Asylum sites to be expanded as ministers bid to end hotel use
A Home Office spokesperson said the government was "making strong strides to deliver a more sustainable and cost-effective asylum accommodation system"."This includes ending the use of hotels, testing new locally-led models, and working closely with local authorities and other departments to ensure a fairer, more efficient approach," they added."Our use of any property or Home Office-owned site will be used in line with the permissions set by planning permissions."The taxpayer cost of asylum hotels has rocketed in recent years, with total accommodation contracts now set to be worth £15.3bn over a 10-year period.But while extending large sites might be cheaper, the move is likely to anger local residents and refugee rights groups.In April last year, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said the Wethersfield site couldn't be "seen as either a sustainable solution for housing asylum seekers nor value for money for the taxpayer".Conservative MP Sir James Cleverly, whose Braintree constituency includes Wethersfield, said the existing cap on the number of people living at the facility "was there to protect the safety and security" of constituents, and "those working at and living on the site".Sir James, who became home secretary shortly after the first asylum seekers moved into Wethersfield, said the government plan to potentially expand the site was "disgraceful and shows just how out of touch they are with the concerns of local communities".In March, the High Court found the previous Conservative government's use of Wethersfield to house asylum seekers was unlawful, after three men argued they were living in "prison-like" conditions.The former RAF base has been housing asylum seekers since 2023. It has a current capacity of 800, but is thought to house closer to 500 people at present.The Home Office contract for the base is held by Clearsprings, whose founder Graham King recently became a billionaire, according to the Sunday Times rich list.The Helen Bamber Foundation, a human rights groups, has previously said that accommodating people at the base causes harm to their physical and mental health.Kamena Dorling, the group's director of policy, told the BBC that Wethersfield "should be closed immediately, not extended".She said: "Housing people, including survivors of torture and trafficking, in an isolated, overcrowded camp reminiscent of an open-air prison, with inadequate healthcare and legal services, is an inhumane way to treat those seeking protection."
Savings target
A pair of former student accommodation blocks in Huddersfield, acquired by the Home Office last year, could also be extended.The buildings, constructed in 2019, have a current capacity of 650 but have never been occupied because of safety concerns.Any extensions to asylum seeker accommodation would be paid for using money earmarked for investment from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, meaning it could be borrowed without falling foul of the chancellor's strict spending rules.Home Office figures released last month show that as of March, there were about 100,000 asylum seekers in government-funded accommodation, with about 32,000 of those in hotels.Cooper hopes to end the use of hotels by reducing small boat crossings, speeding up the asylum application process and moving people into alternative accommodation.Following the chancellor's Spending Review, there had been some confusion over what that alternative accommodation might be.Chief secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones told BBC Newsnight the government would be "upgrading current facilities, which will include some extensions".But on Thursday, the prime minister's official spokesman refused to comment on whether new accommodation would be built.A senior Home Office source has now confirmed to the BBC that while there were no plans for entirely new accommodation blocks, extensions of current facilities will be built and other existing accommodation such as unused student blocks will be rented.The £1bn saving which the chancellor said would come from reducing hotel use has already been taken out of the Home Office budget.The Home Office has a new target for how much additional asylum accommodation needs to be created to help achieve the saving, but that exact figure is unknown.The BBC understands that moving around 14,000 asylum seekers from hotels into other forms of accommodation would likely achieve a saving of £1bn.A senior Home Office source said they were "confident" they could save the required money, but acknowledged that failing to hit the target would force the department to ask Reeves for more funding to avoid having to make cuts elsewhere.The number of asylum seekers in hotels is far lower than the record figure in 2023, but has increased since Labour came to power last year.The latest statistics go up to March and therefore don't take into account the knock-on effect of increased small boat crossings in the months since.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Inside the special relationship between JD Vance and ‘bosh' king Tom Skinner
He made a name for himself peddling pillows with all the gusto of a modern-day Del Boy: the 'absolute guv'nor' of 'graft' who belts out 'Bosh!' like a battle cry and has somehow made the way he pours gravy a key element of his persona. This is Thomas, or Tom Skinner, or 'The Original Bosh' as he calls himself, a Very British Businessman who found fame on The Apprentice – and just a few years later, improbably (or not, as it may be) finds himself sharing beers with the vice-president of the United States, and at the centre of a burgeoning class culture war. This week, 34-year-old Skinner is facing a wave of criticism over that meeting and his latest career turn. The circulating image of the latter created somewhat of a storm – Skinner, wearing a suit and his famous grin, leaning over a much more casually attired JD Vance, both awkwardly giving a thumbs up. Writing on social media, Skinner said: 'When the vice president of the USA invites ya for a BBQ [and] beers, you say yes. Unreal night with JD and his friends n family. He was a proper gent. Lots of laughs and some fantastic food. A brilliant night, one to tell the grandkids about, mate. Bosh.' Within hours, the photo of the unlikely diplomatic exchange was ricocheting across social media, accumulating tens of thousands of likes. The meeting – at a 'booze-fuelled' summer