Jimmy Buffett's Widow Upset, Confused About $275M Estate Drama: He 'Never Would Have Wanted This' (Exclusive Source)
A close friend of the Buffetts tells PEOPLE that Jimmy "would never have wanted Jane to be treated like this"
Jane recently filed to remove the co-trustee of Jimmy's trust, as she claims he has not done his job properly and has been "hostile"
The friend says Jimmy "trusted Jane around so many of his important decisions in his life and career"The drama over Jimmy Buffett's trust continues.
In light of his widow Jane filing suit against Richard Mozenter — an accountant she claims has failed in his role as co-trustee of Jimmy's trust and whom she is seeking to remove — a close friend of the Buffetts tells PEOPLE that Jane and her inner circle are upset and confused by the drama.
'Jimmy would never have wanted Jane to be treated like this,' the friend says. '[I] know how close Jimmy and Jane were all these years, and how Jimmy relied upon and trusted Jane around so many of his important decisions in his life and career.'
Jimmy and Jane were married for 46 years before he died of cancer in September 2023 at age 76. According to Jane's complaint, which was filed on June 3, the "Margaritaville" singer created a series of trusts over the years 'to protect his family after his death.' He and Jane share daughters Savannah, 46, and Delaney, 33, and son Cameron, who was born in 1994.
Jane's suit alleges that Mozenter — who was appointed co-trustee after Jimmy's death — has been "plainly deficient' in his role, failing to provide information as requested as well as being allegedly 'openly hostile and adversarial' toward Jane, her complaint claims. She claims that he has refused to resign despite her repeated requests.
'When you're married for over 40 years, there's a lot that couples go through, but there was always a strong bond and trust in her,' the friend says of Jane and Jimmy. 'And there's just no way that this is what he would have wanted to happen.'
The friend continues, 'These have been very reasonable demands [Jane made of Mozenter]. There was a lot of patience asking for his feedback, and to still not get anything has been very upsetting. The idea that this is how someone responds to pretty basic requests is sort of inexplicable.'
Mozenter did not immediately respond to PEOPLE's request for comment.
Jane's complaint accuses Mozenter — who, along with his firm, has been paid nearly $2 million for his services — of having 'belittled, disrespected and condescended' her in response to 'reasonable requests for information she undoubtedly was entitled to receive.'
Per the filing, Jimmy's trust was created more than 30 years ago for Jane's benefit. It was updated most recently in 2023, and all three of the couple's children have a one-third share of the remaining Federal estate tax exemption, worth about $2 million each. The trust indicates that upon Jimmy's death, the bulk of his assets would go to the marital trust, which was to be administered by Jane and an independent co-trustee.
When Jimmy died, Mozenter assumed the responsibility of managing $275 million in assets, which the singer-songwriter had amassed to fund the marital trust. According to the filing, Jane's first meeting with Mozenter, which took place one month after Jimmy's death, allegedly yielded more questions than answers when it came to what she should expect in projected income.
'Rather than help his recently widowed client understand her finances, Mr. Mozenter spent the next 16 months stonewalling and making excuses for why he could not yet provide the requested information,' the filing claims.
