Candidate for McGloin vacancy worked as consultant for Dem panel's director
Former county economic development Director Brenda Sacco is listed as a 'consultant' on a document related to a state Redevelopment Assistance Capital Program grant that businessman and developer Alpesh Patel, the committee's executive director, secured for a hotel and event space project at the former Gertrude Hawk property on Drinker Street in Dunmore. Patel applied in 2023 for $3 million in RACP funding to support the hotel development and secured a $500,000 state grant for the project last year.
State Sen. Marty Flynn, D-22, Dunmore, announced in November the $500,000 RACP award to Alsqstop Real Estate LLC, Patel's firm. It was one of nearly 20 local projects Flynn highlighted for receiving RACP funding.
Sacco — who led the county's Department of Planning and Economic Development for about five years before McGloin and fellow Democratic Commissioner Bill Gaughan dismissed her in January 2024 — is one of three candidates the Democratic Committee advanced for consideration by the judges of the County Court of Common Pleas to potentially succeed McGloin, who resigned last month. County President Judge James Gibbons recently paused that replacement process after Gaughan and the county challenged it in court.
The process that played out late last month saw county Democratic Party leaders, including Patel and county Democratic Chairman Chris Patrick, use a scoring rubric to narrow a list of 18 applicants for the vacancy to three finalists. Those three finalists — Sacco, Olyphant Borough Council President James Baldan and Scranton School Director Robert J. Casey — were put before the county party's full executive committee, which voted to advance them to the judges.
Sacco is identified as a 'consultant' on a state 'Grantee Selection & Partner Portal Assignment Worksheet' related to Patel's Dunmore project. The worksheet identifies the grantee for the project and the people, including Sacco and Patel, who'll be granted permission to upload documents and access and view project information through a 'partner portal.'
County economic development Director Kristin Magnotta, whom Gaughan and McGloin hired shortly after dismissing Sacco, said Sacco worked as a consultant for Patel after her separation from the county.
'She was hired by Al,' Magnotta said of Sacco. 'She was not a consultant for Lackawanna County.'
Specific details of Sacco's consulting work and whether it is ongoing remain unclear. Neither Sacco nor Patel responded to multiple attempts to reach them for comment and context.
But the apparent business relationship preceded the Democratic Committee's advancing of Sacco as a finalist to replace McGloin as commissioner.
Gaughan has criticized that process as nontransparent and politically tainted. Patrick has defended the process in the face of those criticisms, and unequivocally defended Sacco's resume and qualifications Wednesday.
Patrick said he didn't know anything about Sacco's consulting work, but pointed to her professional background and extensive economic development experience with the county. Consulting on a development project involving grant funding would be consistent with her background and expertise, he said.
Sacco joined the county economic development office in August 2013 as deputy director of operations and finance under Director George Kelly, who left in January 2019. Kelly ran for commissioner that year as incumbent Democratic Commissioner Jerry Notarianni's running mate, but didn't advance beyond the primary.
Commissioners elevated Sacco in early 2019 to replace Kelly as director, initially in an acting capacity. She served through the next administration of Notarianni, fellow Democratic Commissioner Debi Domenick and Republican Commissioner Chris Chermak, often earning praise for her performance. Gaughan and McGloin gave no specific reason for letting her go.
'Brenda Sacco has a resume that would blow your mind if you looked at it,' Patrick said, noting he furnished the judges with three good candidates. 'And Brenda Sacco, if anybody wants to dispute her qualifications let me say this to you, she's more qualified by her resume to be the county commissioner than Bill Gaughan, Chris Chermak, Matt McGloin and probably 10 commissioners before (them).'
The rubric party leaders used to determine which three highest-scoring applicants to put before the full executive committee included points for government, professional and economic development experience, experience developing or helping to develop budgets, educational background and experience working for or with the county Democratic Committee. Patrick, who provided those details last week, acknowledged Wednesday that Patel participated in the process.
