End of consumer carbon tax means cheaper gas but leaves $1.5B hole in B.C. budget: business prof
Social Sharing
British Columbia's budget shows that the impending end of the province's consumer carbon tax will leave a roughly $1.5-billion hole in its revenue streams, with one expert saying "there will be both winners and losers" from the change.
The budget released earlier this month shows the province was forecasting revenue of just over $2.5 billion from the tax in the 2024-25 fiscal year, while the estimated cost of the climate action tax credit was $995 million.
Werner Antweiler, associate professor at the Sauder School of Business at the University of British Columbia, said that leaves about $1.5 billion in revenue the province will need to make up, which could include cutting spending or raising taxes elsewhere.
Antweiler said the end of the consumer carbon tax will bring relief for drivers at the gas station — as much as about 17 cents per litre.
However, he said the climate action tax credit targets low-income households, and those who have seen a significant benefit may lose out.
WATCH | How will the end of the consumer carbon tax impact individuals?
What does the cancellation of the carbon tax mean for your wallet?
2 days ago
Duration 1:53
British Columbians will soon have to pay less when they fill up their gas tanks. The province and the federal government are cancelling the consumer carbon tax, effective April 1. But with the disappearance of the associated tax credit, will the cancellation put money back into British Columbian's pockets?
People in lower-income households tend to drive less, especially in urban areas with transit systems, while wealthier people tend to drive more, Antweiler noted.
That means some who had been receiving the climate action tax credit won't see equal savings at the pump once the carbon tax is scrapped, he said.
It's also not clear how organizations that received money from the tax — including TransLink and B.C. Transit — will make up for the shortfalls.
B.C. looking to make up shortfall
The B.C. carbon price has been in place since 2008, when the province became the first jurisdiction in North America to impose such a levy.
The first phase of the system was designed to be revenue neutral, returning the costs in the form of corporate and personal tax cuts, Antweiler said.
As the price of carbon rose, he said the B.C. government took a "double dividend" approach by using some of the revenue to fund climate action initiatives while returning some of it to consumers with a climate action tax credit.
The province now faces a "significant shortfall," he said.
WATCH | Climate solutions minister Adrian Dix says politics has undermined carbon tax's value:
B.C. will do away with provincial consumer carbon tax, energy minister says
34 minutes ago
Duration 11:04
Energy and Climate Solutions Minister Adrian Dix said his government will follow through on a pledge to eliminate B.C.'s own consumer carbon tax in response to U.S. tariffs, among other measures.
Premier David Eby has said work was underway in the Finance Ministry to make sure B.C. is "able to accommodate this commitment within the budget."
He made the comment when announcing on Friday that his government would follow through on its promise to repeal the consumer carbon tax after Prime Minister Mark Carney moved to eliminate the federal version of the levy.
Energy Minister Adrian Dix was also asked how the province plans to replace the lost revenue at an unrelated news conference on Monday.
He said legislation would be introduced before the end of the fiscal year on March 31, and the finance minister would provide further details.
Dix said the tax had been effective but that it had been politicized beyond the point of usefulness.
"The debate about climate change has become a debate about the carbon tax," he said in an interview with CBC's The Early Edition. "[It's] undermined the overall effort to address climate change."
Eby said cost-of-living pressures and the pending removal of federal carbon pricing for consumers showed there was no longer support for the levy.
Still, he said B.C. would ensure "big polluters continue to pay" for their emissions as the province retains its carbon pricing system for large industrial emitters.
"Not because we want them to have to be taxed, but to encourage them instead to adopt the technologies that reduce emissions," the premier said.
WATCH | How will Canada tackle emissions as the consumer carbon tax is lifted?:
What's next for climate action with consumer carbon tax ending?
3 days ago
Duration 2:31
The Opposition B.C. Conservatives have previously voiced concern that Eby's government would scrap the consumer carbon price, then boost charges on businesses, which would still affect consumers in the end.
The B.C. Greens issued a statement last week saying the decision to end the tax and associated rebate "leaves many questions unanswered," including how the government will make up the revenue.