barbecue in the Cotswolds – took place during Vance's English holiday, in the same week he met Reform UK leader Nigel Farage for breakfast. The pair bonded in recent weeks after Vance sent him a supportive meme on X and their online friendship culminated in the invitation to the event with the vice-president. The question is, why would Donald Trump's right-hand man have any interest in being seen with Skinner, a perennially tanned, former market trader from Romford, Essex? For the same reason that the BBC announced him as an upcoming contestant on this year's Strictly Come Dancing. Since he made a big impression on viewers of The Apprentice in 2019, Skinner has traded on his 'man of the people', plain-talking, working-class image and, unsurprisingly, it's made him extremely popular. For the right, it has been political gold dust. Skinner is the supposed embodiment of the ordinary British families – no airs, no graces, just so-called authenticity and greasy fry-ups. His relatability has amassed him more than 700,000 followers on Instagram, just over half a million on TikTok and a similar figure on X. Across his platforms, you'll find him posing with 'proper English grub' like pies at the pub or toad in the hole, which he pours gravy over, making sure not to look at the plate as he does so – a trademark of his, albeit quite a baffling one. His pride and joy is his Ford Transit van; his brand, a nostalgic celebration of British culture, family, land, and hard graft, pitched as the mirror image of 'ordinary working voters'. Except, 'ordinary working voter', in 2025, has shifted significantly in meaning – and so now, apparently, has Skinner's politics. His brand draws heavily on a certain kind of working-class masculinity: entrepreneurial, salt-of-the-earth, no-nonsense, 'honest' people 'left behind' by modern Britain. The sort of people who hate being told what to do, especially by middle-class politicians they can't relate to. 'We need leadership that understands the streets, the markets, the working class,' he wrote recently on X, in a post that caught the eye of those noting his recent, subtle shift. 'People like me.' However, despite his white-man-van persona, Skinner attended the prestigious Brentwood School, which carries day fees of £29,112 per year, or boarding fees of £56,358 on a sports scholarship and grew up in relative affluence in a house worth more than £2.5m. His father, Lee, was a 'mega-rich marketing boss and businessman who was once able to have a garage full of Lamborghinis' (before being bankrupted over his role in a suspected investment fraud). This part of Skinner's life, however, doesn't fit into a carefully crafted rags-to-riches narrative. According to readers, his book, Graft: How to Smash Life, glossed over much of his childhood. So how authentic is the 'hard-working' hero his marketing suggests? Certainly, cosplaying in a working-class identity is hardly new nor rare, particularly on the political right, but rather a strategic decision. From financier Nigel Farage's well-worn pub pint pics to trust-fund Trump's blue-collar bravado, the trick is more than familiar: adopt the aesthetics and language of a class you do not belong to, then trade on the credibility and, particularly when it comes to working classness, the protection from criticism that it grants you. For Skinner – who openly showed support for Donald Trump last year and has said he'd like to run for mayor of London – the point is that the spin he's put on his background offers hope, or some sort of proof that happiness and success can come from true grit alone if you just have the right attitude, no matter how much society shows you that simply isn't the case. The Conservative Party, following Reform UK's lead, have taken the idea very seriously. And it's Tory MPs who have acted as Skinner's gateway to his latest association in US politics. Vance was not Skinner's first political collaboration – that was with shadow chancellor Robert Jenrick. The politician, who also had his meeting with Vance this week, once filmed a pretty excruciating video with Skinner in which he claimed that 'tool theft' among tradesmen was high on his political agenda. They were reportedly introduced by James Orr, associate professor of philosophy of religion at the University of Cambridge – the man who spotted Skinner's potential to 'speak human', as he puts it. 'I guess the way I look at it is kind of in the same way organisations have secret agents,' says Dr Mikey Biddlestone, of the University of Kent. 'Where they pinpoint and target the nerdy scientist who's the perfect person to groom into helping with their mission. 'They're hijacking this brand that already exists to be a mouthpiece for the content that they want to spread, to the demographic they want to reach.' Agreements with influencers are valuable, according to Professor Stephan Lewandowsky, because of a 'fantasy industrial complex', an imaginary world, or closed loop between politicians, influencers and audiences in which reality is less important than emotional recognition (or facts, Biddlestone adds). The mechanics are simple: Skinner's cheerful posts and 'everyman' appeal draw eyeballs; the algorithm rewards the content with further reach; the association between the two men and, crucially, what they stand for, quietly settles into the minds of their shared audience. And yet not a single policy point has been uttered publicly between them. The danger lies in what comes next or, as Biddlestone describes, the likely 'mission creep' that ensues in partnerships like this one. 'Like an insidious push towards an extreme idea,' he explains, 'where you introduce very small amounts of changes in perspective or messaging. And then it's a bit like that frog in boiling water analogy – before you know it, you've been nudged into an extremist right-wing perspective.' And who's going to argue with the guy who got famous simply by saying that hard work and family values matter? Skinner might have avoided being overtly political so far, but he's certainly at least right-wing coded. More worryingly, he's also one carefully selected mouthpiece in a much broader trend of political actors talking to influencers they see as being able to 'play' the working class for power. He might insist he's only interested in a hard day's graft and having a laugh, but already he's making very big political statements. The question is not just what Skinner will do with that, but how others might benefit from it. Bosh.
