&w=3840&q=100)
Will explore more, no compromise on farmers' interests: Shivraj on tariffs
Speaking at an event in Subrahmanyam Hall in New Delhi, Chouhan emphasised that India's population is its strength and the country will also find new markets.
In a veiled reference to the United States imposing 50 per cent tariff on India and apparent pressure in trade talks for greater access to India's agriculture and dairy sectors, Chouhan said there is vast difference in the size of landholdings and agricultural practices and cost of production in the two countries.
"The whole country was apprehensive, tariff...You know how much land they hold: 10,000 hectares, 15,000 hectares. Meanwhile, our farmers have land ranging from one acre to three acres, with many having just half an acre. We have a little land. Is this competition fair? You use GM seeds. There are different kinds of perceptions about our GM. The whole country was apprehensive, what will happen? They want their soybean to come here, their wheat, maize, rice," the Agriculture Minister said.
"The cost of production per hectare is less there because GM seeds and other things are used, so the yield is more and the cost is less. The cost of production per hectare here is much higher than there, and if it had come openly, the prices of the crops here would have fallen further in our country. Where would the farmer go? Therefore, it was decided that no matter what happens, there will be no compromise with the interests of the farmer," he added.
Chouhan referred to PM Modi's remarks that no matter how much loss he personally incurs, there will be no compromise with interests of farmers.
"Prime Minister Narendra Modi said recently that no matter how much loss I personally incur, but the interests of farmers will not be compromised. This is the voice of India, voice of farmers...Farmer brothers, be assured. If there is some difficutly, we will see. We will find new markets, and India itself is such a big market that our things will be consumed here. The population of the whole of Europe is 50 crore, America's is 30 crore, our population of 144 crore is not our weakness; it is our strength. That is why this decision was taken. It is also testing time, we don't have budge, bow..." Chouhan said.
US imposed 25 per cent reciprocal tariffs on Indian goods last month and increased it to 50 per cent over import of Russian oil.
Chouhan also spoke of the government's determination to provide more resources to agriculture. Chouhan also dismissed nuclear sabre-rattling by Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir and said India has decided to put the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance after the Pahalgam terror attack.
"Today, as a farmer, I want to congratulate our Prime Minister Narendra Modi, I want to thank him. The first thing is the Indus Water Treaty. Now the neighbour is giving threats from America. India is not going to be afraid of any threat. The whole world should hear that the Indus Treaty has been cancelled, and our water will be used for the farmers. This is Modi ji's decision. Such an unjust treaty, the rivers, land, water are ours and the canal will be built in Pakistan. We gave 80% of the water, and Nehru ji also gave money to build the canal there; this was a sin. Now this will not be allowed at any cost; our water will be used for our own purposes," Chouhan said.
Referring to Pakistan's support for cross-border terrorism against India, Chouhan said PM Modi has made it clear that "blood and water cannot flow together".
He said the government would soon bring in a new law to take strict action against those producing fake fertilisers and chemicals.
He said various schemes for farmers' welfare are being advanced on priority and digital payment of insurance amounts was made to farmers on Monday from Jhunjhunu in Rajasthan under the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana.
The Union Minister highlighted PM Modi's 'Nation First' resolve and emphasized that the Prime Minister has always taken strong, bold, nation-centric decisions, for which the country will forever remain indebted.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
15 minutes ago
- India.com
Maoist Killed In Encounter With Police In Chaibasa, SLR Rifle Seized
A Maoist was killed in a fierce encounter with police and security forces near Sauta village under Goilkera police station limits in West Singhbhum district, Jharkhand, on Wednesday morning. An SLR rifle was recovered from the site, officials said. Jharkhand Police IG (Operations) Dr Michael Raj said the encounter took place during a joint search operation in the Goilkera area, a known Maoist stronghold. He said as the team entered the forested hill terrain of Sauta, Maoist cadres opened indiscriminate fire. The forces retaliated, triggering a gun battle that lasted for nearly an hour, with several rounds of firing exchanged from both sides. According to the IG, the rebels suffered significant losses. A Maoist body was recovered after the area was secured, though the deceased is yet to be identified. He said security forces have intensified combing operations in the area to track down Maoists who managed to escape. For the past several weeks, police have been conducting sustained anti-Naxal operations in the Saranda region and adjoining forests -- dismantling Maoist bunkers, seizing large caches of IEDs, and recovering weapons. Officials say the campaign aims to eradicate Maoist influence from the region. Dr Raj asserted that the forces have been achieving 'continuous success' and expressed confidence that Maoist activities in the area will soon be eliminated. This year alone, 23 Maoists have been killed in various encounters across Jharkhand. In April, eight Maoists -- including top leader Prayag Manjhi alias Vivek -- were gunned down in a major operation in Bokaro district's Lugu Hills. Earlier, police had claimed that Maoist activities are now restricted only to the Saranda jungles in Jharkhand. They said they have been eliminated from other areas. Union Home Minister Amit Shah had earlier said that the security forces will wipe out Maoism from the country by March next year. He also appealed to the Maoists to surrender and join the mainstream by availing the government's rehabilitation package.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
15 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Zelenskyy to visit Berlin for meetings ahead of Trump-Putin summit
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy will visit Berlin on Wednesday to join German Chancellor Friedrich Merz for talks with European and US leaders ahead of the Trump-Putin summit later this week, the German government said. Merz has convened a series of virtual meetings on Wednesday in an attempt to have the voice of European and Ukraine's leaders heard ahead of a summit that they have been sidelined from. Zelenskyy is due to meet with European leaders first, to prepare for a virtual call with US President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance about an hour later. A call between leaders involved in the coalition of the willing countries prepared to help police any future peace agreement will take place last. Trump has said he wants to see whether Putin is serious about ending the war, now in its fourth year. Trump has disappointed allies in Europe by saying Ukraine will have to give up some Russian-held territory. He also said Russia must accept land swaps, although it was unclear what Putin might be expected to surrender. The Europeans and Ukraine are wary that Putin, who has waged the biggest land war in Europe since 1945 and used Russia's energy might to try to intimidate the EU, might secure favourable concessions and set the outlines of a peace deal without them. European countries' overarching fear is that Putin will set his sights on one of them next if he wins in Ukraine. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
15 minutes ago
- First Post
Will Pakistan go to war with India over the Indus Waters? Or are the threats hollow?
