Maharashtra to request Centre to include thalassemia under National Sickle Cell Disease Programme
Thalassemia is one of the common hereditary blood disorders that impair the body's ability to make hemoglobin and healthy red blood cells. Untreated thalassemia can result in medical complications which may lead to death. The pre-natal test that is available in private health centres costs nearly Rs1,500, which many parents, especially those belonging to vulnerable communities, can't afford.
Dr Chandrakala S, Head of Hematology at KEM Hospital, told Indian Express that nearly 100 adults and 100 children with thalassemia are currently under care in her department. 'Most of them are dependent on blood transfusions every month, starting from six months of age. Yet awareness about thalassemia is very, very low, not just among the public but even among many general physicians,' she said, while explaining the need for greater state support for early diagnosis and treatment.
Carriers, who have a thalassemia trait, do not show symptoms and are often unaware unless specific blood tests such as HPLC are conducted.
A recent study found that thalassemia prevalence among paediatric ward patients in Mumbai is nearly 6.2 percent. However, routine premarital and antenatal screening is rarely done. 'Screening happens on a case-to-case basis, not uniformly. Over 80 percent of severe cases I see in children are from couples who never realised they were both carriers,' said Dr Chandrakala.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
14 hours ago
- The Hindu
Closure of Jan Aushadi Kendras: Karnataka's Health Minister justifies move, says it is to ensure free medicines
Justifying Karnataka's move to close Jan Aushadi Kendras on the premises of government-run hospitals, Health Minister Dinesh Gundu Rao wrote to Union Health Minister J.P. Nadda on Tuesday stating that the move was intended to ensure free and assured supply of essential medicines to patients. Responding to the Union Health Minister's letter to Chief Minister Siddaramaiah on the issue, Mr. Rao has said the intention to close the kendras only on the premises of government hospitals is to reduce the out-of-pocket expenditure for patients. 'The decision was taken to prevent doctors from directing patients to purchase medicines from these commercial outlets, thereby ensuring they are not denied free medicines available at the hospitals,' he said in the letter. Karnataka ranks among the top States in terms of the number of operational Jan Aushadi Kendras, with over 1,417 currently functioning. Of these, only 184 are located on the premises of government hospitals under the Department of Health and Family Welfare, while the rest operate independently outside government hospital campuses. Free supply Stating that the Karnataka government is committed to the free supply of all essential medicines, as listed in the Essential Medicines List (EML), across public healthcare institutions, Mr. Rao's letter said: 'To streamline public healthcare delivery and eliminate the risk of patients being denied medicines at government facilities, the State government has directed that prescriptions by government doctors be limited to medicines available within the hospital supply.' 'Medicines are regularly provided to government hospitals through Karnataka State Medical Supplies Corporation Limited (KSMSCL). Hospitals have also been allocated sufficient funds and have standing instructions to purchase medicines locally in case of any shortage. This effort is aimed at ensuring universal access to essential medicines for patients visiting government hospitals — entirely free of cost,' Mr. Rao said in the letter. Asserting that the decision does not restrict the operation of Jan Aushadhi Kendras outside government hospital premises, Mr. Rao said citizens are free to access them as per their choice. 'This move is primarily aimed at benefiting poor and marginalised patients who rely heavily on government hospitals for healthcare,' the Minister said in the letter. Subsidised rate Highlighting the affordability of medicines sold under the Pradhan Mantri Bhartiya Janaushadhi Pariyojana (PMBJP), Mr. Rao noted that the scheme offers medicines at prices 50% to 80% lower than branded alternatives. PMBJP is implemented by the Pharma and Medical Bureau of India (PMBI), a society registered under the Societies Registration Act. Mr. Rao urged Mr. Nadda to direct PMBI to supply medicines to Karnataka's Health Department at the same rates offered to Jan Aushadi Kendras. 'This will go a long way in supporting the State's free drug supply initiative,' he added.
