Japan's Ishiba faces difficult election amid far-right surge – DW – 07/20/2025
Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's ruling coalition is at risk of losing its majority in the upper house in Sunday's election, multiple polls showed as voting got underway.
The Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), already in a minority in the lower house since last October's snap election, faces mounting public discontent over inflation, political scandals, and a surge in anti-immigration sentiment.
With only 50 of the 125 contested seats needed to retain control, the LDP and its junior partner Komeito are projected to fall short, according to polls by Kyodo, Yomiuri, and Nikkei.
This would have a drastic impact on Japan's fiscal and political outlook, and comes at a time when Tokyo is struggling to strike a trade deal with the US amid President Donald Trump's tariffs.
This election will also decide the political future of Ishiba.
A major defeat, like last year's, could force his resignation and pave way for a power struggle within the LDP.
Small, opposition parties with anti-establishment messages are likely to erode support from the ruling power.
If the coalition loses both houses, Japan would enter uncharted political territory as the LDP has been in power perpetually since its foundation in 1955, barring a few years in the middle.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The surge of the right-wing populist Sanseito party is complicating the race.
Once a fringe movement, spreading conspiracy theories about vaccinations and global elites during the COVID-19 pandemic on YouTube, the party is now gaining momentum with its "Japanese First" rhetoric and criticism of immigration, globalism, and foreign capital.
Analysts say Sanseito could win over 10 seats, appealing especially to young male voters.
Its leader, Sohei Kamiya, has drawn comparisons to Trump and Germany's AfD for his anti-establishment stance and social media reach.
On Sunday, a Sanseito candidate's interview by Russia's Sputnik news agency courted controversy and prompt denials of ties to Russia by Kamiya, according to AFP news agency.
The European Union has banned Sputnik along with other Russian state media for "disinformation and information manipulation."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
2 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Trump's Truth Social Says They Now Have $2 Billion in Bitcoin Reserves
President Donald Trump's social media app Truth Social announced they now have approximately $2 billion in Bitcoin reserves and Bitcoin-related assets. The move to acquire the large amount of cryptocurrency was made by Truth Social's operator Trump Media, leading the Bitcoin to account for nearly two-thirds of their assets, which total $3 billion, according to a press release . "These assets help ensure our Company's financial freedom, help protect us against discrimination by financial institutions, and will create synergies with the utility token we're planning to introduce across the Truth Social ecosphere," David Nunes, CEO and president of Trump Media, said. Trump Media said it plans to continue acquiring bitcoin and bitcoin-related assets, which will be used by the company to generate revenue and acquire even more crypto assets. The company shared that it has an "options acquisition strategy for bitcoin-related securities" in place, with $300 million set aside for the plan. The president faced scrutiny earlier this year after launching a Trump memecoin, which was valued at a tens of billions of dollars days before his inauguration. According to an April report from State Democracy Defenders Action, a nonpartisan lobbying and advocacy group, the Trump family has profited at least $2.9 billion from cryptocurrency. Trump held a dinner with the top holders of his memecoin in May, with many reportedly saying that they hoped to influence policies on cryptocurrency. Trump's son Donald Trump Jr., who has been a vocal proponent of cryptocurrency, has pushed back against concerns that the memecoin could lead to foreign influence, telling CNBC in June that "it's hard to influence if you don't know where the stuff is coming from." Since the announcement of Truth Social and Trump Media's acquisition of billions in Bitcoin, stock in Trump Media opened 6% higher Monday morning, according to Yahoo! Finance . Originally published on Latin Times
DW
3 hours ago
- DW
Are Trump's tariffs the new sanctions? – DW – 07/21/2025
Donald Trump is betting that tariffs rather than sanctions will fix economic and geopolitical imbalances. But does the threat of rising US inflation and retaliation make sanctions a safer choice? US President Donald Trump's reliance on tariffs rather than sanctions has been described as both the "world's worst bet" and "a powerful proven source of leverage" to protect the national interests of the United States. While tariffs essentially are taxes on imports primarily used to protect domestic industries, sanctions are penalties imposed on another country to punish and its government. Sanctions typically put restrictions on trade or his return to the White House in January, Trump's tariff threats against dozens of countries have created great uncertainty among US businesses and global trading partners. What's become known as "tariff tango" — bold pledges of steep duties on foreign goods, followed by abrupt reversals — suits Trump's shifting political or economic goals. Yet, financial markets remain on edge, not knowing how or when the president may deploy tariffs next. The tariff on China, the biggest economic and military rival to the US, reached historic highs in April, soaring to 145% before being significantly cut the following month after trade talks in London. Trump's sudden increase and later rollback of tariffs show how he uses them as a flexible way to fix what he sees as unfair trade, based on past trade disputes. "What shapes the president's views is the rapid rise of Japan in the 1980s, and the feeling that the Japanese were out-competing the iconic American car industry because the US has been too generous in its trade terms," Jennifer Burns, associate professor of history at Stanford University, told DW. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Tariffs are Trump's preferred weapon to tackle the massive US trade deficit, particularly with China, which amounted to $295 billion (€253 billion) in 2024, according to the US Census Bureau. They also align with his "America First" agenda to protect domestic industries and boost US job creation. The White House has defended the president's approach, insisting that tariffs can be quickly deployed and, unlike sanctions, don't completely shut foreign markets to US firms. "[Trump] can add this pressure when he wants and then bring it back when markets start to freak out or it stops serving his purpose," Sophia Busch, associate director of the Geoeconomic Centre at the Atlantic Council think tank, told DW. "This is much easier with tariffs than with sanctions." Although tariffs have been widely criticized for their potential to stoke inflation, they do raise revenue for the US Treasury, unlike sanctions. US tariff revenues are up 110% to $97.3 billion in the first half of the year, compared to the same period last year. Tariffs are expected to raise $360 billion next year, according to the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. Tariffs give Trump direct, unilateral control, using executive orders without needing approval from the US Congress. Sanctions, on the other hand, often require complex legal frameworks and cooperation with international partners, like the European Union. The preference for tariffs over sanctions reflects Trump's aim for rapid, visible economic leverage, but raises concerns about the destabilizing effects of such policies on global trade and peace. "The reason [tariffs] have such a bad reputation is because they're linked to these episodes of de-globalization, and in the 20th century, they were linked to armed conflict," said Burns. "If low tariffs and open markets knit countries together in a way that forestalls armed conflict, does it mean that we might be moving away from that?" Trump's second-term policies suggest he is using tariffs to achieve objectives typically associated with sanctions, such as pressuring countries like Canada, Mexico and China on nontrade issues like immigration and drug trafficking. These tariffs have prompted retaliatory measures or threats, which have intensified global trade tensions. Similarly, Colombia was threatened with tariffs after it rejected US deportation flights, while threatened levies on the European Union were partly announced as a response to EU privacy and climate regulations. Earlier this month, Trump threatened to impose a 50% tariff on imports from Brazil, which were framed as retaliation for the prosecution of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, a close ally. The far-right politician faces trial for allegedly plotting a coup to overturn his 2022 election loss, including plans to assassinate political rivals. Previous US administrations have preferred sanctions over tariffs as a punitive tool to bring rogue countries into line. Since Moscow launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the US has imposed more than 2,500 sanctions on Russia, targeting individuals, entities, shipping and aircraft. The US has also imposed sanctions on Venezuela, Iran and North Korea. "These economies are not crucial trading partners for the US," the Atlantic Council's Busch said, adding that Trump's tariffs on the "top US trading partners" were "more of an economic threat domestically." Trump has recently expressed more openness to deploying sanctions. Referring to a bill proposed by Senator Lindsey Graham for additional penalties on Moscow if it fails to negotiate a peace deal in good faith with Kyiv, Trump said he was "very strongly" considering fresh sanctions. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video If passed, the Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025 will target key Russian officials and oligarchs, financial institutions and the energy sector, aiming to curb Russia's ability to export oil and gas. The bill, which has bipartisan support, also proposes secondary sanctions on third countries and foreign companies, which Trump has termed "secondary tariffs" of up to 500% on countries importing Russian energy. Trump's similar "secondary tariffs" of 25% on buyers of Venezuelan oil, which took effect in March, were also designed to pressure energy importers to align with US foreign policy, a role typically reserved for sanctions. Secondary sanctions usually include blacklisting individuals and entities, asset freezes and banking restrictions. The threat of US criminal charges and travel bans is also often used. "Sanctions are more about punishing countries for violating international norms," Burns told DW. "They're in response to specific actions, and if those actions cease, the sanctions can be undone." Noting how the uncertainty around Trump's tariff policy had left US firms and global trade partners reeling, Burns warned that "years of tariff uncertainty" may cause a "serious economic slowdown, as businesses and investors wait for a more predictable landscape."
DW
3 hours ago
- DW
Kenya drops terror charges against activist Boniface Mwangi – DW – 07/21/2025
Mwangi was detained on Saturday and accused of the "facilitation of terrorist acts", which he denied. After widespread condemnation, he was charged with a lesser offense of unlawful possession of ammunition. The prominent Kenyan activist Boniface Mwangi was charged with unlawful possession of ammunition on Monday in a case stemming from his alleged role in street protests against the government. Mwangi's supporters had feared he would be charged with the more serious offense of terrorism. He was freed on bond immediately after his appearance in court on Monday. Authorities claim Mwangi helped organize unrest during the June 25 protests, which turned violent and left at least 19 people dead. The protest itself had been called to remember victims of police violence at another major protest against President William Ruto's government on the same date last year. Mwangi, 42, was arrested on Saturday and accused by the Directorate of Criminal Investigations with the "facilitation of terrorist acts", which he denied, declaring in an image on X: "I am not a terrorist". Police said they recovered several items from his home, including unused teargas canisters, a 7.62mm blank round, mobile phones, a laptop, and notebooks. The charge sheet states that Mwangi was "found in possession of noxious substances to wit three teargas canisters without lawful authority." He also faces a charge for possessing a single round of blank ammunition illegally. On Sunday, police had said they planned to arraign Mwangi on Monday for facilitating "terrorist acts" linked to the protests. Boniface Mwangi's attorney Njanja Maina has said the activist never possessed any of the items police claim to have found. Mwangi's wife, Njeri, said on social media that security personnel had raided their home "talking of terrorism and arson." The courtroom in Nairobi was packed with supporters and activists, many draped in Kenyan flags, including Mwangi himself. He was bailed out immediately after his appearance in court on Monday. "The truth is our president is scared of young people, because young people are organising by themselves, they are going to the streets, they are demanding better," Mwangi told supporters and journalists outside the court. Who is Boniface Mwangi? Mwangi, a longtime anti-corruption campaigner and former parliamentary candidate, is known for his outspoken criticism of police abuses and state repression. His arrest comes amid renewed unrest in Kenya, triggered last month by the death of political blogger Albert Ojwang in police custody. Ojwang's death, which police first claimed was a suicide, sparked national outrage after an autopsy pointed to physical assault. The protests have built on earlier demonstrations against the high cost of living, corruption, and alleged police brutality. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video In May, Mwangi was briefly detained and deported from Tanzania after attending a court hearing for opposition leader Tundu Lissu. He later alleged that Tanzanian security officers had assaulted him and Ugandan activist Agather Atuhaire during custody.
