ICJ To Hand Down Watershed Climate Opinion
It is the biggest case ever heard at the International Court of Justice and experts say judges' opinion could reshape climate justice forever, with major impacts on laws around the world.
The ICJ advisory opinion is "potentially one of the most consequential legal rulings of our times," said Joie Chowdhury, Senior Attorney at the Center for International Environmental Law, an advocacy group that backs the case.
It could "define a new era, where climate justice is not a distant aspiration, but a global mandate for the here and now," added Chowdhury.
The United Nations has tasked the 15 ICJ judges to answer two fundamental questions that, according to Chowdhury, "strike at the heart of climate justice."
First: what must states do under international law to protect the environment from greenhouse gas emissions "for present and future generations"?
Second: what are the consequences for states whose emissions have caused environmental harm, especially to vulnerable low-lying island states?
To help answer these questions, ICJ judges have pored over tens of thousands of pages of submissions from countries and organisations around the world.
Analysts say Wednesday's ruling is the most consequential of a string of recent rulings on climate change in international law.
Courts have become a battleground for climate action as frustration has grown over sluggish progress toward curbing planet-warming pollution from fossil fuels.
The Paris Agreement struck through the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) has rallied a global response to the crisis, but not at the speed necessary to protect the world from dangerous overheating.
In December, the iconic Peace Palace in the Hague hosted the court's biggest-ever hearings, with more than 100 nations and groups giving oral statements.
In what was billed a "David Vs Goliath" battle, the debate pitted major wealthy economies against smaller, less developed states most at the mercy of a warming planet.
Major polluters including the US and India warned the ICJ not to deliver a fresh legal blueprint for climate change, arguing the existing UNFCCC sufficed.
The US, which has since withdrawn from the Paris accord, said the UNFCCC contained legal provisions on climate change and urged the court to uphold this regime.
But smaller states said this framework was inadequate to mitigate climate change's devastating effects and that the ICJ's opinion should be broader.
These states also urged the ICJ to impose reparations on historic polluters.
"The cardinal principle is crystal clear. Responsible states are required to make full reparation for the injury they have caused," said Margaretha Wewerinke-Singh representing Vanuatu.
These states demanded a commitment and timeline to phasing out fossil fuels, monetary compensation when appropriate, and an acknowledgement of past wrongs.
Representatives from island states, many wearing traditional dress as they addressed the court for the first time in their country's history, made passionate pleas to the robed judges.
"Despite producing less than 0.01 percent of greenhouse gas emissions, on the current trajectory of GHG emissions, Tuvalu will disappear completely beneath the waves that have been lapping our shores for millennia," said Eselealofa Apinelu from Tuvalu.
The ICJ's advisory opinions are not binding upon states and critics say that top polluters will simply ignore what comes out of the court.
But others note the moral and legal clout enjoyed by the world's highest court and hope the opinion will make a tangible difference to national climate change policies.
"The impacts of climate change, absolutely dire right now, will become catastrophic as the years go by, if we do not course-correct," said Vishal Prasad, director of a campaign by Pacific Island students that pushed the issue before the court.
"The urgency of the matter, the seriousness of why we're here, and how important this is, is not lost upon all Pacific Islanders, all small island countries.
