Enoch Godongwana's budget: a delicate balance of debt control and social investment unveiled
With a scalpel in one hand and undisclosed tax measures for 2026 concealed by a glove in the other, Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana delivered a Budget on Wednesday that aimed to fill the revenue hole dug by the burying of the proposed VAT hikes while keeping mounting state debt levels under control.
But the minister insisted that containing debt did not translate into the pain of austerity.
'This is not an austerity Budget,' the minister said in his prepared remarks.
'It is also a redistributive budget. It directs 61 cents of every rand of consolidated, non-interest expenditure towards the social wage… This budget invests over R1-trillion in critical infrastructure to lift economic growth prospects and improve access to basic services.'
Pointedly, he noted that '… this is done without compromising the fiscal strategy of sustainable public finances'.
The long-stated aim of stabilising debt in 2025/26 at a peak level as measured as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) remains firmly in place, with the ratio now seen at 77.4% of GDP this fiscal year compared to 76.2% in March. This will be its highest level since the dawn of democracy in 1994.
'We have achieved this difficult balance by reducing additional spending over the medium term by R68-billion… the size of the proposed increases to allocations is reduced, in line with what we can afford.'
These 'downward revisions' to additional spending that were proposed in March over the next three years, an inflation-linked fuel levy adjustment, and undisclosed tax proposals for 2026 to boost state coffers by R20-billion — which are clearly in the drafting phase — were the key measures outlined to bridge the gap created by the scrapping of the VAT boost.
The Treasury insists there are no spending cuts, but 'downward revisions' to additional spending amount to the same thing when compared with what was outlined in March. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it ain't no chicken.
Painful Investment
The bottom line is that a scalpel has been deftly wielded instead of a chainsaw, but economists and the markets will welcome the Treasury's commitment to spending within its limited means.
Godongwana was diplomatic and gracious over the VAT fracas that ultimately produced this third try at a Budget.
'The debate and negotiations have deepened our understanding of policy trade-offs and institutional processes, while giving citizens unprecedented visibility into our democracy's evolution,' he said.
'Negotiation, debate and compromise, as we have seen unfold over the last weeks, has been a necessary, if sometimes painful, investment in the productivity of future government reform in the new political environment.'
There will be a slight increase in the gross borrowing requirement to R588.2-billion from the R582-billion foreseen in Budget 2.0. That will include payments to Eskom of R80.2-billion, R30-billion less than the 2024 Budget estimate.
The Budget deficit for this fiscal year is now seen amounting to 4.8% of GDP and is projected to narrow to 3.4% by 2027/28.
'Compared to the March estimates, tax revenue projections have been revised down by R61.9-billion over the three years. This reflects the reversal of VAT increase and the much weaker economic outlook,' the minister said.
The Treasury has slashed its forecast for South African economic growth in 2025 to 1.4% from 1.9% in March, a reflection of ongoing domestic challenges and a worsening global outlook in the face of US President Donald Trump's chaotic tariff policies and trade wars.
The mysterious R20-billion tax measure
The tax measures to raise an additional R20-billion next year remain under wraps.
Although an additional R20-billion is set down in the Budget documents for collection in 2026, Chris Axelson, acting head of tax at the National Treasury, was somewhat coy when questioned by journalists during the Budget lockdown.
'We aren't going into specifics on that right now. There are a variety of options, including options put forward by the public.'
It's clear that the measures will not include any VAT revisions after the recent hullabaloo that almost tore asunder the Government of National Unity (GNU).
In his speech, the minister said that in total an additional R7.5-billion that had been allocated to the South African Revenue Service (SARS) over the next three years, and that any resulting windfall from improved revenue collection would mean the mystery tax measures would not need to be implemented.
'As SARS utilises this investment to raise additional revenue, which I believe can be at least R35-billion, the R20-billion to close the current revenue gap will not have to be raised through taxes,' Godongwana said.
He said SARS was also aiming to '… target illicit trade in tobacco and other areas, which should boost revenue over the medium term'.
All in all, it seems that a viable Budget has been pulled out of Godongwana's fedora against a fraught and fraying political and economic backdrop.
