logo
The untouchable Apple Watch Ultra 2 is on sale at an irresistible Prime Day discount

The untouchable Apple Watch Ultra 2 is on sale at an irresistible Prime Day discount

Phone Arena6 days ago
Is the Apple Watch Ultra 3 actually happening this year? And more importantly, should you care if the Cupertino-based leader of global smartwatch shipments rolls out an all-new rugged model by the end of 2025? I don't really think you should when the perfectly acceptable Apple Watch Ultra 2 can be had at a killer price after an unusually hefty discount of $150. On second thought, "perfectly acceptable" doesn't really do this bad boy justice, as you'll very quickly understand if you take a look at our glowing Apple Watch Ultra 2 review.
GPS, Bluetooth, Cellular Connectivity, Always-On Retina Display with Up to 3000 Nits of Brightness, Apple S9 Processor, 1000m Water Resistance, Double Tap Gesture, ECG, Blood Oxygen Sensor, Sleep Apnea Detection, High and Low Heart Rate Notifications, Irregular Rhythm Alerts, Temperature Sensing, Fall Detection, Crash Detection, Siren, Up to 36 Hours of Battery Life, 49mm Titanium Case, Multiple Band, Size, and Color Options, Amazon Prime Membership Required Buy at Amazon
That's pretty old, but certainly not outdated, with all the praise given to the build quality, super-bright display, silky smooth interface, and solid battery life staying pretty much as true and as relevant today as when the device was originally released nearly two years ago.
Normally available for a whopping $799 apiece and substantially discounted a bunch of times in recent months by a number of major US retailers like Amazon in all sorts of different variants, the Apple Watch Ultra 2 is currently marked down by the aforementioned 150 bucks exclusively for Prime members. This Prime Day 2025 deal is perhaps slightly less spectacular than the discounts received by the Apple Watch Series 10 family, not to mention the likes of Samsung's Galaxy Watch 7 and Galaxy Watch Ultra, during this same special Amazon sales event kicked off earlier this week. But you can still get probably the best smartwatch for your new or old iPhone at a massively reduced price in your favorite color, band style, and band size.
That's definitely nothing to sneeze at, and yes, in case you're wondering, multiple models with that black titanium case released in the fall of 2024 are included in this expansive sale alongside "Rugged Titanium" and "Natural Titanium" versions. Of course, regardless of your chromatic choice, you'll be getting a rugged design here made to withstand water immersion up to 100 meters deep, as well as corrosion and even the occasional drop on a hard surface. That's only one of the Apple Watch Ultra 2 's many key selling points, which also include a customizable Action button, super-precise GPS technology, a simply unrivaled set of health tracking tools, and the aforementioned ultra-high-quality Retina display with up to 3000 nits of brightness and excellent 72-hour battery life (at least compared to the non-rugged Apple Watch Series 10 , Samsung Galaxy Watch 7, and newly unveiled Galaxy Watch 8). Secure your connection now at a bargain price!
We may earn a commission if you make a purchase This offer is not available in your area.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A man proved Meta's AI platform is not so secure and got paid $10,000
A man proved Meta's AI platform is not so secure and got paid $10,000

