‘It was consensual': Court gives teacher, 40, bail over sexual relationship with 16-year-old boy
As reported earlier by HT, the teacher had been arrested for allegedly sexually assaulting the minor student on multiple occasions for over a year and for allegedly luring him to five-star hotels, plying him with alcohol and then engaging in sex with him.
She was arrested last month after the boy's family complained to the police.
In a detailed order, the special court for cases under POCSO Act noted that the accused's resignation from the school last year — during which the alleged sexual assaults took place — had diluted the 'student-teacher dynamic.'
Special judge Sabina Malik also said the trial will take time to commence, so keeping the woman behind bars would not serve any purpose. The court granted the woman bail after considering that she is the mother of two minor children.
'He has a tattoo of my name'
The accused has denied all the allegations, claiming the FIR was 'motivated' and filed at the insistence of the boy's mother who disapproved of their relationship.
In her bail plea, she stated that the boy was emotionally attached to her and referred to her as his 'wife'. She also claimed that he had sent her affectionate messages and handwritten notes, and had a tattoo of her name on his body, adding that these facts were deliberately omitted from the police complaint.
The teacher also claimed that she had resigned from the school in April 2024 to distance herself from the boy and insisted that she would only meet him with his mother's permission. However, he continued to contact her, she alleged.
According to the FIR, from January 2024 to February 2025, the woman had sex with the boy at various five-star hotels and also in her car. She allegedly also gave him alcohol and medication for anxiety, and used a female colleague to persuade him to meet her. She then resigned from the school last year after the boy passed Class 11.
'Made to sign document in Marathi, did not understand'
In the bail order, the court noted, 'As the accused had resigned from the school, the relationship of a teacher and student no longer existed and, hence, the influence was diluted.'
The court also took note of the accused's contention that the police had provided the grounds of her arrest to her in Marathi, a language she does not understand, and that she was made to sign the documents without a translation.
The court recorded this as part of its reasoning while noting improper compliance with arrest procedures under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS).
In her bail plea, the accused pointed to her responsibilities as a single mother of 11-year-old twins — one of whom suffers from a respiratory condition — as grounds for leniency. She submitted her daughter's medical records and argued that her incarceration was affecting the children's education and mental health.
Opposing bail, both the prosecution and the complainant cited trauma, threats, and concerns over tampering with evidence. However, the court said these risks could be addressed through strict bail conditions. 'The potential risk to the victim, if any, could be catered to by imposing necessary terms and conditions,' the court order stated, while also warning that 'breach of any condition will amount to cancellation of bail'.
The teacher was granted bail on furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000, with one or more solvent sureties of the same amount. She was directed not to contact the victim or witnesses, tamper with evidence, or leave Mumbai without the court's permission.
(Reported by Vikrant Jha)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
2 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Kerala nuns remain in Chhattisgarh jail after Durg court doesn't hear bail plea
RAIPUR: A court in Chhattisgarh's Durg district on Wednesday disposed of the bail petitions of two Kerala nuns arrested in an alleged conversion and human trafficking case. Kochi: Nuns stage a protest in Kochi demanding the release of two Kerala nuns arrested in Chhattisgarh over allegations of human trafficking and forced religious conversion, on July 29 (PTI) Ravi Shankar Singh, secretary of the Durg Advocates Association, said the bail application was filed with the sessions judge on Tuesday. 'Today, the judge was on leave, so the additional district judge heard the bail application. In one line, the judge said that he does not have the authority to hear the bail application because the matter comes under the NIA Act and the NIA court is in Bilaspur.' Singh said when the defence lawyers pointed out that the nuns were in a Durg jail, the judge simply said that he was disposing of the application. 'The court told the police they have 15 days to write to the government to transfer the case to the NIA court,' he added. It is not clear why the judge asked the case to be transferred to a NIA court. Tamaskar Tandon, who appeared for the nuns, said the first information report (FIR) was registered in Durg on mere suspicion that a crime has taken place. 'The GRP (Government Railway Police) has conducted no inquiry, hence the FIR is quashable. Further, the alleged victims are all adults and none of their family members have complained of trafficking or conversion.' He added that although the detailed order is awaited, the judge disposed of the bail petition, saying that the charges are covered under the NIA Act and require the Central government's permission. 'We argued why the nuns should be kept in prison all this while when they are not at fault,' he said. The lawyer also said that they were considering approaching the high court. The two nuns, Preeti Mary and Vandana Francis, were arrested by the GRP at Durg railway station on July 25, along with another person, Sukaman Mandavi, following a complaint by a local Bajrang Dal activist who claimed they were forcibly converting and trafficking three women from tribal-dominated Narayanpur district. On Wednesday, senior CPI(M) leader Brinda Karat met the nuns at Durg Central Jail and alleged that their arrest was 'unconstitutional and illegal,' and part of a targeted attack on Christians. 'This is a targeted attack on Christians in the country. Based on a fabricated case, the two nuns have been arrested. They have been working for years among the poor and were sent to jail as part of a narrow agenda of the BJP and the Chhattisgarh government,' Karat told reporters outside the jail. Karat added that the nuns were unwell and were still made to sleep on the floor. 'They are ailing and suffering from fever and arthritis… Even basic human values are being trampled. This is lawlessness,' she claimed. She further alleged that Bajrang Dal activists assaulted the three alleged victims in front of the police and forced them to change their statements. 'There is no rule of law, instead there is rule of goons,' she said, demanding that the FIR be withdrawn and the nuns released immediately. Karat added that a tribal man, Sukaman Mandavi, was also arrested and assaulted. 'The BJP claims to be the well-wisher of tribals. But that man was also forced to change his statement. This is a matter of shame,' she said. Karat said that all citizens have every right to travel and seek employment anywhere in the country. 'All the allegations are baseless and part of a Hindutva agenda to attack minorities.' A delegation of leaders from the Congress-led UDF alliance in Kerala also visited Durg Central Jail and met the two nuns on Tuesday. The delegation later called on Chhattisgarh chief minister Vishnu Deo Sai, who assured them that the matter would be investigated thoroughly. Sai had earlier said it was unfortunate that the issue of women's safety was being politicised. 'Three daughters of Narayanpur were promised nursing training, followed by jobs. A person from Narayanpur handed them over to two nuns at Durg station, who were taking them to Agra. An attempt was being made to convert them,' he had said.