'Al Patel's involved in my process because he's my executive director, he's been my executive director for three years,' Patrick said, noting Patel wasn't making final decisions. 'I make final decisions as the chairman.'
Prior to the committee's Feb. 27 vote to advance Sacco, Baldan and Casey, Gaughan held a press conference to introduce Dunmore Mayor Mark 'Max' Conway Jr. as his preferred choice to replace McGloin. He later blasted the committee process as opaque, arguing it 'threatens to turn the county over to a small group of politicos.'
Lackawanna County Commissioner Bill Gaughan concludes a press conference after announcing Dunmore Mayor Max Conway, right, as his preferred choice to replace former Commissioner Matt McGloin in the Commissioners Conference Room at the Government Center in Scranton Monday, Feb. 24, 2025. (SEAN MCKEAG / STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER)
Conway has also criticized the process.
'I think most people see this process for what it is,' he said the day after the committee vote. 'I knew who the three finalists were an hour before the vote and the meeting started. How is that possible?'
Whether the Democratic Committee process will ultimately stand remains to be seen. The question will be decided in court.
County solicitor Donald Frederickson and attorneys with the Scranton law firm Myers, Brier & Kelly filed a petition last week on behalf of Gaughan and the county asking the county court to amend a March 6 order on the process of replacing McGloin. They specifically seek an amendment bringing the order into compliance with Pennsylvania Rule of Judicial Administration 1908, effectively removing the Democratic Committee from the process of filling McGloin's seat for the almost three years remaining on his unexpired term.
Rule 1908 says the county court, not a political party, 'shall receive applications from any interested candidates for the position' pursuant to a deadline established by the court.
The legal matter will proceed before a panel of Senior Judges Carmen D. Minora, Robert A. Mazzoni and Vito P. Geroulo, who will hear arguments and rule on issues raised in Gaughan and the county's petition.
Whether the county remains a party to the legal action also remains to be seen after the solicitor representing Chermak, Paul J. LaBelle, asked in a court filing Monday for the county to be removed as a party. Chermak opposes the county's involvement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
23 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump is wildly unpopular and losing ground fast. Why is anyone afraid of him?
Trump's approval rating in the YouGov polling has tumbled from +3% at the beginning of February to -15% now. He's underwater on every issue Americans care about. While the top issues for most Americans are high prices, inflation and health care, our increasingly unpopular president is laser-focused on things nobody cares about. Like downplaying exhibitions on the history of slavery at the Smithsonian. On the same day a new poll by The Economist/YouGov showed Donald Trump's disapproval rating hitting a new high, the president took time to post this on social media: 'The Smithsonian is OUT OF CONTROL, where everything discussed is how horrible our Country is, how bad Slavery was, and how unaccomplished the downtrodden have been.' How bad slavery was? I'm not quite sure what that implies, but suffice it to say the new poll didn't find 'See less about how slavery was bad' to be a priority for American voters watching the costs of beef and vegetables skyrocket. Americans care about inflation, Trump cares about 'WOKE' museums Trump went on to say he has 'instructed my attorneys to go through the Museums' and start getting rid of 'WOKE,' whatever that means. The Aug. 19 poll and Trump's rambling post about ridding our museums of history create a perfect moment to pose this question: Why is anyone in American politics or in the corporate world afraid of this toxic president? Trump's approval rating in the Economist/YouGov polling has tumbled from +3% at the beginning of February to -15% now. He's underwater on every issue Americans care about, from immigration (53% disapprove) to jobs and the economy (53% disapprove) to inflation (61% disapprove) to foreign trade (56% disapprove). Nearly two-thirds of Americans – two-thirds! – say the country, under the leadership of President Donald Trump, is 'out of control.' Trump is so unpopular that there's no risk in standing up to him So when a public figure who is unpopular comes out and says he wants to scrub all the stuff about 'how bad Slavery was' from America's museums, I think other public figures would be on solid ground if they denounced him. Republicans won't do it, of course. They've spent decades ignoring the needs of their voters, focusing instead on tossing them red meat from the culture wars and assuming that bashing liberals is all that matters. But even in Democratic circles, most continue to go after Trump with kid gloves, with notable exceptions like Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, Rep. Jasmine Crockett, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York and California Gov. Gavin Newsom. And corporate types are, by and large, either silent or outright supportive of a president liked by fewer and fewer Americans. From a marketing and political strategy standpoint, none of this makes sense. Trump's bullying nature and willingness to use the power of the federal government against his enemies are clearly cowing many, which is pathetic. You don't wait around for an unpopular bully to gather more power. Most Americans don't see US as a dark and dangerous place Think about Trump's anti-immigrant, anti-woke, fearmongering worldview. He has dispatched the National Guard to Washington, DC, to fight a crime wave that doesn't exist. He speaks routinely about big U.S. cities being crime-ridden, trotting out words like 'filth' and 'squalor,' and he demeans Americans who don't stand in lockstep with him. Now consider this question posed in the YouGov poll under 'World View': Which comes closest to your view? The answer 'Our lives are threatened by terrorists, criminals, and illegal immigrants and our priority should be to protect ourselves' was chosen by only 35% of respondents. The answer 'It's a big, beautiful world, mostly full of good people, and we must find a way to embrace each other and not allow ourselves to become isolated' was chosen by 50% of respondents. Corporate leaders only stand to benefit from taking on Trump People aren't buying what Trump is selling. They don't like what he's selling. And they don't like him. There is zero political risk to standing up against this president. There is only upside, and how more haven't realized it yet is beyond me. Powerful people in the business and political worlds, along with everyday Americans, don't have to sit silently and let Trump do what he wants, whether it's militarizing city streets, cruelly rounding up immigrants and forcing them into camps, or purging the evils from America's past to create a fake United States of Righteousness. Opposing him has the benefit of being the moral move and the popular move. The arrow pointing to the right side of history is brighter than the sun. Bending to the will of a wannabe tyrant has never benefited anybody. Standing up and shouting a wannabe tyrant down, on the other hand, is the kind of thing that gets remembered. Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @ and on Facebook at
24 minutes ago
Democratic lawmakers demand information about 'Alligator Alcatraz'
A group of Senate and House Democrats is pushing officials at the Department of Homeland Security for more information about the use of the immigration detention facility in the Florida Everglades known as " Alligator Alcatraz." In a letter sent late Tuesday to the heads of the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and FEMA, the lawmakers expressed concern that the Trump administration's decision to use what lawmakers called a "novel state-run immigration detention model" could violate federal law and make the federal government less accountable for the conditions at immigrant detention centers. The letter comes as the Trump administration has embraced the model of using state-run facilities -- as opposed to federal or private ones -- to detain noncitizens during immigration proceedings, including using a shuttered state prison as an additional site in Florida, dubbed "Deportation Depot," and expanding ICE detention space in an Indiana correctional facility dubbed the "Speedway Slammer" and in a Nebraska facility to be called "Cornhusker Clink." "Experts worry this novel state-run immigration detention model will allow Florida to create an 'independent, unaccountable detention system' that runs parallel to the federal detention system," the group of eight senators and 57 representatives wrote. The "Alligator Alcatraz" detention facility has been the subject of intense political and legal scrutiny since it was rapidly constructed on the site of a rarely used airstrip in the Florida Everglades in June. The temporary detention center -- which currently can house 3,000 migrants awaiting deportation -- was toured by President Donald Trump and DHS Secretary Kristi Noem in early July. "They have a lot of bodyguards and a lot of cops that are in the form of alligators. You don't have to pay them so much." Trump said while touring the facility. "I wouldn't want to run through the Everglades for long." In the letter, spearheaded by Oregon Sen. Jeff Merkley and Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the lawmakers asked the Department of Homeland Security to provide more information about the facility by Sept. 3. They asked the Trump administration to identify the legal authority that allows Florida to run the facility, confirm the facility meets federal standards for the treatment of detainees, and outline the criteria used by DHS to reimburse Florida for the facility. "Brushing aside concerns from human rights watchdogs, environmentalist groups, and Tribal