
Enoch Godongwana's budget: a delicate balance of debt control and social investment unveiled
The bottom line is that a scalpel has been deftly wielded instead of a chainsaw, but economists and the markets will welcome the Treasury's commitment to spending within its limited means.
With a scalpel in one hand and undisclosed tax measures for 2026 concealed by a glove in the other, Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana delivered a Budget on Wednesday that aimed to fill the revenue hole dug by the burying of the proposed VAT hikes while keeping mounting state debt levels under control.
But the minister insisted that containing debt did not translate into the pain of austerity.
'This is not an austerity Budget,' the minister said in his prepared remarks.
'It is also a redistributive budget. It directs 61 cents of every rand of consolidated, non-interest expenditure towards the social wage… This budget invests over R1-trillion in critical infrastructure to lift economic growth prospects and improve access to basic services.'
Pointedly, he noted that '… this is done without compromising the fiscal strategy of sustainable public finances'.
The long-stated aim of stabilising debt in 2025/26 at a peak level as measured as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) remains firmly in place, with the ratio now seen at 77.4% of GDP this fiscal year compared to 76.2% in March. This will be its highest level since the dawn of democracy in 1994.
'We have achieved this difficult balance by reducing additional spending over the medium term by R68-billion… the size of the proposed increases to allocations is reduced, in line with what we can afford.'
These 'downward revisions' to additional spending that were proposed in March over the next three years, an inflation-linked fuel levy adjustment, and undisclosed tax proposals for 2026 to boost state coffers by R20-billion — which are clearly in the drafting phase — were the key measures outlined to bridge the gap created by the scrapping of the VAT boost.
The Treasury insists there are no spending cuts, but 'downward revisions' to additional spending amount to the same thing when compared with what was outlined in March. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it ain't no chicken.
Painful Investment
The bottom line is that a scalpel has been deftly wielded instead of a chainsaw, but economists and the markets will welcome the Treasury's commitment to spending within its limited means.
Godongwana was diplomatic and gracious over the VAT fracas that ultimately produced this third try at a Budget.
'The debate and negotiations have deepened our understanding of policy trade-offs and institutional processes, while giving citizens unprecedented visibility into our democracy's evolution,' he said.
'Negotiation, debate and compromise, as we have seen unfold over the last weeks, has been a necessary, if sometimes painful, investment in the productivity of future government reform in the new political environment.'
There will be a slight increase in the gross borrowing requirement to R588.2-billion from the R582-billion foreseen in Budget 2.0. That will include payments to Eskom of R80.2-billion, R30-billion less than the 2024 Budget estimate.
The Budget deficit for this fiscal year is now seen amounting to 4.8% of GDP and is projected to narrow to 3.4% by 2027/28.
'Compared to the March estimates, tax revenue projections have been revised down by R61.9-billion over the three years. This reflects the reversal of VAT increase and the much weaker economic outlook,' the minister said.
The Treasury has slashed its forecast for South African economic growth in 2025 to 1.4% from 1.9% in March, a reflection of ongoing domestic challenges and a worsening global outlook in the face of US President Donald Trump's chaotic tariff policies and trade wars.
The mysterious R20-billion tax measure
The tax measures to raise an additional R20-billion next year remain under wraps.
Although an additional R20-billion is set down in the Budget documents for collection in 2026, Chris Axelson, acting head of tax at the National Treasury, was somewhat coy when questioned by journalists during the Budget lockdown.
'We aren't going into specifics on that right now. There are a variety of options, including options put forward by the public.'
It's clear that the measures will not include any VAT revisions after the recent hullabaloo that almost tore asunder the Government of National Unity (GNU).
In his speech, the minister said that in total an additional R7.5-billion that had been allocated to the South African Revenue Service (SARS) over the next three years, and that any resulting windfall from improved revenue collection would mean the mystery tax measures would not need to be implemented.
'As SARS utilises this investment to raise additional revenue, which I believe can be at least R35-billion, the R20-billion to close the current revenue gap will not have to be raised through taxes,' Godongwana said.
He said SARS was also aiming to '… target illicit trade in tobacco and other areas, which should boost revenue over the medium term'.
All in all, it seems that a viable Budget has been pulled out of Godongwana's fedora against a fraught and fraying political and economic backdrop.
