
Mullah Marshal Munir and his maniacal mad-dogging
Munir's rants - amongst other things, threatening to bomb any dam built on the Indus River System, claiming that Pakistan had signaled it will target India's largest petroleum refinery owned by the Reliance group, warning that next time Pakistan will lob missiles targeting Eastern India and then move to the West (probably to demonstrate the strike capability of Pakistani missiles), - are actually a full-toss he has bowled for India to hit out of the park in the propaganda wars underway between the two countries.To the rest of the world, he comes out as a deranged character using Islamist/jihadist imagery to drive home his arguments to audiences who are either enamored of him or too diffident to question him and his worldview. But his trash talk is probably popular with Pakistanis, who have convinced themselves of a non-existent 'victory'. Even so, the propaganda wing of the Pakistan Army - Inter-Services Public Relations - has glossed over the threats of a nuclear armageddon as part of the damage control measures.No one in India should be surprised that a fanatic Islamist like Asim Munir is leading the Pakistan Army. For years, strategic analysts and Pakistan watchers have been anticipating precisely these kinds of unhinged characters in the Pakistan Army. He is the second army chief of what is called the 'Zia bharti' (officers recruited after the Islamisation of the Pakistan Army by the former dictator Ziaul Haque).advertisementThe first was Munir's predecessor, Qamar Javed Bajwa. But at the time Bajwa was commissioned in 1980, the ethos of the old British Indian Army had still not been completely erased in the Pakistan Army. Munir was commissioned in 1986 when the Zia-inspired Islamization of the armed forces had been firmly implanted in the training academies. Add to this Munir's own family background - refugee family from Jalandhar, father, a lowly school teacher who doubled as an imam in a masjid and almost certainly a family of converts that sought to enhance their social status by claiming to be Syeds. Clearly, people like him and others of his ilk are deeply steeped in Islamist/jihadist thinking, which is reflected in his constant reference to Quran and other Islamic texts to validate his stance. Just like Donald Trump is no longer an aberration in American politics, Munir too is the beginning of the jihadist generals in Pakistan army.A fact often forgotten about Munir is that he was the ISI chief when the 2019 suicide attack in Pulwama happened. An attack like that could not have been launched by a Pakistani terrorist group like Jaish-e-Mohammad without a nod from the ISI. Similarly, the Pahalgam massacre - Hindu tourists targeted deliberately - had to have the go-ahead from the top brass of the Pakistan Army and ISI.advertisementIn other words, Munir's antics have brought India and Pakistan close to war twice already, and from his public utterances it is almost a certainty that there will be a third round, sooner rather than later. That he is doubling down on support for jihadist terrorists in Kashmir and the civilian regime has neither the legitimacy nor the credibility and certainly no political standing to block him running amok means that India needs to be ready to pre-empt any adventurism of Munir and his military/militant minions.Probably the only time that Munir hovered close to reality was when he metaphorically compared India to a shiny new Mercedes and Pakistan to a dump truck filled with gravel. In his jihadist brain, when such a truck collides with the Mercedes, the loss is that of the Mercedes because the dump truck is, well, a dump anyway. This is quite in line with the general thinking among Pakistani generals who have enriched themselves and settled their children in fancy Western countries while impoverishing their own country.advertisementPakistani generals, analysts, and journalists never tire of boasting that Pakistan has nothing and therefore has nothing to lose, unlike India, which has made great strides and has a lot more to lose in a conflict. This kind of thinking is pervasive in a culture that yearns to bring the house of the enemy down, even if it means coming under.Hopefully, instead of listening to Pakistan's apologists and advocates in India who latch on to meaningless anecdotes to present the Pakistanis as normal people, those charged with framing India's defence and security policies will understand the nature of the beast India is dealing with in Pakistan.People like Asim Munir and his cohort might have the trappings and spit and polish of the old British Indian Army, but fundamentally, they are part of an army that is jihadist in its mindset and believes itself to be a successor of the marauding and murderous armies that invaded India from Central Asia, Arabia, Persia, Afghanistan and Turkey. These people are informing us of their plans. Indian defence planners can either live in denial or work double time to visit ruination on India's implacable enemy.(Sushant Sareen is a Senior Fellow at the Observer Research Foundation)- Ends(Views expressed in this opinion piece are those of the author)Tune InMust Watch
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
14 minutes ago
- Business Standard
US ties with India, Pak unchanged, diplomats committed to both: Tammy Bruce
State Department Spokesperson Tammy Bruce said that the United States' relationship with both Pakistan and India "remains unchanged," adding that the "diplomats are committed to both nations." Her remarks came after Pakistan Army chief Gen Asim Munir's comments in Florida, where he reportedly said Pakistan could use nuclear weapons to take down India and "half the world" in the event of an existential threat. Speaking at the State Department briefing, Bruce stated that "We had an experience with Pakistan and India, when there was a conflict, that could have developed into something quite horrible. There was immediate concern and movement with the Vice President JD Vance, the President Donald Trump and the Secretary of State Marco Rubio in addressing the nature of what was happening."Bruce emphasised the success of diplomatic efforts in preventing the conflict from escalating, stating, "We described the nature of the phone calls and the work we did to stop