In baseball, after three strikes you are out, and the minister's bat on the third try has hit the ball. In cricket terms it may not be a six, but a boundary beckons. DM
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
5 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Key conversations at Naacam 2025 to address tariff pressures and growth
As Nelson Mandela Bay's automotive sector reels from ongoing challenges and a shrinking market, the 2025 Naacam Show provides a crucial opportunity for industry leaders to come together and explore ways to support growth and sustainability. With US tariffs adding fresh pressure, manufacturers of vehicles and automotive components in Nelson Mandela Bay face an uphill battle to stay competitive in an increasingly shrinking market. However, over the next two days, automotive roleplayers will have the opportunity to connect and network on ways to improve their businesses at the 2025 edition of the National Association of Automotive Component and Allied Manufacturers (Naacam) Show and Conference, which takes place at the Boardwalk Hotel International Convention Centre in Gqeberha. About 150 exhibitors will showcase their products and services, while a host of speakers will lead discussions related to the South African automotive industry on a local and global scale. Speaking at the media launch of the event on Tuesday, Naacam CEO Renai Moothilal said South Africa's automotive component manufacturers provided 80,000 direct jobs and about twice as many indirect jobs through suppliers and other auxiliary businesses. He said there was growing concern over the 'fluid global trade environment', referring to the 30% US tariffs and their impact on this sector. In 2024, the export value of South Africa's automotive industry, including vehicles and components, totalled R270-billion, of which just over 10% — R28.7-billion — went to the US. Breaking that figure down further, Moothilal said R4.4-billion worth of components were exported to the US. 'We live in interesting times, and this sector has faced distinct challenges in the recent past. We have observed a decline in the domestic market for vehicles assembled in South Africa, as well as increased import penetration in both vehicles and components. This led to reduced production from original equipment manufacturers (OEMs).' The panel pointed to two stark examples of mounting pressure on the sector — the withdrawal of Goodyear South Africa and the pending closure of its Kariega plant, and the announcement by Jendamark Automation that US tariffs could cost it R750-million in contracts. In addition to the blow delivered to Nelson Mandela Bay in June when the Goodyear announcement was made, a week ago, ROVD Engineering, also based in the metro, said it had lost hundreds of millions of rands in contracts because of the US tariffs. The company, which has operated in Gqeberha for 61 years, designing, manufacturing and exporting turnkey industrial automation systems to US customers, said it was looking at moving offshore to continue manufacturing. Political instability But global pressures aren't the only threat. Locally, Nelson Mandela Bay's political instability and crumbling infrastructure are disrupting the supply chains that manufacturers depend on. Pointing this out, the CEO of the Automotive Industry Development Centre in the Eastern Cape, Thabo Shenxane, said the political climate and service delivery in Nelson Mandela Bay were ongoing challenges. He said crumbling infrastructure had caused countless disruptions throughout the value chain as it led to unreliable energy, water outages and logistical issues as a result of poor roads and inoperable railway lines. He also referred to the well-documented political instability that has long plagued the metro. 'It's not just a Naacam member problem or a government problem. It is a societal problem, and we must look for opportunities to improve our business,' said Shenxane. He believes the Naacam show provides a unique opportunity for stakeholders in the automotive industry to engage constructively and develop solutions that will assist each other and add to the growth of the entire sector. Automotive Industry Transformation Fund (AITF) CEO Jabulani Selumane agreed with Shenxane, saying the show could prove to be a 'catalyst' for SME growth within the automotive sector. He said that since the AITF was founded in 2021, it had contributed to the establishment of 70 small businesses within the sector, creating 2,700 jobs in the process. 'SMEs are not just junior partners. They are the growth engine, and they bring agility, innovation and the capacity to localise component manufacturing to build resilience in our supply chain.' He said SMEs could not operate in isolation but required support, resources, skills and market access that larger corporations provided, which made the Nacaam Show a valuable platform for growth and development. DM
Daily Maverick
5 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
After the Bell: Manipulating the rand — really?
