Treasury minister fails to rule out hitting homeowners with capital gains tax
Chancellor Rachel Reeves is reported to be considering ending the current exemption from CGT for primary residences as she seeks ways to raise cash in the face of dire warnings about the state of the public finances.
Such a move would see higher-rate taxpayers pay 24% of any gain in the value of their home, while basic rate taxpayers would be hit with an 18% levy.
The Times reported that under the proposals being considered for the autumn budget, the private residence relief would end for properties above a certain threshold.
The threshold is still under consideration but a £1.5 million starting point would hit around 120,000 homeowners who are higher-rate taxpayers with capital gains tax bills of £199,973, the newspaper reported.
Treasury minister Torsten Bell declined to rule out hitting people selling their homes with CGT, insisting any potential changes were matters for the Chancellor and would be set out at a budget.
Asked to rule out the move, the pensions minister told broadcasters: 'Working people and people's living standards is what this Government is all about.
'We've seen wages rise more in the first 10 months of this Government than the first 10 years of the last Conservative government.
'But of course, as you know, questions for tax are for the budget and they're for chancellors.'
Ending primary residence relief could deter people from selling their homes, slowing the housing market and could have a particular impact for older people looking to downsize.
The Labour government has ruled out increasing income tax, employees' national insurance contributions and VAT, restricting Ms Reeves' options when it comes to raising money.
The scale of the challenge facing her in the autumn budget was illustrated by the NIESR economic think tank warning this month that Ms Reeves is set for a £41 billion shortfall on her self-imposed rule of balancing day-to-day spending with tax receipts in 2029-30.
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch hit out at the Chancellor's 'disastrous economic mismanagement' and said the Government was 'stuck in a doom loop of low growth and higher taxes'.
She said: 'We should be cutting spending, cutting taxes, and backing the makers who keep our country going.'
Any move to hit expensive properties would be likely to impact more heavily on London than other parts of the country.
Analysis by Rightmove suggested 10.9% of homes for sale in the capital would exceed a £1.5 million threshold, compared with 1.6% outside London.
Rightmove's Colleen Babcock said: 'In essence, this would predominantly be a tax on the most expensive areas of London and the South East.
'The London market is already feeling the effects of taxation more acutely than other parts of England, and this is likely to deter some moves at the upper end.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Traders bet on no more rate cuts this year: Blow for borrowers as inflation hits 18-month high of 3.8%
Millions of borrowers were dealt a bitter blow yesterday as soaring inflation shattered hopes of an interest rate cut. Markets are now betting that rates will remain unchanged for the rest of the year after higher air fares, fuel and food prices pushed consumer price inflation to 3.8 per cent, up from 3.6 per cent in June. That was the highest level in 18 months and above forecasts of 3.7 per cent. It means prices in Britain are rising more quickly than anywhere else in the G7 group of advanced economies. And it piles pressure on the Bank of England – and governor Andrew Bailey – which is tasked with keeping inflation at 2 per cent. It is also a blow to Rachel Reeves, whose faltering stewardship of the economy has seen growth slow in recent months and unemployment rise by more than 200,000 since Labour came to power. Experts said the Chancellor's £25billion employer National Insurance raid, as well as a sharp increase in the minimum wage bore much of the blame for the rise in inflation as firms pass on higher costs to consumers. The Bank has already been turning more hawkish as it voted to cut rates to 4 per cent last month by the narrowest of margins. And it has also warned inflation will continue to rise, hitting 4 per cent by the end of this year. Last night, market betting suggested there was a near zero chance of a rate cut next month and just a one-in-four likelihood that the BoE will reduce rates in November. Traders also saw a 56 per cent probability of rates being held in December, meaning borrowers are likely to have to wait until February 2026 for any relief. Fears of persistent inflation have sent UK borrowing costs higher in recent days with yields on 30-year bonds, known as gilts, rising to the highest level since 1998 earlier this week. The sell-off in bonds – whose yields rise as prices fall – has since abated. But UK borrowing costs continue to be higher than those of other advanced economies. Yesterday's inflation figures are likely to have particularly concerned the Bank of England's rate-setting Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) because of an unexpectedly big jump in services sector prices – a metric that the Bank watches closely. Services sector inflation rose from 4.7 per cent in June to 5 per cent in July. The Bank has been steadily cutting rates since last summer after a bout of spiralling price rises – that saw inflation hit more than 11 per cent – appeared to have been brought under control as it came down to around 2 per cent. But it has since drifted upwards causing doubts that the Bank can continue on the same path. Elliott Jordan-Doak, senior UK economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics, said: 'Inflation is set to stay miles above target for the foreseeable future. We expect headline inflation to remain above 3 per cent until April 2026, forcing the MPC to stay on hold for the rest of this year at least.' Expectations that rates will stay higher for longer are likely to have an impact on fixed rate mortgage deals. David Hollingworth, associate director at L&C Mortgages, said: 'Mortgage borrowers have been enjoying a market where rates have been dropping. 'Fixed rates have been pricing in the recent and future cuts, so have been edging down with a host of deals now below 4 per cent. 'Those reductions have tended to come in small increments, but we could see that slow further or even reverse in some cases if the market reacts badly to the threat of higher inflation than was previously expected.'
