
Musk ordered to block children from viewing porn on X
New rules come into force on Friday requiring all companies that host pornography to introduce robust and 'highly effective' age checks to prevent any child under 18 accessing the content.
Failure to do so will mean they will face enforcement action by the online regulator Ofcom. This can include barring a social media company from operating in the UK or fines worth up to 10 per cent of their global revenue. For X, formerly Twitter, this would mean a penalty of up to £200m.
Mr Musk's X site is understood to be under scrutiny because of the amount of porn available on its platform, which has a 13-plus age limit. Online safety campaigners say it is one of the most commonly cited by adults and children where they stumble across X-rated adult content.
Research by Dame Rachel de Souza, the Children's Commissioner, found that many children were more likely to see porn on X than on established adult sites.
Some 41 per cent of young people aged 16 to 21 reported having seen pornography on Twitter compared with 37 per cent for dedicated adult sites. It was followed by Instagram (33 per cent), Snapchat (32 per cent) and search engines (30 per cent).
To enforce age restrictions, social media companies have been recommended by Ofcom to use open banking, photo ID matching, facial age estimation, mobile network operator age checks, credit card checks and digital ID services.
Industry sources say Mr Musk's X has three options: to bar all children aged under 18 from his site, remove all porn from the platform or introduce age checks for those accounts or parts of the site where there is adult content.
'If X or any other company that hosts pornography has not introduced highly effective age assurance by this Friday deadline, Ofcom has been clear that they will face enforcement action,' a government source said.
It is understood that nearly all of the biggest porn sites worldwide have agreed publicly or privately to introduce age checks to stop children accessing their content.
Aylo, the parent company of Porn Hub, is among those to have said that they will bring in 'government-approved age assurance methods'. Ofcom said the changes would 'bring pornography into line with how we treat adult services in the real world'.
They are part of a raft of measures that take effect this week under the Online Safety Act, which was introduced following The Telegraph's Duty of Care campaign to protect children from online harms.
Social media giants such as Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp will also be expected to enforce age checks at 13 to prevent children accessing content inappropriate to their ages.
The tech companies have been told they must either ensure their minimum age limits of 13 are properly enforced or radically overhaul their sites to make content safe enough for the thousands of under-aged children currently using them.
Ofcom research has suggested as many as six in 10 children aged eight to 12 have a social media profile even though access is supposed to have been restricted to over 13.
The measures are part of new children's codes set by the regulator Ofcom, which require companies to block their access to harmful content, including suicide, self-harm, violence or misogyny, from July 25. Those that fail to do so also will face fines of up to 10 per cent of global turnover or bans on operating in the UK.
Ofcom believes there is technology such as facial estimation, photo ID matching and emerging social ID cards for younger teenagers that could be used to provide 'rigorous' age restrictions.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
5 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Online safety laws behind surge in VPN use
Apps offering VPNs, which are commonly used in authoritarian countries to get around internet censorship, made up half of the top 10 most popular free apps on the UK's App Store this weekend, according to the latest Apple rankings. Proton VPN overtook ChatGPT to become the top free app in the UK. The Swiss-based company said it had seen a more than 1800 per cent increase in daily sign-ups from UK-based users since Friday. On X, Proton said: 'We would normally associate these large spikes in sign-ups with major civil unrest. This clearly shows that adults are concerned about the impact universal age verification laws will have on their privacy'. Nord, another VPN provider, said there had been a 1000 per cent increase in UK purchases of VPN subscriptions since the new rules kicked in. Data from Google Trends also showed a significant increase in search queries for VPNs in the UK this weekend, with up to 10 times more people looking for VPNs at peak times. Rules 'not foolproof' for teenagers Oliver Griffiths, Ofcom group director for online safety, told the Financial Times that the watchdog's age verification rules would not be 'foolproof' for a 'determined teenager', just as under-18s are sometimes able to buy alcohol in UK stores. Mr Griffiths said: 'There are opportunities for people to use VPNs, but this is part of a broader system approach.' Opposition to the new rules has grown in recent days, with a petition submitted through the UK Parliament website attracting more than 280,000 signatures. The petition demands that the Online Safety Act be withdrawn, with a surge of signatures being added to the document in the past week. Under the Online Safety Act, websites that ignore the new laws could be fined up to £18m, or 10 per cent of worldwide revenue.


