A Massive Fault Line Was Supposed to Be ‘Dead'. It Sure Seems Like It's Stirring Again.
The Tintina fault is thought to have been inactive for more than 40 million years, but new research suggests that earthquakes occurred in the zone much more recently.
Researchers from the University of Victoria identified fault scarps that suggest major slips occurred during the Quaternary period (2.6 million years ago to present day).
The team estimated that the fault accumulates.2 to.8 millimeters of strain each year, meaning that a release could cause a 7.5 magnitude earthquake—or on that's even bigger.
Earthquakes occur when two blocks of earth slip past one another at a fault. While earthquakes are perhaps the most tangible reminder that the ground we stand on is always shifting, not all movement at fault planes is sudden. Sometimes blocks slowly creep past each other across centuries. Some faults, like the Tintina fault, are believed to be inactive, meaning that they no longer have earthquakes. The Tintina fault stretches about 1,000 kilometers (621 miles) across the Yukon territory in northwestern Canada, and until recently, scientists believed the zone to have been inactive for over 40 million years.
A new study published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, however, tells a different story. The research team—led by experts from the University of Victoria (UVic)—discovered a 130 kilometer (80 mile) stretch with evidence of recent movement. Now, experts believe devastating earthquakes could be on the way.
The team used high-resolution topographic data and LiDAR surveys collected from satellites, airplanes, and drones to identify fault scarps (linear ruptures produced by landscapes) in the area. Researchers found a series of fault scarps passing within 20 kilometers (12 miles) of Dawson City, Canada—evidence that could completely change our understanding of the Tintina fault's movement.
'Over the past couple of decades there have been a few small earthquakes of magnitude 3 to 4 detected along the Tintina fault, but nothing to suggest it is capable of large ruptures,' Theron Finley, lead author of the study, said in a press release. 'The expanding availability of high-resolution data prompted us to re-examine the fault, looking for evidence of prehistoric earthquakes in the landscape.'
Along the fault scarps, the team found 2.6-million-year-old glacial landforms offset by approximately 1000 meters (3280 feet). Researchers also discovered other 132,000-year-old landforms that were only offset by 75 meters (246 feet). Both findings confirm that the fault slipped substantially during earthquakes in the Quaternary period—a geological timeframe spanning from 2.6 million years ago to present day. Interestingly, landforms that emerged 12,000 years ago showed no movement, meaning that there haven't been any large ruptures in the area for over 12 millennia.
Using the data collected, researchers estimate that the fault accumulates about.2 to.8 millimeters of strain every year, which could mean that a devastating earthquake is imminent.
'We determined that future earthquakes on the Tintina fault could exceed magnitude 7.5,' Finley said in the release. 'Based on the data, we think that the fault may be at a relatively late stage of a seismic cycle, having accrued a slip deficit, or build-up of strain, of six metres in the last 12,000 years. If this were to be released, it would cause a significant earthquake.'
Earthquakes with a magnitude of 3.5 or higher are typically noticeable, but cause little damage. Once an earthquake reaches a magnitude of 6.1, however, it can do damage to poorly constructed buildings. As Finley explained, the Tintina fault may exceed magnitude 7.5, meaning that it would be considered a 'major' earthquake on the magnitude scale, and could cause major damage across larger areas.
According to the press release, Canada's National Seismic Hazard Model (NSHM) doesn't currently recognize the Tintina fault as a discrete seismogenic fault source.
You Might Also Like
The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape
The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere
Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
A Massive Fault Line Was Supposed to Be ‘Dead'. It Sure Seems Like It's Stirring Again.