The Greens have long called for adjustments to carbon pricing "to make it more fair, so that big industrial polluters pay the same per tonne of carbon as everyday British Columbians. Now is the time to fix that imbalance, not abandon climate action altogether," the statement from Interim Green Leader Jeremy Valeriote said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
9 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
B.C. Insider: Premier, Energy Minister say Alberta's pipeline proposals aren't viable
Hi everyone, Mark Iype this morning, filling in for Wendy Cox. Last week, B.C. Energy Minister Adrian Dix dismissed the idea of a new pipeline across the province, saying proposals coming from its immediate neighbour to the east are just not practical. 'We need projects that are actual projects – that are viable economic projects,' he said Wednesday, after the first ministers meeting held earlier in the week. 'With respect to pipelines and what we're seeing from the province of Alberta, we respond to practical proposals.' Canada's premiers met June 2 in Saskatoon, where discussions around 'nation-building' energy projects were front and centre. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith wants to find ways to ship more bitumen from her province, and has been pushing for the revival of the Northern Gateway pipeline project, which would move product to the northern coast of British Columbia. But Dix says there is no economic case for the project, which is why there are no private-sector proponents looking to step up. The minister's economic argument pointed out the high cost of the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion, which cost Canadian taxpayers $34-billion, about six times what the project was initially pegged at. Alberta's Energy Minister, Brian Jean, insisted that the project would be of national interest. 'Premier David Eby is on the record as saying that he will respect the Prime Minister's and Canadians' desire to build nation-building projects,' Jean said in a statement to The Globe and Mail last Wednesday. 'Of all the projects under consideration, this is the one that will lead to the most jobs, taxes, royalties and opportunities for Indigenous Canadians. This project is good for Albertans, British Columbians and Canadians.' Eby, however, is not on board. 'It's not my job to tell Premier Smith that her vision for a North Coast pipeline is many, many years off and there's no proponent at this point,' he said while on his trade mission to East Asia. 'My job is to ensure that British Columbians' interests are protected and promoted, and one of those ways that we're doing that is driving forward shovel-ready projects.' Both Dix and Eby also said that B.C. does not support the lifting of the ban on oil tankers off its coast, another of Smith's demands of the federal government. The initial Northern Gateway plan faced protests and lawsuits from Indigenous and environmental groups, and was also opposed by the B.C. government. The Federal Court of Appeal also ruled in 2016 that the Conservative government of Stephen Harper had failed to adequately consult Indigenous communities when it issued the conditional permit for the pipeline in 2014. The court ordered the new Liberal government to revisit the process, but then-prime minister Justin Trudeau killed the project. Enbridge formally withdrew the project in 2017. One expert, Amy Janzwood, an assistant professor in the department of political science and the Bieler School of the Environment at McGill University, said uncertainty about future demand for Alberta oil would likely keep the project shelved. 'The industry has not been in the market for new mega oil sands pipeline developments. They have long since moved away from this,' Janzwood told The Globe. 'I would be extremely shocked to see any kind of serious proposal, not to mention the political conflicts, Indigenous consultation and all of the challenges that come with mega infrastructure projects.' This is the weekly British Columbia newsletter written by B.C. Editor Wendy Cox. If you're reading this on the web, or it was forwarded to you from someone else, you can sign up for it and all Globe newsletters here.
Vancouver Sun
a day ago
- Vancouver Sun
Opinion: Most Canadians don't support taxpayer subsidies for LNG
Proponents often claim that Canada's LNG will reduce global warming by displacing coal in other countries. However, we have run out of time for a 'transition fuel' if we're to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement. In this context, new LNG infrastructure isn't a climate solution, but rather a substitute for investment in clean energy. Luckily, the price of renewables has dropped dramatically, making this transition both feasible and affordable. LNG is also a bad economic bet. The International Energy Agency has projected that LNG capacity will exceed demand by the next decade, making new capital investments especially risky. This is presumably why private investors are wavering and looking to Canadian governments to subsidize their projects with public dollars. A daily roundup of Opinion pieces from the Sun and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Informed Opinion will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. A recent poll found that 56 per cent of respondents, both in B.C. and nationally, oppose multibillion-dollar public subsidies for foreign-owned LNG projects. Only 18 per cent of Canadians, and 22 per cent of British Columbians, are supportive while the rest are unsure. In B.C., where most LNG projects are proposed and LNG Canada will soon come online, people have other priorities for their tax dollars. In fact, supporting oil-and-gas is at the bottom of a list led by health care, housing, education, renewable energy and transit. The lack of public support for subsidizing fossil fuels