End of consumer carbon tax means cheaper gas but leaves $1.5B hole in B.C. budget: business prof
Social Sharing
British Columbia's budget shows that the impending end of the province's consumer carbon tax will leave a roughly $1.5-billion hole in its revenue streams, with one expert saying "there will be both winners and losers" from the change.
The budget released earlier this month shows the province was forecasting revenue of just over $2.5 billion from the tax in the 2024-25 fiscal year, while the estimated cost of the climate action tax credit was $995 million.
Werner Antweiler, associate professor at the Sauder School of Business at the University of British Columbia, said that leaves about $1.5 billion in revenue the province will need to make up, which could include cutting spending or raising taxes elsewhere.
Antweiler said the end of the consumer carbon tax will bring relief for drivers at the gas station — as much as about 17 cents per litre.
However, he said the climate action tax credit targets low-income households, and those who have seen a significant benefit may lose out.
WATCH | How will the end of the consumer carbon tax impact individuals?
What does the cancellation of the carbon tax mean for your wallet?
2 days ago
Duration 1:53
British Columbians will soon have to pay less when they fill up their gas tanks. The province and the federal government are cancelling the consumer carbon tax, effective April 1. But with the disappearance of the associated tax credit, will the cancellation put money back into British Columbian's pockets?
People in lower-income households tend to drive less, especially in urban areas with transit systems, while wealthier people tend to drive more, Antweiler noted.
That means some who had been receiving the climate action tax credit won't see equal savings at the pump once the carbon tax is scrapped, he said.
It's also not clear how organizations that received money from the tax — including TransLink and B.C. Transit — will make up for the shortfalls.
B.C. looking to make up shortfall
The B.C. carbon price has been in place since 2008, when the province became the first jurisdiction in North America to impose such a levy.
The first phase of the system was designed to be revenue neutral, returning the costs in the form of corporate and personal tax cuts, Antweiler said.
As the price of carbon rose, he said the B.C. government took a "double dividend" approach by using some of the revenue to fund climate action initiatives while returning some of it to consumers with a climate action tax credit.
The province now faces a "significant shortfall," he said.
WATCH | Climate solutions minister Adrian Dix says politics has undermined carbon tax's value:
B.C. will do away with provincial consumer carbon tax, energy minister says
34 minutes ago
Duration 11:04
Energy and Climate Solutions Minister Adrian Dix said his government will follow through on a pledge to eliminate B.C.'s own consumer carbon tax in response to U.S. tariffs, among other measures.
Premier David Eby has said work was underway in the Finance Ministry to make sure B.C. is "able to accommodate this commitment within the budget."
He made the comment when announcing on Friday that his government would follow through on its promise to repeal the consumer carbon tax after Prime Minister Mark Carney moved to eliminate the federal version of the levy.
Energy Minister Adrian Dix was also asked how the province plans to replace the lost revenue at an unrelated news conference on Monday.
He said legislation would be introduced before the end of the fiscal year on March 31, and the finance minister would provide further details.
Dix said the tax had been effective but that it had been politicized beyond the point of usefulness.
"The debate about climate change has become a debate about the carbon tax," he said in an interview with CBC's The Early Edition. "[It's] undermined the overall effort to address climate change."
Eby said cost-of-living pressures and the pending removal of federal carbon pricing for consumers showed there was no longer support for the levy.
Still, he said B.C. would ensure "big polluters continue to pay" for their emissions as the province retains its carbon pricing system for large industrial emitters.
"Not because we want them to have to be taxed, but to encourage them instead to adopt the technologies that reduce emissions," the premier said.
WATCH | How will Canada tackle emissions as the consumer carbon tax is lifted?:
What's next for climate action with consumer carbon tax ending?
3 days ago
Duration 2:31
The Opposition B.C. Conservatives have previously voiced concern that Eby's government would scrap the consumer carbon price, then boost charges on businesses, which would still affect consumers in the end.
The B.C. Greens issued a statement last week saying the decision to end the tax and associated rebate "leaves many questions unanswered," including how the government will make up the revenue.
