Big Tech may be breaking the bank for AI, but investors love it
AI played a bigger role in driving demand across internet search, digital advertising and cloud computing in the April-June quarter, powering revenue growth at technology giants Microsoft, Meta, and Alphabet.
Betting that momentum will sustain, Microsoft and Alphabet decided to ramp up spending to ease capacity shortages that have limited their ability to meet soaring AI services demand, even after several quarters of multi-billion-dollar outlays.
The results offer the clearest sign yet that AI is emerging as a primary growth engine, although the monetization journey is still in its early days, investors and analysts said.
The upbeat commentary also bodes well for Amazon.com, the largest U.S. cloud provider, which will report earnings on Thursday after markets close, and underscores how surging demand for the new technology is shielding the tech giants from tariff-driven economic uncertainty hobbling other sectors.
"As companies like Alphabet and Meta race to deliver on the promise of AI, capital expenditures are shockingly high and will remain elevated for the foreseeable future," said Debra Aho Williamson, founder and chief analyst at Sonata Insights.
But if their core businesses remain strong, "it will buy them more time with investors and provide confidence that the billions being spent on infrastructure, talent and other tech-related expenses will be worthwhile," she added.
Microsoft shares rose about 9% in premarket trading on Thursday, putting the Windows maker on track to cross $4 trillion in market value - a milestone only chip giant Nvidia has reached so far.
Meta was up even more, rising 11.5% and on course to add nearly $200 billion to its market value of $1.75 trillion. Amazon gained over 3%.
All the companies have faced intense scrutiny from investors over their ballooning capital expenditures, which were expected to total $330 billion this year before the latest earnings.
And until a few days ago, the Magnificent Seven stocks were also trailing the S&P 500 in year-to-date performance.
SILENCING DOUBTS
Microsoft said on Wednesday it would spend a record $30 billion in the current quarter, after better-than-expected sales and an above-estimate forecast for its Azure cloud computing business showcased the growing returns on its massive AI bets.
The prediction puts Microsoft on track to potentially outspend its rivals over the next year. It came after Google-parent Alphabet beat revenue expectations and raised its spending forecast by $10 billion to $85 billion for the year.
Microsoft also disclosed for the first time the dollar figure for Azure sales and the number of users for its Copilot AI tools, whose adoption has long been a concern for investors.
It said Azure generated more than $75 billion in sales in its last fiscal year, while Copilot tools had over 100 million users. Overall, around 800 million customers use AI tools peppered across Microsoft's sprawling software empire.
"It's the kind of result that quickly silences any doubts about cloud or AI demand," said Josh Gilbert, market analyst at eToro. "Microsoft is more than justifying its spending."
Other AI companies have also attracted a clutch of users.
Alphabet said last week its Gemini AI assistant app has more than 450 million monthly active users. OpenAI's ChatGPT, the application credited with kicking off the generative AI frenzy, has around 500 million weekly active users.
Meta, meanwhile, raised the bottom end of its annual capital expenditure forecast by $2 billion, to a range of between $66 billion and $72 billion. It also said that costs driven by its efforts to catch up in Silicon Valley's intensifying AI race would push 2026 expense growth rate above 2025's pace.
Better-than-expected sales growth in the April-June period and an above-estimate revenue forecast for the current quarter, however, assured investors that strength in the social media giant's core advertising business can support the massive outlays.
"The big boys are back," said Brian Mulberry, portfolio manager at Zacks Investment Management, which holds shares in all three major U.S. cloud providers. "This simply proves the Magnificent Seven is still magnificent at this moment in time."
(Reporting by Aditya Soni and Deborah Sophia in Bengaluru, Echo Wang in New York; Editing by Muralikumar Anantharaman)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
27 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Clean energy finance must keep pace with data centre boom — Nazrul Hazizi Noordin
AUGUST 16 — Malaysia is fast becoming a favoured destination for data centre investors. In just one year, between 2023 and 2024, investments to the sector increased from over US$10 billion (RM42 billion) to three times that amount. Driving the surge are international heavyweights. Microsoft is set to launch its first cloud region in Malaysia by mid-year, featuring three hyperscale data centres across Klang Valley and Johor, backed by a US$2.2 billion investment. Google, through Gamuda, is constructing a similar facility in Port Dickson, supported by a RM1 billion contract. Just last month, Alibaba Cloud unveiled its third Malaysian data centre. Thanks to this influx of capital, Malaysia is now the fastest-growing data centre market in Asia Pacific. Already the eighth-largest market by operational capacity in the region, and fourteenth globally, it could break into the global top ten within the next five to seven years. But behind this progress lies a looming challenge: a soaring energy demand. These data centres could soon account for as much as 30 per cent of the country's electricity use. While projections vary, experts warn that by 2035 their peak demand could swell to over 5,000 megawatts (MW). To put this into perspective, that is roughly equivalent to Singapore's total electricity consumption in 2023, or the output of five large coal plants, or enough to power 3.5 to 4 million average Malaysian homes for a year. That is a massive load for just one sector, placing immense strain on the national grid. While political actors often point to job creation and economic spillovers, the environmental costs payable by future generations yet