2023 Titan implosion: US coast guard calls tragedy 'preventable'; points to systemic failures at OceanGate
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The Titan, owned and operated by Washington-based private company OceanGate, imploded during a deep-sea expedition in the North Atlantic. All five people on board were killed, including Stockton Rush, OceanGate's CEO and the operator of the submersible. The incident triggered a massive search and rescue effort off the coast of Canada that drew global attention, but there were no survivors.
The Coast Guard convened its highest level of investigation, a Marine Board of Investigation, in the aftermath of the disaster.
Their final report pointed to significant failures in nearly every area of the Titan's operation, from its design to its day-to-day oversight, reported PBS News.
Investigators found that the submersible's design, certification, maintenance, and inspection processes were all inadequate. A Coast Guard statement further cited a 'toxic workplace culture' within OceanGate and noted that the company's mission was hindered by a lack of both domestic and international regulatory frameworks for submersible operations.
'There is a need for stronger oversight and clear options for operators who are exploring new concepts outside of the existing regulatory framework,' said Jason Neubauer, of the Marine Board of Investigation as quoted by PBS News. 'The findings will help prevent future tragedies.'
In the two years since the implosion, multiple OceanGate employees have come forward to support the Coast Guard's findings, describing unsafe practices and internal dysfunction at the company.
The Titan disaster has since led to lawsuits and mounting pressure for tighter regulation of the rapidly growing private deep-sea expedition industry.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
HC directs formation of ‘expert committee 'to address pigeon feeding dispute in Pune
Pune: The Bombay high court (HC) has directed the formation of an 'expert committee' to evaluate the Pune Municipal Corporation's (PMC's) decision to prohibit feeding of pigeons at 20 designated locations across the city. The court stated that the committee will comprise qualified experts in the field, and will be formed after considering suggestions from the petitioners, the state government and the municipal corporation. The court also emphasised that the opinion of the committee will be binding, and should not be contradicted by either the corporation or the state government. It is common for astrologers to recommend the feeding of fish, pigeons and dogs to people who approach them for good luck. But experts scoff at the idea, saying what people feed them doesn't suit the animals. (PTI Photo) The Bombay HC order comes after hearing the petition filed by Pune-based NGO, Shashwat Foundation, challenging a directive dated March 10, 2023, issued by the chief medical officer of the PMC, Dr Kalpana Baliwant. The directive orders the removal of pigeon shelters and imposition of a fine of ₹500 on those feeding pigeons at 20 designated locations across the city. Whereas the petition states that the directive violates Constitutional provisions and is contrary to existing legal precedents, including judgements by the Supreme Court of India. The NGO has been following the issue for several years, and in March 2025, submitted a formal representation to the PMC commissioner, requesting withdrawal of the directive. The NGO further states that asked to clarify the legal basis of the directive, the PMC failed to do so. Left with no alternative, Shashwat Foundation president Ashapurna Ambekar, approached the Bombay HC seeking to quash the PMC directive. Meanwhile, the Animal Welfare Board of India also took note of the issue and wrote to the State Animal Welfare Board and the animal husbandry department, Pune, urging them to intervene. Acting on this, the State Animal Welfare Board communicated to the PMC that the directive is inconsistent with legal and welfare norms. However, despite repeated objections, the PMC continued to enforce the ban, collecting fines totalling ₹55,000 to ₹ 56,000. In a hearing dated August 7, 2025, a Bombay HC bench comprising justice G S Kulkarni and justice Arif S Doctor observed that there exists a wealth of medical literature concerning the issues raised in the matter. The court noted its limitations in evaluating such complex scientific material, especially if the petitioners choose to contest the medical opinions presented. Acknowledging the technical nature of the issue, the bench stated, 'It is for this reason that we are inclined to