Even CEOs get a do-over now and then. Just ask OpenAI's Sam Altman.
That was the messaging from OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and his team last week.
A day later, Altman changed his mind. He told the world the older version of ChatGPT was going to stick around, after all — in addition to the new version that was meant to replace it.
I'm not getting into the weeds here about the change and change back, which is confusing for people who use ChatGPT, and impenetrable to non-users. (If you want to, I suggest you head to Business Insider's coverage, or this post from analyst Ben Thompson, for details.)
I'm most interested in Altman's incredibly quick pivot.
Because I'm having a hard time thinking of a CEO hyping a new product launch, and almost immediately changing course afterward, supposedly because his customers didn't like it.
Can you think of one? The most obvious one I can recall is New Coke, which you have to be pretty old to have tried. It only lasted for a few months in 1985, because lots of Old Coke drinkers hated it, and it's now synonymous with Corporate Mega Flops. But it still lasted for a few months — not a single day.
And this is different than product flops like the Samsung Galaxy Note 7, which was pulled off the market after a couple of months because some of them exploded.
And to be clear — Altman isn't recalling his newest, very high-profile AI engine. It still exists; he's just reversing his call to get rid of the older one.
(Business Insider owner Axel Springer has a commercial agreement with OpenAI. And our CEO thinks we should all use AI in our day-to-day work.)
It's possible that there are other, yet-to-surface explanations for Altman's change of heart. But so far, the only one he's offered is that he heard from people on Reddit and presumably other places who were upset to lose the versions of the service they already had.
If you are an Altman fan, you can paint the episode as a story that shows you how nimble and responsive a Big Tech CEO can be.
If you are less generous, you might argue that this was something Altman and his company should have seen coming, and acted accordingly. Either by not budging, and explaining to users that they were wrong, and would learn to love the new tech. Or by not making the move in the first place.
Thompson, in his Stratechery newsletter, worries that Altman's quick flip is a sign of a bigger problem — that he's too willing to tell people what they want to hear:
The real question for OpenAI is if they are in fact ... just a bit too obsequious and sycophantic. The paradox of successful consumer companies from Apple to Facebook is that they give customers what they want, but they don't ask them; they make decisions and then seek out revealed preference through data, not stated preference on social media. Hopefully OpenAI did that in this case; my concern is that the more realistic explanation is that this is a company that, in the end, can't say "no" to anyone.
Maybe! But I think this is probably a pretty small chapter in the OpenAI story — a visible, but ultimately not-that-consequential misstep. Maybe OpenAI really did misjudge its customers. But it was pretty easy to make those customers happy, simply by … not taking something away from them.
It also helps that this was a do-over Altman and crew could do with a couple key strokes. There were no devices (yet) to recall, no refunds to issue.
In that sense, this reminds me of something closer to a branding or marketing snafu, like a new Gap logo that lasted for 10 days in 2010, or that Kendall Jenner Pepsi ad from 2017 that disappeared after people called it stupid and tone-deaf. Embarrassing screw-ups, but not the first thing you think about when you think about those companies.
I myself had forgotten those stories until ChatGPT reminded me of them, when I asked for comparable flip-flops. (I don't use ChatGPT to write my stories, but I definitely find myself using it as a superior version of Google more and more these days.)
And yes, if we see more waffling from Altman in the months and years to come, we'll be able to point back to this botched rollout as the start of a pattern.
But for now, this one seems like an odd and interesting footnote, and not much else.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Reddit's Most Unhinged Money Hacks
You can find a lot of wild and wacky stuff on Reddit. Some of it is comical, some of it is bawdy. No small amount of it is weird. A lot of it makes you grateful for your own life — and for your common sense. There's no stone of human experience that Redditors will leave unturned, including everything from the existence of aliens to personal finance tips. Read Next: Check Out: While there are some very smart personal finance tips out there, penned by people who are professionals in the field or in communities dedicated to renowned experts, there are also a lot of money hacks that feel, well, the word unhinged comes to mind. GOBankingRates had a fine time finding some of the most unhinged money hacks on Reddit. Please, dear reader, don't try some of these at home. Getting Creative on Marketplace When members of the Ask Reddit community were asked about how they'd make money in a pinch, two people shared their very unique money-making hack, which fused creativity with a dash of duplicity. Redditor stonedfishing had a very simple plan to make a few extra bucks: 'Find rocks on the beach, spray them with clearcoat, and sell them on marketplace as artisanal decorations.' So, if you bought any decor from stonedfishing, you probably could have done this yourself for less money. Not to be outdone, _coffee_ shared that they did a similar thing with old wooden doors. Strip off the hinges and knobs, give them a good clean or polish, and voila, you can sell 'em as tabletops. Now that is some rustic chic. Learn More: Freezing Out Utilities Bills Keeping your home cool in the hot months and warm in the cold months can cost you, it's true. But Redditor duyli was undaunted — and frankly, unhinged — in their suggestion for saving money on utilities: 'Unplugged my fridge in winter. Nature's cold, why pay twice?' Saving a buck is great, but there are some things you do need to splurge on — and proper food sanitation is one of them. If you nosh on certain kinds of unrefrigerated foods, you could end up spending everything you saved on utilities bills, and then some, on a hospital stay. So, um, please don't try this. Highway to the Danger Zone? You can also put this tip firmly in the 'do not try this at home — or anywhere' category. When Redditors were asked how they save money while traveling, people in one thread shared a rather unconventional tip — traveling to a global geo-political hot spot to save money on tickets while avoiding long wait times and benefiting from enhanced security. 