the attacks, bringing the parties together to create something enduring. It's a very proud moment that Secretary Rubio, Vice President Vance and the top leaders in this nation were involved in stopping that potential catastrophe." She also noted that the US relationship with "both nations remains unchanged - good. The diplomats are committed to both nations." Highlighting the US-Pakistan counter-terrorism dialogue, which was established in Islamabad on Tuesday, she affirmed, "The United States and Pakistan reaffirmed their shared commitment to combat terrorism in all its forms and manifestations during the latest rounds of talks in Islamabad. The US and Pakistan discussed ways to enhance cooperation to counter terrorist threats." "For the region and for the world, the US working with both those nations is good news and will promote a future that's beneficial," she added. Notably, Munir visited the US for the second time in less than two months. The trip comes after a private luncheon with Trump in June. Munir arrived in Washington on Sunday for a series of high-level meetings with the US top political and military leadership. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
14 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Will explore more, no compromise on farmers' interests: Shivraj on tariffs
Union Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan on Tuesday lauded Prime Minister Narendra Modi for his determination to protect the interests of farmers in the wake of tariff pressures and said it has been decided that there will be no compromise with the interests of the farming community. Speaking at an event in Subrahmanyam Hall in New Delhi, Chouhan emphasised that India's population is its strength and the country will also find new markets. In a veiled reference to the United States imposing 50 per cent tariff on India and apparent pressure in trade talks for greater access to India's agriculture and dairy sectors, Chouhan said there is vast difference in the size of landholdings and agricultural practices and cost of production in the two countries. "The whole country was apprehensive, know how much land they hold: 10,000 hectares, 15,000 hectares. Meanwhile, our farmers have land ranging from one acre to three acres, with many having just half an acre. We have a little land. Is this competition fair? You use GM seeds. There are different kinds of perceptions about our GM. The whole country was apprehensive, what will happen? They want their soybean to come here, their wheat, maize, rice," the Agriculture Minister said. "The cost of production per hectare is less there because GM seeds and other things are used, so the yield is more and the cost is less. The cost of production per hectare here is much higher than there, and if it had come openly, the prices of the crops here would have fallen further in our country. Where would the farmer go? Therefore, it was decided that no matter what happens, there will be no compromise with the interests of the farmer," he added. Chouhan referred to PM Modi's remarks that no matter how much loss he personally incurs, there will be no compromise with interests of farmers. "Prime Minister Narendra Modi said recently that no matter how much loss I personally incur, but the interests of farmers will not be compromised. This is the voice of India, voice of brothers, be assured. If there is some difficutly, we will see. We will find new markets, and India itself is such a big market that our things will be consumed here. The population of the whole of Europe is 50 crore, America's is 30 crore, our population of 144 crore is not our weakness; it is our strength. That is why this decision was taken. It is also testing time, we don't have budge, bow..." Chouhan said. US imposed 25 per cent reciprocal tariffs on Indian goods last month and increased it to 50 per cent over import of Russian oil. Chouhan also spoke of the government's determination to provide more resources to agriculture. Chouhan also dismissed nuclear sabre-rattling by Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir and said India has decided to put the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance after the Pahalgam terror attack. "Today, as a farmer, I want to congratulate our Prime Minister Narendra Modi, I want to thank him. The first thing is the Indus Water Treaty. Now the neighbour is giving threats from America. India is not going to be afraid of any threat. The whole world should hear that the Indus Treaty has been cancelled, and our water will be used for the farmers. This is Modi ji's decision. Such an unjust treaty, the rivers, land, water are ours and the canal will be built in Pakistan. We gave 80% of the water, and Nehru ji also gave money to build the canal there; this was a sin. Now this will not be allowed at any cost; our water will be used for our own purposes," Chouhan said. Referring to Pakistan's support for cross-border terrorism against India, Chouhan said PM Modi has made it clear that "blood and water cannot flow together". He said the government would soon bring in a new law to take strict action against those producing fake fertilisers and chemicals. He said various schemes for farmers' welfare are being advanced on priority and digital payment of insurance amounts was made to farmers on Monday from Jhunjhunu in Rajasthan under the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana. The Union Minister highlighted PM Modi's 'Nation First' resolve and emphasized that the Prime Minister has always taken strong, bold, nation-centric decisions, for which the country will forever remain indebted.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
14 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump admin calls out human rights records of countries accepting deportees
