
Valparaiso officials: City can keep ARPA funds used to buy land for now-defunct plans for sports complex
City officials say no, a point they emphasized during Monday's City Council meeting, which stretched almost five hours and drew hundreds of people to City Hall with concerns about the potential data center.
Council President Ellen Kapitan, D-At-large, called the issue a 'red flag' during the council meeting, adding it led to a lot of questions, including whether the city would be on the hook for repaying the funds.
'Is this legal?' she asked Patrick Lyp, the city attorney.
'The simple answer is yes,' he said, adding an outside law firm from Indianapolis helped the city work through the details.
If the Redevelopment Commission sells the property, he said, 'there would be no prohibition or covenant on the money.' The funds, he added, would return to the RDC.
The tenets of ARPA funding offer exemptions for paybacks of funds under $10 million, as long as they are used for public purposes, Lyp said. There also is no prohibition on the sale or use of the property.
'There's no obligation that would be tied to ARPA funds,' said Councilman Robert Cotton, D-2nd.
The city received $7,681,979.52, according to an amended resolution for ARPA spending passed by the City Council on July 25, 2022.
That included $4,717,278.92 for land acquisition 'for future Park related activities,' according to the resolution, and includes the parcels for the proposed sports complex.
The breakdown on the use of the rest of the funding, according to the resolution, included $1 million for the demolition of the former Whispering Pines facility and two adjacent residential structures on North Calumet Avenue, as well as site remediation, for a then-proposed adult enrichment center; $663,147.68 in premium pay for eligible city employees; $575,000 for several nonprofit agencies; $500,000 for the replacement of sidewalks, walking paths and other infrastructure; $40,000 for consultant fees and reserve funds for future audits, all related to disbursement of the ARPA funds; and $25,000 each to the police and fire departments, for various upgrades.
The brunt of the spending, including the parkland purchase, fell under ARPA's 'Provision of Governmental Services using Revenue Loss Funds,' per the council's resolution, which is the most flexible of categories for ARPA spending.
In emails to the Post-Tribune before the City Council meeting and Mayor Jon Costas' statement that the city would no longer pursue the data center proposal because of the public outcry, Lyp and George Douglas, the city's development director, offered further insight into the transfer of funds before the 248 acres, comprised of four parcels between County Roads 500 North and 400 North east of Indiana 49, was purchased for parkland.
According to the option agreement signed in January between the RDC and the data center developer, Agincourt Investments LLC, the RDC would have sold 180 acres of that property for just over $9 million, almost twice what the RDC paid for the land.
'The Valparaiso Redevelopment purchased the properties in 2022 with available cash funds. The City Council did approve the use of ARPA funds to reimburse the RDC for the full purchase price in August of 2022,' Douglas said in his email.
He added he didn't believe anything happens to the ARPA funds once they have been used to reimburse the RDC for the land purchase and if the RDC were to sell the property, the commission could use the proceeds for any of its permissible expenditures.
'The ARPA funds were used for an allowed purpose when the City reimbursed the RDC,' Lyp said in his email. 'If the land is sold, the proceeds would be paid to the RDC and used by the RDC consistent with Indiana law.'
Jennifer Hora, a political science professor at Valparaiso University who focuses on state and local government, agreed that the ARPA funds come with flexibility but said that flexibility is supposed to come with accountability and responsibility.
She summed up her concerns as 'the spirit of the law vs. the letter of the law.'
City officials dropped the plans for the park when, according to then-Mayor Matt Murphy, bids for the project, slated for $30 million, came in $7 million over budget. Costas said in an interview with the Post-Tribune last month that the city was going to invest more in its current parks instead and scuttle the plans for the sports complex.
City officials, Hora said, 'threw their hands up' and walked away from the sports complex proposal when it came in over budget and proposed using that land for the data center.
The future of the land purchased with those funds is unknown.