There are times in life when you are so desperate to find someone else to blame for your situation that you just lash out. And you grab any chance to blame someone else. I sometimes wonder if that feeling, that horrible desperation, the feeling that our currency is so weak, is behind the very strange story about claims that a group of 28 banks, both South African and foreign, manipulated the rand. The backstory is long and complicated, but essentially, the Competition Commission says it has evidence that traders working for the banks were part of a single conspiracy. There is talk of 'rand-pairs' and secret chats on Bloomberg terminals – even phone conversations and secret agreements. Considering that the phrase 'rand-pair' is second only to watching golf in making my eyes feel somewhat weighted, it's easy to understand how this thing has such political power. It's because, like the chap on par-who-gives-a-monkey's, almost all of us have no cooking clue what is going on. And the moment I hear phrases like 'manipulation' or 'hedge' or 'rand-currency-pair', I immediately get the feeling you get when someone is trying to sell you car insurance. You just know you're being screwed. But in fact, as former Daily Maverick journalist Ray Mahlaka once clearly explained, the currency market is just too big for it to have any impact on you. Around $50-billion (about R882-billion) is traded every day. And while some of the banks involved are big, none are big enough to have played that particular game. Now obviously, some people did play games with the currency. Absa was the first to announce that it had discovered two of its traders were doing this. It told the regulators and suspended them. Standard Chartered and CitiBank have also admitted that some of their people were guilty. They've paid a fine and moved on with their lives. But some of the other banks are fighting on. As Business Live reported this morning, the Constitutional Court is finally expected to put all of this to bed one way or another in a four-day hearing next week. One hopes the coffee machine at Constitution Hill can do double-time. Four days of a hearing about currency pairs is more than we mere mortals could possibly stand. Two things have really struck me about this case. The first is that I remember speaking to the Competition Commission about it in 2017. The recording is sadly lost now, but I remember so clearly how adamant they were that first, all the named banks were involved, and second, how they would wrap up this case in a couple of months. It's 2025 now, and it's still going. The other is the language used by the banks in their defence. Take Sim Tshabalala, the CEO of Standard Bank. I think it was the first time I'd seen a CEO of one of our big banks writing an op-ed in our media, back in 2023. It was on this topic. Remember how dangerous it is for a CEO, who was not on the Bloomberg terminal or the Reuters chat or the phone conversation, to say anything dogmatic about what happened. But this is what he said in News 24 two years ago: 'We're not playing for time or looking for a deal. When we say that we are innocent of currency manipulation, we mean it. We will not settle. Where we found that our people have engaged in wrongful conduct, we will act swiftly and will work with the relevant authorities. Where we find no evidence of wrongdoing, we will protect and defend our people – our most valuable assets.' This is a person putting their entire reputation on the line. He must believe it. Firmly, utterly, unshakeably. I have a horrible feeling in my belly that the Competition Commission might feel a little silly after all of this – that the Constitutional Court, after selecting a good nine-iron, might include a few choice words about the commission's conduct in its final ruling. But that won't be the end of it. I think the damage is done. Parties such as the EFF and MK, and perhaps even the SACP, who have every incentive to attack the system, banks and institutions, will just go on attacking them. I wouldn't be surprised if we hear that phrase 'monopoly capital' again. They might even turn, again, on our judges. It's quite strange in one way. Julius Malema has mouthed off time and time again about 'currency manipulation'. It almost makes you wonder what he might know about making a profit off the manipulation of a bank. In the meantime, bankers who are innocent will probably feel pretty frustrated, too. And not just with their putting. I think they'll feel they've been dragged into something that they have nothing to do with. I'll tell you this for free, though. Like any golf tournament I've ever watched, I can't wait for the whole saga to end. DM
The Citizen
8 hours ago
- The Citizen
Apple and pear exports lost R1 billion in 2024 due to Cape Town port inefficiencies