NDTV
34 minutes ago
- NDTV
Tamil Nadu Dalit Techie Murder: Case Transferred To Crime Branch Amid Outrage
Chennai: The Tamil Nadu police have transferred the case involving the alleged honour killing of Dalit techie Kavin Selvaganesh to the Crime Branch - CID for a "fair and independent investigation". The move follows massive public outrage over his murder, allegedly by the woman's brother who opposed the inter-caste relationship. The woman's brother and main accused Surjith was arrested and remanded on the same day of the crime Tamil Nadu DGP Shankar Jiwal confirmed that a murder case has been registered and sections of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act have been invoked. The police have also invoked the Goondas Act against him. The accused's parents, both serving police sub-inspectors, have also been booked for murder and suspended from service to ensure a free and transparent investigation. "Preliminary investigation reveals the murder was over the relationship between the accused man's sister and the victim," the DGP said in a statement. The murder took place outside a Siddha centre in Tirunelveli where Kavin's grandfather was undergoing treatment and his girlfriend also worked. CCTV footage reportedly shows Surjith taking Kavin away on his motorbike shortly before the attack. The techie was later found brutally murdered. Tensions have flared in the region. Kavin's family has refused to accept his body after post-mortem, demanding the immediate arrest and remand of the cop couple, whom they believe played a role in orchestrating the killing. "Surjith has been booked as A1. Our only demand is his parents ought to be remanded. With that demand, we protested the other day and we've not collected the body. This is a clear case of honour killing. There's provision to remand them based on the FIR," said Selvam, a relative of the victim. Rajya Sabha MP and Makkal Needhi Maiam chief Kamal Haasan condemned the killing, calling it shocking and urged all political parties to unite in a fight against caste-based violence. "Stringent punishment must be ensured. Casteism must be eradicated through collective political will," he said in a post on X. This murder has reignited calls for stricter enforcement of laws against caste crimes and honour killings in Tamil Nadu, a state often seen as a champion of social justice. Many are also demanding a stringent law for honour killings.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Karnataka high court imposes cost on petitioners for misuse of legal process
Bengaluru: The Karnataka high court imposed a Rs 10 lakh cost on six petitioners for concealing crucial facts and misusing legal procedures in a land acquisition case. "The petition, replete with suppression and bereft of bona fides, must meet its dismissal, not dismissal simpliciter, but with an exemplary cost. If the petition is now entertained on any score, it would amount to putting a premium on the litigative persistence of the petitioners and rewarding abuse of the process and tacit fraud played on this court. This forms the ninth petition on the same cause of action, seeking the very same prayer, differently worded, after the dismissal of eight rounds of litigation, all of which are suppressed in the subject petition," Justice M Nagaprasanna observed in his order. The case involves legal representatives of Venkata Bhovi and Hanumantha Bhovi, who received 2 acres and 20 guntas of land in Nagadevanahalli, Bengaluru, through an official memorandum dated Jan 9, 1979. The land was previously under their unauthorised occupation, and the deputy commissioner subsequently granted them ownership, recording their names in revenue records. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru The land acquisition process began on July 31, 1986, with a preliminary notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, followed by a final notification on Jan 22, 1987. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You To Read in 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo The compensation was fixed at Rs 65,000 per acre plus Rs 15,000 per acre in solatium and interest on June 6, 1987. The divisional commissioner deposited the award amount on Oct 9, 1987. Following Venkata's death, his legal heirs sought to remove the property from acquisition through various representations. They cited a draft notification under Section 48(1) of the Act from April 23, 1993. The petitioners approached the authorities on Jan 24, 2025, requesting a no-objection certificate, claiming their lands were excluded from acquisition based on a Sept 3, 1993 notification. Justice M Nagaprasanna noted that the petitioners' latest argument relied on a previously unmentioned 1993 notification. The court observed that this revelation came after eight rounds of litigation, characterising it as judicial manipulation rather than justice-seeking. "What I witness is not the pursuit of justice, but a game of judicial hide and seek, where one of the family members of the grantee seeks invocation of the writ jurisdiction, while the other member hides. Later, the other member seeks, and the former hides. Such cynical use of writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India must be arrested in its tracks," Justice Nagaprasanna observed while dismissing the petition by Gangamma and five others to prevent abuse of judicial process and ensure finality in judicial decisions. —— BOX 3-decade saga The first round of litigation started in 1993. In 1994, the high court dismissed the petition. The second challenge was made in 1997 and the same was also dismissed. The third one was a suit filed in the civil court in 1993 which also met the same fate. In 2003, another petition was filed in the high court and was dismissed. In 2004, a second civil suit was filed and the same was dismissed as not maintainable. In 2007, the children of Vektata filed a petition on the same cause of action and it was dismissed on the grounds of delay. The order was challenged before a division bench in 2012 and the order of the single bench was affirmed in Nov 2022. In between, during the pendency of the writ appeal, a petition was filed in 2016 which was eighth in the series. However, when the petition was pending, the latest petition was filed on March 4, 2025. The petition filed in 2016 was withdrawn.
