
Average rate on a 30-year mortgage eases again, offering modest relief for home shoppers
Borrowing costs on 15-year fixed-rate mortgages popular with homeowners refinancing their home loans also eased. The average rate dropped to 5.85 percent from 5.87 percent last week. A year ago it was 5.99 percent Freddie Mac said. Elevated mortgage rates continue to weigh on the US housing market which has been in a sales slump going back to 2022 when rates started to climb from the rock-bottom lows they reached during the pandemic.
Mortgage rates are influenced by several factors from the Federal Reserve's interest rate policy decisions to bond market investors' expectations for the economy and inflation. The main barometer is the 10-year Treasury yield which lenders use as a guide to pricing home loans. The yield was at 4.34 percent at midday Thursday down from 4.37 percent late Wednesday.
Yields moved higher most of July as traders bet that the Fed would keep its key short-term interest rate unchanged at its meeting this month. On Wednesday the central bank's policymaking committee voted to hold its main interest rate steady. And Fed Chair Jerome Powell pushed back on expectations that the Fed could cut rates at its next meeting in September pointing to how inflation remains above the Fed's 2 percent target while the job market still looks to be in balance. A cut in rates would give the job market and overall economy a boost but it could also fuel inflation just as the Trump administration's tariffs risk raising prices for US consumers. If a September rate cut starts to be more likely it is possible that we could see mortgage rates edge downward at the end of the summer similar to what we saw last year at this time said Lisa Sturtevant chief economist at Bright MLS. If inflation expectations continue to be high mortgage rates could also remain higher.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


ArabGT
3 hours ago
- ArabGT
Tesla Hit with $243 Million Verdict Over Fatal Crash
A courtroom in Florida may have just drawn a new line in the sand for autonomous driving. In a landmark ruling, a jury ordered Tesla to pay $243 million in damages following a fatal 2019 crash involving its Autopilot system. But beyond the headline figure, what really stands out is the message: when technology falls short, it can—and will—be held accountable. The tragedy claimed the life of Naibel Benavides Leon and left her former partner, Dillon Angulo, with lifelong injuries. Both were standing beside their parked Chevrolet Tahoe when a Tesla Model S, driven at high speed by George McGee, slammed into them. McGee had reportedly dropped his phone and was reaching for it when he ran a stop sign and red light—without any warning from the Autopilot system. The jury didn't let Tesla off the hook. While the driver bore a significant share of the blame, the court also held Tesla responsible—arguing that the design of Autopilot allowed for misuse, and that public claims from Elon Musk about its safety may have misled consumers. The verdict awarded $129 million in compensatory damages and $200 million in punitive damages. Tesla was found liable for 33% of the total. For Tesla, this is more than just a legal blow. It's a moment of reckoning. The company pushed back, insisting the crash was due solely to human error and warning that this kind of ruling could slow progress in developing life-saving technology. 'No car—then or now—could have avoided this accident,' Tesla said in a statement. But for Dillon and the family of Naibel, this ruling was something else entirely: a recognition that something broke down when it mattered most, and that someone needed to be held responsible. Legal experts are calling it a turning point. Professor Alex Lemann of Marquette University noted, 'We've seen many fatal Autopilot crashes, but this is the first time Tesla has been hit with a major financial judgment. It changes things.' And it comes at a sensitive time. As Tesla navigates slowing EV sales and rising pressure to justify its massive market valuation, the spotlight is back on whether its bold promises about autonomy and AI are outpacing reality. At its core, this case raises a vital question: in a world racing toward automation, what happens when the machines we're told to trust fail us? The answer, at least in this Florida courtroom, is that someone must answer for it.