Read the original article on People

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Buzz Feed
25 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Jonathan Joss Gunman "Laughed As He Died," Husband Says
On Monday, the sad news broke that actor Jonathan Joss had died at age 59 years old after he was shot and killed in what his husband, Tristan Kern de Gonzales, alleged was an anti-gay hate crime on Sunday, June 1. People previously reported that the couple's neighbor Sigfredo Ceja Alvarez, 56, confessed to shooting Jonathan as he was detained and has been charged with first-degree murder. He was released from police custody under full house arrest on a $200,000 bond on June that same day, Tristan posted a statement to Jonathan's official Facebook page where he alleged that Jonathan had been killed because of his sexuality. He added that he and Jonathan had been 'harassed regularly' by their neighbors in San Antonio, Texas, for being a gay couple, and that their home had recently burned down after repeated threats. Tristan, 32, said that the shooting occurred when he and Jonathan returned to the remains of their home to check for mail and became distressed when they found their dog's skull at the site, which had been 'placed in clear view.' 'My husband Jonathan Joss and I were involved in a shooting while checking the mail at the site of our former home. That home was burned down after over two years of threats from people in the area who repeatedly told us they would set it on fire. We reported these threats to law enforcement multiple times and nothing was done,' the statement began.'Throughout that time we were harassed regularly by individuals who made it clear they did not accept our relationship. Much of the harassment was openly homophobic,' Tristan went on. 'When we returned to the site to check our mail we discovered the skull of one of our dogs and its harness placed in clear view. This caused both of us severe emotional distress. We began yelling and crying in response to the pain of what we saw.''While we were doing this a man approached us. He started yelling violent homophobic slurs at us. He then raised a gun from his lap and fired,' he alleged. 'Jonathan and I had no weapons. We were not threatening anyone. We were grieving. We were standing side by side. When the man fired Jonathan pushed me out of the way. He saved my life.' And Tristan has bravely shared some more details from his husband's death in a devastating new interview with People, where he alleged that the gunman was 'laughing' at them as Jonathan died. He also opened up about immediately knowing that 'there was no hope of saving' Jonathan due to the severe damage caused by the 'really, really close range' shot to his head. 'He was struggling so hard, trying to stay alive,' Tristan recalled. 'I held my husband's face together as best I could, and I told him how much I loved him, and that none of this was his fault. I told him he needed to cross over easy. He didn't need to keep fighting.''I told him that no matter what, and in some way, shape, or form, we'll always be together, and he'll always be my husband,' Tristan continued. He also claimed that the alleged gunman 'still had the gun pointed over' him while his husband lay dying, adding: 'He was laughing. He mocked me for telling my husband that I loved him and used the same homophobic slurs.' Tristan told the publication that he finds it hurtful 'whenever people try to say that it wasn't a hate crime,' which is no doubt a reference to the San Antonio Police Department saying that they had 'found no evidence to indicate that Mr. Joss's murder was related to his sexual orientation' just one day after his murder. On Thursday, SAPD police chief William McManus admitted that he regretted making this statement, and said that it was 'way too soon' for a hate crime to be ruled out. 'That was way, way, way, premature,' he said. 'We shouldn't have done it. It was way too soon before we had any real information. And I will own that… I want to apologize to the LGBTQ+ community for the tragic loss of Mr. Joss, which has been heavily felt."'Our homicide detectives are continuing to pursue every lead in this case to ensure that we understand the full picture of what led up to the senseless murder of Mr. Joss,' McManus added during a press also addressed Tristan's claims that their home was burnt down in an anti-gay hate crime, saying that they were 'working closely' with the fire department's arson investigators, and that 'the investigation is still active.'He went on to confirm that law enforcement had received 'approximately 70 calls over the past two years' from both Jonathan and his neighbors over 'neighborhood-type disturbances.'


