Trump's Trade Deal With Indonesia, Explained
Last week, after threatening Indonesia with a 32 percent tariff, U.S. President Donald Trump announced that he had spoken directly with Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto and that they agreed on the basic outline of a trade deal. This week the United States and Indonesia released a joint statement providing a bit more detail, although we should keep in mind these terms may very well change.
For now, taken at face value, it appears that Indonesian exports to the United States will be subject to a 19 percent tariff, while most U.S. exports to Indonesia will face no tariff barriers. Indonesia also committed to buying Boeing aircraft, increasing imports of U.S. agriculture and energy products, and reducing non-tariff barriers like cumbersome licensing requirements.
In assessing this deal, it should be noted that the U.S. is not a huge export market for Indonesia, especially compared to other countries in the region like Vietnam. According to the Atlas of Economic Complexity, Indonesian exports totaled $287 billion in 2023 and around $22 billion, or 8 percent, of that went to the U.S. Most of this was from textiles ($8 billion), electronics ($3 billion), and palm oil ($1.5 billion).
At first glance, Indonesian textile exporters look to be getting the worst of this deal. Indonesia's textile industry, especially firms with a lot of international exposure, have already been facing intense pressure thanks to weak global demand. The industry has been grappling with thousands of layoffs and at least one blockbuster bankruptcy. A 19 percent tariff on Indonesian textile exports to the U.S. is unlikely to help matters.
But the long-term outlook is harder to parse. If Nike and other companies feel it makes financial sense to relocate production from Indonesia to another country, they might do so. But relocating manufacturing on that scale is both expensive and time-consuming, so companies will probably wait for a while and see if the tariff scheme changes again, or if they can carve out an exemption. This is why trade policy is usually made in a more measured and consistent way, so that firms have time to adjust and respond to clear market signals rather than ad hoc announcements.
Palm oil is a bit different. Malaysia and Indonesia produce the vast majority of the world's palm oil. The U.S. can certainly tariff Indonesian palm oil if it wants to, but there aren't many other places where importers can get it. For this reason, the joint statement noted that 'certain commodities that are not naturally available or domestically produced in the United States [may be considered] for a further reduction in the reciprocal tariff rate.' This gives the U.S. wiggle room to exempt things like palm oil, for which there are limited domestic substitutes.
On the flip side, Indonesia agreed to buy (or more likely lease) Boeing aircraft and import more American agriculture and energy products. We will have to see what happens, but my reading of this is that it does not represent a huge shift from the status quo and could be a net benefit to the Indonesian economy.
Indonesia has a big commercial aviation market, and domestic carriers are already leasing and operating large fleets of Boeing aircraft. It is likely that Indonesian airlines, including flag carrier Garuda, which is majority owned by the state, would have added more Boeing aircraft to their fleet in the coming years simply through the normal course of business operations. Meanwhile, soybeans and petroleum products are already among the largest American exports to Indonesia, so buying more of them is also something that likely would have happened under normal business conditions.
The other aspect of giving the U.S. more access to the Indonesian market is not just trade, but investment, and that's probably what the Indonesian government is really after. Reuters reported that Indonesia's new state-run investment fund is exploring an $8 billion partnership with U.S. engineering firm KBR to ramp up domestic oil refinery capacity, something that has been a major priority of the government for years.
Much remains to be seen about the impact of this, and how it will play out (including what terms other countries in the region get, and whether any of this will actually last). At the end of the day, for now Indonesian exports to the U.S. will be subject to a 19 percent tariff, which is not great news especially for an already beleaguered domestic textile industry. But Indonesia is not as heavily reliant on exports as Vietnam and Thailand, so there may have been some willingness to give ground there in exchange for the promise of more U.S. investment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NHK
2 hours ago
- NHK
US, EU agree on 15% tariff
US President Donald Trump says he has reached a tariff agreement with the European Union. Trump had said Washington would impose a 30 percent levy on goods from the EU starting on August 1. But he told reporters on Sunday after a meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen that the rate will be set at 15 percent.
NHK
9 hours ago
- NHK
Trump in Scotland, set to talk with EU, British leaders on tariffs
US President Donald Trump is staying at a golf resort in Scotland owned by his family's business. He is expected to hold talks with EU and British leaders on tariffs. Trump has been in Scotland since Friday. On Saturday, he was seen playing golf and driving his own golf cart, as local police maintained tight security in the area. Trump said he plans to meet with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen on Sunday to discuss what he calls "reciprocal tariffs." He has suggested that he would levy a 30-percent tariff on products coming from the European Union, starting on August 1. Trump is also due to meet with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer during his stay. British media say the two will discuss reducing additional tariffs on UK-made steel products, a topic they have continued to negotiate, among other things. People in Scotland held rallies in several places to protest against Trump's political moves and other matters.