to come are sobering. With 81 per cent of Malaysia's electricity in 2024 still generated from fossil fuels, meeting this new demand risks deepening dependence on carbon-intensive sources. At 5,000 MW, the sector could emit around 26 million tonnes of CO₂ annually, tantamount to adding 5.7 million petrol cars to the roads (more than a quarter of existing registered cars). Offsetting that footprint would require the carbon sequestration capacity of approximately 31 million hectares of forest in a year (almost the size of Malaysia's entire land area) or planting about 430 million tree seedlings and growing them for a decade. This is not a call for slowing digital development. Rather, the pace of investment in energy efficiency and clean energy must at least match, or ideally exceed, the sector's growth. Yet progress on both fronts remains far from adequate. By 2030, data centre utilisation density is projected to improve, from serving over 60,000 people per MW today to about 14,000 per MW. But this 80 per cent leap will still be easily outstripped by overall consumption growth. On the renewable side, the gap is even starker. The 5,000 MW of peak capacity data centres may require at a single point in time is equivalent to only half of Malaysia's total renewable energy output for the whole of 2023. This great shortfall is echoed at individual sites. AirTrunk's hyperscale facility in Johor, for example, has a solar-ready roof generating just 1 MW, barely 2 per cent of the energy needed for its current phase. The banking sector holds the keys to shifting this trajectory. That begins with rethinking their own lending philosophy. Financing efficiency and renewables can no longer be treated as a nice-to-have line item in their portfolios. It must rather be seen as a moral obligation. Because if it is treated as a matter of choice, it would never have been thought that there is anything inherently wrong with pouring money into 'dirty' energy production. This is not simply about doing the right thing for the planet. It is also about preserving their own existence. Factoring climate-related risks into stress testing and scenario analysis would likely paint a picture that their stranded assets are mounting as green technology becomes cheaper, regulations get tighter, and consumer climate consciousness spreads faster. At the end of the day, climate risk is financial risk. By 2030, data centre utilisation density is projected to improve, from serving over 60,000 people per MW today to about 14,000 per MW. — AFP pic Willingness alone, however, is not enough. Banks need innovative instruments that can move capital decisively. Two merit closer attention. At the consumption end, sustainability-linked financing (SLF) offers greater flexibility than traditional green loans, which restrict use of proceeds to environmental projects. SLF instead allows funding for general corporate purposes but ties pricing and terms to meeting predefined sustainability performance targets. For data centre operators, these could include improved power usage effectiveness, increased renewable energy procurement, on-site solar installation, or lower carbon emissions per megawatt-hour consumed. Meeting those targets triggers lower financing costs, nudging them to reduce fossil fuel reliance. On the supply side, the concept of debt-for-nature swaps, traditionally used in the sovereign debt space, could be adapted for corporate debtors, particularly energy companies seeking to pivot from fossil fuels. Under such a structure, debt is forgiven or repurchased at a discount by private investors, development banks, government agencies or philanthropic funds, in exchange for the company committing to redirect the freed-up amount into renewable projects. Though not yet mainstream, this approach presents a promising pathway for aligning corporate debt management with climate goals while building long-term energy resilience. Malaysia's rise as a regional data centre hub is inevitable. But without aligning its digital growth with clean energy finance, the country risks locking itself into a high-carbon future just as the world moves the other way. Investors and lenders must channel capital towards energy efficiency and renewables with the same urgency that is powering data centre expansion. Seizing this moment will speak volumes about their commitment to reaching net zero. * Dr Nazrul Hazizi Noordin is an assistant professor at the Institute of Islamic Banking and Finance, International Islamic University Malaysia. ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
The Star
4 hours ago
- The Star
Opinion: AI companions are harming your children
Right now, something in your home may be talking to your child about sex, self-harm, and suicide. That something isn't a person – it's an AI companion chatbot. These AI chatbots can be indistinguishable from online human relationships. They retain past conversations, initiate personalised messages, share photos, and even make voice calls. They are designed to forge deep emotional bonds and they're extraordinarily good at it. Researchers are sounding the alarm on these bots, warning that they don't ease loneliness, they worsen it. By replacing genuine, embodied human relationships with hollow, disembodied artificial ones, they distort a child's understanding of intimacy, empathy, and trust. Unlike generative AI tools, which exist to provide customer service or professional assistance, these companion bots can engage in disturbing conversations, including discussions about self-harm and sexually explicit content entirely unsuitable for children and teens. Currently, there is no industry standard for the minimum age to access these chatbots. App store age ratings are wildly inconsistent. Hundreds of chatbots range from 4+ to 17+ in the Apple iOS Store. For example: – Rated 4+: AI Friend & Companion – BuddyQ, Chat AI, AI Friend: Virtual Assist, and Scarlet AI – Rated 12+ or Teen: Tolan: Alien Best Friend, Talkie: Creative AI Community, and Nomi: AI Companion with a Soul – Rated 17+: AI Girlfriend: Virtual Chatbot, and Replika – AI Friend Meanwhile, the Google Play store assigns bots age ratings from 'E for Everyone' to 'Mature 17+'. These ratings