"That's why we're looking to the ICJ." The ICJ has its seat in the historic Peace Palace AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
13 hours ago
- DW
As France's Africa policy collapses how do companies adjust? – DW – 07/27/2025
With the political leaders of francophone Africa increasingly turning their backs on their former colonial rulers, French corporations have been forced to rethink doing business with Africa without Paris' support. The disruption is now in full swing, with more and more African countries, particularly in the Sahel region of northern and western Africa, rejecting the so-called Francafrique policy by their former colonial power, France. The term refers to a complex and controversial network of political, economic, social and military ties between France and its former African colonies, describing a kind of special relationship characterized by ongoing French influence in these nations. Often described as neocolonial, France's Africa policy is under massive political and popular pressure, and the fight against it is openly challenging Paris' military, diplomatic and economic footprint in Africa. The Sahel region stretches from the Sahara Desert in the north to the savannas in the south, encompassing several countries, including Mali, Niger, Burkina Faso, Mauritania and Chad. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Antoine Glaser is a French journalist and former director of Paris-based magazine — a leading publication focused on Africa with editions in English and French. He said French companies with operations in the region enjoyed "preferential treatment," especially during the Cold War era due to the Francafrique policy. "They thought they were at home in Africa," he told DW, and ignored more recent realities such as the fact that Africa has "gone global and France didn't see China coming." One such stark reality, he added, is Chinese companies now have a 25% market share in French-speaking Africa, while France's share has tumbled to "between 6% and 7%." Moreover, French multinational nuclear fuel cycle corporation Orano announced last September that it would suspend production at its Arlit uranium mine in northern Niger due to financial difficulties faced by its Nigerien subsidiary, Somair. The decision came as border closures between Niger and Benin, triggered by the July 2023 coup, had blocked all uranium exports, Orano said in a statement, adding: "In spite of efforts to find alternative possibilities to export the uranium produced by Somair and to relaunch commercial activities, all the proposals made to the Nigerien authorities have remained unanswered." In June 2024, Orano also lost its mining license for the Imouraren uranium deposit due to a decision by the military government, which revoked the license following a period of tensions and ultimatum. Situated about 160 kilometers (100 miles) from Agadez — the largest town in central Niger — the Imouraren mine holds one of the world's largest uranium deposits. Mining was launched by French nuclear group Areva, rebranded as Orano in 2018, which mothballed the mine in 2015 due to unfavorable market conditions. Since then, tensions have illustrated the fragility of a system in which military and diplomatic presence supported economic interests. Beyond the uranium sector, France's whole model of influence is being destabilized, affecting sectors like infrastructure, telecommunication, energy and public works — all symbols of France's presence that are now being regularly challenged. In February 2023, French President Emmanuel Macron presented a new strategy, entitled "Our Future The Africa-France Partnership," and offering new forms of partnerships. Unveiled by Macron ahead of his tour of Central Africa, the strategy advocates abandoning old paradigms and puts a new emphasis on economic and trade relations rather than focusing on security issues. The central idea of this new model is based on a transition from "a logic of aid to a logic of solidarity investments and partnerships," and is meant to be a "symbiotic relationship" beneficial to all parties. What France used to consider as its "backyard" for a long time is disappearing amid wider change in the Sahel region. In addition, Africa as a whole is no longer France's exclusive business playground. Countries like Turkey, Russia, China and even Germany are advancing their positions, forcing French companies to readjust their business policy if they are to survive in an increasingly competitive environment. A French corporate consultant, speaking on condition of anonymity, told DW that in Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger, the real French presence was "already marginal before recent tensions" with their colonial motherland. In the mining industry, he said, the main players are now often from Australia or Canada, like Toronto-based mining giant Barrick Mining Corporation. "The perception that France is omnipresent is stronger than the reality," he said. He also noted that behind "official posturing," a strategy was becoming clearer: "Maintain a presence, but through more indirect means." French companies would now seek to maintain market share "without provoking rejection" by launching joint ventures, local partnerships or the creation of project companies under local law. "There is now a dynamic in which these companies are adapting through cooperating more with local partners, setting up shared structures. It's a way of staying active while avoiding head-on visibility," he added. Yves Ekoue Amaizo, the director at the Afrocentricity Think Tank, thinks the gradual withdrawal of French companies also opens the door to new alliances, because African countries would now have "the capacity and the partners to replace these companies." "China, Turkey and other immediate players are already involved. But this means accepting new, often opaque conditions, and managing a context of risks [such as] political instability, terrorism and legal uncertainties," he told DW. While withdrawal seems inevitable for some French multinational corporations, others are still betting on rebalancing their business strategies. According to a report in the offshore industry magazine , energy giant TotalEnergies, for example, is trying to find a new footing in English- and Portuguese-speaking countries, including Kenya, South Africa, Namibia and Angola. But competition there is fierce, and France can no longer rely on a historical advantage in these countries. Even more so as questions of legitimacy and social responsibility also play an increasing role, said Amaizo. "The real question is one of mentality. If companies want to remain credible, they must prove that they are co-constructing locally and sharing the benefits, rather than going it alone with the resources." With the era of the Francafrique special relationship between France and its former African colonies now coming to an end, there are signs that French multinationals are trying to transform themselves, too, by collaborating more strongly with local partners or moving operations elsewhere in Africa. No matter what they do or where they go, legitimacy remains their main capital and must be regained.