'This is not transparency,' she said. 'This is definitely not the spirit of ARPA law.'
alavalley@chicagotribune.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gardner Preliminary Election Guide: What you need to know, from deadlines to early voting
Before Gardner residents vote for the next mayor in November, voters will have to cast a ballot at the preliminary election on Tuesday, Sept. 16. The preliminary election will determine which two candidates will move on to the general city election ballot for mayor on Tuesday, Nov. 4. Voters will also elect five city councilors for wards 1-5, six city councilors at large, and three school committee members during this year's general city election. All candidates running for the city councilor and school committee positions are uncontested, which means no preliminary election is required. All candidates are current city officials seeking re-election. Here's what to know about the upcoming preliminary election next month and the general election in November, as well as deadlines and where to register to vote. What's a preliminary election? If there are more than two candidates for a position, a preliminary election will be held automatically in September. The two candidates with the highest total votes will be placed on the general city election ballot in November. A primary election is held for political parties to decide who will run for their party if there is more than one candidate running for office. This year, three candidates running for mayor will be on the preliminary election ballot on Sept. 16: Kimberly Blake, Ann Debarros, and Michael Nicholson. When is the deadline to register to vote Residents who haven't registered to vote must do so by the registration deadline before they can cast a ballot at either the preliminary or general mayoral election. The last day to register to vote for the preliminary election is Saturday, Sept. 6 by 5 p.m. If you don't plan to vote in the preliminary election but want to vote in the city's general election in November, you need to register by Saturday, Oct. 25 at 5 p.m. To check your voter registration status and register to vote, go to the Secretary of State's website. Residents can also register to vote at the City Clerk's Office during operating hours: Monday to Thursday from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. and Friday from 8 a.m. to 1 p.m. How do I vote early or through absentee or mail-in ballots? Mail-in and absentee ballots are available for both the preliminary election and the general city election. The last day to request a mail-in ballot for the preliminary election is Tuesday, Sept. 9 by 5 p.m. Mail-in ballot requests for the general city election in November are due Tuesday, Oct. 28 at 5 p.m. Gardner City Clerk Titi Siriphan said that the reason for not offering in-person early voting is that it has not been well-attended in the past, with more voters opting for mail-in voting. There is a key difference between an absentee ballot and a mail-in ballot. Siriphan said voters request an absentee ballot when they will not be in the city during the election. She said that mail-in ballots are intended for voters who aren't leaving the city but are unable to reach their polling location on election day. When are polls open for the preliminary election in Gardner? All polls are open from 7 a.m. until 8 p.m. in Gardner. Anyone standing in line at 8 p.m. will be permitted to vote. What if I have specific questions about my voter registration status or polling location Siriphan said the Secretary of State's website is the place where residents can get their basic election day questions answered about voter registration, vote by mail, absentee ballots, and where to vote. Siriphan said on both election days, signs will be posted all over the city to guide voters to the polls. "Of course, people can always give the Clerk's Office a call if they can't find what they are looking for on the website," she said. "We also have city election information posted on our website, but people can always give us a call." Voters can call the City Clerk's Office at 978-630-4058 or email Siriphan at tsiriphan@ This article originally appeared on Gardner News: Election 2025: Gardner preliminary vote for mayor is Sept. 16 Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ingram to stay on District 2 ballot, circuit court judge rules
UPDATE (Aug. 19, 5:40 p.m.): All three candidates in the race for the Mobile City Council District 2 seat are speaking out after a ruling in a lawsuit filed by one candidate to get another removed from the ballot. The ruling states that the case was dismissed by a Mobile circuit court judge. This decision comes just over a week before election day. 'We have a candidate, blatantly in their own admission, who is in violation of the Zoghby Act but continues to commence as a candidate,' Candidate Reggie Hill said. 'So there is only one way to remedy this. ' Hill filed the lawsuit in hopes of getting Samantha Ingram taken off the ballot. Hill believes Ingram doesn't meet the residency requirements to be in the race. 'I look at this as a blessing as well, because it further proves these archaic practices are hindering what's in the best interest of the public and the taxpayer,' Hill said. 