Here's what you'll learn when you read this story: The Tintina fault is thought to have been inactive for more than 40 million years, but new research suggests that earthquakes occurred in the zone much more recently. Researchers from the University of Victoria identified fault scarps that suggest major slips occurred during the Quaternary period (2.6 million years ago to present day). The team estimated that the fault accumulates.2 to.8 millimeters of strain each year, meaning that a release could cause a 7.5 magnitude earthquake—or on that's even bigger. Earthquakes occur when two blocks of earth slip past one another at a fault. While earthquakes are perhaps the most tangible reminder that the ground we stand on is always shifting, not all movement at fault planes is sudden. Sometimes blocks slowly creep past each other across centuries. Some faults, like the Tintina fault, are believed to be inactive, meaning that they no longer have earthquakes. The Tintina fault stretches about 1,000 kilometers (621 miles) across the Yukon territory in northwestern Canada, and until recently, scientists believed the zone to have been inactive for over 40 million years. A new study published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, however, tells a different story. The research team—led by experts from the University of Victoria (UVic)—discovered a 130 kilometer (80 mile) stretch with evidence of recent movement. Now, experts believe devastating earthquakes could be on the way. The team used high-resolution topographic data and LiDAR surveys collected from satellites, airplanes, and drones to identify fault scarps (linear ruptures produced by landscapes) in the area. Researchers found a series of fault scarps passing within 20 kilometers (12 miles) of Dawson City, Canada—evidence that could completely change our understanding of the Tintina fault's movement. 'Over the past couple of decades there have been a few small earthquakes of magnitude 3 to 4 detected along the Tintina fault, but nothing to suggest it is capable of large ruptures,' Theron Finley, lead author of the study, said in a press release. 'The expanding availability of high-resolution data prompted us to re-examine the fault, looking for evidence of prehistoric earthquakes in the landscape.' Along the fault scarps, the team found 2.6-million-year-old glacial landforms offset by approximately 1000 meters (3280 feet). Researchers also discovered other 132,000-year-old landforms that were only offset by 75 meters (246 feet). Both findings confirm that the fault slipped substantially during earthquakes in the Quaternary period—a geological timeframe spanning from 2.6 million years ago to present day. Interestingly, landforms that emerged 12,000 years ago showed no movement, meaning that there haven't been any large ruptures in the area for over 12 millennia. Using the data collected, researchers estimate that the fault accumulates about.2 to.8 millimeters of strain every year, which could mean that a devastating earthquake is imminent. 'We determined that future earthquakes on the Tintina fault could exceed magnitude 7.5,' Finley said in the release. 'Based on the data, we think that the fault may be at a relatively late stage of a seismic cycle, having accrued a slip deficit, or build-up of strain, of six metres in the last 12,000 years. If this were to be released, it would cause a significant earthquake.' Earthquakes with a magnitude of 3.5 or higher are typically noticeable, but cause little damage. Once an earthquake reaches a magnitude of 6.1, however, it can do damage to poorly constructed buildings. As Finley explained, the Tintina fault may exceed magnitude 7.5, meaning that it would be considered a 'major' earthquake on the magnitude scale, and could cause major damage across larger areas. According to the press release, Canada's National Seismic Hazard Model (NSHM) doesn't currently recognize the Tintina fault as a discrete seismogenic fault source. You Might Also Like The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
'Once in 1,300 Years': The World's Most Extreme Rogue Wave
Like the kraken, or going out for just one beer with the boys, rogue waves were once the stuff of myth. However, in recent years, scientists have been studying, analyzing, and documenting these mammoth liquid mountains, uncovering vital insights. And of course, they've gotta start at the top – the biggest, heaviest, 'most extreme.' Hence, the rogue wave discussed below. In November of 2020, an abnormally large wave was captured by buoys off British Columbia, measuring 17.6 meters (58 feet) high. And that wave, after the scientists dug in, dubbed it the 'most extreme' on record. It's been called the Ucluelet wave. And due to its size in comparison to the surrounding seas, it's been given that title as, not the biggest, but most extreme. Why? "Proportionally, the Ucluelet wave is likely the most extreme rogue wave ever recorded," said Dr. Johannes Gemmrich of the University of Victoria. "Only a few rogue waves in high sea states have been observed directly, and nothing of this magnitude. The probability of such an event occurring is once in 1,300 years."As mentioned, this wasn't the biggest rogue wave ever recorded. That designation belongs to the Draupner Wave, which occurred off the coast in Norway in 1995. It struck an offshore oil rig and measured in at 25.6 meters (84 feet), while the surrounding waves averaged 12 meters (40 feet). Learn more about that behemoth here. But the Ucluelet Wave, although not as big as the Draupner, was the most intense due to the massive jump in size paralleled to the other waves around it. Speaking to their research, MarineLabs CEO, Dr. Scott Beatty, said: "The unpredictability of rogue waves, and the sheer power of these 'walls of water' can make them incredibly dangerous to marine operations and the public. The potential of predicting rogue waves remains an open question, but our data is helping to better understand when, where and how rogue waves form, and the risks that they pose." Rogue waves: Once fable, now fact.'Once in 1,300 Years': The World's Most Extreme Rogue Wave first appeared on Surfer on Aug 4, 2025 Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
A Massive Fault Line Was Supposed to Be ‘Dead'. It Sure Seems Like It's Stirring Again.
