In 16 hours of Operation Sindoor debate, Congress gets two hours for discussion in Rajya Sabha
As of 12 pm on Monday, the Lok Sabha is yet to hold a debate on Operation Sindoor and the Pahalgam terror attack. The lower house has been adjourned twice since the morning amid the Opposition's uproar.
The Opposition has been raising questions over US President Donald Trump's repeated claims, demanding that Prime Minister Narendra Modi refute the US President's remarks.
Defence Minister Rajnath Singh was expected to speak on Operation Sindoor around 12 pm on Monday. However, the house was adjourned till 1 pm. According news agency PTI, PM Modi is expected to take part in the discussion on Operation Sindoor scheduled to be held in the Lok Sabha on Monday.
The proceeding in the Rajya Sabha was also defered till 2 pm on Monday.
Before adjourning the house till noon in Question Hour, Lok Sabha Speaker said that opposition members were deliberately disturbing the proceedings of the house.
He asked Leader of the Opposition (LoP) Rahul Gandhi to instruct members of his party not to display posters, as that is not the purpose of sending MPs to Parliament.
"Respected members, do you want to obstruct the house? Do you not want to discuss Operation Sindoor? Both Gogoi and people from the government had come (for an all-party meeting), you said to do a discussion on Operation Sindoor, now you are interrupting the house. Question hour is the members' most important time," Birla said before adjourning the lower house.
Meanwhile, the Rajya Sabha was also adjourned until noon amid a ruckus raised by the opposition after Deputy Chairperson Harivansh Narayan Singh declined notices demanding a discussion on the closure of government schools in Uttar Pradesh.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
10 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
California governor election 2026: Who's running? Check full candidate list
Kamala Harris announced on Wednesday that she will not be participating in the race for California governor, leaving the space empty with no new frontrunner. Gavin Newsom has been appointed as the governor of the state for the past eight years. With his second term almost over, the 2026 elections for California governor present an opportunity for a fresh leader's face. Kamala Harris will not run for California governor, and Gavin Newsom's term to end soon; a crowded field of candidates emerged from both parties. (AP Photo/Juliana Yamada, File)(AP) Also Read: California woman charged $8000 for 45 mins parking at Glendale hospital: Here's what happened next Who is running for California governor in 2026? With a crowded field of both Republican and Democratic candidates vying for attention, voters are faced with a mix of well-known political figures. While some candidates bring name recognition, many others remain unfamiliar to the public, as reported by ABC7. Democrats Katie Porter Former Congresswoman from Orange County, Katie Porter, has previously served in Washington from 2019 until 2025, when she stepped down to run for Senate. However, she lost in the primary to Adam Schiff. Beyond her time in Congress, she has built a distinguished career and is a tenured professor at UC Irvine's law school. Eleni Kounalakis Under Gavin Newsom, Kounalakis has served as California's Lieutenant Governor for seven years. She also brings diplomatic experience with her as she was previously appointed as US Ambassador to Hungary by former President Barack Obama. Antonio Villaraigosa Antonio Villaraigosa served as the Mayor of Los Angeles from 2005 to 2013. He has also been long active in Democratic politics, including roles as co-chair of Hillary Clinton's 2008 presidential campaign and chair of the 2012 Democratic National Convention. He previously ran for governor in 2018 when Newsom was elected. Xavier Becerra Becerra was the first Latino to serve as the Secretary of Health and Human Services under former President Joe Biden. He also served as California's Attorney General from 2017 to 2021. Prior to that, he was part of Congress. Toni Atkins Toni Atkins is a longtime California lawmaker who served as President Pro Tempore of the State Senate from 2018 to 2024. Before that, she made history as the Speaker of the State Assembly from 2014 to 2016. Betty Yee Betty Yee served as California's State Controller from 2015 to 2023. Prior to that, she was a member of the State Board of Equalization from 2004 to 2015. Stephen Cloobeck American businessman Stephen Cloobeck is the founder of the timeshare company Diamond Resorts. He has donated to several democratic causes over the years and also appeared on the television show Undercover Boss. Tony Thurmond Tony Thurmond is the California State Superintendent of Public Instruction and was part of the state assembly from 2014 to 2018. Republicans Chad Bianco Chad Bianco has served as Riverside County Sheriff since 2019 and is a prominent figure in California's law enforcement community. Steve Hilton Former Fox News host Steve Hilton is a vocal supporter of Trump and continues to contribute to the news outlet. He was a British citizen who became a US citizen in 2021. Green Party Butch Ware Butch Ware is a hip-hop artist and an associate professor who was also the vice presidential nominee for the Green Party in 2024.