Phone Arena

time9 minutes ago

  • Phone Arena

A man proved Meta's AI platform is not so secure and got paid $10,000

If you think that a given AI platform is safe because it's backed by a multi-billion dollar company, well, think again. A man who managed to find a security bug on Meta's AI platform was rewarded with $10,000 by Zuck and co. Meta has recently resolved a critical security flaw that exposed private prompts and AI-generated responses from its Meta AI chatbot to other users, a report by TechCrunch reads. The issue was discovered by Sandeep Hodkasia, founder of security testing firm AppSecure, who reported the vulnerability back in December 2024. For his disclosure, Meta awarded him $10,000 through its bug bounty program (if you happen to find anything, don't hesitate to report on it). The company confirmed that the bug is now patched, and stated that there was no evidence of malicious exploitation. However, that should ring a bell for everyone who uses AI without a second thought. I won't be the one who tells you to avoid AI like the plague, but one should definitely act cautiously. A line of code could cost you dearly. Image by Meta Hodkasia uncovered the flaw while examining how Meta AI lets logged-in users edit prompts to regenerate responses. He noticed that each edited prompt was assigned a unique identifier by Meta's back-end systems. By intercepting network traffic during this process, he realized that altering the identifier allowed access to other users' prompts and responses. The problem stemmed from Meta's failure to validate whether a user was authorized to view a given prompt. According to Hodkasia, the identifiers were predictable, which could have enabled attackers to automate the process and collect sensitive user inputs at discovery comes amid broader criticism of Meta AI's privacy practices. Since the launch of its stand-alone app earlier this year, users have inadvertently exposed private conversations by misunderstanding sharing options. The app includes a feature allowing users to share interactions publicly, but many appear unaware that they are posting personal queries, images, and even audio clips for public viewing. Some of these slip-ups have revealed highly sensitive details, from questions about financial crimes and legal troubles to personal data like home addresses. Yikes! Despite the company's heavy investment in AI, the Meta AI app has seen limited adoption, with about 6.5 million downloads since its April 29 release, according to app analytics firm Appfigures. Well, nothing is perfect, but a couple more bugs like that and Meta will have to find a new name for the platform. Like Google did with Bard, that is now called Gemini. Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer

5 changes Apple needs to make for the upcoming iPhone 17
5 changes Apple needs to make for the upcoming iPhone 17

Phone Arena

time9 minutes ago

  • Phone Arena

5 changes Apple needs to make for the upcoming iPhone 17

iPhone 16 . | Image credit – PhoneArena We are getting closer to the iPhone 17 launch and as usual, the closer we get, the more the leaks and rumors start piling up. And honestly? Based on what we've heard so far, the base model still feels like it is missing some key upgrades. So, here's a look at the five biggest changes Apple needs to make to the standard iPhone 17 if it wants to truly call it an upgrade over the iPhone 16 – and not just another refresh. Let's get this one out of the way – because it's honestly getting embarrassing. In 2025, a $799 flagship phone still rocking a 60Hz screen just doesn't cut it. The iPhone 16 is stuck there and Apple has to change that with the iPhone 17 .It's time to bring ProMotion – Apple's fancy name for the LTPO display that smoothly adjusts from 120Hz down to 1Hz – to the regular iPhone. Every major rival already does it. Galaxy S25? 120Hz. OnePlus 13? 120Hz. Xiaomi 15? Same story. Hey, even a bunch of mid-range phones come with high refresh rates say Apple might finally bump the iPhone 17 up to 90Hz. Sure, that's better... but honestly, still not enough. Siri needs a serious glow-up At this point, Siri isn't just lagging behind – it's kind of broken. In 2025, with AI assistants from Google, Amazon and OpenAI pulling off some seriously impressive stuff, Siri still feels stuck in the past. The promised upgraded Siri is still missing. | Video credit – Apple Apple promised big things for Siri with Apple Intelligence on the iPhone 16 , but most of that didn't pan out. The iPhone 17 needs to turn that mess around and finally deliver a version of Siri that feels smart, responsive, and genuinely helpful. Faster charging speeds, please Officially, the iPhone 16 lineup didn't get faster wired charging – but under the hood, there were signs of progress. Our tests showed brief charging spikes up to 38W when the phone was under heavy load, like during gaming or using demanding real jump was on the wireless side. Apple boosted MagSafe charging from 15W to 25W, which is getting surprisingly close to wired speeds. But again, in 2025, that's still playing catch-up. Android phones like the Xiaomi 14T Pro or Motorola Edge 50 Pro are miles ahead when it comes to charging speed. Even affordable models like the Edge 50 Fusion beat the iPhone here. Apple needs to stop lagging and step it up with the iPhone 17 and actually, some leaks suggest it might indeed do so. Base model deserves better cameras Apple's camera game is solid – if you are going for the Pro models. The regular iPhones don't get the same love and that's a shame. More RAM to keep up with AI With AI becoming a thing – and apps and games getting heavier – RAM matters more than ever. The iPhone 17 is expected to come with 8 GB of RAM, which sounds decent… but might not be enough in the long stay future-proof, it would make more sense for Apple to match the 12 GB expected on the rest of the iPhone 17 family: the iPhone 17 Air, iPhone 17 Pro, and iPhone 17 Pro Max. More RAM means smoother multitasking, better app performance and just a longer-lasting phone overall. What would actually make you upgrade to the iPhone 17 ? And what more do you think Apple needs to bring to the base model to make it worth it in 2025? Drop your thoughts – curious to see what's on your wish list. Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer

We tested the six most popular smartwatches charging speeds and the results might surprise you
We tested the six most popular smartwatches charging speeds and the results might surprise you

Phone Arena

timean hour ago

  • Phone Arena

We tested the six most popular smartwatches charging speeds and the results might surprise you

The main reason expensive smartwatches like the Apple Watch Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra are popular is clearly the battery life. While you can get two to three days on a single charge with the Ultra models, the regular versions only last around a day or a day and a half. And if you want to track your sleep, this means that you have to carefully plan your charging routine. But how much time do you need to fully charge these smartwatches? And is a 15-minute top-up enough? As we are wrapping up our review of the Galaxy Watch 8 and Watch 8 Classic, we thought this is the perfect opportunity for the ultimate smartwatch charging test. For this charge speed test, we had eight smartwatch models that you will see listed below: We carefully drained all of them, paired them up with the provided cables and proper charging bricks, and started the charging process. Unfortunately, the test failed on two of those. The OnePlus Watch 3 43mm model failed because of our own mistake, while the Apple Watch Ultra 2 had a very strange result despite us using the proper charging cable and charging brick (we have to re-do this one). So we were left with six smartwatches and some very interesting charging speed results. As you can see, if you just leave your watch for a quick 15-minute top-up, you won't see much of a difference in the charge percentage gained between devices. Five of the smartwatches get 20% to 23%. The big exception here is the OnePlus Watch 3 (46mm). This watch charges remarkably quickly. Not only is it the one with the longest battery life, it also gives you nearly half the battery life back in just 15 minutes. Impressive! Leaving the smartwatches on the charger for a bit longer shows bigger differences. The Galaxy Watch Ultra is slowest, but that is kind of expected given its extra-large battery. However, the Galaxy Watch 8 and Watch 8 Classic are much slower to charge compared to the Apple Watch Series 10 and the Pixel Watch 3 . We definitely hoped for faster charging speeds from Samsung, but no such luck. Once again, the odd one out is the OnePlus Watch 3 which gets an impressive 80% of its battery back in just half an hour. On this next check-in, we again see the Galaxy Watch lag behind rivals in an even more noticeable way. The larger Watch 8 Classic model, specifically, is 20 percentage points behind the Apple Watch Series 10 and the Pixel Watch 3 . And the OnePlus Watch 3? Well, it's practically fully charged in just 45 minutes. We really wish The conclusions are clear: Samsung's Galaxy Watch 8 and Watch 8 Classic charging speeds are clearly behind the competition. We really wish Samsung improved this. Having a smartwatch with one-day battery life and slow charging is just not a good look. Both Apple with the Series 10 watches and Google with the Pixel 3 series support slightly faster charging. And even though the difference is not night and day, it's noticeable. For a gadget that you have to top up every day, having faster charging seems very important. We also have to congratulate OnePlus on the incredible charging speeds we see from the OnePlus Watch 3 series. This watch is clearly the winner of this test. The OnePlus Watch 3 not only lasts multiple days, but it also charges much faster too. It uses a proprietary charging system, but if it can get such amazing results, maybe other companies should take notes. Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store