Emirates airline president reveals staggering cost to transform Qatari ‘sky Palace' into Trump's new Air Force One jet
The US government now faces a "Herculean task" to transform the huge Boeing 747-8 into a new Air Force One fit for a president, warns Sir Tim Clark.
Advertisement
9
President Trump boards Air Force One earlier this month
Credit: Reuters
9
President of Emirates airline Sir Tim Clark believes it will cost a few billion dollars to properly transform it into a replacement Air Force One
Credit: Emirates
9
A look inside the lavish $400million plane shows the Boeing kitted out in gold
Credit: YouTube/Spotti Flight
9
President Trump, 78, sparked concerns earlier this month with his willingness to accept the plush flying mansion from the Qatari royal family.
The giant gift, worth an estimated $400m (£300m), has raised several ethical questions about if the US leader should be allowed to accept such expensive goods from other states.
But despite the controversy, Trump gladly took the 13-year-old mega jet back to Washington with him.
He now plans to make it part of his Air Force One fleet alongside two other Boeing 747-200 jumbo jets.
Advertisement
They have been operational since 1990 but are now said to be not up to scratch compared to modern planes such as Qatar's 747-8.
In order for it to become a fully fledged member of the president's aviation arsenal however, it will need to go through some serious work.
It would have to be kitted out with top-tier communications and security tech before ever ferrying around Trump.
And significant retrofitting and clearance from security officials would be required.
Advertisement
Sir Tim, president of Emirates, told Piers Morgan Uncensored that President Trump's flashy plans may cost a 'couple of billion dollars'.
He explained to Piers: 'I think you're talking a couple of billion dollars to start with.
Trump's new $400m Qatari Air Force One jet from Qatar is 'hackers dream'
"Just roll back a little bit and look at what it takes for us to convert our 777s - from the old to the new - because we haven't got the Boeing's coming in at the pace we want them so we're having to reconfigure all of them."
The top aviation boss said trying to fix up all the jets as an airline has been an extremely tough task.
Advertisement
Tim admitted to "pulling his hair out" over the regulators and the tiny tweaks that have to be made to modernise a plane of that size and stature.
And he believes the US government will face an even trickier - and much more expensive - battle to get the gifted plane ready for presidential trips.
He said: "It's a Herculean task, make no mistake about it.
"Whether President Trump will adapt fully, this present from Qatar, to an Air Force One I doubt it, but he'll certainly get a lot of it done."
Advertisement
Aviation specialist Jeff Wise also told The Sun that he expects the Air Force One replacement to take years and need billions of dollars pumped into the project to make the jet viable.
Trump's Air Force One jets currently in use come with dozens of specialised security features.
9
Donald Trump's new 'sky Palace' which he has been gifted from the Qatari government
Credit: YouTube/Spotti Flight
9
The jet would need to be kitted out with top-tier communications and security tech before being used as Air Force One
Credit: YouTube/Spotti Flight
Advertisement
9
The plane marks the most expensive gift ever given to a US president
Credit: YouTube/Spotti Flight
These include armoured glass and plating, on board flares to confuse enemy missiles, mirror-ball defences and even an electric jamming system.
Another unique yet needed element is an electromagnetic shield for nuclear explosions.
This has to be on a presidential plane as the leader of Washington can actually launch a nuke from the aircraft.
Advertisement
But the new Qatari jet lacks most of these security features.
Instead, the lavish aeroplane boasts a luxurious interior, featuring spacious suites and rooms with ornate interior decoration.
It also has glittering gold-coloured furnishings and hallways that echo Trump's well-know interior design preferences.
The president is believed to have spent an hour inspecting the plan when when it was parked at West Palm Beach International Airport back in February.
Advertisement
The luxury Boeing was once even listed for a whopping $400 million, according to the Business Jet Traveler.
During his first stint in office, Trump had ordered two new Air Force One jumbo jets from Boeing to replace the pair that have been in service since George H. W. Bush's presidency.
But the Boeing contract has faced delays, and reports suggest the new plans would not be ready until after Trump leaves the Oval Office.
Fears Trump's new Air Force One replacement is vulnerable to devastating HACKS – or worse
By Chief Foreign Reporter, Katie Davis
A LAVISH jumbo jet Donald Trump plans to receive from Qatar will be vulnerable to hacking, an expert has warned.
The Boeing 747 - dubbed a "palace in the sky" - could even be blasted out the sky, aviation specialist Jeff Wise believes.