In baseball, after three strikes you are out, and the minister's bat on the third try has hit the ball. In cricket terms it may not be a six, but a boundary beckons. DM
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
‘No problem,' says Joburg as R1bn tender goes to officials' families or friends
The City of Johannesburg defends the award of massive transport contracts to politically connected families, despite concerns from the Auditor-General and civic watchdogs A week after Auditor-General revealed that the City of Johannesburg had awarded R972-million in dodgy family-linked tenders, city spokesperson Nthatisi Modingoane has confirmed that the metro government sees no problem and will not investigate. Six awards (or contracts) valued at almost R1-billion were made to the family of either a city official or councillor for the extension of the BRT/Rea Vaya bus system in 2023. The extension of the city transport service is eight years behind schedule, and a final deadline for the end of 2024 was also missed. 'There is no regulatory provision that prohibits the Municipality to award contracts to the category of people in question (spouse, child or parent of a person in service of state either actively or in the past twelve months). Therefore, the question whether the City failed in oversight and due diligence is misplaced,' said Modingoane. The Auditor-General has a different view. 'Although there is no legislation that prohibits municipalities from making awards to suppliers in which close family members or business associates of employees or councillors have an interest, such awards create conflicts of interest for these employees or councillors and/or their close family members or business associates. The possibility of undue influence cannot be discounted, especially if the person could have influenced the procurement processes for these awards, potentially creating opportunities for irregularities.' While Modingoane confirmed the awards were made for the BRT/Rea Vaya extension, he would not provide further details. He said the connected council official had not sat in on the award decision. Asked if the award would be rescinded or investigated, Modingoane said, 'To rescind such an award will be unlawful and the Municipality will be exposed to litigation risks as a result'. He said that the transactions had been disclosed in the city's annual financial statements as required by law, and no further investigation was necessary. BRT-Rea Vaya veers off track When cities commit to ending spatial inequality (which means that poor black people live on the outskirts while the middle and wealthy classes live in the city near opportunities and amenities), there are two ways to do so: provide transport for workers to get to economic opportunities or increase social housing near jobs. In Johannesburg, the rapid bus transport system was an innovative idea to mediate apartheid planning by making it cheap, easy and fast for workers living on the city's outskirts to go into town, to where they worked, or to get around. The city, which began as a gold mining town, was built along the ultimate apartheid master plan. Black people were housed in dormitory towns and suburbs far out of the white city in enclaves easily controlled by security forces if they resisted – the violent response to the 1976 student rebellion was the obvious example of how it worked. The BRT/Rea Vaya incorporates the taxi industry and co-owns two companies that run the system, PioTrans and Litsamaiso. The city pays BRT/Rea Vaya for trips made. The system has not been without conflict, especially with PioTrans. Its expansion to the north (the so-called Phase 1C) of the project has fallen prey to serial infrastructure and leadership weaknesses that beset local government, which Maluleke highlighted. The city has expanded north, and job opportunities are increasingly available in the new nodes. Phase 1C would almost double the number of buses and take people to where the opportunities are. But new stations lie dormant as delays have repeatedly impacted on roll-out. The weaknesses include corruption (as the R972-million contracts suggest), institutional capacity, effective project governance, ineffective planning, procurement and contract management weaknesses and a lack of accountability for poor performance. Maluleke's report lays bare all these factors. Phase 1C is eight years behind schedule, and the Johannesburg Development Agency (JDA) missed a pledge to get it running by the end of 2024. Daily Maverick regularly tracks the route to check, and progress is still far from complete. This detracts from the effort to end spatial inequality and get young people into jobs — Gauteng and Johannesburg have among the highest youth unemployment rates. Because it is subsidised, trips on the Rea Vaya are cheaper than other forms of public transport. Intervention delivers little Johannesburg is under soft intervention by the Presidency because of its rapidly collapsing infrastructure and services, but after 100 days, most residents say the impacts on the ground are imperceptible. In the past week, there have been multiday water cuts in the east of the city and power outages in the near west and across the inner city as underground fires roar through cabling. Last week, Mayor Dada Morero launched a 'bomb squad' to help him improve city management. MMC for Transport Kenny Kunene said, 'I have not heard anything about it (the R972-million dodgy tenders).' He said he would investigate and revealed that when he started his job in 2021, R23-million had been stolen from the BRT and officials had been suspended, but reinstated after the ANC intervened. He had ensured they exited as part of an anti-corruption plan, he told Daily Maverick. Failing management Johannesburg's audit outcome was unqualified with findings. (For context: the board of a private sector CEO of a company with a budget of R88-billion – Joburg's budget – would sack a CEO for this outcome.) The city lost R2.9-billion in water and R4.93 billion in electricity. Auditors ensured city finance officials reduced fruitless and wasteful expenditure to R1.48-million in 2023/24. Over the past three years, this figure stood at R354-million. The AG said the quality of its submitted statements was poor, but good on publication after remediation. The quality of its performance reports was poor. The overall status of its financial controls was poor. The BRT/Rea Vaya delays symbolise this failing management. The AG also found that 'The City of Johannesburg did not coordinate effectively with its entities. This was due to misalignment between the metro and its entities on expectations and plans, obligations, budgets and timelines for the successful delivery of key projects.' The DA has lodged a formal complaint with the Special Investigating Unit over the R1-billion in awards to companies that are linked to current and former councillors, said its head of caucus, Belinda Kayser-Echeozonjoku. 'This shocking report paints a grim picture of a city where public money is seemingly treated as a personal piggy bank by those elected to serve it. At a time when Joburg's streets are crumbling, power outages are the norm and basic service delivery is in freefall, it is unacceptable that councillors may be benefiting from a broken procurement system.' Risk is that nothing will be done – Corruption Watch 'The worrying thing is that it is a sizeable amount – it may be six officials (or six awards to one official) or their relatives who cost Joburg residents just under R1-billion. 'The official response is quite disturbing. The biggest risk is that nothing will be done, and another big transport infrastructure is threatened. Metro governments are regressing in terms of their reports to the Auditor-General,' said Moepeng Talane of Corruption Watch, who assesses all AG reports for the organisation. 'It's worrying and urgently needs the intervention of the provincial governments,' she said. DM


The South African
7 hours ago
- The South African
Luxury travel buddy: Who is Paul Mashatile's wife?