has been consistent for years. In 2018, two-thirds of Canadians opposed subsidizing oil-and-gas, 41 per cent strongly. More than half remained unsupportive, even after being told oil-and-gas subsidies would create jobs and economic growth. In 2021, 62 per cent of Canadians wanted the federal government to stop fossil fuel subsidies and there was mounting frustration that the government hadn't acted on a 2015 campaign promise to do so. In 2023, the majority of Canadians felt that oil companies, not taxpayers, should foot the bill for the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion. Only 30 per cent of British Columbians supported subsidies for LNG. A 2023 poll found 96 per cent of Canadians felt the federal government should disclose subsidies for fossil fuels. That year, the government of Canada signed a joint ministerial statement at the UN climate talks that committed them to do just that by the end of 2024. There is still no inventory of fossil fuel subsidies in mid-2025, undermining Canadians' ability to understand where their tax dollars are going. Canada claims to be a global leader on climate change, yet we continuously fail to meet our climate targets. The main reason is that emissions growth from oil-and-gas production has offset progress in other areas. According to the UN Environment Programme , governments around the world, including Canada, are planning for continued fossil fuel production that will result in more than double the global emissions scientists advise are consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 C. Canada, unfortunately, is one the biggest funders of the fossil fuel industry globally. That includes billions of taxpayer dollars that the federal and B.C. governments have already committed to LNG in the form of direct subsidies, lower tax and electricity rates, and public loans. Canadian taxpayers have been footing the bill for fossil fuel developments that threaten our own climate, health and economy. In this critical moment, Canada's leaders should instead use public funds to support projects that advance Canada's economy and safety, not only today but for decades to come. Kathryn Harrison is professor of political science at the University of B.C. Cara Pike is co-founder and senior adviser to at Carleton University in Ottawa.
Global News
a day ago
- Global News
B.C. government takes heat over marked growth in public payroll
B.C.'s NDP government is defending itself in the wake of new reports detailing the dramatic increase in public sector employees and the cost of payroll. The province is in the midst of a staffing shortage across key public sectors – currently short more than 1,000 teachers and six times as many nurses. But while critical positions go unfilled, the size of the public sector continues to grow, with British Columbia leading the country in the growth of taxpayer-funded jobs. 'It's gone from $5 billion worth of people (earning) over $75,000 to now $11.5 billion, so it's more than doubled,' BC Conservative finance critic Peter Milobar said. 'This government has a real problem when it comes to hiring, reining in costs and bringing things under control, and that leads to our structural deficit of over $12 billion.' Story continues below advertisement 1:57 B.C. database shows public sector salaries Critics say the size of government has increased across the board under the NDP's watch. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy In 2017, there were just over 29,000 public servants. That number has increased to nearly 39,000, jumping 32 per cent over eight years. While the public sector is growing, private sector job growth is half of its historical average. The B.C. General Employees Union acknowledges the unionized workforce has grown, but says the real issue is the growth of non-union positions, and that management has increased at a pace nearly double that of union members. It's a claim that is echoed in health care, where the B.C. Nurses' Union says health authorities are top-heavy. 'Anecdotally, that's how it appears,' BCNU president Adrianne Gear said. 'From my members' perspective, it does seem like there is a lot of senior management leadership. Story continues below advertisement 'At any given time, we are almost 6,000 nurses short, that's how many vacancies we have, and when we move to full implementation of nurse-patient ratios … we are going to need many, many more nurses.' 1:20 How much could a new B.C. public sector contract cost taxpayers? The B.C. government has committed to hiring more front-line workers in health care, education and other critical occupations. But competition worldwide is intense. B.C. Premier David Eby said much of the growth is related to tackling that competition. 'They are doctors, they are nurses, they are teachers, they are people who provide vital services in our province. It is why we are leading Canada in recruiting family doctors and why we are on track to ensuring every British Columbian gets access to a family doctor. Ensuring we are competitive in wages for those doctors, ensuring we are competitive in wages for nurses, that we are the best place for a nurse to work in Canada,' Eby said. Story continues below advertisement 'It is how we are getting a handle on the big challenges we've faced in terms of closures at hospitals or shortages of nurses that are raising concerns among the profession here.' However, he admitted he was 'very concerned' about the growth in health care administration costs. He said the province is currently doing an 'extensive review' of B.C. health authorities to minimize those administrative costs. A renewed focus on B.C. resource economy, meanwhile, could bring an increase in private sector job creation. The business community is optimistic that the government is sending the right signals, but says it is waiting for the needed follow-through.