nations, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has greenlit the construction of this expansive detention facility that may violate detained individuals' human rights, jeopardize public and environmental health, and violate federal law. We ask that DHS promptly provide critical information for the American public to better understand this detention plan," the Democratic lawmakers wrote. The lawmakers also requested additional information about legal access for detainees at the facility and the environmental impact of the site -- issues that have been at the center of two federal lawsuits challenging the facility. A federal judge has temporarily paused further construction at the site over environmental concerns, and a lawsuit over legal access was partially dismissed after the Trump administration established a nearby immigration court to handle issues stemming from Alligator Alcatraz. A spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the letter. Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin has previously said the facility complies with federal detention standards. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has lauded "Alligator Alcatraz" as an efficient way for Florida to work with the Trump administration to carry out deportations, and has encouraged other states to do the same. "I know that the administration has called on other states to follow suit and expand this type of capacity, and I would just reiterate that call. I think it's important. I think it will make a difference," DeSantis said at a press conference at the site in July. "The whole purpose is to make this be a place that can facilitate increased frequency and numbers of deportations of illegal aliens." Since "Alligator Alcatraz" opened in July, immigration advocates have been pushing for more information about the facility, arguing that the custodial and operational details were initially kept murky to prevent oversight. According to documents released in an ongoing lawsuit challenging the facility, the Florida Division of Emergency Management and Florida State Guard -- along with private contractors -- are running the site under a 287(g) agreement with the federal government. "While the aliens are in the physical custody of the State, they are for certain legal purposes treated as in the custody of the federal government," an attorney with the Department of Justice wrote in a court filing earlier this month. According to H. Marissa Montes, a professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles, the model used by Alligator Alcatraz allows the federal government to outsource detention facilities to eager states and private contractors. While the federal government has long relied on county jails and for-profit prison companies to house detainees, facilities like "Alligator Alcatraz" expand the scale of individual states' involvement in federal immigration proceedings, Montes said. "Given that DHS is working directly with the Florida state government on a detention facility with alarming implications, DHS should ensure transparency and accountability surrounding the facility's financing operations," the lawmakers wrote in their letter. With Trump vowing to carry out the largest deportation in U.S. history, the use of facilities like "Alligator Alcatraz" contributes to a deterrent effect that encourages self-deportation, according to Montes, who runs Loyola's Immigrant Justice Clinic. "We've got an increased number of people who come in seeking to self-deport because they'd rather self-deport in a way that's dignified, right, than at the hands of the federal government," Montes said.
Time Magazine
24 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
Venezuela Readies Militia as Trump Involves Military in Fight Against Drugs
The U.S. and Venezuela appear to be heading towards a standoff with neither country indicating a willingness to back down. The Venezuelan government on Monday mobilized more than four million militia troops seemingly in response to reports of U.S. naval movements in the region. 'We defend our seas, our skies, and our lands. We liberated them. We guard and patrol them. No empire will touch the sacred soil of Venezuela, nor should it touch the sacred soil of South America,' Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro said in a televised address Monday. Three U.S. Navy missile destroyers have been deployed to the waters off Venezuela, U.S. officials told Reuters on Monday. 'President Trump has been very clear and consistent. He's prepared to use every element of American power to stop drugs from flooding into our country and to bring those responsible to justice,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday. Here's what to know about the state-of-play between the U.S. and Venezuela. Trump and Maduro have had longstanding hostilities Washington and Caracas broke off formal bilateral diplomatic relations in 2019 during Trump's first term, after Trump backed opposition leader Juan Guaidó in the Latin American country's presidential election. The U.S. government has not recognized Maduro's last two electoral victories, and the Trump Administration has repeatedly called Maduro's presidency illegitimate, including as recently as Tuesday. 