logo
Broken cities, bad governance: Blue state city residents voting with their feet

Broken cities, bad governance: Blue state city residents voting with their feet

Fox News22-05-2025
On the surface, newly-released data from the Census Bureau looks to be good news for big cities. In the wake of the Covid panic that drove residents to the suburbs and beyond, city populations generally rebounded. "Cities of all sizes grew on average from 2023 to 2024," the Bureau reported. "Cities of all sizes, in all regions, showed faster growth and larger gains".
The number – 94 percent of cities showing population growth – is impressive, overall. But a closer look tells another story – about some of the largest "blue" state cities, governed by Democratic mayors. New York, Los Angeles, Chicago and Philadelphia continue to have lower populations than in 2020. New York City has had the largest drop – from 8.805 million to 8.478 million, or 3.7 percent. Philadelphia's population has fallen by 1.9 percent; Chicago's by 1 percent, and LA's by .5 percent.
An even slightly-closer look at these cities' quality of life and affordability – factors that are the function of the effectiveness of their local governments – offers explanations for the trend.
Housing costs in New York, according to the national tracking service RentCafe, are 21.8 percent higher than the national average – despite the fact that the city has more price-regulated and public housing than any other. Low turnover rates in the nearly 1 million rent-stabilized apartments help drive up the price of the remaining market-rate housing, as city residents play a costly game of housing musical chairs, with those not able to get apartments priced artificially low forced to pay more. Where is housing cheaper? Look to Houston, which has gained 3.9 percent in population. Its housing costs are the mirror image of New York City's – 21 percent lower than the national average. Not surprisingly, Houston's population, per the Census, is 3.9 percent higher than it was in 2020.
To explain Chicago's population loss, look to its crime rate. The Windy City last year led the nation in murders – 653 – almost twice the number of Baltimore, the city with the second-highest number. Instances of gang violence have spread from the low-income South Side to the "miracle mile" of downtown's Michigan Avenue. Yet for the privilege of being subjected to high crime, Chicagoans have paid more and more – and more – in property taxes. As the civic group Chicago Federation reports, between 2014 and 2024, Chicago increased its property taxes by $2.7 billion, or 53.3 percent, compared to an inflation rate of 35 percent. The separate property tax levied by the Chicago Public School (CPS) district, increased $1.4 billion, from $2.4 to $3.8 billion. Yet, according to the Illinois Policy Institute, "in spring 2024, 30.5% of CPS students in third through eighth grade met proficiency standards in reading and 18.3% were proficient in math." A 2022 report found that, in 55 Chicago public schools, zero percent of students were proficient in either.
Los Angeles, another population loser, stands out on another measure: street homelessness, as exemplified by the tent encampments in its Skid Row area. The city's 71,000 homeless constitute, per the Brookings Institution, 670 for every 100,000 residents. Even more notably, 70 percent of LA's homeless, some 472 per 100K are "unsheltered", higher than any major city except San Jose—which is also among the few cities with lower populations than in 2020. It's no wonder that California Governor Gavin Newsom, with his eye on higher office, has moved to ban street encampments in the state.
The other population-losing cities have their own versions of the same stories. Philadelphia ranks among the homelessness leaders, with 18 percent of the homeless among the "unsheltered", the highest number among cities in the Northeast. The unsheltered homeless rate in San Jose, down 1.6 percent in population, stands at 77 percent, the nation's highest.
It's fair to argue that the combination of mild weather and air-conditioning, over the long term, has lured Americans from the Northeast and Midwest to the Sunbelt. But the new Census data shines a light on what's happening right now, as cities even in California as well as the Rust Belt and the Northeast, fail to recover their pre-Covid population levels. It's hard to avoid the conclusion that ineffective governance has played a role; crime and homelessness, high tax levels and poor-performing public schools are not magnets to draw back former residents or draw in new ones. The fact that all the population-losing cities are run by Democratic mayors helped Donald Trump win the popular vote; even in New York City he ran better than he had in 2020.
Cities can be the engines of economic innovation and prosperity. But not if local government fails to provide effective essential services. Americans have given a negative Census report card on just those services, delivered to some of our largest cities.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lakers' Austin Reaves Could Get 'Wake-Up Call' on Massive New Contract
Lakers' Austin Reaves Could Get 'Wake-Up Call' on Massive New Contract

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Lakers' Austin Reaves Could Get 'Wake-Up Call' on Massive New Contract