The Greens have long called for adjustments to carbon pricing "to make it more fair, so that big industrial polluters pay the same per tonne of carbon as everyday British Columbians. Now is the time to fix that imbalance, not abandon climate action altogether," the statement from Interim Green Leader Jeremy Valeriote said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Cision Canada
2 hours ago
- Cision Canada
New research shows most B.C. investors responded to recent market volatility
VANCOUVER, BC, June 11, 2025 /CNW/ - Recent investment market volatility spurred by changes in U.S. trade policy sparked widespread concern among B.C. investors and prompted most to change their behaviour or investment strategy, according to new research from the BC Securities Commission (BCSC). The study found 74 per cent of B.C. investors said they were closely following changes in the investment markets, and 72 per cent reporting concern about the impact on their investments. April's market volatility and the headlines that followed prompted 61 per cent of investors to take action. Among all investors: 39 per cent reported monitoring their investments and the news more closely 32 per cent reported adjusting their strategy, including speaking with their advisor and making changes to their investment strategy or financial plan, and 25 per cent reported buying and/or selling investments that changed in value or that they expected to change in value. Selling was more common among self-directed investors and investors between the ages of 18 to 34 and among those with investable assets less than $100,000. "Anxiety can lead us to make changes and decisions based on short-term factors that can have long-term consequences on our financial futures," said Pamela McDonald, the BCSC's Director, Communications & Education. "Investors, when confronted by economic instability, should focus on good investing habits, and do a 'check-in' on their short- and long-term goals, so they can make sound decisions." Investors can also navigate volatility in the investment markets by understanding their risk profile, talking to a registered investment advisor to create a tailored plan, and considering the source of information and advice they rely on to make investment decisions. Investors should also be familiar with the warning signs of investment fraud because scammers will often use periods of economic uncertainty to rope individuals into investment schemes. British Columbians can find unbiased investment information and educational resources on the BCSC's investor education website, About the research: This omnibus survey, conducted by Innovative Research Group for the BCSC, included questions aimed at understanding attitudes toward recent changes in the investment markets and whether those changes had an impact on investor behaviour. The online survey was conducted among a representative sample of British Columbians from April 28 to May 2, 2025. A total 1,005 individuals age 18 and over completed the survey, which was weighted to 1,000 by age, gender, region, education and investable assets to ensure that the overall sample's composition reflects that of the actual population according to Statistics Canada data. About the B.C. Securities Commission ( The BC Securities Commission, an independent provincial government agency, strives to make the investment market benefit the public. We set rules, monitor compliance by industry, take action against misconduct, and provide guidance to investors and industry. As guardians of B.C.'s investment market, we're committed to maintaining a market that is honest, fair, competitive and dynamic, enabling British Columbians to thrive.
Globe and Mail
3 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Alberta working with oil companies on pipeline proposal, Danielle Smith says
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith says her government is working with oil companies to try and secure a proposal for a new pipeline to the west coast – and says she expects Prime Minister Mark Carney to 'operate in good faith' on the pipeline issue. The Alberta government has also pitched Mr. Carney on a kind of quid pro quo, in which oil companies commit to building the Pathways carbon capture project if he greenlights an oil pipeline. Oil and gas pipelines have come into sharp focus in the wake of President Donald Trump's trade war, as Canada's fossil fuel sector searches for more opportunities to diversify itself from the United States, its largest customer. Mr. Carney has also pledged to make Canada into an energy superpower, but Ms. Smith says meeting that goal will rely on new pipelines that can transport Alberta oil and gas to a Canadian coast –west, north or east – for access to overseas markets. British Columbia's Energy Minister, Adrian Dix, recently shut down the idea of a new pipeline in the province, citing the impracticality and massive costs associated with such a proposal. But Ms. Smith told the Global Energy Show in Calgary on Wednesday that she's confident she can convince the province's premier, David Eby, of the merits of an oil pipeline. 'We're doing what we can to address the legitimate concerns that we heard,' Ms. Smith said. 'What I've heard them say recently is there's no project - no project and no proponent. Well, that's my job. There will be soon. We're working very hard on being able to get industry players, private-sector players, to realize this time might be different.' Ms. Smith said there may be a consortium of companies interested in joining forces to build a pipeline. If so, she said Alberta would work with the group to test out Mr. Carney's promised two-year approval process for major infrastructure projects. 'We know that it's a chicken-and-egg problem, that no one's going to come forward with a project without some guarantee that's going to be approved,' she said. 'The Prime Minister, I want to take him at his word that he wants to operate in good faith. So we're going to operate in good faith.' The ultimate goal is to get an oil pipeline onto a list of major infrastructure projects being developed by the federal government. Ms. Smith said she also wants to see the Pathways Alliance carbon capture project on that list. The Pathways Alliance is a consortium of Canada's six largest oil sands companies, which together have publicly committed to reaching net-zero greenhouse gas emissions from oil sands production by 2050. At the heart of the group's pledge is a 400-kilometre-long pipeline that would transport carbon captured at oil sands facilities to an underground hub near Cold Lake, Alta., reducing emissions by 22 megatonnes a year. The project could cost anywhere from $10-billion to $20-billion – an amount that's all expense, because there is no revenue associated with it, Ms. Smith said. 'But if you couple it with a million barrel-per-day pipeline, that allows you $20-billion worth of revenue year after year after year for the lifetime of that project. All of a sudden, a $10-billion to $20-billion cost to decarbonize looks a lot more attractive when you have a new source of revenue.' Ms. Smith said she doesn't believe it would be problematic to fill a new pipeline, given that Enbridge recently announced an open season on its Flanagan South pipeline expansion to the U.S. for 100,000 barrels, and drew 400,000 barrels of interest. 'What we are hearing from the energy sector is: Build it, they will come.'