'I know it very well, and Venezuela is right now being run by a dictator,' Trump said in August last year, as he blamed the country for the flow of criminals and drugs into the U.S. and campaigned to crack down on it. Democratic former Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden also opposed the Maduro government, which has suggested jailing its opposition and has deported American journalists. During Trump's first term, the U.S. imposed financial sanctions on Venezuela in 2017, 2018, and 2019. In 2020, Maduro was indicted in a New York federal court on charges of narco-terrorism, conspiracy to import cocaine, and other charges. And the tensions between Trump and the Venezuelan leader have only escalated during Trump's second term. Earlier this month, the Trump Administration doubled the reward to $50 million for information leading to Maduro's arrest. The Administration also accused Maduro of being 'one of the world's largest drug traffickers' and the head of the so-called Cartel of the Suns, allegations that the Venezuelan government has rejected. The U.S. also alleged links between Maduro and Mexico's Sinaloa Cartel, which Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum said earlier this month her government has no evidence of. Attorney General Pam Bondi said that the U.S. government had seized up to $700 million of assets with alleged links to Maduro on Aug. 13, including luxury goods, bank accounts, and private jets. Trump has pushed to use the U.S. military to scuttle cartels. In February, he designated Venezuela's Tren de Aragua, as well as six groups in Mexico and MS-13 in El Salvador, as foreign terrorist organizations. The President signed a secret directive to the Pentagon to use military force against these cartels, sources told the New York Times earlier this month. The Administration has sought to counter the inflow of drugs, especially fentanyl, through tariffs, such as imposing tariffs on Canada, China, and Mexico, citing the countries' 'failure' to stop fentanyl smuggling into the U.S. And Trump issued penalty tariffs on countries that buy oil from Venezuela in March, highlighting the threat of Tren de Aragua to the U.S. Trump has also targeted Venezuelans on immigration issues, revoking the protected status of hundreds of thousands of Venezuelan immigrants in the U.S. and deporting 238 Venezuelans in March to an El Salvadoran prison as part of a mass deportation campaign claiming to target alleged gang members. U.S. courts have ordered the return of several of those who were wrongfully deported, while many other deportees reject the allegations against them. Trump sends missile destroyers to Venezuelan waters On Monday, the U.S. government ordered three U.S. Navy missile destroyers—USS Gravely, USS Jason Dunham and USS Sampson—and around 4,000 military personnel to the edge of Venezuela's territorial waters, according to Reuters. The Administration confirmed to CNN last week that it had ordered naval movements as part of an effort to stymie drug trafficking. The Trump Administration is also committing additional military assets in the broader region within international airspace and waters, including several P-8 spy planes, warships, and an attack submarine, an official told Reuters. Venezuela mobilizes millions of militia fighters 'This week, I will activate a special plan with more than 4.5 million militiamen to ensure coverage of the entire national territory—militias that are prepared, activated and armed,' Maduro said Monday. The Venezuelan Militia was created in 2005 by the late President Hugo Chávez and formally established in 2010. Maduro's plan will involve mobilizing peasant and worker militias 'in all factories and workplaces in the country' and providing 'missiles and rifles for the working class, to defend our homeland,' the Venezuelan President said Monday. Maduro called U.S. threats 'rotten rehashes' and 'extravagant, bizarre, and outlandish.' The Venezuelan government also temporarily banned the purchase, sale, and operation of drones in Venezuelan airspace on Tuesday. A drone laden with explosives detonated near Maduro in 2018 in an apparent assassination attempt, which resulted in the arrest warrants for more than two dozen people, including one who later died under mysterious circumstances, and the convictions of 17 people, including opposition leader Juan Requesens. 'Washington's accusing Venezuela of drug trafficking reveals its lack of credibility and the failure of its policies in the region,' Venezuela's foreign ministry said in a Tuesday statement. 'While Washington threatens, Venezuela advances firmly in peace and sovereignty, demonstrating that true effectiveness against crime is achieved by respecting the independence of the people. Every aggressive declaration confirms the inability of imperialism to subdue a free and sovereign people.'