DW
3 days ago
- DW
Will Thailand-Cambodia border clash spiral into all-out war? – DW – 07/25/2025
Both sides are trading blame and downgrading diplomatic ties over deadly border clashes as the region potentially faces its most serious conflict in over a decade. Clashes between Thai and Cambodian troops continued throughout the night and into Friday morning after a massive escalation of tensions. On Thursday, Thailand's military said it carried out airstrikes on the Cambodian side of the border after it said the Cambodian army launched artillery shells over the Thai border. The clash began in the morning near the contested Ta Moan Thom Temple. Both sides said the other started the shooting. As of Friday afternoon, Thailand's acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai said that he knew of "more than 20 deaths" as well as dozens of injuries. It is believed that most of these casualties are Thai civilians. Cambodian officials have not yet released any official figures on casualties. Since May, tensions have escalated between the Southeast Asian neighbors after a Cambodian solider was killed in an exchange of fire with Thai troops while digging trenches on the disputed frontier. Earlier this week, a landmine injured several Thai soldiers, and Bangkok immediately accused Cambodia of laying new landmines, while Phnom Penh argued that it was most likely one of many mines laid in the area in the 1980s. Thailand withdrew its ambassador from Phnom Penh and sent home Cambodia's envoy. Cambodia followed suit, and both sides downgraded diplomatic relations on July 23, a day before the latest clashes broke out. Whether the military strikes will continue and escalate into a wider war remains to be seen. "The armed conflict could be resolved very quickly; war is not remotely inevitable," Bradley Murg, senior research fellow at the Cambodia Institute for Cooperation and Peace, told DW. "However, the underlying tensions and resolution of the border issue will be deeply protracted," he added. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Cambodia and Thailand have both claimed sovereignty over several patches of territory for more than a century, following the French colonial authorities' redrawing of national borders in French Indochina. While both sides have attempted to resolve these issues through negotiation, military clashes broke out in 2008 over ownership of a temple near the town of Preah Vihear. The tensions lasted for five years, spiking in 2011 when several troops were killed in a skirmish. In 2013, the International Court of Justice ruled most of the territory in question belonged to Cambodia. The latest violence is the worst since 2011, and involves slightly different dimensions involving nationalist sentiment and internal Thai politics. In 2024, segments of the Thai and Cambodian public began to raise the issue of Koh Kood, an island officially part of Thailand but claimed by Cambodia. These revanchist claims then spread to several other border areas. After the Cambodian solider was killed digging trenches in May, both countries dispatched troops to the region and tightened border controls. A phone call in June between Cambodian Senate president Hun Sen and Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra was an attempt to ease tensions, but ended up escalating matters further. Hun Sen, for decades Cambodia's strongman prime minister, and still the de facto leader, leaked the phone call, during which Paetongtarn called him her "uncle" and made disparaging comments about the Thai military. These comments sparked a crisis within Thai politics, with a major party leaving the Paetongtarn coalition government. Eventually, the Constitutional Court intervened to suspend her for her actions. Joshua Kurlantzick, senior fellow for Southeast Asia at the Council on Foreign Relations, told DW that this conflict potentially "further boosts the power of the Thai army and gives them more influence over politics." Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet, Hun Sen's son, said on Thursday that "Cambodia has always adhered to resolving issues peacefully, but in this case, we have no choice but to respond with force against this armed invasion." A diplomatic source in Phnom Penh, who requested anonymity, told DW that the conflict poses the most significant challenge to Hun Manet since he assumed the role of prime minister from his father in 2023. If things go badly for Cambodia, the relatively inexperienced leader could take most of the blame. "The current flare-up between the two sides that has escalated into a military clash involving heavy weaponry may get worse before it can ease," Thitinan Pongsudhirak, a senior fellow at Thailand's Institute of Security and International Studies, a think tank, told DW. "The danger is that the Thai army has taken charge of border policy while Hun Sen appears intent on further provoking and agitating a weak and divided Thai government with Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra under suspension for her compromising phone call with him, which was secretly recorded," he added. Zachary Abuza, a professor at the National War College in Washington, noted that a prolonged military conflict does not favor Cambodia. The terrain in the "Emerald Triangle" region favors Thailand, and the Thai military is a better-equipped force, Abuza told DW. A clear example of this came on Thursday morning, when Cambodia launched indiscriminate rocket and artillery strikes that seemingly hit only civilian targets. In comparison, Thailand has launched far more surgical air strikes. Thailand also has the upper hand because it has more ways to economically hurt Cambodia, Abuza added. "Thailand has more ways to punish Cambodia. Cambodia is far more dependent on exports to Thailand than the other way around. While Thailand needs Cambodian workers, Cambodia needs remittances more, and there are plenty of workers from Burma and Laos," he said. Moreover, Thailand can play a significant role in putting international pressure on Cambodia's illegal cyber scam industry. "Bangkok understands that this is the center of gravity for Hun Manet; it's these proceeds that allow him to maintain the Cambodian People's Party's (CPP) patronage network," Abuza said. As the current round of violence escalates, 100,000 people have fled border regions. The United Nations Security Council is due to hold an emergency meeting later Friday. Malaysia, the current chair of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) bloc, has spoken with Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet and the Thai acting Prime Minister, Phumtham. "In our conversations, in Malaysia's capacity as ASEAN Chair for 2025, I appealed directly to both leaders for an immediate ceasefire to prevent further hostilities and to create space for peaceful dialogue and diplomatic resolution," Anwar said in a statement. Political scientist Thitinan said one offramp for the conflict could be third-party mediation, by either ASEAN or the UN. However, amid the acute violence, getting both sides to climb down with dialogue is a tough task. "The UN, the US or even China does not seem to have sufficient trust on both sides to facilitate a diplomatic way out," Thitinan said. "The military situation can worsen before any dialogue and compromise takes hold because both sides are driven by nationalist sentiments and cannot be seen to budge." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
DW
3 days ago
- DW
Thai-Cambodian border dispute: What you need to know – DW – 07/24/2025
Tensions along the disputed Thai-Cambodian border are flaring once again, with both sides exchanging blame for the escalation. The decades-old conflict reaches back to the colonial era. On Thursday morning, deadly fighting broke out between Thai and Cambodian troops along their disputed border. Authorities have confirmed that at least 12 people, most of them Thai civilians, were killed in the crossfire. Thailand has blamed Cambodia for killing Thai citizens, while Cambodia has blamed Thailand for bombing Cambodian targets with fighter jets. Neither claim could be independently verified at the time this article as published. Videos circulating online show explosions and gunfire in the disputed area. Many who live along the contested border have sought shelter. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video While it's still unclear what tipped the scales in this most recent escalation, tensions between both nations have been rising noticeably in recent months. In late May, Thai armed forces killed a Cambodian soldier in an exchange of fire that ensued as his unit was digging trenches along the disputed border. Since then, both counties have sent reinforcements to the area On Wednesday, Thailand said it was withdrawing its ambassador from Phnom Penh and expelling Cambodia's ambassador. The kingdom also closed multiple border crossings to Cambodia. This came after land mines reportedly wounded a series of Thai soldiers in several incidents along the contested border region. Thai authorities claimed the mines had been newly laid along paths that were supposed to be safe. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The border dispute between Thailand and Cambodia is decades old. Both countries share a 800-kilometer (500-mile) border which stretches across regions that are sparsely inhabited. It is difficult to access in parts, and has been insufficiently charted in the past. Many demarcations are remnants from colonial times. France occupied Cambodia from 1863 until the nation gained its independence in 1953, while Thailand has remained an independent kingdom. During this near-century of French occupation, Cambodia and Thailand mutually ceded territory multiple times, changing the boundary line. And in 1907, France pressured Thailand, then Siam, to sign a treaty adjusting its border. Thailand later went on to contest this treaty. There are also several temples near the Thai-Cambodian border to which both countries lay claim — most notably, the historic Preah Vihear temple, a 1,000-year-old Hindu site built by the Khmer Empire. The temple lies in the so-called Emerald Triangle. Both Cambodia and Thailand claimed ownership and the case went to court, where in 1962, the International Court of Justice in The Hague ruled that the temple was on Cambodian territory. In 2008, as UNESCO was moving to declare it a World Heritage Site, the old dispute over the temple reignited. Several people were killed as fire was exchanged at the border. When Cambodia turned to the IJC once more in 2011, the ruling was again in Cambodia's favor. In 2000, Thailand and Cambodia formed a Joint Border Commission to peacefully resolve border disputes. But the body has not registered much success to date. In February, Cambodia turned to the ICJ for a third time in a letter "requesting adjudication of the long-standing border disputes" with Thailand. Meanwhile, Thailand appears to prefer bilateral solutions — which, given recent escalations, appear far away for now. "Cambodia wants to bring the current case before the ICJ, because in the past, its appeals to the court were successful," Zachary Abuza, an expert on the region at the independent think tank Lowy Institute, told DW in June. "Thailand wants to use its economic might, and believes it has a significant economic advantage." Thailand is more industrialized that its southeastern neighbor, with a gross domestic product that is about 12 times as high. While Thailand exports electronics, automobiles and foodstuffs, Cambodia's industry relies mostly on the textile and agricultural industries. According to official statistics, some 500,000 Cambodian guest workers live in Thailand. "Both have a lot to lose," Tita Sanglee, a research fellow at Singapore's ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, told DW. "Thailand is highly dependent on Cambodian laborers and exports a significant amount to Cambodia. Next to fuels, machines and drinks, many Thai exports are everyday necessities." She added that both nations also rely on income from tourism, which is expected to scale back drastically should the conflict drag on. The governments in Phnom Penh and Bangkok had actually kept close ties, not least thanks to good relations between former Thai Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra and Cambodia's former leader, Hun Sen. In Cambodia, Hun Sen's son, Hun Manet, took over the reins in 2023. But in Thailand, Thaksin Shinawatra's daughter, Paetongtarn Shinawatra, was recently suspended over political scandal involving a leaked phone conversation in which she addressed the former Cambodian leader as "uncle" and criticized her own military commanders with regards to the shared border conflict. Prior to this, conservative voices close to the military had sharply criticized Paetongtarn's plans to engage in discussions with Cambodia over jointly exploring oil and gas fields in a shared contested maritime area in the Gulf of Thailand. Thailand has also been struggling with a shrinking economy and high tariffs imposed by the US. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The prime minister was suspended by Thailand's constitutional court in early July, and months could pass before a final ruling is handed down on the matter. Until then, Thailand's political stability is likely to remain fragile. The Thai military might be taking advantage of a situation in flux: In recent weeks, its rhetoric toward Cambodia has become noticeably sharper. And the English daily, , has already openly discussed fears from the tourism branch that another military coup might be on the horizon.