Globe and Mail
a day ago
- Globe and Mail
B.C. Insider: Premier, Energy Minister say Alberta's pipeline proposals aren't viable
Hi everyone, Mark Iype this morning, filling in for Wendy Cox. Last week, B.C. Energy Minister Adrian Dix dismissed the idea of a new pipeline across the province, saying proposals coming from its immediate neighbour to the east are just not practical. 'We need projects that are actual projects – that are viable economic projects,' he said Wednesday, after the first ministers meeting held earlier in the week. 'With respect to pipelines and what we're seeing from the province of Alberta, we respond to practical proposals.' Canada's premiers met June 2 in Saskatoon, where discussions around 'nation-building' energy projects were front and centre. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith wants to find ways to ship more bitumen from her province, and has been pushing for the revival of the Northern Gateway pipeline project, which would move product to the northern coast of British Columbia. But Dix says there is no economic case for the project, which is why there are no private-sector proponents looking to step up. The minister's economic argument pointed out the high cost of the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion, which cost Canadian taxpayers $34-billion, about six times what the project was initially pegged at. Alberta's Energy Minister, Brian Jean, insisted that the project would be of national interest. 'Premier David Eby is on the record as saying that he will respect the Prime Minister's and Canadians' desire to build nation-building projects,' Jean said in a statement to The Globe and Mail last Wednesday. 'Of all the projects under consideration, this is the one that will lead to the most jobs, taxes, royalties and opportunities for Indigenous Canadians. This project is good for Albertans, British Columbians and Canadians.' Eby, however, is not on board. 'It's not my job to tell Premier Smith that her vision for a North Coast pipeline is many, many years off and there's no proponent at this point,' he said while on his trade mission to East Asia. 'My job is to ensure that British Columbians' interests are protected and promoted, and one of those ways that we're doing that is driving forward shovel-ready projects.' Both Dix and Eby also said that B.C. does not support the lifting of the ban on oil tankers off its coast, another of Smith's demands of the federal government. The initial Northern Gateway plan faced protests and lawsuits from Indigenous and environmental groups, and was also opposed by the B.C. government. The Federal Court of Appeal also ruled in 2016 that the Conservative government of Stephen Harper had failed to adequately consult Indigenous communities when it issued the conditional permit for the pipeline in 2014. The court ordered the new Liberal government to revisit the process, but then-prime minister Justin Trudeau killed the project. Enbridge formally withdrew the project in 2017. One expert, Amy Janzwood, an assistant professor in the department of political science and the Bieler School of the Environment at McGill University, said uncertainty about future demand for Alberta oil would likely keep the project shelved. 'The industry has not been in the market for new mega oil sands pipeline developments. They have long since moved away from this,' Janzwood told The Globe. 'I would be extremely shocked to see any kind of serious proposal, not to mention the political conflicts, Indigenous consultation and all of the challenges that come with mega infrastructure projects.' This is the weekly British Columbia newsletter written by B.C. Editor Wendy Cox. If you're reading this on the web, or it was forwarded to you from someone else, you can sign up for it and all Globe newsletters here.