He fears Trump may bypass necessary measures to save time and money - which could therefore invite hacking or a devastating assassination attempt.
Wise told The Sun: 'This Air Force One would be a major intelligence target for any adversary nation or even our allies, because allies love to spy on each other.
'The United States is being given this albatross that they are going to have to spend billions of dollars on to fix up for the personal use of Trump.
'If your job is to protect the President of the United States or if your job is to protect the secrets of the United States, then this is a massive headache for you.
'This is a plane that does not have secure communications and the anti-missiles defence systems that a normal Air Force One has. It's just wide open.
'This is an administration that is completely irresponsible in the way they use their personal devices. They're using these off-brand apps to communicate. It's just a hacker's dream.'
Wise continued: 'I would say an increasing number of people would like to target Air Force One.
'America's list of enemies is growing longer and longer as we become an increasingly horrible nation, from the Houthis to the Iranians to the Russians.'
9
Trump sparked concern after he willingly accepted the plush plane from the Qatari royal family, headed by Qatar's Emir Sheikh Tanim bin-Hamad Al Thani
Credit: AP
Advertisement
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
8 minutes ago
- Reuters
Shadow tanker fleet grows more slowly as Western sanctions target Russian oil
LONDON, Aug 13 (Reuters) - Dozens of tankers have joined the shadow fleet this year compared with hundreds in previous years as the harshest Western sanctions yet target Russia's oil exports and add to the difficulty of finding suitable vessels, shipping sources said. The European Union and Britain last month imposed further sanctions on Russia over its war in Ukraine. Together with U.S. restrictions, they mean more than 440, opens new tab shadow fleet tankers face sanctions, including tankers Moscow needs to ship oil to its biggest buyers, China and India. The shadow fleet of vessels is used by Venezuela and Iran, as well as Russia to evade Western sanctions. Typically, the vessels are old, their ownership is opaque, and they sail without top-tier insurance cover to meet international standards for oil majors and many ports. Since the Ukraine war began in 2022, the shadow fleet has been especially used by Russia, which has relied on oil revenues to help finance its war effort. In addition to the sanctions, the Group of Seven countries has imposed a cap over what price level Russian oil can be sold at, adding to trade complexities. The size of the fleet is between 1,200 and 1,600 tankers, according to estimates from industry sources and analysts, including Lloyd's List Intelligence and shipbroker Gibson. This represents an estimated fifth of the overall global tanker fleet. That compares with a few hundred vessels operating before the Ukraine war, but sources say its growth has slowed year-on-year as the list of sanctions has grown and sales of second-hand ships have been under more scrutiny from authorities and legal compliance teams. The estimate of the shadow fleet's size does not include hundreds of smaller coastal tankers, which are not ocean-going but have transported oil, chiefly for Russia. "Regulators are closing the net," Anna Giacomello, analyst with British maritime cyber defence and risk intelligence company Dryad Global, said in a July report. For all the risks, the potential for profit remains a lure for some. "Operators may still enter the shadow fleet because it can be highly lucrative," said Leigh Hansson, sanctions partner at law firm Reed Smith, who advises shipping and trading companies on oil sanctions compliance. But she said the major established players would stay away and that only those with little experience of the shipping market may be willing to engage in risky operations, with older vessels that major ship insurers will not cover.