Here's what you'll learn when you read this story: The Tintina fault is thought to have been inactive for more than 40 million years, but new research suggests that earthquakes occurred in the zone much more recently. Researchers from the University of Victoria identified fault scarps that suggest major slips occurred during the Quaternary period (2.6 million years ago to present day). The team estimated that the fault accumulates.2 to.8 millimeters of strain each year, meaning that a release could cause a 7.5 magnitude earthquake—or on that's even bigger. Earthquakes occur when two blocks of earth slip past one another at a fault. While earthquakes are perhaps the most tangible reminder that the ground we stand on is always shifting, not all movement at fault planes is sudden. Sometimes blocks slowly creep past each other across centuries. Some faults, like the Tintina fault, are believed to be inactive, meaning that they no longer have earthquakes. The Tintina fault stretches about 1,000 kilometers (621 miles) across the Yukon territory in northwestern Canada, and until recently, scientists believed the zone to have been inactive for over 40 million years. A new study published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, however, tells a different story. The research team—led by experts from the University of Victoria (UVic)—discovered a 130 kilometer (80 mile) stretch with evidence of recent movement. Now, experts believe devastating earthquakes could be on the way. The team used high-resolution topographic data and LiDAR surveys collected from satellites, airplanes, and drones to identify fault scarps (linear ruptures produced by landscapes) in the area. Researchers found a series of fault scarps passing within 20 kilometers (12 miles) of Dawson City, Canada—evidence that could completely change our understanding of the Tintina fault's movement. 'Over the past couple of decades there have been a few small earthquakes of magnitude 3 to 4 detected along the Tintina fault, but nothing to suggest it is capable of large ruptures,' Theron Finley, lead author of the study, said in a press release. 'The expanding availability of high-resolution data prompted us to re-examine the fault, looking for evidence of prehistoric earthquakes in the landscape.' Along the fault scarps, the team found 2.6-million-year-old glacial landforms offset by approximately 1000 meters (3280 feet). Researchers also discovered other 132,000-year-old landforms that were only offset by 75 meters (246 feet). Both findings confirm that the fault slipped substantially during earthquakes in the Quaternary period—a geological timeframe spanning from 2.6 million years ago to present day. Interestingly, landforms that emerged 12,000 years ago showed no movement, meaning that there haven't been any large ruptures in the area for over 12 millennia. Using the data collected, researchers estimate that the fault accumulates about.2 to.8 millimeters of strain every year, which could mean that a devastating earthquake is imminent. 'We determined that future earthquakes on the Tintina fault could exceed magnitude 7.5,' Finley said in the release. 'Based on the data, we think that the fault may be at a relatively late stage of a seismic cycle, having accrued a slip deficit, or build-up of strain, of six metres in the last 12,000 years. If this were to be released, it would cause a significant earthquake.' Earthquakes with a magnitude of 3.5 or higher are typically noticeable, but cause little damage. Once an earthquake reaches a magnitude of 6.1, however, it can do damage to poorly constructed buildings. As Finley explained, the Tintina fault may exceed magnitude 7.5, meaning that it would be considered a 'major' earthquake on the magnitude scale, and could cause major damage across larger areas. According to the press release, Canada's National Seismic Hazard Model (NSHM) doesn't currently recognize the Tintina fault as a discrete seismogenic fault source. You Might Also Like The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life? Solve the daily Crossword