'I booked Peru early 2023 when all that political stuff was going down,' HappyPenguin2023 recalled. 'Got super cheap prices and everything had settled down by the time we went in July — but crowds were still really low!' Another user chimed in, sharing that, by booking their travel to Bogota during huge protests, they were able to save 60% on hotel costs. That's One Way To Earn Credit Card Points Once upon a time, Redditor Perfect_Zone_4919 had a perfect scheme for racking up those valuable credit card points: 'Shut down now, but I used to buy golden dollar coins from the mint with a credit card. They had free shipping and no tax because they wanted to get them in circulation. As soon as they arrived, I'd cash them in at the bank and repeat. Built up huge reward points on my card.' Avoid Those Check Bag Fees by Any Means Necessary Redditor kacombs may say that they look like 'an eccentric weirdo at the airport' but one person's eccentricity is another person's thriftiness. And this Redditor will go to some fashion extremes to save money on checking a bag: 'I always wear several layers of clothing to avoid checking a bag (even when it's hot) and I always wear my biggest pair of shoes (usually hiking boots). I also wear a fanny pack under my sweatshirt/coat and sometimes I stuff a neck pillow (or even just regular pillowcase) with clothes,' they wrote. 'Most airlines have policies to not charge for a pillow and it's honestly none of anyone's business whether my pillow is filled with down/fiberfill or cotton and polyester lol.' Is this comfortable? Of course not, but to make it bearable, they'll hide tote bags to switch up items. Oh, and they've also been known to put clothes and other items in a plain brown paper bag, making it seem like they've gone shopping at the airport to avoid those bag check fees. Well, we promised some unhinged money hacks from Reddit, and we delivered. But seriously, don't try most of these at home. More From GOBankingRates New Law Could Make Electricity Bills Skyrocket in These 4 States I'm a Self-Made Millionaire: 6 Ways I Use ChatGPT To Make a Lot of Money 5 Strategies High-Net-Worth Families Use To Build Generational Wealth Warren Buffett: 10 Things Poor People Waste Money On This article originally appeared on Reddit's Most Unhinged Money Hacks Solve the daily Crossword
Fast Company
an hour ago
- Fast Company
Mark Cuban and Sam Altman just warned about disappearing jobs and the need to learn AI
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman isn't shy about discussing the future of AI. As the CEO of a market leading company, his predictions carry plenty of weight, such as his worry that AI could make things go 'horribly wrong,' or that AI agents will completely transform the workplace. Nor is billionaire Mark Cuban, who also sees vast changes to an AI-dominated workplace. Altman's recent remarks to finance executives at a Federal Reserve conference on large banks and capital requirements included his belief that entire job categories will be eaten up by AI. He said customer service is all but completely ready for an AI takeover right now, as reported by the Guardian newspaper. 'That's a category where I just say, you know what, when you call customer support, you're on target and AI, and that's fine,' he said. When a user calls a hotline now, AI answers, and it's like 'a super-smart, capable person,' Altman explained, adding that 'there's no phone tree, there's no transfers. It can do everything that any customer support agent at that company could do. It does not make mistakes. It's very quick. You call once, the thing just happens, it's done.' You may have already encountered an AI customer service system, or at the very least spoken briefly to one before being forwarded to a person with the info you're seeking. And anecdotally, if Altman's promise of no mistakes proves true, then that's a huge sell for customer service departments—and consumer satisfaction. (We all know how frustrating it can be calling these lines.) What an AI can offer under these circumstances is also clearly defined: customers probably call with a discrete set of common issues, and the AI can be trained on what to do. Subscribe to the Daily newsletter. Fast Company's trending stories delivered to you every day Privacy Policy | Fast Company Newsletters But the next industry Altman said was ripe for an AI takeover is more complex, requiring deep knowledge and empathy, and there are much higher stakes at play. According to the AI CEO, AI is already better than human doctors. It can, 'most of the time,' surpass human physician skills, he argued, suggesting it's 'a better diagnostician than most doctors in the world.' But then he pointed out a very human truth: 'people still go to doctors,' he said, and he added that he felt the same, 'maybe I'm a dinosaur here, but I really do not want to, like, entrust my medical fate to ChatGPT with no human doctor in the loop.' That at least aligns with warnings from medical experts who say that while AI may be useful for medical advice under some circumstances, like helping to make medical notes, it's just too subject to misinformation errors to be trusted to give mental health advice or diagnoses, for example. In fact a group of therapists recently warned of the danger in doing so. Altman also told the bankers that he's worried near future AIs could be used by bad actors, perhaps based overseas, to attack the U.S. financial