Lakers' Austin Reaves Could Get 'Wake-Up Call' on Massive New Contract originally appeared on Athlon Sports. It's no secret that the contract the Lakers gave guard Austin Reaves when he hit free agency in 2023--four years and $54 million--was a rock-bottom NBA bargain. Many expected Reaves to get something in the four-year, $100 million range, but under league rules, the Lakers were not allowed to pay Reaves at that level and, ultimately, he could not get anyone else to make that investment, either. So he took his hefty deal from L.A. and is now careening toward his next crack at free agency, next summer when he surely will exercise his player option. As one executive told Tim Bontemps of ESPN, "I think he will get $30 [million] plus." That's per season, of course, and could mean that Reaves is in line for a five-year, $150 million megadeal. Lakers Could Benefit Ah, but not all executives agree. One GM said he thinks Reaves will be, "a little bit of a test case" for the NBA's new, stiffer luxury-tax rules. "Two years ago, Reaves would get $30 million, no doubt," the GM said. "If there had been more (cap) space, he might have gotten it then. There has been a mindset to being willing to overpay players based on, almost, where they're supposed to slot in. So, Zach LaVine got $215 (million) even though the Bulls knew they did not want to give it to him and tried to trade him as soon as they did give it. And there's 15, 20 guys like that. "You can't do that anymore. You can't just say, 'Well, he averages 20 (points) so he needs to get $30 (million) per year.' No. You're going to have to take these negotiations more seriously. You're going to have to be realistic about what a guy is worth, on both ends of the floor, before you put a number out there. And Austin Reaves should get $24, $25 (million) a year. Not $30. "It matters." If teams are being tighter, of course, that figures to benefit the Lakers. Lakers Will Have Cap Space Reaves had a breakout season, averaging 20.2 points. But he remains a defensive liability, and a player who has struggled in the playoffs. More important, while there will be teams with cap space next season, it's still a limited field. It could held Reaves that, other than the Lakers and the Clippers, the rest of the list of teams with cap space are is made up of mostly teams that are low on talent--teams like Washington, Charlotte, Chicago and Brooklyn could have space. But the league's salary cap will be set at a lower mark than expected. That's going to eat into cap space for a player like Reaves. Austin Reaves Contract: 'It Only Takes One' Said another NBA executive, "Look, $30 million for Austin Reaves, it only takes one team to make the offer and I don't think you can rule that out. But everything is tighter now. Derrick White gets $30 million from the Celtics, and so you have to ask, does Austin Reaves affect winning as much as Derrick White?" We have seen players like Jonathan Kuminga and Josh Giddey seeking paydays in the $30 million range per year in restricted free agency. Neither is going to get anything close to that level. Reaves is a better player than either. But some expect him to feel the chill of cooled NBA spending next summer. "We'll see what kind of year he has, that's going to be a factor," the executive said. "And we'll see what kind of things teams do that give them more or less space. But I would not assume $30 million for Austin Reaves. It could be a wake-up call for a lot of guys." This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Aug 9, 2025, where it first appeared.

Priscilla Presley's ex-business partners sue her for more than $50 million, alleging fraud
Priscilla Presley's ex-business partners sue her for more than $50 million, alleging fraud

Washington Post

timean hour ago

  • Washington Post

Priscilla Presley's ex-business partners sue her for more than $50 million, alleging fraud

Priscilla Presley's former business partners have filed a lawsuit seeking more than $50 million in damages, alleging fraud and breach of contract. Brigitte Kruse and Kevin Fialko filed the lawsuit Monday in Los Angeles Superior Court. Among many other allegations, they say Presley used them to financially exploit her name, image and likeness, hiding the fact that she had sold those rights decades earlier. The lawsuit comes just over a year after Presley, the 80-year-old former wife of Elvis Presley , sued Kruse and Fialko, alleging they engaged in elder abuse in a 'meticulously planned and abhorrent scheme' to 'prey on an older woman by gaining her trust, isolating her from the most important people in her life, and duping her into believing that they would take care of her (personally and financially), while their real goal was to drain her of every last penny she had.' Kruse and Fialko's lawyer, Jordan Matthews, said in a statement Wednesday that the 'evidence will establish that the real victims here are my clients, who invested millions and years of hard work into revitalizing Priscilla Presley's brand, only to be betrayed and falsely accused once the money was on the table and every personal and business issue had been resolved.' An email seeking comment from Presley's lawyer was not immediately answered. Kruse and Fialko's lawsuit says Kruse is a well-known auctioneer and Fialko a successful entrepreneur, both of whom dealt in Elvis Presley memorabilia. The duo previously sued Priscilla Presley in Florida. They say she approached them in 2021 looking for help to save her from financial ruin, which they spent thousands of hours working to do. 'Kruse and Fialko deployed IP, know-how and creative marketing to enhance Priscilla's brand,' the lawsuit said, and formed several companies to exploit her name, image and likeness. But they say as this was happening, Presley hid from them that she had sold the rights to license her name as part of a $6.5 million deal with Elvis Presley Enterprises in 2005. The lawsuit says that when confronted about the previous agreement, Presley repeatedly denied making it, and later said she had forgotten about it when confronted with evidence of it. The lawsuit also alleges Presley sought to take advantage of the 2023 death of her daughter and Elvis Presley's heir, Lisa Marie Presley , to aggrandize herself and regain a stake in the Elvis' estate. Priscilla and Elvis Presley were married from 1967 to 1973, divorcing four years before the death of the rock 'n' roll legend. Kruse and Fialko say they brokered a 2023 deal to end a legal fight over the estate between Priscilla Presley and Lisa Marie Presley's daughter, actor Riley Keough , getting Priscilla Presley $2.4 million. But the lawsuit says she cut them off in violation of contracts soon after, publicly smeared them and later sued them. Priscilla Presley's lawsuit says that Kruse and Fialko fraudulently convinced her they were essential to her recovering financially, and that her former trusted advisers had been cheating her. It said they compelled her to take part in sham companies, lost control of her name, image and likeness, and forced her into 'a form of indentured servitude.' 'By isolating her and immersing themselves in every aspect of her life, the Defendants were able to fraudulently induce Presley into giving them power of attorney, control over her family and personal trusts, and control over her bank accounts,' the lawsuit said. Priscilla became a major public figure when she was a teenager because of her relationship with one of the world's most famous men. She never left the public eye, but she has regained a special prominence in recent years through Baz Luhrmann's 2022 film 'Elvis' and Sofia Coppola's 2023 film 'Priscilla,' based on her memoir. She is also an actor who starred in the original 'Naked Gun' franchise in the 1980s and 1990s, and she had a cameo in the new reboot.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store