It is not only US tariffs that keep farmers and export agents up at night. The state of the Cape Town port also has them counting apples. South Africa's apple and pear export industry is calling for Transnet to act due to the mounting losses caused by inefficiencies at the port of Cape Town, estimating that delays and logistical bottlenecks have cost the sector around R1 billion in 2024 alone. The Western Cape department of mobility met with Two-a-Day, an apple and pear packing and marketing cooperative, and its logistics partner, Link Supply Chain Management, on Monday for a strategic discussion and site visit to tackle the logistic challenges affecting the fruit export industry. At the meeting, industry role players warned that without urgent intervention, including the fast-tracking of the port's privatisation, the country risks losing hard-won market share in key global markets. 'We work in a complex, time-sensitive value chain. If a vessel to Europe, the United Kingdom, or the Far East is missed, the sale is gone. You do not get a second chance to deliver on time in a programme-driven market. Logistics is the single biggest risk for us right now. 'If we cannot get our product out, everything else, from on-farm innovation to market development, is compromised,' Roelf Pienaar, managing director of Tru-Cape Fruit Marketing, says. ALSO READ: Cape Town port ranked the worst in the world Delays at Cape Town port force diversions to Port Elizabeth, costing money Chris Petzer, operations director at Two-a-Day, explains that port delays often force the business to divert containers to Port Elizabeth at significant cost, simply to keep the supply chain moving and avoid halting harvest and packing operations. 'It is not sustainable, but sometimes it is the only option to prevent greater losses.' Although the Cape Town port's efficiency is slightly improving, according to Chris Knoetze, managing director of Link Supply Chain Management, a fourth-party logistics provider owned by several of the Western Cape's leading fruit exporting companies, including Two-a-Day and Tru-Cape Fruit Marketing, it is still throttling exports. A more effective port with higher productivity will attract more vessels and services, expand capacity and give more reliable shipping options to various export markets. 'Given several interventions, like Transnet's appointment and changes at senior management level, the repair and maintenance of equipment, solving personnel matters, focusing on operational improvement and capital investment in new rubber tyre gantry cranes (RTGs) in Cape Town Container Terminal, we should expect to see a step change in productivity to at least twenty gross crane movements per hour (GCH) or more in the coming months. 'However, the process is still too slow and far removed from the 33 GCH reported by Transnet in November 2012. When port operations are disrupted, it affects product quality, increases costs and damages our credibility with overseas buyers.' ALSO READ: Where are the private sector plans for Cape Town port? Inefficiencies cost apple and pear industry R1 billion in 2024 Knoetze emphasises that inefficiencies have cost the apple and pear industry in the Western Cape an estimated R1 billion in 2024 due to additional storage, trucking and plug-in costs, as well as missed market opportunities when vessels bypass Cape Town. 'We urgently need to fast-track the privatisation of the Cape Town terminal to restore competitiveness.' The Department of Mobility confirmed that it is actively pursuing measures to tackle these constraints. Corrine Gallant, deputy director-general of the Western Cape's mobility department, outlined existing initiatives, including the port of Cape Town's Logistics Development Project Management Unit and plans to revitalise rail infrastructure. 'We are working on the landside and waterside inefficiencies. This includes improving road freight safety and capacity, restoring rail services like the Overberg line and ensuring that the Western Cape's needs are heard at a national level. 'We cannot afford more costs down the chain. Our focus is on solutions that remove bottlenecks and protect jobs.' ALSO READ: US tariffs: SA sends new proposal but no changes to laws Global shipping bypasses port due to inefficiencies Industry representatives stressed that time is critical and warned that delays in decision-making could see global shipping lines bypass Cape Town in favour of more efficient ports, delaying fruit by one to two weeks and undermining the Western Cape's competitiveness. 'The farmers, pack-houses and exporters are investing in efficiency every day. Now we need the same urgency and commitment at the port, as without it, the entire value chain is at risk,' Gerhard van Heerden, director at Link Supply Chain Management, warns. Isaac Sileku, Western Cape minister of mobility, echoed this and emphasised the need for urgency and structured collaboration with Transnet. 'We cannot afford to be reactive. We must have formal agreements and mechanisms in place so that when bottlenecks arise, we know exactly which button to press. Speed of execution is critical — our farmers and exporters cannot wait years for solutions.' The session concluded with agreement on the need for: Faster execution of port and rail improvement projects. Formal industry-government forums with direct access to decision-makers. Targeted short-, medium- and long-term actions to resolve 'low-hanging fruit' issues and systemic challenges. The Western Cape apple and pear industry contributes significantly to local employment and the provincial economy and stakeholders agreed that improving Cape Town's port efficiency is essential not only for sustaining the sector but also for enhancing South Africa's competitiveness in global fruit markets.