News24
3 hours ago
- News24
Another Diddy ex testifies to ‘obligation' in coerced, choreographed sexual encounters
A key witness, 'Jane,' has provided graphic testimony in the federal trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs, alleging coercive sexual encounters. Combs allegedly orchestrated disturbing acts involving multiple women, with testimony also backing claims made by ex-girlfriend Casandra Ventura. The trial has featured intense courtroom moments, including accusations of witness manipulation by Combs and shocking allegations from witnesses about violent and exploitative behaviour. A key witness took the stand in the federal trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs Thursday, giving graphic detail of choreographed sexual encounters with the music mogul that were allegedly coercive, testimony that's core to the prosecution's case. The woman, who is speaking in court under the pseudonym Jane, began delivering testimony that is expected to last for days and which so far mirrors descriptions provided by another marquee witness against Combs, his ex-girlfriend Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura. Combs, 55, faces upwards of life in prison if convicted of racketeering and sex trafficking crimes. Both Jane and Ventura are key witnesses to the latter charges. Jane took the stand after some courtroom drama: the judge threatened to remove Combs after he was 'looking at jurors and nodding vigorously' while a different witness testified. Calling Combs's behaviour 'absolutely unacceptable,' Judge Arun Subramanian said, 'It cannot happen again.' READ | 'Sometimes I scream in my sleep': Witness claims Diddy dangled her from 17th-story balcony Communications between a defendant and a jury are strictly prohibited. The court had been hearing testimony from Bryana Bongolan, a friend of Ventura's who had alleged that Combs dangled her from a 17th-story balcony before throwing her against furniture. Combs's gestures to the jury took place as Bongolan was under tense questioning from his defence team, who sought to cast her as an unreliable witness who abused drugs. 'Hotel nights' Jane's testimony was highly anticipated: she began by detailing how she had met Combs through a friend who was dating him at the time. But he came on strongly to Jane, she said, and when her friend got engaged to someone else, she began seeing Combs romantically. Their relationship began in earnest during a whirlwind five-day date at a Miami hotel, she said, describing Combs - as many others during the trial have - as 'larger than life.' READ MORE | Hush money bombshell: Hotel worker testifies Diddy paid to bury Cassie assault video 'I was pretty head over heels for Sean,' she told jurors. Several heady months followed, including a romantic trip to Turks and Caicos and the Bahamas in February 2021. She said Combs first gave her illicit drugs on that trip. When the vacation ended, he wired her $10 000 because she had been unable to work - at the time, she was creating content for brands on social media - and was a single mother. Jane silently collected herself and held her face in a tissue as she described how her blissful early days with Combs took a sharp turn in May 2021 when he began talking about his fantasies of seeing her with other men. She acquiesced because she wanted to make Combs happy, she said, and to her surprise, he arranged for another man she dubbed Don to meet them at a hotel that very night. AFP Jane thought the experience was a one-time thing, but she said instead, it became 'a door I was unable to shut.' The 'hotel nights' became a regular feature of their relationship, Jane told jurors, even when she said she didn't want it. 'He was just dismissive,' she said, saying that approximately 90 percent of their relationship became a pattern of her having sex with other men under Combs's direction. Full-time job Jane's descriptions of the 'hotel nights' - her provocative attire that Combs requested, red mood lighting, heavy drug use and copious baby oil - closely tracked with the testimony that Ventura gave on the stand of what she called 'freak-offs.' Jane said that the amount of time she spent getting ready for hotel nights with Combs, which he demanded at a moment's notice and sometimes flew her to, meant she did not work. Money from Combs and child support from her previous relationship were essentially her only income, she said. That testimony echoed Ventura's, who had said her freak-offs with Combs came to feel like a full-time job. Combs put Jane up in a home in Los Angeles for $10 000 a month, she said, and when she spoke against hotel nights, he would bring up that point. ALSO READ | 'You post the great times': Witness asked to defend Instagram posts in Sean Combs trial 'My feeling of obligation really started to stem from the fact that my partner was paying my rent,' she said. Jane told jurors their relationship continued up until Combs's arrest in September 2024. Prosecutors say he ran a criminal enterprise of high-ranking employees and bodyguards who enforced his power with illicit acts, including kidnapping, bribery and arson. Along with Ventura and Jane, witnesses have included former employees of Bad Boy Enterprises, Combs's company. Jane's testimony will continue on Friday. The trial is expected to last at least another month.


CNN
6 hours ago
- CNN
'Absolutely Unacceptable': Judge Calls Out Diddy's Nods To Jury - Laura Coates Live - Podcast on CNN Audio
'Absolutely Unacceptable': Judge Calls Out Diddy's Nods To Jury Laura Coates Live 47 mins A judge rebuked Sean 'Diddy' Combs for his behavior in court, and a woman using the pseudonym 'Jane' alleged that Combs pressured her to have sex with other men as part of her testimony at the hip-hop mogul's federal criminal trial. The key testimony from Jane comes as the prosecution seeks to show Combs and his inner circle used violence, lies, drugs, and other means to coerce Jane and Cassie Ventura into participating in sexual performances with male escorts known as 'hotel nights' or 'Freak Offs.'