BBC News
23 minutes ago
- BBC News
Tory councils should consider asylum hotel challenges, says Badenoch
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch is encouraging Tory-controlled councils to consider launching legal challenges against the use of hotels to house asylum seekers in their said Epping Forest District Council had achieved "a victory for local people", after a High Court ruling blocked a hotel from housing asylum a letter to Conservative council leaders, Badenoch wrote "we back you to take similar action to protect your community... if your legal advice supports it".A Labour spokesperson said Badenoch's letter was "desperate and hypocritical nonsense from the architects of the broken asylum system". The Labour spokesperson said under the Tories, "the number of asylum hotels in use rose as high as 400"."There are now half that and there are now 20,000 fewer asylum seekers in hotels than at their peak under the Tories," the spokesperson comes after the High Court on Monday granted the Conservative-controlled Epping council a temporary injunction to stop migrants from being accommodated at The Bell Hotel in court ruled that about 140 asylum seekers must be moved out of the hotel by 12 September, giving the government limited time to find alternative across England are considering similar legal challenges as ministers to draw up contingency plans for housing asylum seekers set to be removed from the Bell Hotel. Historically, hotels have only been used to house asylum seekers in short-term emergency situations when other accommodation was hotel use rose sharply during the Covid-19 pandemic, hitting a peak of 56,042 in 2023 when the Conservatives were in Labour government has pledged to end the use of migrant hotels by 2029, by cutting small-boat crossings and speeding up decisions on asylum were 32,345 asylum seekers being housed in hotels at the end of March, down 15% from the end of December, according to Home Office recent years, other councils have taken legal action in an attempt to close asylum hotels in their areas but in previous cases judges have refused to Epping Forest District Council successfully argued its case was different as the hotel had become a safety risk, as well as a breach of planning law by ceasing to be a normal judge ruled in favour of the council, which made the case there had been "evidenced harms" related to protests around the hotel, which had led to violence and other councils to follow suit they would have to show the High Court evidence of local harm. On Wednesday, a number of councils, including some run by Labour, said they were assessing their legal her letter, Badenoch told Tory council leaders they may "wish to take formal advice from planning officers on the other planning enforcement options available to your council in relation to unauthorised development or change of use".The Conservative leader of Broxbourne Council, Corina Gander, said she was "expecting to go down the same path" as Epping Forest District Council when filing a legal challenge to an asylum hotel in her UK leader Nigel Farage has said all 12 councils controlled by his party will "do everything in their power to follow Epping's lead".The leader of Reform UK-led West Northamptonshire Council said he was "considering the implications of this judgment to understand any similarities and differences and actively looking at the options now available to us".Carol Dean, leader of Labour-controlled Tamworth Council, said her authority had previously decided against legal action but was now "carefully assessing" what the decision might mean for the said it was a "potentially important legal precedent".If successful, further legal challenges have the potential to pile more pressure on the government to find alternative housing options for home secretary Chris Philp said asylum seekers moved out of the hotel in Epping should not be put in other hotels, flats or a letter to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, he called for alternative accommodation such as former military sites or barges to be Office Minister Dan Jarvis told the BBC the government was "looking at contingency options" for housing those being moved out of the Bell Hotel but gave no specific examples."There's likely to be a range of different arrangements in different parts of the country," Jarvis June, ministers said the government was looking at buying tower blocks and former student accommodation, external to house migrants. Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Reeves eyes raid on tax-free pension lump sum
Rachel Reeves is to consider cutting the tax-free pension lump sum in a move that would be expected to raise more than £2bn a year. The Telegraph understands the idea is to feature on an extensive list of money-raising proposals that civil servants will present to the Chancellor ahead of the Budget, as she battles a hole in the public finances of up to £50bn. Industry insiders said there was widespread speculation she will cut the maximum amount people can withdraw from their pension without paying tax. At present, pensioners are allowed to withdraw as much as 25 per cent of their pot tax-free upon retirement, up to a cap of £268,000. Reducing this cap would allow the Treasury to raise billions of pounds a year. The Treasury did not deny that a change would be considered, though one Whitehall official cautioned that the Chancellor was not prioritising pension reforms and said they thought it 'unlikely'. Experts claimed that Ms Reeves may have no choice but to act given the scale of the challenge facing the public finances. The Chancellor is also thought to be considering a