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Hong Kong democracy activist granted asylum after fleeing to Australia
Australia has granted asylum to Hong Kong pro-democracy activist Ted Hui, he said in a social media post, a move likely to raise tensions with China. Mr Hui, a former Hong Kong parliamentarian, fled the city four years ago and first arrived in Europe in December 2020. In March 2021, he became the first Hong Kong politician to be granted a special travel exemption during coronavirus restrictions to enter Australia. In 2022, Mr Hui was convicted in Hong Kong in his absence on charges of taking part in a pro-democracy protest and was sentenced to three-and-a-half years in jail. On Saturday, Mr Hui said he had 'received formal notification from the Australian Department of Home Affairs that I have been granted asylum in Australia'. In an emotional post, he said: 'When people around me say 'congratulations' to me, although I politely thank them, I can't help but feel sad in my heart. How to congratulate a political refugee who misses his hometown?" "If it weren't for political persecution, I would never have thought of living in a foreign land. Immigrants can always return to their home towns to visit relatives at any time; Exiles have no home." Mr Hui, who is now an Adelaide-based lawyer, said he identifies more closely with Australia today than he did when he arrived four years ago, and said he 'believe[s] asylum also carries responsibility'. 'My family and I are determined to give back to Australia in every way we can—through our work, our civic engagement, and our commitment to the values of democracy and freedom,' he said. The Australian government's 'decision reflects values of freedom, justice, and compassion that my family will never take for granted,' he added. The 42-year-old father, a prominent critic of both the Hong Kong government and Beijing, was one of several overseas activists hit with Hong Kong police bounties of HK$1m (about £94,281) each in 2023. While these bounties have drawn condemnation from Western governments, they are largely viewed as symbolic gestures, since most of those targeted live in countries with little prospect of extradition to Hong Kong or mainland China. In Adelaide, where Mr Hui is based, the campaign against him has taken a more personal turn. Earlier this year, his colleagues received an anonymous letter offering $203,000 Australian dollars for information about his movements and family. Around the same time, fake pamphlets portraying Mr Hui as a pro-Israel lawyer bent on 'waging war' against Islamic terrorism were reportedly circulated to local mosques, apparently in an effort to threaten and discredit him. At that time, Mr Hui blamed 'the Chinese regime's long arm' for harassing him internationally. Mr Hui concluded his post by requesting the Australian government not to forget those still suffering in Hong Kong's prisons, mentioning a number of activists including Jimmy Lai, the media mogul and British citizen who is currently on trial in the city. 'Australia must do more to rescue them and to speak up for their humanity,' Mr Hui said. 'Its stance matters internationally, and its protection of Hongkongers sets a precedent for other democracies.' The Hong Kong government said in a statement that it was 'against the harbouring of criminals in any form by any country'. Australian prime minister Anthony Albanese visited Beijing last month as part of his administration's years-long push to improve ties with China, Australia's number one export market. The relationship suffered a number of blows during the pandemic as both countries hit each other with punitive trade tariffs. During the visit, Xi Jinping said the China-Australia relationship 'has risen from the setbacks and turned around, bringing tangible benefits to the Chinese and Australian peoples'.
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Lord Kinnock urges Labour to scrap two-child benefit cap with ‘Robin Hood economics'
Labour must scrap the two-child cap on benefits to lift children out of poverty, the party's former leader Neil Kinnock has said. Rising levels of poverty 'would make Charles Dickens furious', Lord Kinnock said in an interview with the Sunday Mirror, in which he urged ministers to introduce a wealth tax. Lord Kinnock, who led Labour in opposition between 1983 and 1992, is the latest senior party figure to pressure the current government to end the two-child limit on benefits. Former Labour prime minister Gordon Brown recently said ending the two-child limit, as well as the benefit cap, would be among the most effective ways of reducing child poverty. Lord Kinnock acknowledged the government may not be able to scrap the two-child cap 'all at once'. He added: 'But I really want them to move in that direction because the figures are that if that did occur it would mean that about 600,000 kids fewer are in poverty.' Lord Kinnock suggested such a move could be funded by a wealth tax on the 'top 1 per cent'. 'I know it's the economics of Robin Hood, but I don't think there is anything terribly bad about that,' he said. He warned that over the decade and a half the Conservatives were in power child poverty gradually rose. The Labour peer said: 'In 15 years, starting from a position where beneficial change was taking place, we've got to the place that would make Charles Dickens furious. 'It's been allowed to happen because the kids are voiceless and their parents feel powerless. I defy anybody to see a child in need and not want to help.' The two-child limit has been long-criticised by Labour backbenchers as a driver of child poverty. Ministers are expected to set out plans to tackle child poverty at the budget in the autumn.