Japan Times
9 hours ago
- Japan Times
The Fed needs to tread carefully with this strange dollar
The U.S. economy hasn't seen tariffs like these in around 80 years. Given the lack of recent precedent, the Federal Reserve is right to wait on more evidence that consumer prices aren't spiking before proceeding with interest rate cuts. There's another reason to tread carefully in these uncertain times: The extremely unusual behavior of the U.S. dollar. Many economists — including Council of Economic Advisers Chair Stephen Miran — expected the buck to strengthen when U.S. President Donald Trump implemented tariffs. In an essay published last November, Miran wrote that the exchange rate was "more likely than not' to appreciate alongside an improving trade balance, as it did during Trump's first trade war in 2018 and 2019. The so-called currency offset was critical to his view that the new duties wouldn't necessarily be passed through to consumers, at least not entirely. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent made the same point during his confirmation hearings. Bafflingly, the dollar actually weakened for reasons that are still hotly debated (more on that shortly.) The U.S. dollar Index has declined by 6.8% since just before the "Liberation Day' tariffs unveiled on April 2 and it's down about 10% in 2025, the worst year-to-date performance in at least a quarter century. The median forecaster surveyed by Bloomberg expects the greenback to depreciate further over the next year or so. All else equal, you might expect the upward pressure on U.S. consumer prices to be even worse than tariffs alone would suggest. In the past, for a given move in developed nation currencies, economists have identified long-run pass-through into import prices on the order of 60%. (Estimates were around 40% for the U.S. specifically.) But pass-through is highly context-dependent and all else is never equal. So far, measures of consumer inflation remain relatively tame, either because the transmission will take time to materialize; retailers are "eating' the higher costs in the form of narrower margins; or because the doomsayers were just plain wrong. Realistically, it could even be some combination of the three. Given that range of possibilities, it's prudent to wait for the data to tell the story, exactly as Fed Chair Jerome Powell is currently planning. This is much to the chagrin of Trump, who regrettably insists that he can have tariffs and expeditiously lower policy rates too. In an ill-advised effort to get his way, he's exerting extraordinary public pressure on the independent central bank and its outgoing chair. So why is the dollar weakening in the first place? In the heat of the April selloff, many of us interpreted it as a sign of cracks in America's "exorbitant privilege.' The idea was that the U.S. — with the world's deepest and most liquid markets — had long occupied a special place at the center of the global financial system. That special status meant that we probably had a slightly stronger currency and relatively lower borrowing costs than would otherwise have been the case. When the the dollar weakened alongside rising borrowing costs after April 2, an argument advanced in market commentary and academia was that haphazard policymaking was eroding the American brand in the eyes of the world. Another somewhat related argument was tied to capital flows. At the time of the tariff announcement, investors around the world were extremely exposed to U.S. equities, thanks in part to the remarkable outperformance of the U.S.'s mega-cap growth stocks, known as the Magnificent 7. From the start of 2020 until March 2025, the S&P 500 Index had outperformed the rest of the developed world's equity markets by more than two-to-one. Global investors had piled into the stocks to get a piece of the action, often through unhedged positions. The hasty unwind of some holdings briefly created a macroeconomically significant wave of outflows. Plausible as these theories may be in explaining that wild week or so in early April, it's far from clear that the narratives around cracks in U.S. exorbitant privilege and equity outflows are still reasons to bet against the dollar going forward. As far as the former is concerned, America's brand may suffer additional damage from Trump's overt threats to Fed independence. But we're talking about a very nuanced change: a move from an extraordinarily special status in global markets to just very special. In practice, there's still no viable alternative to U.S. debt and its currency. European debt markets lack our market depth and China lacks our transparency, while Bitcoin is as volatile as a tech stock. Meanwhile, a solid streak of Treasury auctions has more or less ended the debate about caution among overseas investors. In the U.S. equity market, the panic is in the rearview mirror. Since bottoming on April 8, the S&P 500 has returned to all-time highs and is again outperforming the rest of the developed world's markets. The story isn't over, though. While the dollar hasn't weakened much more from its April lows, the durability of the move makes it more likely that currency weakness will have a meaningful impact on the economy, including consumer prices. In recent weeks, the greenback seems to have resumed its typical correlation with Treasury yields, opening the door to further declines if markets begin to price in significant rate cut expectations. That's why the Fed needs to proceed with extreme caution. Policymakers shouldn't lower borrowing costs and implicitly weaken the exchange rate until they can be sure that higher consumer prices aren't already in train. Without question, they should hold rates at their July meeting and the inflation data would need to stay quite tame to justify a cut at the subsequent meeting in September, at least in the absence of a labor market deterioration. The tariff experiment, coupled with the shock exchange-rate reaction, is an event study unlike any other in recent memory and the stewards of stable prices can't take anything for granted. Even if prices do jump, it's still possible that the uptick won't lead to a lasting increase in the rate of inflation and the Fed can eventually get on with easier monetary policy. But at this point, the responsible option is to wait and see how it plays out in the data. Jonathan Levin is a columnist focused on U.S. markets and economics. He is a CFA charterholder.
