MK Party has had 7 Secretaries-General in under a year - Analysts call it a 'One-Man Show'
Political analysts says the rotation of seven secretary-generals reflects instability and suggests MK Party is Jacob Zuma's project, managed as he wishes.
Image: Tumi Pakkies / Independent Newspapers
Political analysts have slammed Former President Jacob Zuma's Umkhonto weSizwe (MK Party) as a 'one-man show' after its leader said that the party has had seven secretaries general in under a year.
Some were of the view that the party is Zuma's own 'personal project,' which he runs as he wishes.
Zuma spoke at the launch of the MKP Youth Branch in Claremont on Monday, reigniting concerns over the party's internal instability, leadership style, and long-term viability.
Zuma defended the party's decision to cycle through seven Secretaries-General in under a year.
'We're not here to play games,' he said.
'This is not an organisation to make money, it is an organization to liberate South Africa,' Zuma told supporters.
'If one of us goes off track, we don't beg them.'
However, independent political analyst Goodenough Mashego said the turnover in senior leadership is less about discipline and more about Zuma's whims, pointing to a worrying pattern of autocratic control.
Speaking to IOL News on Tuesday, Mashego said the repeated removal and replacement of secretary-generals reflects a deeper issue within the party's structure.
'Zuma is the one looking for a certain caliber of secretary-general,' said Mashego.
'It's not the party's membership that determines that. Skills and popularity with members don't matter; what matters is who Zuma wants.'
'If Zuma wants a secretary-general who can't even write the word 'tomorrow,' the MK Party will get one who can't write. If he wants someone who can't read, that's who will be appointed…,' Mashego said.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Mashego described the secretary-general as the engine of any political organisation, responsible for managing membership, expanding structures, and coordinating development at provincial, regional, and branch levels.
'When the secretary-general is unstable, the entire party becomes unstable,' he said.
'Most of the people removed from that position weren't even given a chance to prove themselves. Some were removed within two weeks.'
'You can't build a political party on one man's whim,' he added.
'You need vision, a mission, and a democratic mandate. The MK Party, apart from the votes it got in the 2024 general election, has no such mandate. Its leadership was not elected, it was appointed.'
Meanwhile, the latest demotion of Floyd Shivambu as the secretary-general for the party has raised eyebrows.
Even though the party claimed Shivambu would be deployed to Parliament, IOL News previously reported that his name does not appear on the party's official list of Members of Parliament.
This has raised speculation that he may have been quietly removed from the party.
Mashego said this again points to the 'undemocratic structure' of the MKP.
'No one in MK's leadership was elected. All were appointed and continue to be shuffled based on Zuma's decisions. That's why it's so easy for the party to move people around,' he said.
He argued that MKP is not a political party in the conventional sense.
'I've said many times, that MK is a project. Projects have a start date and an end date,' Mashego said.
'This party exists to reclaim the ANC. If the ANC's leadership in 2027 doesn't suit MK's ambitions, the party won't survive to 2029.'
He warned that MKP is likely hoping a figure like Deputy President Paul Mashatile will emerge as ANC leader in 2027, someone they believe might recall President Cyril Ramaphosa, exit the GNU, and realign with MKP.
'That's their way of creeping back into power,' he said.
Professor Theo Neethling echoed Mashego's concerns.
He said while the MK Party claims to carry forward the liberation legacy of the ANC's former armed wing, the original Umkhonto weSizwe, Zuma's interpretation of democratic principles is troubling.
'Zuma's stance on the Constitution is often ambiguous, if not outright contradictory,' Neethling told IOL News.
'He publicly acknowledges the Constitution's role in protecting democracy and rights, but many of his actions suggest a willingness to sidestep or undermine it - particularly on land reform, corruption, and the rule of law.'
Neethling said the MK Party has openly stated it will not hold elective conferences, which is something that sets it apart from even the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), often criticised for being tightly controlled by its leader, Julius Malema.
'Malema is accused of running the EFF like a personal project, but at least the party holds elective conferences. MK Party doesn't... That's extraordinary in a democracy,' said Neethling.
Commenting on Shivambu's demotion, he said,'It's becoming clear that MK Party may be the most undemocratic party ever to win parliamentary seats in post-1994 South Africa.'
Neethling said Zuma appears to believe in a form of democracy rooted in racial majoritarianism.
'Now that white minority rule is over, he seems to think that the party representing the black majority, according to him, MK Party, should have unchecked power. This raises real concerns about democratic backsliding,' he said.