Indian Express
14 hours ago
- Indian Express
Abortion law faces heat in HC over mental health clause
The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Wednesday issued notice to the Union government on a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a 57-year-old Hisar resident challenging the legal provision that allows abortions based on presumed mental health injury without requiring evaluation by a psychiatrist. Deepak Kumar, the petitioner, has sought a declaration that a key clause under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act, 1971, particularly Section 3(2) and Explanation 1, is unconstitutional. He argues that the provision violates Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution by allowing gynaecologists to terminate pregnancies on mental health grounds, even though they are not qualified to assess psychological conditions. He has also asked the court to rule that abortions should only be allowed when the life of the woman or the fetus is in immediate danger, not in cases of failed contraception or presumed mental anguish. The PIL, filed through advocates Dr Pankaj Nanhera, Sanchar Anand, Nitin Verma, and Yogesh Vashista, came up for hearing before the division bench of Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Sanjiv Berry, which issued notice to the Union government and fixed the next hearing for September 16. Section 3(2) of the MTP Act allows a registered medical practitioner to terminate a pregnancy if it risks the woman's life or may cause 'grave injury' to her physical or mental health. For pregnancies up to 20 weeks, the opinion of one doctor is sufficient; between 20 and 24 weeks, two doctors must concur for certain categories of women. Explanation 1 to this section presumes that if a pregnancy results from the failure of contraceptive methods, the resulting mental anguish is automatically considered a grave mental health injury, making abortion legally permissible. The PIL argues that: • Gynaecologists are not trained to assess mental health and should not be given the power to presume psychological harm. • Only psychiatrists can evaluate whether a woman is experiencing mental anguish severe enough to justify an abortion. • The automatic presumption that contraceptive failure causes grave mental injury is arbitrary and may lead to misuse of the law. • The law lacks clear definitions of what qualifies as 'grave injury' to mental health, giving doctors unchecked discretion. The petitioner contends that these provisions enable abortions in situations that fall outside the core intent of the MTP Act, and that such broad presumptions may undermine fetal rights and open doors to female feticide. Among other reliefs, Deepak Kumar has requested the court to: • Declare Section 3(2) and its Explanation 1 unconstitutional. • Clarify that 'grave injury' to mental health should not include distress caused by unintended pregnancies due to failed contraception. • Limit the scope of legal abortions to life-threatening situations for the woman or fetus. The court has admitted the petition and listed it for further hearing on September 16.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
18 hours ago
- Business Standard
Claims for CGHS hospital treatment: Rules for geo-tagged photos explained
The Health Ministry will require users of the Central Government Health Scheme (CGHS) to upload geo-tagged photographs at a website whenever they are treated at a hospital, seeking to improve compliance for a scheme that serves Central Government employees, pensioners, and their eligible family certain other categories such as Members of Parliament, Freedom Fighters, and some employees of autonomous organizations are also eligible. The step was ordered amid concerns over fraudulent claims and intends to ensure transparency in the billing and admission process for inpatient (IPD) and outpatient (OPD) services. One-time waiver for past cases The Ministry of Health & Family Welfare has allowed health care organisations (HCOs) a one-time exemption from uploading daily geo-tagged photos of patients admitted under CGHS between the date of the earlier mandate in December 2024 and the date of the latest Office Memorandum (OM) issued in 2025. Hospitals can now resubmit pending claims from this period by appending a copy of the current OM to each case on the Transaction Management System (TMS) portal. What's mandatory and what's not in new rules The revised norms, effective immediately, spell out different photo requirements for referral and non-referral cases: For IPD patients -No geo-tagged photos needed for referral cases (via e-referral): -Valid referral must be uploaded on the National Health Authority (NHA) portal. -Two geo-tagged photos required for non-referral cases (manual, emergencies, follow-ups, age 70+): At admission At discharge -If hospitalised for more than seven days: one additional photo every 7th day. -Photos must be clicked inside the hospital (ward/ICU). No CGHS card required in the frame. For OPD visits No geo-tagged photos needed for valid referral or endorsement: -Without referral: -Mandatory photo required in following cases: Patients aged 70 and above Follow-up consultations without a fresh endorsement Bed-ridden patients (screenshot of video consultation acceptable) How hospitals must upload photos -Images must be geo-tagged automatically via a smartphone or tablet. -Upload must happen in real-time or within 24 hours of capture. -Each photo should be under 1 MB to avoid portal slowdowns. -Hospitals must store a local backup of images for at least 90 days for audit checks. The government's new rules aim to tighten oversight while reducing administrative burden where possible. CGHS beneficiaries are advised to keep track of their treatment referrals and consult hospital staff in case of queries on claim eligibility.
