logo
India-US trade deal: 4 implications for Indian stock market from Trump's 25% tariff salvo

India-US trade deal: 4 implications for Indian stock market from Trump's 25% tariff salvo

Mint3 days ago
India, driven by the principle of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam—'The world is one family'—aims to strike mutually beneficial agreements, including with the United States. Rooted in ancient Indian philosophy and often referenced by PM Modi, the phrase reflects India's commitment to global unity and shared responsibility.
However, this ethos is being tested by the ongoing tariff dispute with the U.S., particularly concerning agricultural access. As noted in our July 11 article in The Mint titled 'What Tariff?! The $100 Billion Question,' the core issue lies in protecting India's vulnerable small-scale farmers. Unlike U.S. agribusinesses, Indian farmers lack subsidies and scale, and over 60% of the population still depends on agriculture. Opening the market to heavily subsidised U.S. products could be economically damaging.
Cultural factors also play a role—many U.S. dairy products contain animal fats, which conflict with dietary norms in largely vegetarian India. Simply put, caving on these fronts would be economic and cultural 'hara-kiri.'
The newly imposed 25% U.S. tariffs on Indian exports (starting August 1) are projected to trim India's GDP growth from 6.5% to around 6.25%—a 2.5% to 3% drag. While this will impact sectors like textiles, pharma, electronics, agri-products, and machinery, the broader effect is limited. Only 2% of Corporate India's earnings are at risk, as 85% of the economy remains domestically driven.
India is actively pursuing alternate trade avenues, including deals with the UK and EU, to offset potential export losses to the U.S.
India's longstanding defense relationship with Russia—still its top arms supplier—remains a sticking point for Washington, which would prefer India buy American weapons. Yet India continues to follow a multi-aligned strategy rooted in sovereign interest.
U.S. Tariff Details: 25% tariffs affect ~$87B of Indian goods exports (approx. 20% of total exports and 2.5% of GDP), particularly in key manufacturing and agri sectors.
Offsetting Factors: INR depreciation could help mitigate the impact by boosting competitiveness.
Global Effects: Higher tariffs and a narrowing U.S. trade deficit may slow global growth, adding deflationary pressure unless surplus countries like China and Germany raise domestic demand.
Capital Flows: Higher tariffs may trigger FII outflows, adding volatility amid already weak domestic demand.
Policy Watch: The RBI may need to consider monetary easing to counterbalance the external drag.
Sectoral Impact: Pharma, auto ancillaries, cables, and industrials face direct pressure; SMID caps and domestic cyclicals could be hit harder due to capital flight.
Potential Bright Spot: IT may benefit from sustained INR weakness, aided by low valuations—but sentiment remains key.
India remains firm in defending its economic and cultural interests, even as it seeks equitable trade partnerships. In the near term, markets are likely to remain volatile. A cautious investment stance is advised.
(The author is CIO-Equities, LGT Wealth)
Disclaimer: This story is for educational purposes only. The views and recommendations made above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, and not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

7 books that faced bans in India and why they were controversial
7 books that faced bans in India and why they were controversial

Indian Express

timea few seconds ago

  • Indian Express

7 books that faced bans in India and why they were controversial

The Jammu & Kashmir Home Department has banned 25 books on Kashmir, citing concerns over 'secessionist content' and their alleged role in spreading misinformation, glorifying militancy, and undermining national sovereignty. The banned books include constitutional expert AG Noorani's The Kashmir Dispute 1947-2012, Sumantra Bose's Kashmir at the Crossroads and Contested Lands, David Devadas' In Search of a Future: The Kashmir Story, Booker-prize-winning author Arundhati Roy's Azadi and journalist Anuradha Bhasin's A Dismantled State: The Untold Story of Kashmir After Article 370. The move, which invoked provisions of the new Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, has renewed debate over censorship. This is not the first time books have been banned or restricted across India or in specific states and territories for allegedly offending religious sentiments, distorting history, or threatening public order. Here are some books that have faced bans in Independent India: Published in 1954, Rama Retold by British writer Aubrey Menen was the first book to be banned in Independent India. The novel offers a satirical retelling of the Ramayana, interpreting its characters, including Rama, Sita, and Ravana, in an unconventional manner. Menen's version sought to secularise the epic and question traditional interpretations, which drew strong criticism for allegedly offending religious sentiments. In 1955, the Jawaharlal Nehru government banned the book's import, citing concerns over potential communal unrest. An Area of Darkness (1964) by Indian-origin author and winner of the Nobel Prize in Literature VS Naipaul documents his impressions during a visit in 1962. Though Naipaul was of Indian origin, the book was banned soon after publication for portraying the country in a negative light. However, decades later, re-published by Pan Macmillan and is now available on Amazon. Naipaul's account focuses on poverty, bureaucracy, and social issues, described in blunt and critical language. The Indian government banned its import, citing concerns that the depiction was offensive and misrepresented the nation. Critics accused Naipaul of generalising and lacking cultural understanding, while others acknowledged the honesty of his observations. The Rajiv Gandhi government 'banned' Salman Rushdie's The Satanic Verses in 1988, following global outrage from Muslim groups who considered its content blasphemous. The novel sparked protests worldwide and led to a fatwa calling for Rushdie's death. For decades, the book remained officially unavailable in India. In late 2024, however, the Delhi High Court closed a petition against the ban after authorities failed to produce any official ban notification. Shortly after, limited copies began appearing at Bahrisons Booksellers in Delhi. Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code was banned in the state of Nagaland in 2006, following protests from Christian groups who considered its content blasphemous. The Nagaland government prohibited the book's publication, sale, and distribution, citing that it hurt religious sentiments in the Christian-majority state. The ban was prompted in part by the global publicity around the film adaptation released the same year. The film also faced opposition in other Indian states, including Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Punjab, and Goa. Censors allowed the film to release with an 'adults only' rating and required a disclaimer stating it was a work of fiction. The book and film continue to draw controversy over their depiction of Christian history and beliefs, particularly the suggestion that Jesus married Mary Magdalene. Hansda Sowvendra Shekhar's The Adivasi Will Not Dance, a short story collection published in 2015, was temporarily banned by the Jharkhand government in 2017. The ban followed criticism that the book portrayed Santhal women in a negative light. The decision drew widespread condemnation from writers and free speech advocates. The ban was lifted four months later after a review by the state government. In November 2022, the Manipur government banned The Complexity Called Manipur: Roots, Perceptions and Reality, written by the late Brigadier Sushil Kumar Sharma. The book, based on Sharma's PhD thesis, claimed that the princely state of Manipur covered only the valley region at the time of its merger with India. The implication that the surrounding hill areas were not part of the state was seen as factually incorrect and potentially inflammatory. The state government cited risks to communal harmony and national security, saying that the book contradicted official records, including the 1950 White Paper on Indian States. The order directed that all copies be forfeited and prohibited further circulation. Following the controversy, the government announced that future books on Manipur's history and culture would require clearance from a state-appointed review committee.

Donald Trump's new India tariffs could hit American household kitchen cabinet. Here's how, why?
Donald Trump's new India tariffs could hit American household kitchen cabinet. Here's how, why?

Economic Times

timea few seconds ago

  • Economic Times

Donald Trump's new India tariffs could hit American household kitchen cabinet. Here's how, why?

Live Events FAQs (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel A dash of this and a pinch of that could cost more in American kitchens with new tariffs on goods from India. Many spices used by home chefs, restaurants and large manufacturers are imported from India, and the 50 per cent tariffs on the country imposed by President Donald Trump could drive costs higher, a trade association warned year, the United States imported more than $410 million in spices from India, according to the U.S. Department of essential spices, including cinnamon, pepper, nutmeg and cloves, require tropical climates and, therefore, cannot be grown in the United States on a large enough scale to meet demand, Laura Shumow, executive director of the American Spice Trade Association, said in a spice industry is one of many sectors that are tallying up the potential costs of Trump's trade wars with various partners, warning that the fallout could hit either profits at American companies or consumers' late June, executives at McCormick warned that Trump's tariff policy could cost the spice company $90 million a year."Tariffs on these products -- including additional new tariffs announced this week -- do not incentivize U.S. production or create American jobs," Shumow said. "Instead, they place an undue financial burden on U.S. food manufacturers, restaurants and, ultimately, American consumers."The spice association noted that in the framework of a trade deal with Indonesia, the Trump administration had created the potential for exemptions or reductions in tariffs for commodities not naturally available or produced in the United States. The trade group said it hoped a similar framework could be put into agreements with other nations."We firmly believe that smart, targeted trade policies can support the U.S. spice industry and other American businesses," Shumow said, "while helping to keep grocery costs down for families."A1. President Donald Trump has imposed 50 per cent tariffs on India.A2. Last year, the United States imported more than $410 million in spices from India, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

KPMG India reappoints industry veteran Yezdi Nagporewalla as CEO
KPMG India reappoints industry veteran Yezdi Nagporewalla as CEO

Mint

timea few seconds ago

  • Mint

KPMG India reappoints industry veteran Yezdi Nagporewalla as CEO

KPMG India on Thursday, 7 July 2025, announced the re-appointment of Yezdi Nagporewalla as the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the consultancy firm for the three years beginning February 2027, according to the official announcement. The company also said that the second CEO's term will begin immediately after the expiry of the current executive's term. 'KPMG in India today announced the re-appointment of Yezdi Nagporewalla as Chief Executive Officer for a second term, which will span three-years, beginning February 2027. The extension will take effect immediately after the expiry of his current term,' the company said in an official filing. The company also said that the decision to re-appoint Yezdi Nagporewalla comes as the board of directors and partners of the Indian-arm are focused on the market as the firm continues its growth journey. 'My focus will be to continue sharpening the firm's client focus, integrating innovative approaches, deepening expertise and enhancing our culture to unlock value for our clients. Over the past years, we have built trust among our stakeholders with a clear emphasis on ethics and quality, which will remain our core,' said Yezdi Nagporewalla in the official statement. Ajay Mehra, the Non-Executive Chairman at KPMG India, said that Yezdi Nagporewalla has been leading the Indian company over the last three years, and his strength lies in maintaining and strengthening relationships with the clients and people. 'It has been our privilege to have Yezdi lead the India firm over the last three years. His strength lies in maintaining and strengthening relationships with our clients and people. His insights and experience will help scale the firm to a better and brighter future,' he said in the filing. Yezdi Nagporewalla has a career of close to three and a half decades, during which time he has dedicated two and a half decades to KPMG India. Yezdi has garnered expertise in diverse areas, including client relations, market expansion, strategy, business improvement, transformation, and governance and regulatory matters, according to the company data.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store