'Zuma did not hesitate to attack the Constitution in recent years, and that shows clear signs of anti-constitutionalism.'
simon.majadibodu@iol.co.za
IOL Politics
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
29 minutes ago
- TimesLIVE
'Fail!' – ActionSA rejects GNU's progress
As the government of national unity (GNU) marked its first anniversary on June 14, ActionSA has poured cold water on its progress in office, saying they are nowhere near delivering on promises they made to the electorate. In fact, they have awarded the GNU an F on their report card in their self-generated GNU tracker, saying the grand coalition is a 'complete failure', adding that they have had no meaningful performance, and their obligations have remained entirely unmet, with a collapse in delivery and accountability. The party's parliamentary leader Atholl Trollip said this outcome rubber-stamps their decision not to join the governing coalition, as they were concerned about playing a 'constructive role' in the opposition. Taking a swipe at the MK Party and the EFF, Trollip said they made this decision because with 'regressive forces in the opposition benches of parliament, who played key roles in robbing the state of hundreds of millions during the state capture era, along with the radical, violence-inducing rhetoric that was recently put on display for the whole world, we recognised that ActionSA's most effective role was in opposition'. With a six-seater caucus in parliament, the party vowed to hold the executive to account, scrutinise the delivery of services and monitor how public funds are spent. 'To do this, ActionSA in parliament developed our GNU Performance Tracker, a comprehensive index designed to monitor and hold accountable the GNU. Drawing on data from sources such as Stats SA and official parliamentary replies, the tracker benchmarks performance against government targets, international best practice and ActionSA policy positions.'
TimesLIVE
an hour ago
- TimesLIVE
MKP Youth League convener apologises for 'ishangane' comments after backlash
MK Party Youth League national convener Qiniso Cibane has apologised for comments he made about the league's co-ordinator, Nkateko Mkhabela, during the launch of the youth league in KwaZulu-Natal on Monday. Cibane referred to Mkhabela as 'ishangane from Limpopo,' sparking outrage from social media users who argued that the word 'ishangane' is disrespectful and humiliating. The incident fuelled speculations that the MK Party is a Zulu tribalistic party. Responding to the backlash, Cibane said his words were taken out of context. 'What I said was taken out of context,' he said. 'The MK Party doesn't belong to KZN people only; it belongs to all nine provinces.' He said he was trying to defend Mkhabela from party members who were disrupting her while she was trying to speak. 'What happened was me stopping ill-disciplined behaviour, but there may be those who felt offended. I sincerely apologise. I was protecting Nkateko and protecting the party's constitution.'
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Cabinet to decide on Israeli embassy closure in South Africa by year-end
International Relations Minister Ronald Lamola says consultations have taken place within the relevant government cluster system to prepare a memorandum for submission to Cabinet for the closure of the Israeli embassy in South Africa. Image: Leon Lestrade / Independent Newspapers The Cabinet is expected to decide by the end of the year on the potential closure of the Israeli embassy in Pretoria. This was revealed by International Relations and Cooperation Minister Ronald Lamola during a question-and-answer session in the National Council of Provinces on Tuesday. Responding to a question from EFF MP Virgill Gericke about the steps he has taken in honouring and executing the November 2023 resolution of the National Assembly to close down the Israeli embassy, Lamola said consultations have taken place within the relevant government cluster system to prepare a memorandum for submission to the Cabinet. 'In accordance with the constitutional principle of the separation of powers, the authority to decide on the possible closure of the Israeli embassy in South Africa rests solely with the Cabinet. 'Once Cabinet has deliberated and reached a final destination, the Department of International Relations and Cooperation will act in accordance with these directives,' he said. Lamola indicated that the Israeli embassy remained downgraded. 'The downgraded embassy only just facilitates the normal processes of visa and travelling of civilians between the two countries, with no full operation of a full embassy in terms of liaising on political, diplomatic, and also economic relations between the two countries.' He also said since the matter was processed through the Cabinet process, he was unable to specify the date it will be resolved. 'But I can state that before the end of the year, Cabinet will have processed the matter.' Asked what outside forces were exerting pressure on the Cabinet or the government to relent on its initial resolve to close the Israeli embassy, Lamola said the authority to decide on the possible closure of the Israeli embassy in South Africa rests solely with the Cabinet. 'Cabinet has to undergo its internal processes, which it will be undergoing to deal with this matter, and it is being processed. 'It will be processed objectively, in line with the South African constitution, with no external pressure to be exerted on the South African government by any forces or anyone. The South African government will act within its sovereignty to make decisions informed by facts, policies, the Constitution, the National Development Plan, and national interests,' he said. Asked whether his department has considered other measures like economic sanctions against Israel as part of intensifying pressure against the continued Israeli attacks and aggression against Palestine, Lamola said the matter will require the Cabinet to deliberate on whether to exert economic sanctions and any other pressures that may need to be executed. 'But the South African government will continue to support the work that has been done by other countries. The European Union, its member states, have also begun to sanction some of the leaders of the Israeli regime in terms of economic sanctions, and also some countries like those in the G-7 have announced this type of measures.' He explained that the existing decision that has been taken relates to taking the Israeli government to the International Court of Justice. Lamola also said economic sanctions against Israel will require all countries to play a role through various instruments. 'The wheel is coming to a full cycle with all member countries of the UN, either putting economic sanctions, political pressure through diplomatic channels, and we are leading the legal route of the process. So there is a contribution by many member states of the UN to continue to exert the necessary pressure to stop the ongoing genocide by the Israel Defense Force.' Pressed on whether cutting diplomatic ties with Israel effectively disqualified South Africa from playing any mediating role in the much-needed peace process, Lamola said that as the Cabinet was processing the matter, all factors would be considered. 'But the resolution we are talking about is because it is a parliamentary resolution which the Cabinet is duty-bound to consider within the principle, obviously, of the separation of powers. 'We will look into all the facts and all the prevailing circumstances and present a way forward.'