'The closing sentiment of the order, it says that the presentation that what was pleaded was accurate. It does not exonerate anyone that is not qualified for being on the ballot.' Samantha Ingram said the lawsuit is a 'desperate tactic' and that District 2 is ready for new leadership. 'It's just another frivolous waste of time, distractions,' Ingram said. 'And District 2 deserves leadership that's going to stay focused. Laser-like focused on progress and solutions. And that's basically what I'm doing. You know, I expected it to be dismissed. But more importantly, I stayed the course of making sure that, as you can see, we're out in the community doing the work.' District 2 City Council incumbent William Carroll also weighed in on the court's decision. 'It's required that we vote where we live, you know, according to the law, in accordance with the law, we vote where we live,' Carroll said. 'So if you voted in another state, you're saying that I live in another state. If you vote in this city, you're saying that I live in this city, and there's only one person in this race that hasn't voted in this city or in the state in the last year, but has voted somewhere else.' In the lawsuit, Hill accuses the City of Mobile's Chief Election Officer, Lisa Lambert, of not vetting the candidates. According to the election manual, the clerk and mayor have no authority to judge the qualifications of a candidate, including their residency. The judge said that Hill's case is not without merit, but should not have been filed against the city clerk. Hill told News 5 he plans to re-file, but for now, Ingram will remain on the ballot. MOBILE, Ala. (WKRG) — Mobile City Council District 2 Candidate Samantha Ingram has responded to the recent lawsuit filed by Candidate Reggie Hill in an attempt to have Ingram removed from the ballot. Magnolia Landing boardwalk closed due to lawsuits 'Both opponents continue to rely on desperate tactics meant to confuse voters, proving exactly why District 2 is ready for new leadership,' Ingram said. 'Leadership should be about empowerment and clarity, not frivolous distractions that waste time and erode trust.' Hill filed the lawsuit Aug. 1 against City Clerk Lisa Lambert, saying Ingram did not meet residency requirements to be a candidate, and accusing Lambert of not properly vetting candidates. Hill asked the court to make Lambert remove Ingram from the ballot. Hill did not include Ingram in the lawsuit, stating in court records that 'she had no right to be named in the suit because of her alleged disqualification to be a candidate in that race.' Monday, the court dismissed the case, citing Hill's lack of 'sworn' documents and the Alabama League of Municipalities' 'Procedure for Holding Elections in Mayor-Council Municipalities,' which says 'the clerk and the mayor have no authority to judge the qualifications of a candidate, including residency of the candidate.' Ingram said the lawsuit was a tactic to create confusion and chaos, and said she is focusing on her campaign. 'As I canvass, I see firsthand the confusion their actions create — deliberate chaos meant to divide us — but our campaign will stay focused on solutions and progress for the people of District 2,' Ingram said. Mobile man sentenced for manslaughter of medic Ingram and Hill will face incumbent William Carroll in the race for District 2 on Aug. 26. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Canton residents push back against project website
CANTON, Texas (KETK)– Canton residents are speaking out against the new website for the Grand Saline Creek reservoir, voicing their displeasure at the city council meeting on Tuesday. The Canton City Council met Tuesday night in a packed room filled with residents pushing back against the Grand Saline Creek reservoir project. 'If your land was being stolen, would you be upset? I mean, that's exactly what's happening,' Canton resident Donna Greer said. Amazon plans new delivery station in Nacogdoches At the meeting, the Canton City Council announced the launch of the Grand Saline Creek Reservoir website, where people can read about the project, see frequently asked questions, and submit questions. 'It was a last-ditch effort for transparency, of which there has never been any transparency through this whole thing,' Geer said. Residents said they think the information on the site is wrong, claiming it doesn't show the harm it would bring to people. 'My thoughts are it's misrepresented, it's not truthful, and it was put out the day before the big meeting,' Geer said. 'It was a last-ditch effort for transparency, of which there has never been any transparency through this whole thing.' Med truck tire blowout leads to crash, injuring 2 firefighters in Jasper County Van Zandt County resident John Borgstedt said he's surprised the mayor is still pushing this project forward and wants people to know he and others in the community will continue to fight against it. 'Families just want to take their house, 143 families' houses. She wants to take over 5000 something acres, and she says there are no structures that are going to be affected by this,' Borgstedt said Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword