Who was Tipu Sultan? Anwar urges Malaysians to look beyond colonial narratives in Asian history
He said that the contributions of Tipu Sultan and his father Haider Ali, as defenders against British colonial expansion, exemplified the importance of understanding history from the perspective of local and regional leaders rather than solely from Western accounts.
'History is not necessarily very kind, one of our scholars Syed Hussein Alatas emphasised the need to reconstruct history because history cannot be written only by the winners or from the perspective of the colonial rulers,' he said during the launch of the More Than A Day As A Tiger exhibition at the Islamic Arts Museum Malaysia, here tonight.
Also present were the Prime Minister's wife Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail; Albukhary Foundation Chairman Tan Sri Syed Mokhtar Al-Bukhary; Malaysian National News Agency (Bernama) Chairman Datuk Seri Wong Chun Wai and his spouse, as well as representatives from embassies and consulates.
The Prime Minister noted that Malaysian history, like that of many others, is often written from the perspective of the British, essentially reflecting Western colonial rule.
'Of course, there have been lots of academic accounts, including by Edward Said on Orientalism, but the manner, the whole discipline of history, culture and society is being dictated by certain Western viewpoints,' he said.
Anwar also shared his personal experience visiting Mysore before taking office, recalling his admiration for Tipu Sultan's modest palace and his protection of Hindu temples, including the ancient temple in Mysore.
He also praised Tipu Sultan's foresight in mastering military technology to confront colonial powers, citing the Mysore Sultanate's renowned cannons and firearms that had shocked the British in the early wars.
'It is not just an ordinary exhibition, but to showcase the history of India and the Muslim world, and the history of the anti-colonial struggle against colonial rule, in this particular case, the British rule.
'His diplomatic skills with the few sultanates, Muslims and Hindus in India and his venture into international diplomacy, particularly in persuading the French forces to support his struggle against the British,' he said.
Anwar noted that while Malaysians have historically had limited knowledge of Tipu Sultan and Haider Ali's legacy, the Islamic Arts Museum Malaysia's exhibition would significantly enhance understanding about the two historical figures.
Featuring an extensive collection of artefacts, manuscripts, weaponry and artworks related to Haider Ali and Tipu Sultan, the exhibition will run from tomorrow until January 11, 2026, at Special Gallery 2. — Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
30 minutes ago
- The Star
Chinese tourists to get visa-free entry
South Korea will offer visa-free entry to tourist groups from China, for a temporary period from Sept 29 through June 2026, to boost foreign tourism ahead of an Asia-Pacific summit, the government said. The visa-free offer was first announced in March after China's decision last November to offer a visa exemption to South Koreans and foreign visitors from several other countries. It also comes amid expectations that ties between the two countries will improve under the new South Korean administration of liberal President Lee Jae-myung. The decision to introduce the measure ahead of a Chinese holiday period in early October will help boost the domestic economy amid a recovery in foreign visits, the tourism ministry said yesterday, after a meeting to revitalising tourism ahead of the Asia-Pacific summit. South Korea will host a summit of leaders from 21 economies for the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum from Oct 31 to Nov 1 in the southeastern city of Gyeongju, a gathering where Chinese leader Xi Jinping and US President Donald Trump might hold separate talks. — Reuters
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
The dialogical basis of Anwar Ibrahim's Nobel Prize nomination — Osman Bakar and Phar Kim Beng
AUGUST 7 — In the realm of international recognition for peace and justice, the Nobel Peace Prize stands as the world's most prestigious accolade. While the prize is often awarded for mediating ceasefires or ending wars, it is equally important to remember that peace is a process, not merely a momentary cessation of violence. It is in this broader, global civilisational sense that we offer our endorsement of Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim's nomination — not solely for his timely role in the Thailand–Cambodia ceasefire, but for something far more enduring: his lifelong contributions to the culture of dialogue. His role in the ceasefire, we believe, is not only born out of his sense of responsibility as ASEAN chairman and his 'love thy neighbour' philosophy but more importantly as a clear expression of his lifelong commitment to the pursuit of peace through dialogue. Indeed, even well before the recent escalation between Phnom Penh and Bangkok, there were sustained discussions among scholars, thinkers and civil society leaders about nominating Anwar Ibrahim for the Nobel Peace Prize. Our reasons were rooted not in the tactical diplomacy of a single event, but in the strategic and ethical ethos that Anwar has exemplified over decades: the empowerment of dialogical culture across civilisations, religions and political fault lines. Anwar Ibrahim's public life has consistently been defined by his belief in the power of words over weapons, and in the transformative potential of mutual understanding over mutual suspicion. From his early involvement with Islamic civil society movements in the 1970s, to his intellectual engagement with global thinkers like Ismail Al-Faruqi, John Esposito, even the works of Izutsu Toshiko, Anwar has consistently called for the harmonisation of faith, reason and governance through dialogue. He has embodied what we may call a 'civilisational mediator' — a leader who recognises that conflicts, even geopolitical ones, are rooted in deeper epistemological and cultural misunderstandings. The current ceasefire between Thailand and Cambodia, brokered in part through Malaysia's quiet but deliberate diplomacy under Anwar's chairmanship of ASEAN, is a case in point. While the dynamics of great power politics may shape regional developments in complex ways, this should not detract from the dialogical infrastructure that made the ceasefire possible. Moreover, it is continuing dialogue — the spirit of which flows in his blood veins — that will help sustain peace between the two nations and in the region beyond Anwar's chairmanship of ASEAN and even premiership of Malaysia. The success of any negotiation is built on years of trust, cultural literacy and principled leadership. This is precisely where Anwar's lifetime of work in fostering interfaith dialogue and regional understanding becomes invaluable. Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's civilisational positioning of Malaysia as a bridge nationhas become a model of peaceful coexistence in an increasingly fractured global order. — Picture by Sayuti Zainudin His leadership in convening the ASEAN–GCC Summit, coupled with China's active participation in the ASEAN–GCC–China Summit, represents a defining moment of dialogical diplomacy. These summits were not merely symbolic. They brought together diverse civilisational blocs — Southeast Asia, the Gulf and East Asia — into a single framework of cooperation grounded in mutual respect, shared values and an agenda for peace and development. That such a summit could take place under Malaysia's chairmanship, with Anwar at the helm, reflects his profound ability to orchestrate dialogue at a civilisational scale. It is worth recalling that Nobel Peace Laureates are not chosen merely for stopping a war. Many have been honoured for laying the groundwork for future peace — by building institutions, creating intellectual bridges or planting seeds of understanding in hostile terrains. In this regard, Anwar's lifelong commitment to the dialogical method — to resolving difference through deliberation rather than domination — resonates with the highest ideals of Alfred Nobel's vision. Anwar Ibrahim's political trials have also forged in him a moral authority that cannot be manufactured. His years in prison did not diminish his belief in reconciliation. Upon returning to power, he chose dialogue over vengeance, inclusion over exclusion. This is not just a political choice — it is a philosophical and a moral one, a commitment to the idea that democracy, like religion, must be grounded in a culture of ethical conversation and mutual respect. Moreover, his civilisational positioning of Malaysia as a bridge nation — between East and West, Islam and the modern world, between liberalism and tradition — has become a model of peaceful coexistence in an increasingly fractured global order. Whether through the ASEAN–GCC–China platform, Track II diplomacy, or his writings and speeches on the spiritual and ethical foundations of governance, Anwar's hand has always been visible, guiding the conversation toward common ground. Some may argue that the full impact of his dialogical contributions has yet to be measured on the global stage. We submit, however, that the Nobel Peace Prize has always been as much about moral signal as political signal. It is about honouring those who, through patience and principle, have shaped a new architecture of peace, even when global attention is elsewhere. In that spirit, we submit that Anwar Ibrahim's Nobel-worthiness lies not in a single ceasefire — though that alone is commendable — but in a life devoted to the ethics of dialogue. A prize bestowed upon him would be a recognition not only of his past, but a reinforcement of a model the world urgently needs: leadership rooted in humility, guided by wisdom, and committed to dialogue in the service of humanity. Let us not wait until history catches up. Let us recognise now what many already know: that Anwar Ibrahim represents the dialogical conscience of our time. * Emeritus Prof Dr Datuk Osman Bakar is the Al-Ghazali Chair of Epistemology and Civilisational Studies Rector at International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM). Prof Dr Phar Kim Beng is professor of Asean Studies, IIUM and director, Institute of Internationalization and Asean Studies (IINTAS). ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Free Malaysia Today
6 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
PAS leaders may have broken laws with cow, bull analogy, says minister
Law and institutional reform minister Azalina Othman Said said the PAS leaders may have breached several provisions in the Penal Code with their remarks. PETALING JAYA : Law and institutional reform minister Azalina Othman Said said PAS leaders may have broken several laws by comparing women leaders to animals and citing the Quran in defending the analogy. In a post on X, Azalina said the PAS leaders may have breached several provisions, namely Sections 509, 504 and 298A of the Penal Code. The three sections deal with insulting the modesty of a person, intentional insult to provoke a breach of the peace, and actions that cause disharmony, respectively. She did not name the leaders, but uploaded two articles which identified Maran PAS Youth information chief Salman Al Farisi and party deputy president Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man. 'To whom it may concern: if you are still comparing women leaders to animals in 2025, congrats! 'Do better, or lawyer up,' she said, in an apparent sarcastic jab at Salman and Tuan Ibrahim, who had defended the youth leader. Azalina also said those who incorporated religion into their argument could be committing an offence under Section 507B of the Penal Code that deals with insulting words. On Monday, Malaysiakini reported Salman as comparing men to bulls, and women to cows when emphasising the importance of men in leadership roles, based on his experience in livestock farming. Salman had claimed that a cow would usually lead the herd, while bulls serve to protect the herd. He said society should, therefore, avoid elevating women to leadership positions, and that men should assume leadership roles in accordance with Quranic teachings. Earlier today, Tuan Ibrahim defended Salman, saying such analogies were used in literary works and not meant to degrade women. 'In Islamic literature in the past, there are works such as 'Kalilah wa Dimnah', which are filled with analogies and stories about animals, used to convey teachings and moral values,' he was quoted as saying. He said he saw nothing sexist about Salman's remark.
