Bank of Mexico seen cutting key rate by 50 basis points next week
According to a Reuters poll released on Friday, 21 of 26 economists expect the central bank to cut borrowing costs to 8%, from its current 8.5%, in what would be its fourth consecutive 50 basis point cut.
Three participants expect Banxico, as the central bank is known, to take a more gradual approach by reducing interest rates by just 25 basis points, while the remaining two believe it will keep rates unchanged, following the U.S. Federal Reserve's decision this week to hold its benchmark interest rate steady.
Banxico has said it is considering lowering the interbank rate again by 50 basis points in its June 26 announcement, extending a monetary readjustment cycle that began in 2024 after it raised its key interest rate to a record high of 11.25% as part of its efforts to tame inflation following the pandemic.
But in May, the consumer price index exceeded the bank's official target of 3% interest rate plus or minus one percentage point, raising some doubts about whether the bank will follow through with such a significant rate reduction.
Deputy Governor Jonathan Heath told Reuters last week that he believes 50 basis point cuts should be paused until the data can be evaluated further.
A further 50 basis point cut would take Banxico's rate to its lowest level in three years, which could provide some relief to the weakening Mexican economy. But the majority of participants polled by Reuters said they believed the central bank should be more cautious in its next moves.
Latin America's second-largest economy narrowly avoided a technical recession in the first quarter of the year, but still faces serious risks amid sluggish domestic activity and uncertainty related to U.S. tariff policies.
Following next week's decision, Banxico could opt for a 25 basis point cut in its next announcement in August, according to 15 participants, possibly followed by a similar cut in September. A majority of the participants said they believed the third quarter could end with an interest rate at 7.5%.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Donald Trump's latest Liberation Day means another dark day for America
Precisely what poor, benighted Syria and prosperous, neutral Switzerland have done to deserve US tariffs of 41 per cent and 39 per cent respectively is hard to discern. Neither is the kind of industrial superpower that represents a threat to America's economic hegemony, and both would, in their different ways, prefer to stay on reasonably good terms with the Trump White House. It is, sadly, easier to see why Canada got whacked with a 35 per cent levy on some of its exports – and Donald Trump's tariff tactics do have a hint of the mob about them. Mr Trump suggested that Canada's decision to recognise the state of Palestine as a sovereign nation would make it harder to achieve a trade deal, and he also mentioned the scourge of fentanyl. But then again, Mexico, which has also recognised Palestine and is by far the more important source of the drug, has been granted a 90-day tariff reprieve. Ever since the opening salvo in the Trump tariff war on 2 April – so-called Liberation Day – the shifting schedules and random pauses have lacked both rhyme and reason. Even at the time, their supposed 'reciprocity' was ridiculed. They have generated huge uncertainty, and, for a time, did so much damage to the dollar and US Treasuries on the capital markets that even Mr Trump had to make a tactical retreat. In fact, the US president's observed tendency to cave in whenever a trading 'partner' showed any sign of resistance led to the unwelcome 'Taco' sobriquet – 'Trump Always Chickens Out'. Some countries, such as the UK, Japan and the EU member states, have breathed a sigh of relief that they have escaped the worst, while others – often impoverished ones with no diplomatic leverage, such as Bangladesh and Lesotho – will find it difficult to cope with tariffs that are now considered moderate, but would have seemed shocking even a few years ago. Yet the game, even now, is not over. China – the second-largest economy in the world, and America's most formidable rival – has been left out of this supposedly final list of tariff increases. The trade talks between the two economic giants in Stockholm are dragging on, the prohibitive mutual tariffs having been abandoned, and they may well be extended past the next deadline of 12 August. President Trump met his match in Xi Jinping, and will not be imposing any further punitive trade sanctions on China for fear of another tit-for-tat escalation. Thus far, the markets have received the latest news of tariffs with some equanimity, but a collapse in trade between the world's two greatest economies would generate the kind of turmoil Mr Trump doesn't need right now. Even assuming that the eventual trade truce with China avoids disaster, these US tariffs are, in broad terms, the highest since 1934 and the era of the notorious Smoot-Hawley Act, which helped to strangle world trade and exacerbated the Great Depression. The Trump tariffs are no less damaging to world trade, and thus to economic growth, including that of the United States. But these restrictions on trade are what Mr Trump's Maga 'base' voted for, the folk memory of the previous disastrous experiment with tariffs having faded. The