raid on the sale of high-value homes, as well as a further crackdown on inheritance tax, in a scramble to balance the books. John Havard, a consultant at tax firm Blick Rothenberg, said: 'Rachel Reeves has taken all her easy choices for increasing tax revenue off the table by sticking with her manifesto promises. But one option that remains open to her is targeting pension tax reliefs.' Torsten Bell, the pensions minister, has previously advocated cutting the tax-free lump sum limit from its current level to just £40,000. Mr Bell stoked speculation of a raid in an interview last month, when he suggested that there were no plans for pension savings to be 'taxed twice' – a form of words that experts said left the door open for a raid on lump sums because they are not currently taxed at all. Pension industry figures fear Ms Reeves could launch a raid on wealthier retirees as she struggles to find enough cash to meet her fiscal rules. Ahead of last year's Budget, Treasury officials asked a top pension provider to assess the impact of reducing the limit by almost two-thirds to £100,000. Ms Reeves opted against the move, which would hit public servants with gold-plated pensions, and hiked other taxes like national insurance instead. But experts said the Chancellor may now be forced to revisit it as weak economic growth and high borrowing have left her with a huge fiscal shortfall. She has ruled out breaking Labour's manifesto promise not to raise income tax, VAT or employee national insurance, leaving a crackdown on pension reliefs as one of the few areas open to her which could yield significant cash. Ms Reeves, who is under pressure from backbenchers to introduce wealth taxes, is also reportedly considering a cap on the amount of money that can be gifted to family members to avoid inheritance tax. Any such move would follow an inheritance crackdown on farmers that has already triggered widespread protests. Another proposal on the table is the introduction of a so-called mansion tax, charging capital gains on the sale of family homes worth over £1.5m. However, experts cautioned that these plans, which would land higher-rate taxpayers with a bill equal to 24 per cent of any gain made on the rise in value of their property, would risk backfiring and could raise little or even no money. Andrew Wishart, an economist at Berenberg Bank, said: 'It is going to incentivise people to not sell, to try and hold to the next election, to see if it changes. Therefore, it might not generate any additional revenues at all.' If she were to go ahead with a raid on the pensions, the Chancellor could also make a Left-wing argument for slashing the tax-free allowance. The Chancellor would likely cite figures showing even a significant cut to the maximum lump sum would only impact the richest quarter of pensioners. Mr Havard said: 'The Government's argument will likely be that, as a disproportionate percentage of relief goes to fund the retirements of the 'better off', it is not fair for 'ordinary working people' to be subsidising the retirement of the 'wealthy'. 'With fiscal pressures mounting and political promises limiting traditional tax levers, pensions represent one of the few big-ticket items the Chancellor can realistically target. But the trade-offs are delicate.' Gary Smith, a retirement specialist at Evelyn Partners, said the wealth management firm had seen a 'rush of enquiries' from people worried the limit will be cut. He said: 'We can expect a re-run of last summer's uncertainty, unless the Treasury rules out such moves. 'That it hasn't, again – despite calls from stakeholders in the financial services sector to do so – can only leave people to suspect that pensions are on the table for the Budget.' Last year both the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) and the Labour-leaning Fabian Society think tanks proposed cutting the limit to £100,000. The IFS said that doing so would save around £2bn a year in the long run as wealthy pensioners were forced to pay tax on more of their savings. Mr Bell, who is now the pensions minister, backed an even more radical cut to the lump sum when he was head of the Resolution Foundation think tank. In an article in 2019 he said that the current tax free allowance was 'very generous, very regressive, and a strange incentive not to stagger your retirement income'. 'Capping the tax-free lump sum at £40,000 would raise £2bn a year while leaving three quarters of future pensioners unaffected,' he said at the time. Helen Whately, the shadow pensions secretary, said: 'After a year of punishing pensioners, it should come as no surprise Labour have them in the crosshairs once again. 'People who have worked hard, done the right thing and saved all their lives should not have the rug pulled out from them by this incompetent Chancellor. 'We know tax rises are inevitable in the autumn. If they care at all about our nation's savings they should not go ahead with this one.' Sir Steve Webb, a former pensions minister who is now a partner at pension firm LLP, said he thought ministers were unlikely to end up cutting the allowance. He said that the need for transitional measures for pensioners and people close to retirement meant that the move would not raise much money before the next election. A Treasury spokesman said: 'We are committed to helping our pensioners live their lives with dignity and respect, which is why in April the basic and new state pension increased by 4.1 per cent. 'Pensioners will receive a boost of up to £470 to their income in 2025-26. Our commitment to the triple lock means millions will see their pension rise by up to £1,900 this parliament.'