Reuters
5 minutes ago
- Reuters
Out-gunned Europe accepts least-worst US trade deal
LONDON, July 27 (Reuters) - In the end, Europe found it lacked the leverage to pull Donald Trump's America into a trade pact on its terms and so has signed up to a deal it can just about stomach - albeit one that is clearly skewed in the U.S.'s favour. As such, Sunday's agreement on a blanket 15% tariff after a months-long stand-off is a reality check on the aspirations of the 27-country European Union to become an economic power able to stand up to the likes of the United States or China. The cold shower is all the more bracing given that the EU has long portrayed itself as an export superpower and champion of rules-based commerce for the benefit both of its own soft power and the global economy as a whole. For sure, the new tariff that will now be applied is a lot more digestible than the 30% "reciprocal" tariff which Trump threatened to invoke in a few days. While it should ensure Europe avoids recession, it will likely keep its economy in the doldrums: it sits somewhere between two tariff scenarios the European Central Bank last month forecast would mean 0.5-0.9% economic growth this year compared to just over 1% in a trade tension-free environment. But this is nonetheless a landing point that would have been scarcely imaginable only months ago in the pre-Trump 2.0 era, when the EU along with much of the world could count on U.S. tariffs averaging out at around 1.5%. Even when Britain agreed a baseline tariff of 10% with the United States back in May, EU officials were adamant they could do better and - convinced the bloc had the economic heft to square up to Trump - pushed for a "zero-for-zero" tariff pact. It took a few weeks of fruitless talks with their U.S. counterparts for the Europeans to accept that 10% was the best they could get and a few weeks more to take the same 15% baseline which the United States agreed with Japan last week. "The EU does not have more leverage than the U.S., and the Trump administration is not rushing things," said one senior official in a European capital who was being briefed on last week's negotiations as they closed in around the 15% level. That official and others pointed to the pressure from Europe's export-oriented businesses to clinch a deal and so ease the levels of uncertainty starting to hit businesses from Finland's Nokia ( opens new tab to Swedish steelmaker SSAB ( opens new tab. "We were dealt a bad hand. This deal is the best possible play under the circumstances," said one EU diplomat. "Recent months have clearly shown how damaging uncertainty in global trade is for European businesses." That imbalance - or what the trade negotiators have been calling "asymmetry" - is manifest in the final deal. Not only is it expected that the EU will now call off any retaliation and remain open to U.S. goods on existing terms, but it has also pledged $600 billion of investment in the United States. The time-frame for that remains undefined, as do other details of the accord for now. As talks unfolded, it became clear that the EU came to the conclusion it had more to lose from all-out confrontation. The retaliatory measures it threatened totalled some 93 billion euros - less than half its U.S. goods trade surplus of nearly 200 billion euros. True, a growing number of EU capitals were also ready to envisage wide-ranging anti-coercion measures that would have allowed the bloc to target the services trade in which the United States had a surplus of some $75 billion last year. But even then, there was no clear majority for targeting the U.S. digital services which European citizens enjoy and for which there are scant homegrown alternatives - from Netflix (NFLX.O), opens new tab to Uber (UBER.N), opens new tab to Microsoft (MSFT.O), opens new tab cloud services. It remains to be seen whether this will encourage European leaders to accelerate the economic reforms and diversification of trading allies to which they have long paid lip service but which have been held back by national divisions. Describing the deal as a painful compromise that was an "existential threat" for many of its members, Germany's BGA wholesale and export association said it was time for Europe to reduce its reliance on its biggest trading partner. "Let's look on the past months as a wake-up call," said BGA President Dirk Jandura. "Europe must now prepare itself strategically for the future - we need new trade deals with the biggest industrial powers of the world."


The Sun
5 minutes ago
- The Sun
Horse racing faces ‘grave risk' from new betting tax bombshell, bosses warn
A LOOMING tax on horserace betting would wipe £330million off the industry in just five years and risk thousands of jobs, bosses have warned. The levy has been branded an existential threat to the beloved spectator sport and sparked urgent calls for a climbdown. 1 Ministers are proposing to raise the 15 per cent tax on horserace bets into line with the 21 per cent for online casinos. Devastating analysis has revealed this could cost the sector £66million every year and put up to 2,752 people out of a job. Towns where racecourses are a big source of employment - like Doncaster and York - would be particularly affected. The British Horseracing Association has warned this would send the sport into 'irreversible decline' in a blow to the five million racegoers who attend every year. Chief executive Brant Dunshea said: 'This latest tax bombshell from the Government, if followed through, poses one of the gravest risks to horseracing the sport has ever seen. 'The horseracing industry is already in a precarious financial position, and the latest research provides a much more catastrophic forecast than we first thought. 'We're talking thousands of jobs at risk across the supply chain, severely impacted towns and communities, and the irreversible decline of the country's second most popular sport.' David Menuisier, a trainer at Coombelands Racing Stables, added: 'Racing is much more than just a sport in this country. 'It brings fun and excitement to millions and is a major local employer, particularly here in West Sussex as we prepare for another fantastic year at Goodwood.' A Treasury spokesperson said: 'We are consulting on bringing the treatment of online betting in line with other forms of online gambling to cut down bureaucracy - it is not about increasing or decreasing rates, and we welcome views from all stakeholders including businesses, trade bodies, the third sector and individuals.'