president's winning slogan was 'America First', epitomising a zero-sum, nationalistic view of the world, and unfortunately, he has proved as good as his word on inauguration day: 'Instead of taxing our citizens to enrich other countries, we will tariff and tax foreign countries to enrich our citizens.' Words that were both misguided and economically illiterate, naturally – but a promise kept. Many of the worst fears of America's friends and allies are coming true in these early months of Mr Trump's second term. With far more preparation than took place prior to his first term (which followed an election that, reputedly, he never expected to win), the US president has pressed on with his protectionist, isolationist, natalist agenda with speed and determination, surrounded by mostly underqualified, grotesquely sycophantic cronies. The judiciary is increasingly cowed, and Congress is listless in defending the constitution. The tendency to Caesarism is apparent in everything from the theatrical executive orders to the grandiose golden remodelling of the White House, and the contempt for the chair of the US Federal Reserve, Jerome Powell – a 'moron', apparently. Mr Trump thinks he can, with a stroke of a Sharpie, abolish the birthright to citizenship enshrined in the 14th amendment, passed in 1868. His conception of 'America First' is more America Alone, yet everything he does weakens American power and prosperity. It is an inward-looking, selfish, exclusionary approach. Undoubtedly it enjoys a political constituency, but ultimately it will prove self-defeating.
Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Hammer blow for NPR and PBS as corporation which funds them says it's closing after Trump cuts
National Public Radio (NPR) and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) have been plunged into crisis after the body that provides their funds confirmed it was closing. The Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) announced Friday it was winding down operations shortly after the Trump administration ended federal funding for both broadcasters - bowing to an executive order from the president in the process. The order, signed on May 1, had demanded the private broadcasting corporation responsible for funneling federal funding from Congress to the two firms, 'cancel existing direct funding to the maximum extent allowed by law.' It also stated that NPR and PBS regularly produce 'biased and partisan news coverage'. THE CBP informed its roughly 100 staffers Friday that the majority of staff positions will end on September 1, a day before the deadline disclaimed in Donald Trump's executive order. Patricia Harrison, the president and CEO of the company, lamented the looming loss of the company in a statement, saying it comes 'despite the extraordinary efforts of millions of Americans who called, wrote, and petitioned Congress to preserve federal funding for CPB.' Such efforts fell flat, when Senate Republicans advanced a funding bill that also included no money for public media last week. The move came on the heels of a successful bid to remove $1.1billion in federal funding previously allocated to the CPB to be split amongst both broadcasters. PBS will be in the same boat. The company receives a congressional appropriation each year of about $500M. CPB allocates the money mostly to public television and radio stations, with some assigned to NPR and PBS to support national programming 'We now face the difficult reality of closing our operations,' Harrison wrote in response. 'CPB remains committed to fulfilling its fiduciary responsibilities and supporting our partners through this transition with transparency and care.'
Reuters
29 minutes ago
- Reuters
Corporation for Public Broadcasting to close after funding cut, in blow to local media
Aug 1 (Reuters) - The Corporation for Public Broadcasting will shut down its operations after the loss of federal funding, the nonprofit said on Friday, in a blow to local TV and radio stations that have relied on its grants for nearly six decades. The Republican-controlled U.S. House of Representatives passed a $9 billion funding cut to public media and foreign aid last month. This included the elimination of $1.1 billion earmarked for the CPB — which distributes funding to news outlets National Public Radio and Public Broadcasting Service — over the next two years. "Despite the extraordinary efforts of millions of Americans who called, wrote, and petitioned Congress to preserve federal funding for CPB, we now face the difficult reality of closing our operations," CPB President and CEO Patricia Harrison said. CPB informed its employees that the majority of its staff will be let go as of September end, except a small transition team that will remain through January 2026 to ensure closeout of operations. Created by the U.S. Congress in 1967, the CPB distributed more than $500 million annually to the PBS, NPR and more than 1,500 locally operated public radio and television stations. U.S. President Donald Trump and many of his fellow Republicans argue that financing public broadcasting is an unnecessary expense and that its news coverage suffers from an anti-right bias. The Trump administration has also filed a lawsuit against three board members of the CPB who have not left their posts despite Trump's attempt to fire them.