NDTV
11 minutes ago
- NDTV
China, Now Trump: Pakistan And The Art Of Somehow Finding Patrons
Since many Indians are upset about the latest oil deal between the US and Pakistan, this move has seemingly achieved its goal before the first drill even touches Pakistani soil. As the announcement is made, predictably on US President Donald Trump's social media handle, on the heels of 25% tariffs announcement for India, it is somewhat natural for New Delhi to feel jilted. Trump seems to have counted on this feeling. After announcing the India-Pakistan ceasefire in May, and never shutting up about it since then, Trump has been coddling both military and civil establishments in Pakistan. Whether it is the much-discussed hosting of Pakistan Army Chief General Asim Munir or this latest oil trade deal, the US and Pakistan appear to be inching closer, reminiscent of the War on Terror days. Since the Afghanistan war is officially over for the US, one may wonder why Islamabad has suddenly become relevant for Washington yet again. 'Just Do It' A quick answer could be Trump's idiosyncratic foreign policy, wherein what Trump thinks in any moment is what Trump does the next, irrespective of how outlandish the thought may be. A serious deliberation, however, may reveal some other factors in no particular order of importance. In 2023, Pakistan received USD 1.8 billion in Foreign Direct Investment, as opposed to India's mammoth USD 44.4 billion. What is more perplexing about these figures is that Pakistan received this sum mostly from China in the form of energy investments. This sum, although not significant, may have irked someone in Washington, prompting a reestablishment of the principal-agent relationship between the US and Pakistan. China's influence needs to be contained anyhow, especially if it involves an agent state. Even without Afghanistan in the equation, Pakistan remains an important box in the "Eurasian chessboard" - or so it wants everyone in the West to believe. Pride And Persuasion Pakistan has successfully lobbied Western capitals into believing in its indispensability in the regional strategic landscape. Portraying their country as a victim of terrorism, Pakistan's civil and military establishments have managed to elicit benefits from the West by playing on the latter's security anxieties. The US continues to buy this narrative for various reasons, not discounting the naivete among them. India may not be thrilled about the latest deal, but bigger maybe the disappointment of Pakistani dissenters. There are growing voices against this constant duping of the public by the establishment. With each such highfalutin 'deal' - like the China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) - there is an expectation of a socio-economic turnaround in Pakistan. With a beleaguered economy crumbling under massive international debt, Pakistan has very little going for itself at present. What Pakistan lacks in terms of state-building, it more than makes up for in the realm of being obsequious towards its principal states, be it China or the US. At Least Someone Is Happy Going by the public discourse, obtaining an International Monetary Fund loan is a cause for national celebration. Grant announcements from the Arab countries give Pakistan a sense of inflated importance. No hint of irony is lost here. When dissenters question this fiction, they are either killed or jailed. Pakistan's playing the vassal state to global superpowers doesn't translate into the country's development, but it keeps the political and military elite and their coterie well-fed. At this very moment, Pakistan's human rights activists are protesting alongside Baloch women in Islamabad against forced disappearances. After a violent crackdown on a similar protest in Karachi earlier this year, the Pakistan government is playing deaf this time. Fissures in Pakistan's socio-political structure are getting exacerbated by economic duress. It is, therefore, a question of Pakistan's survival to make outlandish promises, economic and strategic, to whomsoever it may concern. Keeping America Interested Since the CPEC has underperformed, partially due to the armed resistance it has faced in the Baloch areas and mainly because Pakistan doesn't have a substantial industrial base to take advantage of the corridor, there may be anxieties in Pakistan around exclusive reliance on China. It is important, therefore, to keep the US interested in the utility of Pakistan. In turn, the US may want to keep its non-NATO ally content with deal announcements, with an eye fixed firmly on China. Locked in an impasse over trade with China, the US has been exploring any and all avenues to check China's geopolitical influence. While Pakistan may not overtly defy China - especially after having used Chinese defence hardware and intelligence against India - its proclivity for the original principal state will lead to certain concessions for the US. Should this rekindling bother India? Definitely. Can India do anything about it? Very little, if at all.