hear the learned advocate general on behalf of the state so that an 'expert committee' may be formed as may be suggested.' The court further stated that if the expert committee upholds the decision of the PMC and there is no need to recall the same, the authorities in consultation with experts such as the Bombay Natural History Society (BNHS), Animal Welfare Board of India and others can explore alternative solutions. These alternatives may be proposed by various stakeholders including the petitioners, with a view to formulating and implementing a workable mechanism. The bench added, 'In our prima facie opinion, this is the only manner in which the impasse can be resolved. We accordingly adjourn the proceedings to August 13, 2025 at 3 pm so that we may hear the advocate-general and also consider the names of experts who can be part of the committee to be appointed by the state government.' During the hearing, senior counsel for one of the petitioners informed the court that the petitioner wishes to continue feeding pigeons. In response, the court permitted the petitioner to submit a formal application to the municipal commissioner. The court directed that the commissioner grant the petitioner and other stakeholders an opportunity to be heard and issue an appropriate order in accordance with the law particularly keeping in mind the larger issue of public health. The court also clarified that if such an application is rejected, the petitioner would have the liberty to approach the court again. Advocate Harshad Garud, counsel for the petitioner, opined, 'The feeding activities cannot be stopped. Culling pigeons is not a viable solution, as they have an inherent right to live and to access food necessary for survival.' Ambekar, president of the NGO involved in the matter, added, 'This issue primarily revolves around the need for cleanliness, which is the responsibility of the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC), particularly in areas where pigeons are being fed. While pigeon droppings may pose some exposure risk to humans, appropriate precautions can be taken. The pigeon population in Pune is significantly lower than that in Mumbai, and feeders should still be allowed to feed them responsibly.' Advocate Madhavi Tavanandi said, 'The order says that the feeders can make an application to the municipal commissioner who will decide on the feeding. The matter will be heard on Aug 13 and an expert committee will be set up ,' she said.
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
US law firm to represent 65 families in AI crash probe
Vadodara: Prominent US-based law firm Beasley Allen will represent at least 65 families from India and the US whose relatives died in the AI-171 plane crash in Ahmedabad. The law firm's aviation attorney and the lead lawyer for the AI-171 crash, Mike Andrews, is on a visit to India to meet families. He visited the plane crash site in Ahmedabad. Talking to media persons, Andrews said that the families he met in the UK and India expressed a burning desire for answers, transparency, and information. Andrews said that the legal options available to the family will primarily be based on what data shows and what the investigation reveals. "We visited the crash site and spoke with some of the individuals who were there. We were able to take some photographs and get a feeling of the size of the scene," said Andrews. The Boeing 787-8 plane en route to London from Ahmedabad crashed into a medical hostel shortly after take-off, killing 241 out of 242 people onboard and 19 on the ground. Andrews said that the data will give them an idea of which entity may or may not be responsible for the crash. He added that if Boeing is found to be responsible for this crash, the cases will be filed in the Federal court in the US. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Can Mental Illness be the Key to Their Creativity? Undo When asked about reports of a pilot error being responsible for the incident, Andrews said that more often than not, pilots who are deceased are the ones who are blamed. He added that in other incidents where the planes landed safely, the pilots were not blamed because those pilots can still speak for themselves. Andrews said that previous crashes taught us that the rush to reach a judgement on any crash is premature and speculative. "We need to wait to get all of the data," he said. After Ahmedabad and Vadodara, Andrews was scheduled to visit Surat and Diu. From Diu, he was expected to return to Ahmedabad and then to London. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Raksha Bandhan wishes , messages and quotes !
