Tell us: what are your experiences of buying a home in Australia?
The share of investors buying homes has consistently grown over the past 25 years at the expense of prospective owner-occupiers. That trend threatens to accelerate again as younger buyers get priced out of the market amid another surge in property prices.
A lack of housing stock has meant properties in favourable locations, near schools and transport networks, are subject to fierce competition between investors and those looking for a family home.
We would like to hear your experiences of buying a home. How long have you been actively looking to purchase a property? What have been the worst of your near misses? Are you being outbid by other home buyers or investors?
If you have recently bought a property – did you have to make any sacrifices in your search? Did your toughest competition come from owner-occupiers or investors?
Tell us the suburb and city
Please include as much detail as possible.
Please include as much detail as possible.
Your contact details are helpful so we can contact you for more information. They will only be seen by the Guardian.
Your contact details are helpful so we can contact you for more information. They will only be seen by the Guardian.
If you include other people's names please ask them first.
If you're having trouble using the form, click here. Read terms of service here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
24 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Fixing Australia's broken environmental laws must be the first step in improving productivity
We must reform Australia's broken national environment laws, as they have failed to protect the environment. Projects critical to our future prosperity are bogged down in slow, opaque, duplicative and contested environmental planning and approvals processes based on poor information, and mired in administrative complexity. Matters of national environmental significance (MNES), such as world and national heritage areas and the Great Barrier Reef, must be protected and restored. Protecting the environment while facilitating faster project decision-making demands several important changes to the existing commonwealth legal framework. First, we need regional plans, developed cooperatively with state and local governments. Second, we need stronger resourcing of the newly established Environment Information Australia to identify MNES and monitor the goal to stop and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030. Third, we need national environmental standards to provide a basis for the commonwealth to accredit state decision-making processes, permitting the streamlining of project approvals. And fourth, we need an expert, independent and trusted decision-maker in the form of a national Environment Protection Agency. There is no chance of Australia meeting stated targets for net zero, renewable energy, critical minerals development, housing and transport infrastructure without robust national laws that set clear environmental standards for major projects, along with a strong national regulator respected by all parties and significant improvements in commonwealth and state and territory environmental protection systems. Reformed laws will be critical to enhancing economic resilience and lifting flagging productivity growth, which underpins intergenerational equity and opportunity. Commercial and political vested interests are always tempted to exploit the moments of uncertainty generated by proposed reform. This has been a feature of all previous attempts to achieve reform. For some, the stakes at play in environmental law reform are high. After all, we have whole industries with business models built on the destruction of the natural world. It can be done. But it will take a lot of work over many years to put in place new architecture to protect the environment while also facilitating efficient and transparent project approvals. Reforms of the sort outlined here were recommended by Graeme Samuel's review, published five years ago. The recommendations have enjoyed bipartisan political support. They have also had the support of major business and environmental groups. But when it comes to the details of the legislation, stakeholders have invariably found themselves in deadlock. Generally, developers have favoured the fast-tracking of reforms that reduce complexity and facilitate the accreditation of state approvals systems. Environmental interests have favoured stronger protections. The deadlock must be broken. Reforms will be delivered if there is genuine cooperation and a shared purpose among the commonwealth, states and territories, businesses and environmental groups – to prioritise the interests of future generations. Ken Henry is an economist, policy adviser, former Treasury secretary and chair of the Australian Climate and Biodiversity Foundation
Reuters
24 minutes ago
- Reuters
The US economy's key weak spots in five charts: McGeever
ORLANDO, Florida, Aug 14 (Reuters) - The U.S. economy seems to be chugging along fairly smoothly, if a little too slowly for some observers' liking. Under the bonnet, however, the picture is more worrisome, and the risk of engine malfunction is rising. Technology's role in the U.S. economy has never been greater, and artificial intelligence could deliver a historic productivity boom. But return on the huge investment being made on that bet could take years to materialize. What's more, an unbalanced economy may not be desirable in the long term, as it can lead to poor investment and policy decisions. Below are five charts that indicate the foundations of the resilient U.S. economy and booming stock market may be much shakier than they appear, especially if AI- and tech-related spending, investment and optimism are stripped out. Inflation-adjusted investment in 'AI-sensitive' sectors of the economy since the end of 2019 has risen 53%, notes Troy Ludtka, senior U.S. economist at SMBC Nikko Securities. Investment elsewhere has inched up just 0.3%. Relatedly, the contribution of software and IT equipment capex to U.S. GDP has never been higher, according to analysts at BlackRock. Aggregate capex in all other areas of the economy, however, actually fell in the first half of this year – a rare occurrence. Meanwhile, personal consumption expenditures are slowing sharply, a worrying sign given that the consumer accounts for around 70% of total U.S. GDP. Personal consumption expenditures in the second quarter grew by only 0.9%, the slowest pace since the pandemic. And in real terms, consumer spending has completely flat-lined in the first half of the year. Corporate bankruptcies in July were the highest for a single month since July 2020, according to S&P Global Market Intelligence. Even more alarming, the tally of year-to-date bankruptcy filings through the end of July was the highest for this seven-month period since 2010. Nearly a third of this year's bankruptcies were in the consumer discretionary and industrial sectors. Finally, the concentration on Wall Street has been widely discussed, but the levels continue to be eye-popping. One stock, chipmaker Nvidia, accounts for 8% of the benchmark S&P 500's entire market cap. That's a record for a single name. And the top 10 stocks, most of which are Big Tech megacaps, make up 40% of the index's market cap and 30% of all earnings. These are also record levels. The more Wall Street – and even global markets - rely on the revenue, earnings and profitability of a set of companies that can be counted on two hands, the bigger the potential mess could be if the trends driving these companies' performance lose momentum. (The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters)
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Activist Starboard buys more Salesforce stock after first demanding change in 2022
NEW YORK, Aug 14 (Reuters) - Activist Starboard Value, one of the first investors to publicly push Salesforce (CRM.N), opens new tab to make changes three years ago, increased its stake in the U.S. software company by almost 50% in the second quarter, according to a regulatory filing on Thursday. The hedge fund reported owning 1.3 million shares in Salesforce on June 30, compared with 849,679 shares at the end of the first quarter when it boosted its stake by almost 52%. The move comes as the company's stock price has lost nearly 30% since January and is off nearly 9% over the last 12 months. Salesforce, which has a market value of $223 billion, came under intense pressure from a handful of activist investors in late 2022 and early 2023. But many who publicly pushed for changes cut their stakes or exited completely by the middle of 2023 after the company reported better results, added a new director to the board and made other changes. Now the pressure may be increasing again with Starboard, which is known to revisit earlier investments if the company is seen as backsliding on promises, loading up on the stock. While Salesforce's stock price gained nearly 100% in 2023, Starboard's chief executive, Jeffrey Smith, said late last year that the company still had room to become more efficient and profitable. A Starboard spokesperson could not be reached for comment on Thursday. The firm also increased its holding in drugmaker Pfizer (PFE.N), opens new tab by 10.5% to 8.5 million shares, less than a year after unveiling a $1 billion stake in the company and pushing it to improve performance. At Autodesk (ADSK.O), opens new tab, where the hedge fund settled its fight with the software design company in April, Starboard cut its stake by nearly 27%, the filing shows. While Thursday's filing is backward-looking, the so-called 13F filings, which detail what U.S. stocks a fund manager owned at the end of the previous quarter, are closely watched for possible investment trends.