NDTV
11 minutes ago
- NDTV
"In Securing Our Energy Needs...": India's Calm Reply To US' Russia Oil Fury
New Delhi: India has issued a measured reply to US' criticism of its continued Russian oil purchases. "In securing our energy needs, we are guided by what is on offer in the market and the prevailing global circumstance," Foreign Ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said Friday. The US has ramped up pressure on India to stop buying Russian oil, arguing it amounts to funding Vladimir Putin's war on Ukraine. Secretary of State Marco Rubio called the purchases "a point of irritation" in comments this morning, as Delhi and Washington toil to secure a trade deal and scale down Donald Trump's 25 per cent 'reciprocal tariff'. Rubio acknowledged India's vast energy needs - analysts expect crude oil demand from the world's fourth largest economy to cross 6.6 million barrels per day by 2030 - and that it was buying oil and gas from Russia because the sanction-hit country is offering steep discounts. "But that, unfortunately, is helping to sustain the Russian war effort. So, it is most certainly a point of irritation in our relationship with India," he told American broadcaster Fox News. Trump, he said, expressed "very clear frustration… with so many vendors available India continues to buy so much from Russia, which in essence is helping to fund the war effort…" Rubio's comments follow Trump's scathing remarks about Delhi still buying crude and gas from Moscow. The US President pointed out Russian oil accounted for 35 per cent of India's supply in the first half of the year, and demanded it, instead, buy from his country. On Thursday Trump decreed a 25 per cent 'reciprocal tariff' on Indian goods imported into the US and levied an unspecified penalty for buying Russian oil and weapons. NDTV Explains | The Story Behind Donald Trump's 25% 'Reciprocal Tariff' On India "... they (India) have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of energy... at a time when everyone wants Russia to stop the killing in Ukraine. India will, therefore, be paying a tariff of 25 per cent, plus a penalty..." The new tariff - to which India will not retaliate, at this time - came into effect this morning. India has always said Russia is a 'close, all-weather friend", and that it will not be bullied, by any country, into re-defining decades-old foreign policies and current economic concerns. In the past - when faced with criticism over buying Russian oil - External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said, quite categorically, that India would prioritise its citizens' needs first. READ | US Penalty On Buying Russian Oil. What Is India's Stance This, he said, would mean buying oil from anyone who sells at the best possible price. "India is a big oil consumer... We are a big oil importer because we don't have oil. Now, it is not like there is a political strategy to buy oil... There is an oil strategy to buy oil... There is a market strategy," Mr Jaishankar said in August 2024. Prior to the war in Ukraine, India rarely bought Russian crude due to high freight costs. By 2023, though, Moscow was selling about 1.66 million barrels per day, up from less than 700,000 in 2022. India eventually became the biggest buyer of seaborne Russian crude since the West halted purchases and imposed sanctions against Moscow. In an effort to placate Trump, India committed, in February, when Prime Minister Narendra Modi met Trump in Washington, to buy more oil and gas from the US, which will also help, to some extent, hit the ambitious mark of $500 billion in bilateral trade within the next five years. However, the sheer volume of India's energy demands means the US cannot be the sole, or even a major, supplier. As of today, India's largest are Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and Russia.