The threats continue from across the border. After Asim Munir and Bilawal Bhutto, Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif issued a warning over India's decision to pause the Indus Waters Treaty, saying it would teach the 'enemy' a 'lesson it would never forget'. But is there more to it than just words? Fishermen ride their boats in the Indus River. India's decision to pause the Indus Waters Treaty has led to several Pakistani officials to issue threats. File image/AFP In the aftermath of the April 22 Pahalgam attack, India took stern steps announcing that it was pausing the Indus Waters Treaty with Pakistan, with Prime Minister Narendra Modi stating, 'Now, India's water will flow for India's benefit, it will be conserved for India's benefit, and it will be used for India's progress.' However, this move of putting the years-old treaty on hold has enraged Pakistan — with its prime minister now issuing threats to New Delhi, saying the 'enemy' would not be allowed to snatch 'even one drop' of water belonging to his country. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD His remarks come after Pakistan's army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir and its former foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto issued similar threats. But should these threats worry India? What did Sharif say on IWT? Any attempt to block water flows into Pakistan would violate the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) and provoke a 'decisive response', Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said on Tuesday, issuing a stern warning to India yet again. Addressing an event in Islamabad, Sharif was quoted by Geo News as saying, 'The enemy cannot snatch even a single drop of water from Pakistan. If you attempt such a move, we will teach you a lesson you will never forget.' He described water as Pakistan's 'lifeline' and vowed no compromise on the nation's rights under international agreements. What about Bhutto and Asim Munir? Sharif's remarks come after former foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari made similar comments, terming the Indus Waters Treaty's suspension an attack on the Indus Valley Civilisation and said Pakistan would not back down if India forced it into war. While speaking at a function on Monday, the Pakistani leader say the country is 'strong enough for war to get back all six rivers,' vowing that Pakistan 'will never bow down'. According to a report by Express Tribune, Bhutto said that the Indus is the singular major water source for the entire country and that the Indus valley civilisation has remained connected with the river for aeons. 'We have fought wars in the past, but the Indus was never attacked, and no one even thought of building dams or canals on the river.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Even Pakistan's Field Marshal Asim Munir issued threats against India over the Indus Waters Treaty. From US soil, the war-mongering general said that Islamabad would destroy any dam if it cut off water flow to Pakistan. 'We will wait for India to build a dam, and when it does so, phir 10 missile sey faarigh kar dengey [we will destroy it with 10 missiles],' he was quoted as saying by The Print. India's decision to pause the Indus Waters Treaty in the aftermath of the Pahalgam attack, enraged many in Pakistan. File image/Reuters Do these threats hold any water? However, it seems that these remarks are part of just empty rhetoric. The treaty has a redressal system in which disputes are first taken up at the level of the Indus Commissioners of India and Pakistan, then escalated to the World Bank-appointed Neutral Expert, and finally to the International Court of Arbitration (CoA) in The Hague. The World Bank itself has no jurisdiction in the matter with President Ajay Banga stating that the said that the agency has no role to play beyond a facilitator in the Indus Waters Treaty signed between India and Pakistan in 1960 for sharing of waters of Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab. 'We have no role to play beyond a facilitator. There's a lot of speculation in the media about how the World Bank will step in and fix the problem, but it's all bunk. The World Bank's role is merely as a facilitator,' World Bank President, Ajay Banga, was quoted as saying earlier. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Moreover, India has also rejected the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) at The Hague in this matter. New Delhi has maintained that it does not recognise this body and had earlier insisted that a neutral expert should handle the matter. However, the PCA proceeded, resulting in India boycotting the proceedings, terming them as 'illegal'. In fact, on August 11, the PCA ruled that India must adhere to the Indus Waters Treaty in the design of new hydro-electric power stations on rivers that flow west to Pakistan endorsing Islamabad's position. In its ruling, it noted that it 'does not permit India to generate hydro-electric power on the Western Rivers based on what might be the ideal or best practices approach for engineering' of these projects. However, India has rejected this, maintaining that the arbitration process was unilaterally initiated by Pakistan, violating the treaty's dispute resolution mechanism and undermining bilateral dialogue. The Indus Waters Treaty is very crucial to Pakistan, as it lays down terms for the waters of the Indus River, a crucial lifeline for both countries. File image/Reuters Why is the Indus Waters so important to Pakistan? But why all of this hoopla over pact signed way back in 1960? Pakistan gets around 80 per cent of the Indus basin water, making it one of the largest irrigation systems in the world. About 80 per cent of Pakistan's farmland or nearly 16 million hectares, depends on this water, and 90 per cent of it goes into irrigation. Now, if the water was to dry up here as a result of India holding back water in its reservoirs, Pakistan's farmers might struggle to sow key crops like cotton and paddy on time. This would eventually hurt the country's economy. There's also the matter of power; the lack of water could squeeze power generation, hit factory production and drive electricity prices even higher. And that's bad news because Pakistan's power sector is already drowning in $9 billion of circular debt. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Only time will tell if Pakistan resorts to military solutions on the Indus Waters Treaty. For now, it's a wait and watch game? With inputs from agencies