Al Arabiya
a day ago
- Al Arabiya
US President Trump stakes reputation as dealmaker with tariff policy
Donald Trump is staking his reputation as a tough negotiator and slick dealmaker -- that has served him well throughout his life -- with his ultra-muscular, protectionist tariffs policy. On Friday, the White House released a picture of the US president seen with a smartphone pressed to his ear, with the caption: 'Making calls. Making deals. MAKING AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!' Every trade deal announced by the president, who is convinced that tariffs are both a tool and manifestation of America's economic might, is celebrated by his supporters as a show of his negotiating prowess. This week's flurry of rate changes was no different. On Thursday, with the stroke of a black marker, the former real estate developer slapped fresh tariffs on dozens of US trade partners. They will kick in on August 7 instead of August 1, which had previously been touted as a hard deadline. The Republican leader's backtracking, frequently setting trade deadlines only to rescind or extend them -- he most recently granted Mexico a 90-day extension -- has given rise to the mocking acronym 'TACO' ('Trump always chickens out'). The jokes implying Trump is all talk and no action on trade have previously struck a nerve for the president. 'Not chicken' But analysts believe there will be no going back this time. Trump has 'not chickened out,' according to Josh Lipsky, an international economics expert at the Atlantic Council think tank. Lipsky told AFP the president is 'following through, if not exceeding' what he vowed during his campaign in respect to tariffs. Matthew Aks, a public policy analyst at Evercore ISI, said he did not anticipate a 'massive shift' on the latest order, aside from some economies like Taiwan or India striking deals during the seven-day buffer. Following crunch negotiations leading up to the tariffs announcement, Trump struck a series of compromises, notably with the European Union, Japan, and South Korea, setting varying tax rates and touting high investments in the United States. The details of these agreements remain vague and leave the door open to key questions: Are exemptions possible? What will become of key sectors like automobiles, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors? And what of China? The US president and leaders of other countries 'have reasons to avoid going into detailed agreements' explained Aks, allowing all sides to present the deals in the most positive, or least negative, way possible to their public. The ability to conclude deals -- often with or without crucial detail -- is, for the 79-year-old Republican, an integral part of his political signature. 'Art form' In his book 'The Art of the Deal,' the billionaire wrote: 'Deals are my art form. Other people paint beautifully on canvas or write wonderful poetry. I like making deals, preferably big deals. That's how I get my kicks.' Trump explained in his book that he always 'protects' himself 'by being flexible.' 'I never get too attached to one deal or one approach.' But despite comments about his trade policy reversals, Trump has hardly budged from his trade strategy, and that could prove politically painful. In a survey conducted by Quinnipiac University published in mid-July, only 40 percent of respondents said they supported the president's trade policy, while 56 percent criticized it. The latest employment figures bear the marks of Trump's protectionist offensive, according to experts. Job creation in May and June was revised sharply downward, falling to levels not seen since the COVID-19 pandemic.


Al Arabiya
2 days ago
- Al Arabiya
World economies reel from Trump's tariffs punch
Global markets reeled Friday after President Donald Trump's barrage of tariffs against nearly all US trading partners, as governments looked down the barrel of a seven-day deadline before higher duties take effect. Trump announced late Thursday that dozens of economies, including the European Union, will face new tariff rates of between 10 and 41 percent. However, implementation will be on August 7 rather than Friday as previously announced, the White House said. This gives governments a window to rush to strike deals with Washington under more favorable conditions. Neighboring Canada, one of the biggest US trade partners, was hit with 35 percent levies—up from 25 percent—effective Friday, though wide-ranging current exemptions remain in place. The tariffs are a demonstration of raw economic power that Trump sees as putting US exporters in a stronger position, while encouraging domestic manufacturing by keeping out foreign imports. But the muscular approach has raised fears of inflation and other economic fallout in the world's biggest economy. Stock markets in Hong Kong, London, and New York slumped as they digested the turmoil, while weak US employment data added to the concerns. Trump's actions come as debate rages over how best to steer the US economy, with the Federal Reserve this week deciding to keep interest rates unchanged despite massive political pressure from the White House to cut. Data released Friday showed US job growth missing expectations for July, while unemployment ticked up to 4.2 percent from 4.1 percent. On Wall Street, the S&P 500 dropped 1.6 percent, while the Nasdaq tumbled 2.2 percent. Political goals Trump raised duties on around 70 economies from a 10 percent level imposed in April, when he unleashed 'reciprocal' tariffs citing unfair trade practices. The new, steeper levels listed in an executive order vary by trading partner. Any goods 'transshipped' through other jurisdictions to avoid US duties would be hit with an additional 40 percent tariff, the order said. But Trump's duties also have a distinctly political flavor, with the president using separate tariffs to pressure Brazil to drop the trial of his far-right ally, former president Jair Bolsonaro. He also warned of trade consequences for Canada, which faces a different set of duties, after Prime Minister Mark Carney announced plans to recognize a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly in September. In targeting Canada, the White House cited its failure to 'cooperate in curbing the ongoing flood of fentanyl and other illicit drugs'—though Canada is not a major source of illegal narcotics. By contrast, Trump gave more time to Mexico, delaying for 90 days a threat to increase its tariffs from 25 percent to 30 percent. However, exemptions remain for a wide range of Canadian and Mexican goods entering the United States under an existing North American trade pact. Carney said his government was 'disappointed' with the latest rate hike, but noted that with exclusions, the US average tariff on Canadian goods remains one of the lowest among US trading partners. 'Tears up' rule book With questions hanging over the effectiveness of bilateral trade deals struck—including with the EU and Japan—the outcome of Trump's overall plan remains uncertain. 'No doubt about it—the executive order and related agreements concluded over the past few months tears up the trade rule book that has governed international trade since World War II,' said Wendy Cutler, senior vice president of the Asia Society Policy Institute. On Friday, Trump said he would consider distributing a tariff 'dividend' to Americans. Notably excluded from Friday's drama was China, which is in the midst of negotiations with the United States. Washington and Beijing at one point brought tit-for-tat tariffs to triple-digit levels, but have agreed to temporarily lower these duties and are working to extend their truce. Countries that managed to strike deals with Washington to avert steeper threatened levies included Vietnam, Japan, Indonesia, the Philippines, South Korea, and the European Union. Among other tariff levels adjusted in Trump's latest order, Switzerland now faces a higher 39 percent duty.