The Trump administration on Tuesday released human rights reports for countries worldwide, which eliminate mentions of discrimination faced by LGBTQ people, reduce a previous focus on reproductive rights and criticise restrictions on political speech by US allies in Europe that American officials believe target right-wing politicians. The reports, which cover 2024 before President Donald Trump took office, reflect his administration's focus on free speech and protecting the lives of the unborn. However, the reports also offer a glimpse into the administration's view of dire human rights conditions in some countries that have agreed to accept migrants deported from the United States under Trump's immigration crackdown. This year's reports were streamlined for better utility and accessibility in the field and by partners, the State Department said. The congressionally mandated reports in the past have been frequently used for reference and cited by lawmakers, policymakers, academic researchers and others investigating potential asylum claims or looking into conditions in specific countries. The reports were delayed by the Trump administration's changes The reports had been due to be released in March. The State Department said in an overview that the delay occurred because the Trump administration decided in March to adjust the reports, which had been compiled during the Biden administration. Among other deletions, the reports do not include accounts from individual abuse survivors or witnesses. Frequently, eyewitnesses are intimidated or prevented from reporting what they know, the overview said. On the other hand, individuals and groups opposed to a government may have incentive to exaggerate or fabricate abuses. In similar fashion, some governments may distort or exaggerate abuses attributed to opposition groups. Human rights groups decried the changes in focus and omissions of certain categories of discrimination and potential abuse. The new reports reveal a disturbing effort by the Trump administration to purposefully fail to fully capture the alarming and growing attacks on human rights in certain countries around the globe, Amnesty International said in a statement. The reports do follow previous practices in criticizing widespread human rights abuses in China, Iran, North Korea and Russia. Laying out the poor human rights records of countries accepting migrant deportees Although such deportations did not begin until after Trump took office, the reports, with one notable exception, detail general poor human rights conditions in many of the countries that have agreed to accept migrants, even if they are not citizens of that nation. The exception is El Salvador, which was the first of several countries in Latin America and Africa to agree to accept non-citizen migrant deportees from the US. Despite claims from rights advocates to the contrary, the report about the country says there were no credible reports of significant human rights abuses in El Salvador in 2024 and that the government took credible steps to identify and punish officials who committed human rights abuses. Human rights groups have accused authorities of abuses, including at a notorious prison where many migrants are sent. However, for Eswatini a small country in Africa formerly known as Swaziland South Sudan and Rwanda, the reports paint a grimmer picture. All have agreed to accept third-country deportees from the United States. In all three countries, the reports noted significant human rights issues included credible reports of arbitrary or unlawful killings, torture and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment serious restrictions on freedom of expression and media freedom, prohibiting independent trade unions or significant or systematic restrictions on workers' freedom of association. Those governments did not take credible steps or action to identify and punish officials who committed human rights abuses, the reports said. Singling out the treatment of white South Africans South Africa was also singled out for its human rights situation significantly worsening. The report pointed to unfair treatment of white Afrikaners following the signing of major land reforms that the Trump administration has said discriminate against that minority, which ran the country's apartheid government. That system brutally enforced racial segregation, which oppressed the Black majority, for 50 years before ending in 1994. With the signing of that law in December, the report said that South Africa took a substantially worrying step towards land expropriation of Afrikaners and further abuses against racial minorities in the country. It also said the government did not take credible steps to investigate, prosecute and punish officials who committed human rights abuses, including inflammatory racial rhetoric against Afrikaners and other racial minorities, or violence against racial minorities. This year, the administration admitted as refugees some groups of white Afrikaners. Accusations of European allies restricting right-wing speech The reports take issue with what the Trump administration believes are restrictions on free speech imposed against generally right-wing voices in the United Kingdom, France and Germany. The reports use identical language to say that human rights conditions in each of the three Nato allies worsened during the year. The executive summaries for each of the three reports say significant human rights issues included credible reports of serious restrictions on freedom of expression, including enforcement of or threat of criminal or civil laws in order to limit expression; and crimes, violence, or threats of violence motivated by antisemitism. These governments have rejected such assertions that have been made by senior US officials, including Trump, Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Targeting Brazil over allegations of restricting Bolsonaro's speech Similar freedom-of-speech issues were raised in Brazil, which has more recently provoked Trump's ire by prosecuting his ally former right-wing President Jair Bolsonaro and led to the imposition of massive US tariffs and sanctions against Brazil's Supreme Court chief justice. The human rights situation in Brazil declined during the year, the report said. The courts took broad and disproportionate action to undermine freedom of speech and internet freedom by blocking millions of users' access to information on a major social media platform in response to a case of harassment. It added that the government undermined democratic debate by restricting access to online content deemed to undermine democracy and specifically mentioned suppressing the speech of Bolsonaro and his supporters. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)