buying Coffee With Bitcoin In 2025 originally appeared on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store