system. He cited the issue of AI voice clones as a direct risk. While he's not predicting AI will steal banking jobs here, he is essentially warning that the entire industry could be upended by AI, used the wrong way. You may think Altman is being unnecessarily doomy here. In this case, you may be more aligned with the thinking of billionaire entrepreneur Mark Cuban. He's just suggested that in his expert mind, AI will become a 'baseline' workplace skill inside five years. Essentially he thinks that 'like email or Excel,' everyone, from fresh graduates to practiced entrepreneurs, will have to master AI to succeed at their tasks. in an interview with Fortune, Cuban predicted that thanks to the force multiplying effects AI can have, 'we'll see more people working for themselves' thanks to the rise of AI assistants, possibly powered by agent AI tech, which can transform 'solo founders into full teams.' And worse, if you're note already using AI to 'move faster or make smarter decisions, you're behind,' he said. While framed more positively than Altman's statements, a closer look says Cuban is still predicting whole classes of jobs will disappear inside five years. Why would a startup CEO need a personal assistant, a coding expert or a marketing adviser if all those tasks could be done by next-gen AI? advertisement All of this, while interesting, could be dismissed as mere PR for the AI industry, but you should actually care about this expert advice. Altman's warnings could have you looking at what tasks you already feel comfortable outsourcing to an AI tool instead of a human worker. And then, taking Cuban's advice, you should consider taking time to properly educate yourself about the promises and risks of AI technology, and also plan on upskilling or reskilling your existing staff. The potential efficiencies AI promises mean they could — By Kit Eaton This article originally appeared on Fast Company's sister publication, Inc. Inc. is the voice of the American entrepreneur. We inspire, inform, and document the most fascinating people in business: the risk-takers, the innovators, and the ultra-driven go-getters that represent the most dynamic force in the American economy.
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Here's why Google might have to sell Chrome, and which companies want to buy it
Chrome is the world's most popular web browser. But how much longer it belongs to Google is an open question. A court last year ruled that Google had violated antitrust laws by maintaining a monopoly on internet search. A second ruling in April found Google also monopolized open-web digital ad markets. The Justice Department asked a judge to force Google to divest its premier web browser to remedy the case. A court is expected to rule on that by the end of this month. Chrome, a free web browser developed by Google, is an important distribution tool for Google Search and its other services. It also provides insights into users' search habits and is the most popular web browser on the market. Being forced to sell Chrome would be an undeniable blow to Google and its parent company, Alphabet Inc. Analysts at Barclays said such an action could be a black swan scenario for Google stock, sparking an estimated 15% to 25% decline. Google denies it's a monopoly. It said in a blog post in May that offloading the web browser to another party could render it "obsolete" and "expose billions of people to cyber-attacks." Although the judge has not yet decided Chrome's ultimate fate, competitors are already lining up to gladly take it off Google's hands. an AI search chat platform, confirmed to Business Insider that it made a $35 billion bid for Chrome this week. JP Morgan and several private equity firms backed the bid. is a division of the digital marketing company Public Good, which acquired in July. Public Good President Melissa Anderson and CEO Danny Bibi told Business Insider they reached out to Google on Wednesday. "Given the number of worldwide users Chrome has, it's a really just phenomenal way to scale user adoption," Anderson said. The pair said they're committed to using AI ethically, which means offering its search for free in an effort to make knowledge accessible for all. They also said founded in 1998, already has a network of clients, so finding potential advertisers wouldn't be a heavy lift. Perplexity Perplexity, an AI search startup, made a $34.5 billion bid for the web browser this week. The company launched an AI-native browser, Comet, in July. Although the bid is higher than Perplexity's entire valuation, The Wall Street Journal reported that several investors have agreed to back the potential deal. Perplexity said it would continue supporting Chromium, Google's open-source web browser project that's the foundation of Chrome, as part of the deal, according to the outlet. The outlet reported that Perplexity would continue to keep Google as the default search engine, but users could change that through settings. OpenAI Although OpenAI's ChatGPT turned it into the leading AI startup in Silicon Valley, the company is a tiny fraction of the size of a Big Tech mammoth like Google. Purchasing Chrome, however, would help even the playing field. During Google's antitrust hearing in April, OpenAI's head of ChatGPT testified that the company would be interested in acquiring Chrome if Google were forced to divest. "Yes, we would, as would many other parties," Nick Turley told the court, according to Bloomberg. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman also recently said he'd be interested in snapping up Chrome. "If Chrome is really going to sell, we should take a look at it," Altman told a group of journalists on Thursday, according to The Verge. Yahoo Yahoo, a direct competitor of Google, would also be interested in bidding on Chrome, Bloomberg reported. Brian Provost, the general manager for Yahoo Search, said Chrome is "arguably the most important strategic player on the web" during a hearing for Google's antitrust case in April. "We would be able to pursue it with Apollo," Provost said, referring to Yahoo's owner, Apollo Global Management Inc.