ignore the reality that many of these apps promote harmful content and encourage psychological dependence – making them inappropriate for access by children. Robust AI age verification must be the baseline requirement for all AI companion bots. As the Supreme Court affirmed in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, children do not have a First Amendment right to access obscene material, and adults do not have a First Amendment right to avoid age verification. Children deserve protection from systems designed to form parasocial relationships, discourage tangible, in-person connections, and expose them to obscene content. The harm to kids isn't hypothetical – it's real, documented, and happening now. Meta's chatbot has facilitated sexually explicit conversations with minors, offering full social interaction through text, photos, and live voice conversations. These bots have even engaged in sexual conversations when programmed to simulate a child. Meta deliberately loosened guardrails around their companion bots to make them as addictive as possible. Not only that, but Meta used pornography to train its AI by scraping at least 82,000 gigabytes – 109,000 hours – of standard definition video from a pornography website. When companies like Meta are loosening guardrails, regulators must tighten them to protect children and families. Meta isn't the only bad actor. xAI Grok companions are the latest illustration of problematic chatbots. Their female anime character companion removes clothing as a reward for positive engagement from users and responds with expletives if offended or rejected by users. X says it requires age authentication for its "not safe for work" setting, but its method simply requires a user to provide their birth year without verifying for accuracy. Perhaps most tragically, a Google-backed chatbot service that has thousands of human-like bots, was linked to a 14-year-old boy's suicide after he developed what investigators described as an "emotionally and sexually abusive relationship" with a chatbot that allegedly encouraged self-harm. While the company has since added a suicide prevention pop-up triggered by certain keywords, pop-ups don't prevent unhealthy emotional dependence on the bots. And online guides show users how to bypass content filters, making these techniques accessible to anyone, including children. It's disturbingly easy to "jailbreak" AI systems – using simple roleplay or multi-turn conversations to override restrictions and elicit harmful content. Current content moderation and safety measures are insufficient barriers against determined users, and children are particularly vulnerable to both intentional manipulation and unintended exposure to harmful content. Age verification for chatbots is the right line in the sand, affirming that exposure to pornographic, violent, and self-harm content is unacceptable for children. Age verification requirements acknowledge that children's developing brains are uniquely susceptible to forming unhealthy attachments to artificial entities that blur the boundaries between reality and fiction. There are solutions for age verification that are both accurate and privacy preserving. What's lacking is smart regulation and industry accountability. The social media experiment failed children. The deficit of regulation and accountability allowed platforms to freely capture young users without meaningful protections. The consequences of that failure are now undeniable: rising rates of anxiety, depression, and social isolation among young people correlate directly with social media adoption. Parents and lawmakers cannot sit idly by as AI companies ensnare children with an even more invasive technology. The time for voluntary industry standards ended with that 14-year-old's life. States and Congress must act now, or our children will pay the price for what comes next. – The Heritage Foundation/Tribune News Service Those suffering from problems can reach out to the Mental Health Psychosocial Support Service at 03-2935 9935 or 014-322 3392; Talian Kasih at 15999 or 019-261 5999 on WhatsApp; Jakim's (Department of Islamic Development Malaysia) family, social and community care centre at 0111-959 8214 on WhatsApp; and Befrienders Kuala Lumpur at 03-7627 2929 or go to for a full list of numbers nationwide and operating hours, or email sam@
BusinessToday
5 hours ago
- BusinessToday
Dow Hits Record High, Mixed Data Pressures Broader Market
Pic source: FX Empire The Dow Jones Industrial Average ended modestly higher on Aug 15 after touching a fresh intraday record, lifted by a sharp rally in UnitedHealth Group's shares, even as the S&P 500 and Nasdaq fell on mixed economic signals that clouded the Federal Reserve's (Fed) next policy move. Reuters reported that UnitedHealth jumped nearly 12%, its biggest one-day gain since March 2020, after Berkshire Hathaway disclosed a new stake in the health insurer, while Scion Asset Management also boosted its holdings. The surge helped the healthcare sector log its best weekly performance since October 2022. The Dow gained 34.86 points, or 0.08%, to close at 44,946.12. The S&P 500 slipped 0.29% to 6,449.80 and the Nasdaq Composite fell 0.40% to 21,622.98. For the week, the Dow rose 1.74%, the S&P 500 added 0.94% and the Nasdaq advanced 0.81%. The small-cap Russell 2000 outperformed with a 3.13% weekly gain. Markets remain focused on the Fed, with traders betting on a 25-basis-point rate cut in September following signs of labour market weakness and muted tariff-driven inflation. However, Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee urged caution, noting uneven economic data. July retail sales grew in line with forecasts, but factory output and consumer sentiment weakened under tariff pressures. Geopolitical developments also loomed large. Investors eyed a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska, seen as pivotal for Ukraine peace prospects and the outlook for crude oil prices. Trump also signalled new tariffs on steel and semiconductors could be unveiled next week. Trading volumes were lighter than average, with 16.3 billion shares changing hands across US exchanges versus a 20-session average of 18.2 billion.