Paul Mashatile has been condemned by parliament for spending millions on luxury travel alongside his wife, Humile. The deputy president and the Second Lady – who have a 24-year age gap – wed in 2023 after both their partners died in 2020. Over the past few days, Deputy President Paul Mashatile has been grilled over his five-star luxury travel he made with his wife Humile on unofficial trips, at the expense of the taxpayer. In a recent parliament sitting, it was revealed that Paul spent over R2 million on a six-night stay in London last year. Earlier this year, he travelled to Japan, where he splurged almost R1 million on a four-night stay with his wife. Since being sworn in last July, Paul has spent almost R8 million on four international trips. Paul Mashatile's younger, attractive wife is no stranger to the spotlight. Humile was first married to former ANC Western Cape secretary Songezo Mjongile, who died in 2020 after a battle with colon cancer. At the time, Paul was the treasurer of the ANC. Paul's first wife, Manzi Ellen Mashatile, died in July 2020 after contracting COVID-19. Paul has four children with his late wife, while Humile has two from her marriage to Songezo. The couple's nuptials occurred just days after Paul was sworn in as SA's new deputy president. Paul Mashatile and his wife Humile Mjongile. Images via X: @pmashatile/ RODGER BOSCH, AFP According to her Instagram account, the second lady is a philanthropist who recently launched her own charity, the Humile Mashatile Foundation. Her areas of interest are autism, HIV/ Aids treatment in young children, and holistic healing. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.

IOL News
12 hours ago
- IOL News
Opposition parties demand action over eThekwini's costly legal disputes
Pressure is piling on eThekwini Municipality mayor Cyril Xaba to take action after the City incurred legal and interest costs after failing to pay a service provider. Image: File Photo Opposition parties in the eThekwini Municipality have called for accountability from the officials who have caused the City to incur costs in a R30 million tender legal battle between the City and the service provider which ended up in the Constitutional Court. Last week, the Constitutional Court dismissed the City's leave to appeal the Supreme Court of Appeal judgment - the City wanted the upper courts to overturn the Durban High Court ruling in 2022 which ordered it to pay Daily Double Trading an amount of R30 million as a settlement to the R43 million claim the company had made for work done. The City's argument was that it did not authorise an attorney who reached a settlement with the service provider therefore it could not be liable for the payment, however, the City did not oppose the matter in court. With the matter dragging on from 2018 at a cost of 10% interest, the City is now liable for an extra R20 million in costs - with significant legal costs on top of this. In the wake of the Concourt decision, the DA on Sunday called for the immediate suspension of City Manager Musa Mbhele and his referral to the Financial Misconduct Board. In a statement, the party said the damages stem from the municipality's 2013 decision to cancel contracts with Daily Double Trading 479CC, adding that courts previously ruled that the cancellation was unlawful. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading 'The DA believes that, as the head of the city's administration, Mbhele has a duty to safeguard public funds and not act recklessly when ratepayers' money is at stake. The party believes that his conduct in this matter warrants a formal investigation by the Financial Misconduct Board and that he should be suspended from his duties pending the outcome. "The City manager had every opportunity to comply with previous court orders related to this matter but refused to, in the process, wasting public money to defend the indefensible,' said the party. Joining the calls, ActionSA provincial leader, Zwakele Mncwango also called on Mbhele to be liable as an accounting officer or else tell the council who had provided legal advice to him to continue defending the matter after several court judgments. Mncwango also questioned the capabilities of the City's legal services unit as the continued dismissal of the case right up to the Constitutional Court meant that the City had been receiving poor legal advice. 'There is a serious problem here, whether Mbhele was appealing this matter (based) on his opinion that the City legal services are incompetent. It is not a legal opinion but a political one,' said Mncwango. The EFF's eThekwini chairperson Themba Mvubu said while his party commended the effort by the municipality to try and save taxpayers' money, there was a need find the officials who illegally authorised to negotiate a settlement with the service provider, without the necessary authority.