Spectator
9 minutes ago
- Spectator
The US is right to warn Britain about its free speech record
Every year the US State Department is required to produce a report on the human rights situation in every country in the world. The report card for the UK came out yesterday. While otherwise fairly anodyne, the US was painfully scathing about our record on free speech. Unsurprisingly, the State Department was unhappy about the Online Safety Act's long-arm provisions affecting US websites, our abortion protest laws and our strict contempt rules (which last year forced the New Yorker to take the drastic step of geoblocking an important and informative article about the Lucy Letby case). It was particularly caustic about the fallout from Southport, where it did not mince its words. It stated, citing widespread arrests and prosecutions for online comments, that 'censorship of ordinary Britons was increasingly routine, often targeted at political speech'. Ouch. Admittedly this appraisal bears strong marks of a Trump administration finger discreetly placed on the scale. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has long seen State Department bureaucracy as too woke and progressive in its approach to human rights abroad: reportedly the order has gone out to backpedal equality and diversity issues and emphasise traditional freedoms instead. Furthermore, the Trump government's own free speech record at home is far from spotless: witness its fairly heavy-handed attempts to browbeat universities, broadcasters and others to toe its line. Nevertheless, this is something we'd be very foolish to ignore. The first point is that, biased or not, the State Department is correct. Britain, or at least the establishment in charge of it, shows worrying signs of seeing free speech as a distraction to be sidelined rather than a value to be pursued. True, the whirlwind state descent on social media following Southport, and the stern warnings from police and others to avoid controversial comment, may not have been secretly ordered from Downing Street in the manner of some Central American dictatorship. But an unprecedented and vicious clampdown it still was, even if it reflected no more than tacit agreement among the great, the good and the courts that something drastic had to be done to stop people speaking out of turn. There were plenty of other things that could have been highlighted in the report, and which would have been an entirely fair cop. Even if the total suppression by injunction of discussion over the Afghan refugee crisis came too late, there were always the 30-plus people a day arrested for social media posts, regular police interventions to silence speakers who might cause offence, and so on. Secondly, it's important that we should take note of how others see us. The slow but steady erosion since about 1990 of our right to speak our mind without state interference has passed many by in the UK who are not free speech enthusiasts. And not entirely surprisingly: gradual political change often presents itself as a fait accompli to a population when it is too late to do much about it. But all this has not escaped foreigners. We should be worried that this country, once seen as a beacon of free speech in an increasingly authoritarian Europe, should now be seen as a serious backslider. Particularly so where this is by the US, a country which retains an instinctive affection for us arising out of shared history and culture. No doubt Uncle Sam would, in its own interests, like to discreetly detach us diplomatically from Europe; nevertheless, we ignore this at our peril. Thirdly, all this should remind us that it is in our interest to keep the free speech issue from hurting our international reputation further. At the moment we are not doing this. We do not endear ourselves to an increasingly online world community when we place large swathes of the internet off-limits to those without VPNs as a result of the Online Safety Act. The government's stern orders earlier this week to websites to preserve online free speech or else will deceive no one and will be seen as the reputation management measure it is. Still less will we win friends when Ofcom, a UK government agency, writes threatening letters on official notepaper to US websites with no connection with the UK at all such as 4Chan, and Kiwifarms. Earlier this year it did just this, demanding promises to comply with UK law and to fill in all sorts of Ofcom paperwork, and menacing them with enormous fines if they did not. (They politely told it to go fish, but by then the damage was done.) Every instinct of this government will be to face down the State Department and carry on referring to keeping the UK internet safe. But it would do well to bear in mind that foreigners can sometimes be right and that taking steps to keep them onside, even at the cost of a little pride, can reap big dividends. This is one such occasion.
Scottish Sun
9 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Trump and Putin ‘plan West Bank-style occupation of Ukraine' to secure truce – as Zelensky & Europe hold emergency talks
Russia would have military and economic control over Ukraine under the plans PEACE PLOT Trump and Putin 'plan West Bank-style occupation of Ukraine' to secure truce – as Zelensky & Europe hold emergency talks Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) RUSSIA and the US are considering a West Bank-style occupation of Ukraine to secure a truce, according to reports. The superpowers have discussed using Israel's occupation of the West Bank as a model for ending the war in Ukraine, sources said. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 President Vladimir Putin welcomes US envoy Steve Witkoff during a meeting Credit: Reuters 2 Trump and Putin will sit down for what the White House calls a 'listening exercise' Credit: Reuters This would give Russia military and economic control of occupied Ukraine, which would run its own governing body, reports The Times. The idea was first raised weeks ago in discussions between US envoy Steve Witkoff and his Russian counterparts, a source close to the US national security council told the paper. Meanwhile, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz says European leaders and Zelensky had a "constructive" meeting with Trump about Ukraine. Zelensky insisted there must be a meeting between all the three leaders of Ukraine, Russia and the US after he was snubbed from Trump and Putin's head-to-head on Friday. He said hopes a ceasefire will be the main topic of discussion in Alaska - and Merz reassured that Trump will make that his "priority". Ursula von der Leyden, European Commission President, said they had a "very good" call with Trump. She said: "Today Europe, the US and NATO have strengthened the common ground for Ukraine. "We will remain in close coordination. Nobody wants peace more than us, a just and lasting peace." More to follow... For the latest news on this story, keep checking back at The U.S. Sun, your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, sports news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures, and must-see videos. Like us on Facebook at TheSunUS and follow us on X at @TheUSSun