The Hindu
5 hours ago
- The Hindu
Industrial accidents, the human cost of indifference
After spending 37 years in India's oil and energy sector, this writer has walked through the innards of factories, refineries, and chemical plants across the country. This writer has seen, up close, the tragic aftermath of industrial accidents — not as distant events, but as raw human tragedies. These are not acts of fate. They are the result of choices — bad ones made by individuals, institutions, and systems that fail to care. We have seen it again, recently — as explosions at Sigachi Industries in Telangana, and as a firecracker unit disaster in Tamil Nadu. They are not aberrations. They are the symptoms of a deeper, ongoing national crisis. A universe is shattered every time In the last five years, at least 6,500 workers have lost their lives in India's factories, construction sites, and mines, according to government data compiled by the Labour Ministry and several Right to Information-based reports. This means nearly three fatalities every day in peacetime, in a growing economy, in the 21st century. In Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu alone, over 200 fatalities have occurred in major industrial mishaps over the past decade. But the true toll — especially from the unregistered or informal sector units may be much higher and rarely makes news. Each of these cases is not just a data point. It is about a breadwinner gone, a child orphaned, and a household thrust into trauma and penury. This writer has witnessed this — an empty seat in a refinery canteen after a fatality, families pacing outside the plant gates, waiting for news they know will break them. A study in 2022 by the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) found that India had had over 130 major chemical accidents in just a 30-month window post-2020, with 218 fatalities and 300-plus injuries. Most of these occurred in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which often operate under regulatory radar. What makes these deaths even more inexcusable is how elementary and avoidable their causes are: no fire No-Objection Certificate (NOC) — factories running without even the basic No-Objection Certificate from the Fire Department; no firefighting systems — alarms, sensors, extinguishers missing or dysfunctional; no permit-to-work system — high-risk jobs undertaken casually, with no formal hazard identification or job safety analysis; no training — especially for migrant and contract workers who often speak different languages and oblivious to the signage or safety protocols; no fire exits — or exits locked, blocked, or hidden under storage materials; no accountability — audits, when conducted, are often tick the box exercises. Convictions for safety lapses are rare, and penalties are negligible. Not a core value Even in large corporates, the focus on operational excellence often overshadows basic safety culture. Globally, countries such as Germany and Japan have embedded safety deeply into industrial design and workplace culture. In contrast, India still treats safety as a compliance hurdle rather than a core value. While the spotlight is on Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu, let us not pretend that other States fare better. Gujarat, Maharashtra, Chhattisgarh, and Uttar Pradesh have their own grim records. In fact, Gujarat witnessed over 60 major industrial fires and gas leaks in just a single year (2021), according to media and State records. According to the Directorate General Factory Advice Service and Labour Institutes (DGFASLI), India records one serious industrial accident every two days in registered factories. What are unregistered units? Nobody truly knows. The pattern is now familiar to the point of fatigue: tragedy, outrage, compensation, committee and then silence. The root cause remains untouched. The next accident is just waiting to happen. What keeps this cycle alive is national indifference — the silence of the public, the inertia of regulators, and the cost-cutting impulse of companies that treat safety as overhead, and not obligation. Workers, especially those on contract, are seen as disposable. There is also a deeply troubling class bias. Would a similar safety lapse at a high-rise corporate headquarters or in a software park go similarly unnoticed? The harsh truth is that these lives are undervalued because of who they are — migrant workers, contract labourers, and the economically voiceless. The phrase 'act of god' There is a phrase that we often hear, which is 'act of God.' It sounds biblical, a way to distance ourselves from culpability. But these disasters are not divine punishment. They are man-made. A National Geographic documentary once explored this very idea showing how industrial accidents across the world stem not from chance, but from negligence and failed systems. Countries such as South Korea and Singapore now have corporate manslaughter laws, holding senior executives criminally accountable for gross safety failures. India needs to begin that conversation. This is not just a call for regulatory reform or better audits. It is a call for collective conscience. As citizens, as industry leaders, as media, as policymakers we need to say, 'We care'. We must not only hold companies to account but also strengthen our labour safety boards, digitise risk reporting, and ensure whistle-blower protection. And for every worker who risks life and limb to keep our industries running, we must affirm this truth: industrial safety is not a favour, it is a right. The question is not whether we have the means to prevent these tragedies. We do. The only question is this: do we care enough to act? Or will we, through silence and resignation, keep proving that unspoken indictment true? Who cares? Shrikant Madhav Vaidya is former Chairman of Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
